Beta
×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Silicon.Com does Linux week

Hemos posted more than 15 years ago | from the good-coverage dept.

Linux 21

A number of people have submitted the Silicon.Com Linux week. They're doing an excellent coverage, with RealPlayer interviews with ESR, and other folks as well. This is a great story for your PHBs to look at-answering the perennial question of whether Linux is ready for wide-spread use.

cancel ×

21 comments

Sorry! There are no comments related to the filter you selected.

Darn login registration (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 15 years ago | (#1884654)

Jeez, it's worse than the New York Times [nytimes.com] .

Re:Darn login registration (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 15 years ago | (#1884655)

Worse, actually; at least the NYT site doesn't have whizzy flying blinking things all over. (Try clicking on a link to an outside site at silicon...you get an irritating animated splash screen that does nothing but tell you you're being redirected to another site.) What's with the "logged out" garbage anyway? Geek to www.silicon.com: there's no such thing as being "logged in" to a web site. Which they knew anyway, but they presumably wanted to look all |<00l and high-tech... I swear, I'm starting to think that all technology reporting in the UK is complete garbage ("The Register", anyone?) - as opposed to the 90% garbage it is here.

Slashdown down 3 points in heavy trading (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 15 years ago | (#1884656)

Analysts expect the market to rally in the afternoon.

Re:Linux spam (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 15 years ago | (#1884657)

I received it too. I'm also Dutch but I'm not on
one of those webpages (I think).

As spam goes it was smartly done, maybe if they
hadn't included my first name in the subject it
would have worked even better.

Re:Linux spam (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 15 years ago | (#1884658)

I got that vanessa spam too. I have yet to figure how they got my e-mail adress (paranoid). And HELL no, I am not giving that *much* information about myself too silicon.com.

It is obvious that whoever did that spam is working for silicon.com

Silicon.com ought to be slaughtered for that one.

Did anyone else receive "personalized" spam? (2)

Anonymous Coward | more than 15 years ago | (#1884659)


Did anyone else receive this bit of spam from (I presume) Silicon.com?
Subject: Fred, Something that might be of interest?

Dear Fred,

Have you seen this story on an exclusive Silicon.com poll? It says that Linux is ready for corporate use - you can see the full thing at
http://www.silicon.com/linuxspecial

The survey, which marks the start of Silicon's week-long Linux Special, found that 71 per cent of viewers believe Linux is ready for business, while only 25 per cent disagreed.

There's a whole Linux Special running this week on the site (http://www.silicon.com/linuxspecial) - exclusive interviews ... etc., etc.

Vanessa

Gee, "Vanessa". Sorry. I'd say that all your credibility was shot by this bit of spam.

List of URLs for the ESR interview (2)

davie (191) | more than 15 years ago | (#1884660)

Here are the URLs for the silicon.com interview with ESR, painstakingly extracted from the HTML. It's only 4:55 long, just a telephone interview, no video of ESR.

Too Bad RealPlayer doesn't work (1)

gavinhall (33) | more than 15 years ago | (#1884661)

Posted by mudmonkey:

It's a damn shame I can't get RealPlayer to work on RedHat 5.2 with kernel 2.2.9...

Mindcraft IV :) (1)

hawk (1151) | more than 15 years ago | (#1884662)

Rob bet that NT couldn't handle slashdot's load, and won :)

SPAM from Silicon.Com for their Linux story (1)

Per Abrahamsen (1397) | more than 15 years ago | (#1884663)

I got this unsolisticated mail, advertising for the Linux week on silicon.com. Was it just me, or have they had a regular SPAM campaign?

PS: I don't know any "Vanessa Carlisle".
PPS: that is the second piece of Linux spam I have gotten. The first was from Linux Mall.

From vanessa.carlisle@surprise.dircon.co.uk Wed May 19 23:58:21 1999
Return-Path:
Received: from th-gt141-094.pool.dircon.co.uk (th-gt141-094.pool.dircon.co.uk [194.112.58.94])
by sheridan.dina.kvl.dk (8.9.0.Beta5/8.9.0.Beta5) with SMTP id XAA07454
for ; Wed, 19 May 1999 23:58:19 +0200
From: vanessa.carlisle@surprise.dircon.co.uk
Message-Id:
Date: 19/05/99 22:25:48 Pacific Daylight Time
Reply-To: vanessa.carlisle@surprise.dircon.co.uk
To: abraham@dina.kvl.dk
Subject: Per, Something that might be of interest?

Dear Per,

Have you seen this story on an exclusive Silicon.com poll? It says that Linux is ready for corporate use - you can see the full thing at

http://www.silicon.com/linuxspecial

The survey, which marks the start of Silicon's week-long Linux Special, found that 71 per cent of viewers believe Linux is ready for business, while only 25 per cent disagreed.

There's a whole Linux Special running this week on the site (http://www.silicon.com/linuxspecial) - exclusive interviews with people like Eric Raymond, Miguel de Icaza and so on.... probably worth a look.


Vanessa

Hahah (2)

Matts (1628) | more than 15 years ago | (#1884664)

OMG the irony of an interview with RMS in realplayer format is just killing me... I hope others see the humour as much as I do... :)

perl -e 'print scalar reverse q(\)-: ,hacker Perl another Just)'

RealPlayer sucks (1)

Tet (2721) | more than 15 years ago | (#1884665)

If the interviews are in RealPlayer format, then for my money, the coverage can't be described as "excellent".

It's a closed, proprietary format and I can't use it. What's that you say? Get of your high horse, and just use the binary version that Real have kindly made available? Well, perhaps I would if they supported Linux on my Sparc or OpenStep on my NeXT...

Proprietary formats are not ideal, but you can live with them on standalone systems. However, when will people learn that on the Internet, they just plain don't work?

Anyone have a login? (1)

Disconnect (5083) | more than 15 years ago | (#1884666)

TSIA .. "Sorry, you were logged out at xxx"...

/*He who controls Purple controls the Universe. *

Realplayer (1)

Gary Franczyk (7387) | more than 15 years ago | (#1884667)

Unfortunately, no one has been able to write a free version of Realplayer. If shoutcast was a compatible format, that sure would be nice. Really, what keeps Real networks from releasing the source to Realplayer and the server? I suppose the server is their only real form of income....

Re:Too Bad RealPlayer doesn't work (1)

Gary Franczyk (7387) | more than 15 years ago | (#1884668)

Yet ANOTHER reason why realplayer should become open-source... (GPL in particular would be nice)

Re:RealPlayer sucks (1)

Arkham (10779) | more than 15 years ago | (#1884669)

The problem is that there is not a non-proprietary streaming video format (yet). Quicktime is moving in this direction with it being the basis of MPEG3 and distributing the server source, but as of now there's no solution. Your options (AFAIK) are:

1) Windows Media
2) Real

Of the two, Real is more cross-platform. It runs on Mac, Windows, and Linux. Windows Media runs on Windows, and it crashes on the Mac. There's no other option for it.

I sincerely hope that Apple will release Quicktime for Linux, but it's not an option yet.

Re:Slashdown down? (1)

mwillis (21215) | more than 15 years ago | (#1884670)

Yes. from around 10pm EST last night until around 1230pm EST today.

Cracked? If so, who's cracking it? Those 10 guys Microsoft hired? Maybe Rob should post an explanation whenever there is downtime, lest we worry.

Re:RealPlayer sucks (1)

mistabobdobalina (29109) | more than 15 years ago | (#1884671)

if you go to www.statmarket.com you will notice that ~ 94% of users are on the win32 platform. therefore, it's more profitable to just go ahead and make software that runs on windows, and possibly mac or redhat if you're really big. i also prefer open formats but businesses tend to make money on closed architectures...

While we're being off topic... (1)

Trojan (37530) | more than 15 years ago | (#1884672)

How exactly is this moderation thing regulated? A week ago or so I Slashdot told me I had 5 moderation points. In two days time I used exactly one of them (to increase a score of some article to +2), and the third day the whole moderation thing was gone. Does anyone know what happened? Is this normal?

Linux spam (1)

Trojan (37530) | more than 15 years ago | (#1884673)

My name/e-mail is on a webpage listing Dutch Linux users. A few weeks ago that brought me two pieces of spam. One about some expensive Linux seminar that I'm not interested in. The other was kind of funny. It stated that people using Linux are usually rather smart and the right kind of people for their company. Checking the company's webpages [pureit.nl] revealed they only do NT...

Slashdown down? (0)

slashdot-me (40891) | more than 15 years ago | (#1884674)

Was slashdot down earlier today (5/21), before 10am pdt?
http://www.ryans.dhs.org
Check for New Comments
Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?