×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Best of What's New 2005

Zonk posted more than 8 years ago | from the toys-and-loot dept.

Toys 132

mmoyer writes "Begin the onslaught of year-end roundups. Popular Science takes the early lead with their Best of What's New awards, a roundup of what they consider the top 100 products and technologies of the year. In addition to the obvious awardees like the PSP and perpendicular magnetic recording, there's interesting asides like the world's first programmable wave pool and colored toy bubbles made from disappearing dye."

cancel ×
This is a preview of your comment

No Comment Title Entered

Anonymous Coward 1 minute ago

No Comment Entered

132 comments

This is filed under Games? (5, Funny)

richdun (672214) | more than 8 years ago | (#14037773)

So how fun is that fiber-reinforced polymer bridge in Wisconsin?

Re:This is filed under Games? (4, Funny)

Shadow Wrought (586631) | more than 8 years ago | (#14037848)

Well Tacoma had a bridge that gave people quite a ride a few years back. Maybe they're just waiting for a windy day?

Re:This is filed under Games? (1)

AKAImBatman (238306) | more than 8 years ago | (#14037975)

So how fun is that fiber-reinforced polymer bridge in Wisconsin?

You know. Bridge-like.

What I don't get is the SAAB Biodiesel and the Mercedes Benz. About the Biodiesel:

--it generates 148 horsepower on pure gasoline, but when it sniffs ethanol, it cranks up the turbocharger's boost pressure (ethanol can handle higher pressure better than gas) to lift output to 184 horsepower.

Who writes this stuff? Ethanol burns faster, thus produces greater compression during the expansion phase. Since ICEs obtain their power primarily from the expansion of gasses, higher compression ratios mean more power despite the lower efficiency of the fuel.

On the MB S-Class:

It sees at night, prevents accidents, and leaves most sports cars in the dust:

It's called a Cadillac. It's been on the road for a good five or six years now. Where the hell has Mercedes been? But wait! They've added radar and LCD mirrors! OOooooo. I'm not impressed. :-/

They're talking about octane rating (5, Informative)

DG (989) | more than 8 years ago | (#14038145)

Disclaimer: I build and race turbocharged race cars http://farnorthracing.com/ [farnorthracing.com]

To oversimplify a complex subject, when you burn fuels in a spark-ignited engine, it is possible to get a kind of explosive combustion called "detonation" instead of a nice smooth rapid burn.

Detonation is also sometimes called "knock" and it is an engine killer. Detonation is Not Your Friend.

The things that tend to increase the liklihood of experiencing detonation are a lean fuel/air mixture, excessive ignition advance, localized hotspots in the combustion chamber, excessive static compression ratio, excessive intake temperature, or excessive intake boost pressure.

The measure of a fuel's ability to resist detonation is its "octane" rating. The derivation of the term is an article in of itself... bottom line is the higher the octane, the lower the probability of detonation.

My race car drinks 118 octane, because it uses a ton of turbo boost and a lot of ignition advance to make power. Most regular pump gasses are 87-89 octane, and premium runs about 91-94 octane.

Ethenol is an octane booster (Sunoco's 94 octane fuel has a lot of it) so all else being equal, it is safer to run higher boost levels when there is ethenol present in the fuel.

DG

No way... (0, Funny)

Anonymous Coward | more than 8 years ago | (#14037783)

Ohhhhh no. You won't get me to RTFA by refusing to post witty comments.

Nice try.

Some just don't compare... (4, Insightful)

mister_llah (891540) | more than 8 years ago | (#14037801)

Comparing a PSP or a Jeep to Neuro-controlled bionic arms and perpendicular magnetic recording?!

haha!

Excuse me for being a cynic, but the PSP/Jeep portion of the 'grand awards' just feels like advertising...

Re:Some just don't compare... (1)

DaveM753 (844913) | more than 8 years ago | (#14038294)

I dunno...being able to send power from 2 engines individually to 4 independent wheels which can steer at 45-degree angles -- forward or reverse, depending on which way you want to go -- sounds like quite a bit of achievement to me.

Is it advertising if you can't buy? (1)

SuperKendall (25149) | more than 8 years ago | (#14038348)

The accomplishment of being able to turn wheels independantly with great power transfer makes it worth mentioning.

What should take it out of the list in my mind is not that it's like advertising - it's that you can't buy one! No fair comparing prototype cars with realy working stuff that you can actually buy.

It's almost like anti-advertising as I'm annoyed with Jeep now for not actually producing one. And yes I'd actually use it for real off-road travel, not just trips to the mall.

A "grand award" for colored soap bubbles? (1)

Jerry Coffin (824726) | more than 8 years ago | (#14037805)

How do they figure that colored bubbles qualify for a grand award? There might be some real applications for this technology, but somehow giving a grand award to soap bubbles seems pretty silly, to put it nicely.

--
The universe is a figment of its own imagination.

Re:A "grand award" for colored soap bubbles? (1)

Holi (250190) | more than 8 years ago | (#14037883)

I think the award was more for the dye then the bubbles.

Re:A "grand award" for colored soap bubbles? (2, Informative)

AKAImBatman (238306) | more than 8 years ago | (#14037891)

The real technology being given the award isn't the bubbles. It's the dyes themselves, which are as close to a programmable pigment as we're going to get. From the sounds of it, the pigments are even non-toxic, making it a rather amazing invention for someone who just wanted to make colored bubbles.

Re:A "grand award" for colored soap bubbles? (2, Funny)

Anonymous Coward | more than 8 years ago | (#14038065)

Yeah, but wonderful technologies like this can be used for good, evil, and gross. From the article:
the temporary washable color may soon show up in other products, including a bathroom wipe that leaves a momentary trail of color to show you where you've cleaned,

Great. Ass dye. We have attained the singularity. [wikipedia.org]

Re:A "grand award" for colored soap bubbles? (1)

AKAImBatman (238306) | more than 8 years ago | (#14038156)

Yeah, but wonderful technologies like this can be used for good, evil, and gross.

Ever hear of a company called "DuPont"? FYI, they're on the cutting edge of technology. Believe it or not, a lot of that technology goes right into making your home a better place to live, regardless of how "gross" it may be. If I were you, I'd be thankful for all these "gross" technologies. Without them we'd still be living in high maintenece homes that required a full repainting every year, had removable (for cleaning) carpets, wooden countertops, required annual winterproofing of windows, needed occasional airings to stay comfortable, and were painted in the ugliest colors you can imagine with chemicals that are slowly killing you.

Re:A "grand award" for colored soap bubbles? (4, Informative)

Z0mb1eman (629653) | more than 8 years ago | (#14037909)

If you'd RTFA, you might find your answer.

The colored bubbles are cool because no one's successfully done it before, getting the dye to spread uniformly over the entire bubble (as opposed to just flowing to the bottom) isn't trivial, and it took the guy about 10 years to actually get it done.

But my guess is the grand award part comes in because of the specific dye they developed in the process. Specifically, this dye disappears after at most half an hour - faster if it's subjected to friction (eg. you can just rub it off your skin, out of your clothes, or whatever it lands on). The article claims (I'm not a chemist, so I don't know how true it is) that this is an entirely new type of dye.

One of the applications they listed was toothpaste that colors the inside of a kid's mouth a bright color until they've brushed the necessary 30 seconds.

All in all, to me it sounds like it deserves it - it's a new concept that opens up entirely new fields of innovation, rather than an iterative improvement over previous technology.

Re:A "grand award" for colored soap bubbles? (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 8 years ago | (#14039354)

All in all, to me it sounds like it deserves it - it's a new concept that opens up entirely new fields of innovation, rather than an iterative improvement over previous technology.

I'm sorry, but dye has been around for well over 20,000 years.

Re:A "grand award" for colored soap bubbles? (1)

WalterODimm (894027) | more than 8 years ago | (#14037945)

Because this product is going to revolutionize raves as we know them. And the hippies turned executive have been waiting for this for almost 50 years.

Re:A "grand award" for colored soap bubbles? (1)

Total_Wimp (564548) | more than 8 years ago | (#14038002)

This is Popular Science. The translation of that title is "Stuff we think is cool because the press release told us it is.... and pretty pictures too."

I'm being a little cruel, I know. They're not really so horrible. They helped get me interested in technology when I was a teenager. But after I got out of highschool I graduated to mags that were much more in depth and took the time to actually reasearch and even use the products in question. I'd take anything on this list with a grain of salt.

TW

Re:A "grand award" for colored soap bubbles? (1)

fatcatman (800350) | more than 8 years ago | (#14038752)

But after I got out of highschool I graduated to mags that were much more in depth and took the time to actually reasearch and even use the products in question.

Like?

(no, really. I want to know. I'd be interested in subscribing to said magazines.)

Re:A "grand award" for colored soap bubbles? (1)

ScottyH (791307) | more than 8 years ago | (#14038898)

I read Popular Science when I was a teenager, and I now enjoy Wired. Wired appeals to me now for the same reasons PS appealed to me then, although they aren't exactly the same. Scientific American goes more into depth on science subjects, but you also get little to no gadgets and cool stuff.

Re:A "grand award" for colored soap bubbles? (1)

utuk99 (656026) | more than 8 years ago | (#14039290)

If you want good no frills science reporting I recommend Science News. Its a small weekly (about 20 pages) with quick summaries of all the interesting science journals and usually one or two in depth articles.

Greatest device (0, Flamebait)

lsusurfer (931302) | more than 8 years ago | (#14037814)

Unfortuantly the xbox 360 came in at 101....

Re:Greatest device (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 8 years ago | (#14037928)

actually, the Xbox360 gets the Grand award for Home Entertainment. Rather far from 101, and much like the King Kong game, getting accolades before it's out and tested by the masses.

Re:Greatest device (4, Interesting)

AKAImBatman (238306) | more than 8 years ago | (#14038098)

actually, the Xbox360 gets the Grand award for Home Entertainment ... getting accolades before it's out and tested by the masses.

No kidding. Could they have written a more sensational piece?

the Xbox 360 easily maintains the cred the original Xbox earned in 2001 when it crushed rival PlayStation with superior graphics and performance.

*Crushed* the Playstation? I hope someone told Sony, because last I heard they were still dominant [bbc.co.uk] .

Its one-teraflops processing speed, fueled by three 3.2-gigahertz processors (think: three desktop computers), may make the 360 the most powerful computer you've ever used.

Do these guys need to work on their copy, or what? 3.2 GHz is impressive, but hardly "three desktop computers". And what's this "fueled by"? Is a processor a consumable? If so, can I turbo-charge it with silicon aditives? I mean, these guys have been writing way too many car reviews.

Besides, the only reason why the X-Box is on top is because they beat Nintendo and Sony to market. Which is kind of funny, because it's sounding more and more like all the console makers will be using many of the same technologies. Which suggests that this could be the least impressive lineup of game consoles ever to hit the market. We'll see how it pans out, though.

Re:Greatest device (1)

im_mac (927998) | more than 8 years ago | (#14038278)

Do these guys need to work on their copy, or what? 3.2 GHz is impressive, but hardly "three desktop computers"

That seems pretty powerful to me. The desktop I'm currently sitting at has only one 2.6GHz processor. Three 3.2GHz processors would be more than three times the power of what I'm using.

Re:Greatest device (4, Insightful)

AKAImBatman (238306) | more than 8 years ago | (#14038384)

Except that it's not actually three processors. It's three processor cores. Just like on the IBM Power and PowerPC chips, AMD64 X2, and the late-model Intel Pentiums and Xeons.

Which isn't to say that the multicore SIMD design of this chip won't be impressive. It will be. But three desktop computers? I don't think so. Even the 1 teraflop claim is suspect. Just like how graphics card manufacturers can pump 3 trillion triangles a second, right? (*cough*underlabratoryconditionsmaybe*cough*)

Versareef (1)

Otter (3800) | more than 8 years ago | (#14037834)

Yeah, I remember reading the CNN article on Versareef [cnn.com] , illustrated with what looks to be Jaws at 35-40 feet. I was thinking "Gee, that's quite a wave pool they have there!" before reading the caption.

Somehow, I'm thinking the Versareef won't be quite that big!

Dyed Toothpaste (5, Funny)

Prince Myshkin (931140) | more than 8 years ago | (#14037838)

"...a toothpaste that turns kids' mouths bright pink until they've brushed for 30 seconds."

If there's one things kids HATE, it's bright pink mouths...
One of the more bizarre products I've heard of. Should do well in Japan.

Re:Dyed Toothpaste (1)

Surt (22457) | more than 8 years ago | (#14038046)

Perhaps it is more of an indicator for parents. Watch them start brushing, then check them again later for pink mouth to make sure they did a good job.

Re:Dyed Toothpaste (2, Informative)

pbhj (607776) | more than 8 years ago | (#14038275)

Dentists used to have things called "disclosing tablets" that I got given as a child (about 1985-ish) they turned your mouth bright pink and where way coool ... it looked like you were a vampire that had just finished feasting!

You'd brush away the dye to show that you've cleaned properly.

FWIW

Re:Dyed Toothpaste (1)

slavemowgli (585321) | more than 8 years ago | (#14039478)

On an not entirely unrelated side note... is it just me, or is 30 seconds not really a long time when it comes to brushing your teeth? I got taught to brush mine for five minutes after each meal when I was a kid.

If we're talking about games (5, Funny)

From A Far Away Land (930780) | more than 8 years ago | (#14037851)

Then Sony's new Rootkit with DRM goodness should get a prize in 2005. It helped dozens or thousands of WoW cheaters to evade The Warden. Now that's cutting edge gaming technology!

Hmmm (2, Insightful)

Ted_Bell111 (931287) | more than 8 years ago | (#14037854)

"Best of Whats New.... Sponsored by Microsoft" And I thought it was the XBox's slim and compact design that won it the Grand Award!

Just a note (5, Informative)

FST (766202) | more than 8 years ago | (#14037860)

For those of you that don't know what perpendicular magnetic recording is, it is basically a new technology recently introduced by Toshiba into their line of MP3 players which is a way of stacking the bits perpendicular to the hard disk rather than laterally. Conventional HDD can hold up to 400 GB while this new technology allows for 10 times the storage per square inch. Many of the hard disk drives plan to introduce a new hard disk in pc's by 2007.

In my opinion, with this new jump in technology, the future is secure with HDD of similar size, yet 10x the capacity.

Re:Just a note (1)

CCFreak2K (930973) | more than 8 years ago | (#14037908)

There was a flash animation explaining how it works on Toshiba's site, called GetPerpendicular.swf I believe.

Re:Just a note (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 8 years ago | (#14038330)

10x the size? I'm not even using a quarter of my 120GB HDD, and that's with about 20 Linux isos.

Now if they made a conventional HDD with 10x the speed, that's a different matter.

Re:Just a note (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 8 years ago | (#14038886)

Actually, It was developed by Hitachi/IBM PopSCI has it wrong...

Re:Just a note (1)

krunk4ever (856261) | more than 8 years ago | (#14039462)

I thought it was developed by Hitachi too. but that could be because that I saw that hilarious flash video on their site. In fact, Hitachi was the 1st to release the Perpendicular bits in retail 3.5" hdds, though that doesn't really say they were the inventors.

Re:Just a note (1)

Skrekkur (739061) | more than 8 years ago | (#14039185)

Heh I was convinced that this was an april fools joke or just some sort of joke, Guess I have to look deeply into how this really works, That flash animation didnt help much, except well it seemed even more silly after that.

How about the worst of what's new? (4, Interesting)

tcd004 (134130) | more than 8 years ago | (#14037861)

Why don't people ever do these kinds of lists?

I can think of a few. Cellphone spam, Sony DRM, the EU trying to take over the internet, T.O. What else?

And of course Small Town Misfit [smalltownmisfit.com] (plug for my website)
tcd004

Re:How about the worst of what's new? (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 8 years ago | (#14038106)

You must be an American.

Re:How about the worst of what's new? (1)

jferris (908786) | more than 8 years ago | (#14038691)

Judging by the fact you are an "Anonymous Coward", can we assume that you are French?

lets Get Perpendicular! (2, Informative)

simcop2387 (703011) | more than 8 years ago | (#14037866)

http://www.hitachigst.com/hdd/research/recording_h ead/pr/PerpendicularAnimation.html

a very informative animation explaining how to do Perpendicular Magnetic Recording

Re:lets Get Perpendicular! (1)

Scrameustache (459504) | more than 8 years ago | (#14037962)

Yeah, so soon as I saw that tech in the blurb, I knew I was gonna have that song in my head all day...

I blam Actuator Man.

Re:lets Get Perpendicular! (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 8 years ago | (#14037981)

Oh. My. God.

Sensational? (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 8 years ago | (#14037894)

FTA "Xbox earned in 2001 when it crushed rival PlayStation with superior graphics and performance."

Last I checked ps2 still held the largest market share?

Re:Sensational? (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 8 years ago | (#14038032)

Yeah, I read that while two MS adds flashed on the site, and then I stopped reading.

Re:Sensational? (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 8 years ago | (#14038058)

There are more Hondas on the road than Porsches, but I bet Porsche would crush a Honda in any road test. Market share is not directly correlated with quality when comparing products like Xbox and PS2. There are other factors involved. I don't think you can deny the technical superiority of the Xbox, can you?

Re:Sensational? (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 8 years ago | (#14038408)

Go play w/ your Lynx. Market share = success in a market where the money is made on # games purchased.

Xbox 360 according to PS (2, Insightful)

Anonymous Coward | more than 8 years ago | (#14037994)

"Its one-teraflops processing speed, fueled by three 3.2-gigahertz processors (think: three desktop computers), may make the 360 the most powerful computer you've ever used. Now all those flying chunks of decimated buildings and exploding monster heads can be uniquely generated based on your actions, delivering the most realistic console-gaming experience ever--and in a full 1,080 lines of high-def resolution. The 360 is also the first Media Center extender that receives and plays back HDTV from Media Center PCs. And it comes with a free lifetime subscription to the Xbox Live online service. $300"

What's wrong with this description?

Re:Xbox 360 according to PS (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 8 years ago | (#14039067)

What's not?

Ahhhh yes... The annual Popular Science (2, Insightful)

StarsAreAlsoFire (738726) | more than 8 years ago | (#14037995)

Kiss of Death awards.

Honestly now, how many Best of What's New features have YOU seen in real life? Bet you can count them on one hand..... ;~)

Photography section is bogus (4, Insightful)

toupsie (88295) | more than 8 years ago | (#14038024)

Not one listing for Digital SLRs just some crappy point and shoots with superfluous features, printers and camcorders. Why not a video section instead of the camcorders? 2005 has unleashed some great SLRs from Nikon and Canon. The Nikon D200 and Canon 20D are two great examples of consumer level Digital SLRs that will blow the doors off a Kodak Easyshare-One or Sony Cyber-Shot DSC-R1 in image quality, speed, CMOS/CCD size and focal range. I would talk about the Canon EOS 1Ds but I would short out my keyboard from the drool.

Re:Photography section is bogus (1)

jdumps (931324) | more than 8 years ago | (#14038615)

That might just be because the majority of consumers won't spend more than a $1000 on a camera, not to mention lenses, filters, extra batteries and whatnot. While Nikon and Canon have both stepped up the quality/price ratio of their consumer end digitals, most people don't fork over large sums of cash for something they might struggle to use. When it comes to cameras an easy learning curve is often more influential than image quality.

DSLRs can be cheaper than the Kodak or Sony listed (1)

toupsie (88295) | more than 8 years ago | (#14039051)

You can picture up the Nikon D50 or Canon 350D (Rebel XT) with "kit lenses" for less than the Sony or Kodak camera. You miss out on some of the higher end features but they will still spank both those point and shoots in quality. Both cameras have settings that do most of the work for you so you don't have to understand shutter speed, aperture or focus. Just point the camera and shoot but with much better results.

Re:Photography section is bogus (1)

Tumbleweed (3706) | more than 8 years ago | (#14038932)

The Nikon D200 and Canon 20D are in a very different category than the Sony R1. They also cost quite a bit more (D200 street price around $1700, the 20D is a few hundred less). And that's just for the body; no lens included with those, so the price goes up quite quickly. You also have to worry about getting dust on the sensor when changing lenses, which you don't with the R1. Yeah, there are many MANY benefits to going with a DSLR, but not everyone needs that much camera. Personally, I'm dying for a D200, though, especially paired with the new 18-200 VR lens.

What's not Best 2005? (1)

toupsie (88295) | more than 8 years ago | (#14039113)

I thought this was the "Best of What's New 2005" not "What the Average Joe Can Handle 2005" from Popular Science. The section is Photography and it should have had the really Best of the field. Not one mention either of the Medium Format digital cameras that are out there.

P.S. Though I am a Canon man, the 18-200VR lens rocks. I have tried it out on a friends D70.

Re:What's not Best 2005? (1)

Tumbleweed (3706) | more than 8 years ago | (#14039246)

Another thing to note: the Canon 20D came out in 2004, so it doesn't really qualify for Best of 2005. Now, the 5D - _that's_ certainly worth a mention. It's 2x more expensive than I can afford, but it's still an achievement in the field of full-frame sensor DSLRs. Someday they'll be affordable. I hope.

I can see why no mention of the Nikon D200 - it's not even out, yet. But then again, neither is the Sony R1, though the D200 specs _just_ came out last week, whereas the R1 specs have been known for quite awhile.

A lot more video options on there than still, which is kind of surprising. People take a helluva lot more pictures than videos.

Perpendicular Hard Drive Industry (5, Informative)

Absolut187 (816431) | more than 8 years ago | (#14038052)

The article says that the whole industry will have moved to perpendicular recording in the next few years.
But my guess is that it will be solely Toshiba until around - and I'm just guessing here - September 13, 2022.

US Patent No: 6,942,936 [uspto.gov]

Perpendicular magnetic recording medium and magnetic recording/reproduction apparatus

Assignee: Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba (Tokyo, JP);
Issue Date: September 13, 2005

Re:Perpendicular Hard Drive Industry (1)

poot_rootbeer (188613) | more than 8 years ago | (#14038289)

But my guess is that it will be solely Toshiba until around - and I'm just guessing here - September 13, 2022.

US Patent No: 6,942,936


My guess is that every HDD manufacturer that it's Toshiba realizes that if they can't keep pace with Toshiba's increases in data density, they are going to go out of business, and therefore open their wallets wide and license the technology for their own products.

My guess is also that due to these licensing costs, you shouldn't expect desktop drives to drop much below 50 cents per gigabyte for the next two or three years.

Re:Perpendicular Hard Drive Industry (1)

AKAImBatman (238306) | more than 8 years ago | (#14038315)

Manufacturers regularly license patents from one another. I wouldn't be surprised if Toshiba actually licenses it out to the highest bidder first rather than directly develop a product.

Re:Perpendicular Hard Drive Industry (1)

StikyPad (445176) | more than 8 years ago | (#14039511)

I'll put $100 on Sep 14th, 2022.

But really, I'm sure they'll license the technology to other companies.

Re:Perpendicular Hard Drive Industry (1)

Absolut187 (816431) | more than 8 years ago | (#14039657)

Why would they license it out? They have already brought it to market, which the other poster would know if he RTFA. Theoretically they could refuse to license to rivals, and charge monopoly prices (or close to it, since old tech. would be a partial substitute) right? Wouldn't monopoly prices gain more profit than licensing out the tech and competing with a rival? I mean no rational firm would pay more for the license than the prospective profit in that market, and the total industry profit in the market goes down in a competitive market. And the patent should protect against antitrust claims, as long as there is no misconduct on their part. And compulsory licensing is extremely rare (according to my casebook)..

Obvious, eh? (1)

speed_of_light (930261) | more than 8 years ago | (#14038120)

in addition to the obvious awardees like the PSP and perpendicular magnetic recording,

Ohvious, eh? What's so great about a perpendendicy-magneto-recordotron anyway? 400k floppies are all I need!

The SonyEricsson K750i... (1)

Crizp (216129) | more than 8 years ago | (#14038268)

...was the best product of 2005, in my opinion. Cellphone with 2 Mp autofocus Sony camera and MP3 player with support for MemoryStick Duo cards.

Granted the W800 is (though the same phone, really) a bit better with minijack for headphones and, apparently, better MP3 software. Still, the K750 was the first _good_ MP3 cellphone :)

ObDisclaimer: I have one, of course.

It's not "What's New" without Phil & Dixie (2, Interesting)

The I Shing (700142) | more than 8 years ago | (#14038287)

I mean, c'mon, how can you call it "What's New" and not have Phil & Dixie hosting it?

That should come back (1)

SuperKendall (25149) | more than 8 years ago | (#14038657)

I still remember them showing you how to simulate typical D&D battle damage by strapping live cats to yourself and taking a cold shower...

There's a web comic that could thrive!

Re:It's not "What's New" without Phil & Dixie (2, Funny)

Molochi (555357) | more than 8 years ago | (#14038840)

I would mod you funny (I am an old PF fan) but alas lost all my mod points to a clahd in dragon poker.

Irrelevant (4, Insightful)

wiredlogic (135348) | more than 8 years ago | (#14038318)

So what. They are just ads in disguise. They awarded the lame ROM exercise machine ($14000 a pop) a few years back. It does nothing that you can't do for free or with $500 in equipment. Their basis for choosing the "best" things is pretty skewed.

Too Early? (2, Insightful)

SnarfQuest (469614) | more than 8 years ago | (#14038513)

Seem to me that declaring the XBox360 as a "best of" is a little bit early, as not a single unit has yet been sold, afaik.

If it turns out that it has any "minor" defect, like an exploding power supply that causes thousands of homes to burn down, then it will likely need to be dropped from this list.

I wonder if such an occurance is covered by their EULA? (873. Explosions and/or fires, including those involving lethal casualties, caused by this device, or any other devices supplied by MicroSoft, are the responsibility of said purchaser. Said purchaser hereby absolves MicroSoft, and its affiliates, from any legal action.)

Re:Too Early? (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 8 years ago | (#14039270)

I think the x-box being on the list (oh! and the 5 microsoft ads that are on the page), proves that a position on this list is given to the highest bidder. If the console is any good it could possibly be in the running for 2006, but 2005? Give me a break, I wouldnt be suprised if MS paid for the whole damn article. Just to try and dupe their moronic customers into thinking a product that isnt even released yet, is the best product of the year. Just goes to show what microsoft thinks of all you fanboys out there.

Sikorsky X2 (2, Informative)

StikyPad (445176) | more than 8 years ago | (#14038820)

The counter-rotating blade concept isn't new by any means.. Many early helicopter designs used the concept to cancel torque, but tail rotors proved to solve the issue of torque while also adding a high degree of control.

In helicopters, 180MPH is generally the speed limit, because that's when the aircraft's airspeed approaches the angular velocity of the rotor on it's rearward sweep. If the aircraft is traveling forward at roughly the same speed that the rotor is sweeping backward, it can't generate any lift on that side. It seems like increasing the rate of rotation would solve the problem, but the short answer is that that introduces even more problems.

Most twin-blade craft use tandem or intermeshing props, like the Chinook or V22. I'm guessing the coaxial counter-rotating design hasn't been popular because it's orders of magnitude (Score: 5, Used "orders of magnitude" in a sentence) more complicated than a standard prop. One of the main concerns in warfare is equipment reliability -- things working when you need them most. If coaxial designs are significantly less reliable in practice, that's a tremendous offset to any possible tactical advantage.

Re:Sikorsky X2 (1)

dan_sdot (721837) | more than 8 years ago | (#14039267)

Yes, the idea of counter-rotating blades has been around for a long time. However this is innovation, because it has actually been implemented correctly.
To draw a comparison, the idea of quantum computing has been around for a while, but they have yet to be implemented properly. When quantum computers begin to roll off of the production line, that will certainly deserve an science award of some type.

Is it just me? (1)

Corbu Mulak (931063) | more than 8 years ago | (#14038832)

Am I the only one that gets angry at comments like this? (from TFA)

"Sony PlayStation Portable The introduction of Sony's PlayStation Portable (PSP) was the moment portable game consoles stopped being toys ..."

What about Virtual Reality? (1)

bigpat (158134) | more than 8 years ago | (#14039140)

We finally have a decent stereoscopic 3d Head mounted display under a thousand dollars and nobody takes note?

The emagin z800 [emagin.com] is 20 years of geek dreams finally made a reality and not even a nod from Popular Science?

I don't like how everything is oversimplified. (2, Insightful)

fitchmicah (920679) | more than 8 years ago | (#14039501)

This article seems poorly written to me. These pop science magazines used to be appealing to me but now I'd rather read real research or go to colloquiums even if I don't completely understand everything.

From the article on the "Emissions Neutral Vehicle..."

"It breaks down hydrogen into electrons, which power the electric motor, and protons, which interact with oxygen taken in through the ENV's nosecone and are released as Earthfriendly water vapor and heat."

They make it sound like fuel cells actually rip the proton from neutron, or like the electrons get "used up," or that the electrons are actually flowing through the motor like water flows through a straw. Something about the way these articles are written makes me feel uncomfortable. It's like they are saying "well, you and I will never completely understand, but at least someone out there does..."

The worst thing is that explanations of more complex ideas might be botched even greater and I would never know if I trusted this magazine. I think this kind of writing promotes dogmatic science. Potential is hyped but details are not; existence of great ideas is mentioned but the ideas themselves are completely ignored.
Load More Comments
Slashdot Account

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?

Don't worry, we never post anything without your permission.

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>
Sign up for Slashdot Newsletters
Create a Slashdot Account

Loading...