Beta
×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Google Opens U.K. Cybercafe and Testing Lab

Zonk posted more than 8 years ago | from the ticket-to-london-please dept.

Google 82

sebFlyte writes "Google has launched a new venture in England to go with its London offices. They've set up a free Web cafe style affair at London's Heathrow airport to help travelers claw back some of the many hours they spend aimlessly wandering round airport lounges. They're not doing it entirely selflessly though: they admit the main reason they're doing it is to get as wide and as large a cross section of people through the centre as they can so that they can then watch them interact with Google's Web applications. ZDNet has photos, too."

Sorry! There are no comments related to the filter you selected.

Stallman Feeds Self Whole Chicken (-1, Offtopic)

Anonymous Coward | more than 8 years ago | (#14117438)

Stallman Feeds Self Whole Chicken
Richard Stallman stunned a conference on Open Source Software and the Free Software Movement when he took the stage with what appeared to be a whole rotisserie chicken. As shocked attendees watched, he then proceeded to eat the entire chicken with his bare hands pausing only to wipe the grease on his shirt while mumbling "microsoft wants you to use a fork and napkin". Upon completion of his one-man chicken eating demonstration he demonstrated the features of EMACS to an audience that could only be described as disguested.

Re:Stallman Feeds Self Whole Chicken (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#14117528)

"Upon completion of his one-man chicken eating demonstration he demonstrated the features of EMACS to an audience that could only be described as disguested."

Should be "disgusted".

Fucking trolls.

Re:Stallman Feeds Self Whole Chicken (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#14118278)

Maybe he means "were made to feel unwelcome"

disguested

Thank you, I'll leave now.

Moon Base (3, Funny)

ZiakII (829432) | more than 8 years ago | (#14117474)

I'm still waiting for a spot to open on there moon base......any second now they'll call me and tell me I'm hired..

Re:Moon Base (1)

Jorkapp (684095) | more than 8 years ago | (#14117488)

You gotta be careful with those extra-terrestrial jobs. Some companies may decide to throw you out the airlock when you get the boot.

Re:Moon Base (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#14117597)

I'm still waiting for a spot to open on there moon base......any second now they'll call me and tell me I'm hired..

Don't bet on it. I think proper spelling knowledge is one of their requirements for employment.

Re:Moon Base (1)

Luke Psywalker (869266) | more than 7 years ago | (#14117847)

Fuck the moon base, they've got Paris Hilton working for them,

http://news.zdnet.co.uk/internet/ecommerce/0,39020 372,39237552-3,00.htm [zdnet.co.uk]

that's enough for me!

Re:Moon Base (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#14117929)

Fuck the moon base, they've got Paris Hilton working for them,

Fuck Paris Hilton, they've-...
okay, no, that's all. I just want to fuck Paris Hilton.

Re:Moon Base (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#14118815)

Not even with your dick... Now Heather Locklear... mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm......

Hmm... Noticed something... (4, Informative)

Pichu0102 (916292) | more than 8 years ago | (#14117477)

Perhaps it's also to promote Firefox as well? I noticed that the browser used in the screenshots was Firefox. I wonder if Firefox is the only thing installed, or if Internet Explorer is also on there?

Re:Hmm... Noticed something... (2, Funny)

Anonymous Coward | more than 8 years ago | (#14117497)

Not even Google can afford to support IE on a semi-public network.

Re:Hmm... Noticed something... (1)

petermgreen (876956) | more than 7 years ago | (#14119021)

you could use vmware in nonpersistant mode or just reimage the boxes nightly no huge issue.

Re:Hmm... Noticed something... (1, Interesting)

nukem996 (624036) | more than 7 years ago | (#14117524)

But I also noticed there using XP. I wonder why google dosnt use a non-MS OS. I would think google would want to show they dont need MS at all.

Re:Hmm... Noticed something... (4, Insightful)

Pichu0102 (916292) | more than 7 years ago | (#14117544)

If they switch Operating Systems altogether, they'll probably lose a ton of users, seeing as most associate Windows with computers. If average users see Firefox, most likely they'll feel like it's unfamiliar and feel a bit edgy about it, but to use a different OS altogether? That in itself would put off a lot of people in one move.

Re:Hmm... Noticed something... (1)

nukem996 (624036) | more than 7 years ago | (#14117559)

If they have a bunch of computers setup for free use with Firefox up most people probably wont even be able to tell the difference. Ive had many windows-only people use KDE and they use it just fine, most dont even notice. Anyway im not saying they have to use Linux, but Mac would give the same message, Google dosnt need MS for anything.

Re:Hmm... Noticed something... (1)

ryanov (193048) | more than 7 years ago | (#14117816)

If they don't need MS for anything, maybe they should stop writing so much MS-only software?

Re:Hmm... Noticed something... (1)

nukem996 (624036) | more than 8 years ago | (#14122228)

Ive been programming for a pretty long time. Personally I believe that if you write a program correctly it should be very easy to port. idsoftware writes there games and they run on Linux Mac and Windows with no problem, why is this? Because they plan on running on different OSs so they use APIs that work across most OSs(OpenGL, OpenAL, SDL ect). If google wrote Google Earth with QT as the GUI I believe we would have versions for Linux, Mac, and BSD already. Google just needs to plan better.

Re:Hmm... Noticed something... (1)

ryanov (193048) | more than 8 years ago | (#14125281)

If I'm not mistaken, Google Earth does support OpenGL. Am I wrong? It's been awhile since I used it.

Re:Hmm... Noticed something... (2, Insightful)

beeshman (672044) | more than 7 years ago | (#14118477)

C'mon now. What they're doing is testing Google apps, not putting machines out there for general use. Most people are familiar with the Google interface. Type something in, press the button, presto! Results! Browsers aren't all that different either. You really only absolutely need four interface widgets: back, forward, home, and the location bar. Simple! Also considering that there are only staff members manning the cafe, you would think their time would be better spent assisting the folks in the cafe, not troubleshooting machines. Why bother with crashing, pop ups, and such? Deploy everything on a safe, stable platform and insure a good user experience.

Re:Hmm... Noticed something... (1, Insightful)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#14118882)

Actually, my experience has been that if I sit someone in front of a Linux desktop running Firefox, they don't even think much about the difference, they just use it. People are focused on the web page itself, not the browser interface that's framing it. That's the beauty of the web: the platform is irrelevant.

overestimating people (1)

FlippyTheSkillsaw (533983) | more than 7 years ago | (#14120054)

I think you are overestimating the average person.

The average person doesn't see IE or Windows, they see a computer with clickies. They see the webpage they typed in and they interact with that.

You could replace it with a location bar on the bottom and no identification at all an they would get used to it pretty quick.

They may not associate it with their home computer anymore, though.

If one of the goals is to say that this setup works on your computer at home, then switching the operating system will probably not portray that.

On the other hand, I bet you 7 of 10 people would have the same reaction if you a) switch XP off the kindergarten theme or b) switched the entire operating system and used a window manager with a start menu.

Re:Hmm... Noticed something... (4, Interesting)

Air-conditioned cowh (552882) | more than 7 years ago | (#14117578)

If encouraging people to use non MS operating systems was a priority for them then their desktop apps would at least be cross-platform.

It clearly isn't for them because they aren't.

Re:Hmm... Noticed something... (0, Troll)

Wikipedia (928774) | more than 7 years ago | (#14119179)

Linux will never be big on the desktop, it's too geeky, it's based in geekiness, therefore it will always be the geek's niche. Something like beos or haiku or Tunes, however, will be big, though.

Re:Hmm... Noticed something... (1)

Panaflex (13191) | more than 7 years ago | (#14119189)

Google Earth, probably among other reasons.

Re:Hmm... Noticed something... (1)

Tim C (15259) | more than 7 years ago | (#14118292)

I wonder if Firefox is the only thing installed, or if Internet Explorer is also on there?

The machine in the shot is clearly running XP, so yes, Internet Explorer is also on there. As to what the default browser is, how easy they've made it to access IE and whose choice it was to be using FF in that shot (e.g. google for a staged photo, J Random Public for a "real life action" shot, etc), I have no idea.

another good community minded move (5, Insightful)

know1 (854868) | more than 8 years ago | (#14117487)

It's ideas like this that make people not mind when google wants a lot of information about you. All those people who will cry "If this was microsoft you would hate it" - microsoft collates it's data surrepticiously, every webpage you visit or email you write. offereing a free web cafe and saying "but we will watch you" in public no less, is a good thing. I can hardly see anyone looking up anything they wouldn't want anybody to know about anyway at a public terminal

Re:another good community minded move (3, Insightful)

zeridon (846747) | more than 8 years ago | (#14117512)

You have a valid point, but this will give google much more valuable information about the way their services are used. For example it could determine that 75% of the people preffer personalised home and 98% of that are using page history as a sort of a bookmarking tool. So after that is noted google video will lose couple of servers which will be transfered for the sake of personalised home and page history.

they are just profiling the usage of their systems, and of course gaining some image :)

Re:another good community minded move (2, Informative)

know1 (854868) | more than 7 years ago | (#14117570)

oh yeah, of course. hey, advertising is their main revenue source. still pretty cool to put a free service where there are a lot of bored people though. I also doubt they will lose those cutting edge type services, they like their cutting edge stuff and have enough cash for now

Re:another good community minded move (1, Informative)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#14118013)

I flew out of Heathrow Terminal 1 to Brussels on Tuesday. While waiting, I wandered into the surprisingly large Googlespace -- rows of seats had simply been pushed together to make room for it rather than removed, so seating around this container-size rectangle is something of a mess.

Googlespace is not a free Internet cafe. You are limited on the Samsung laptops to Google sites. This means that you can do google searches to your heart's content, but that you can't go to the results.

As I'm already familiar with Google's applications, I wandered off.

Wireless access in Heathrow Terminal 1 is already provided by T-Mobile.

Re:another good community minded move (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#14119213)

All those people who will cry "If this was microsoft you would hate it" - microsoft collates it's data surrepticiously, every webpage you visit or email you write.

WHAT THE FUCK are you talking about? Please back this outrageous claim up with at least a shred of evidence!

I can hardly see anyone looking up anything they wouldn't want anybody to know about anyway at a public terminal

You can't? How about this: what people use public terminals for, mostly, is checking their mail. Do you think there might be people who don't want "anybody to know" what's in their mail? If you reply "but mail isn't private anyway, yadda yadda" you're even more retarded. People use it that way. End of story.

Sniff (0, Redundant)

joelito_pr (931211) | more than 8 years ago | (#14117490)

Too bad I'm thousands of miles away from there. :(

Re:Sniff (1)

staticsage (889437) | more than 7 years ago | (#14117616)

At least you can look on with their cool new product called Google Earth [google.com] !

I don't get it ... (5, Funny)

xmas2003 (739875) | more than 8 years ago | (#14117495)

I read this a while back and I still don't get it. Is this some area where you can basically surf whereever/whatever you want to do ... or are you restricted to only using Google Applications so they can see how you interact with them? The later makes more sense from a Google User Interface point of view ... but if I were a traveler, I just want a (fast/open/free) wireless connection to do what I want to do - I'm confused how observing that could be so useful to Google. And heck, they track me anyway with their cookies! ;-)

Re:I don't get it ... (1)

know1 (854868) | more than 8 years ago | (#14117511)

I always have my browser set to delete google cookies at the end of a session. As for how usefull this data is, it's probably usefull to better determine how peoples web viewing habits are, which would be usefull for advertising research (after all advertising is their main revenue source). Sounds like a free focus group for them. It's a win win situation.

Re:I don't get it ... (1, Redundant)

Rob_Ogilvie (872621) | more than 7 years ago | (#14117591)

Ummm... dude... Google *is* the Internet. They don't need to restrict you to only them... they are everywhere... they are everything!

Re:I don't get it ... (2, Insightful)

hobbit (5915) | more than 7 years ago | (#14118774)

They track you already with their cookies if you use Google services. But this way, they can tell what proportion of your surfing that usage is. Plus loads of other stuff like how many pages of Google results you read before you try the same search on Yahoo!, whether you have a personalised Yahoo! homepage but not a Google one, etc.

Great! (0, Troll)

salparadyse (723684) | more than 7 years ago | (#14117517)

Another company with ideas of global domination. Just what we needed.

Re:Great! (2, Insightful)

xfletch (623022) | more than 7 years ago | (#14118007)

They're not doing it entirely selflessly though

I am always glad to see companies being less than ruthlessly hardnosed, but even so perhaps are we now expecting companies to be 'entirely selfless'? Sounds like the Slashdot community has been reading too much Karl Marx...

free marketing? (4, Interesting)

Deitheres (98368) | more than 7 years ago | (#14117537)

Not complaining about slashdot, per se, but did anyone else notice the marketing in those pics?

Must be nice to be a company as big as google, you don't even have to pay to advertise any more. Just do something cool and people eat it up.

9 hours a year... Yeesh.

Makes me glad I don't fly.

Re:free marketing? (1)

hugzz (712021) | more than 7 years ago | (#14118058)

Must be nice to be a company as big as google, you don't even have to pay to advertise any more. Just do something cool and people eat it up.

you see, they did pay to set this thing up. and yes, they paid for it, in part, for marketing purposes.

So just like every other company, they pay for marketing, and in much the same way as many other companies do.

Re:free marketing? (2, Informative)

linuxci (3530) | more than 7 years ago | (#14118392)

> 9 hours a year... Yeesh.

> Makes me glad I don't fly.

The 9 hours a year waiting for travellers at Heathrow I could certainly believe. Problem is all BAA run airports (Heathrow, Gatwick, Stansted, Southampton, Edinburgh and probably others) are badly run.

If you're travelling from London much better to fly from the smaller London City Airport, smaller means less queues and the checkin for each flight stays open upto 15 minutes before departure. If you travel airlines that let you check in online (KLM and British Airways spring to mind) then as long as you reach the gate before boarding then you're fine. As it's a small airport it doesn't take long to get to the gate.

Of course being a small airport means less flights, but if there's a destination not served by London City then you can fly KLM via Amsterdam and get to a lot of worldwide destinations, trust me, even with the transfer at Amsterdam Schiphol it's still a lot less hassle than the nightmare that is Heathrow.

Google Employees (5, Interesting)

Jazzer_Techie (800432) | more than 7 years ago | (#14117577)

From TFA, 3rd Picture [zdnet.co.uk] Caption
The 10 Samsung laptops in the temporary installation will be manned from 0700 to 1900 by Google employees from across the organisation, with some flown in especially to help out.
--
It would appear that Google has been flying in their more attractive employees. (Or maybe if I worked for Google I'd look like that too.)

Re:Google Employees (1)

potat0man (724766) | more than 7 years ago | (#14118106)

meh, they're ok [zdnet.co.uk]

Attractive Assistants (3, Insightful)

ethzer0 (603146) | more than 7 years ago | (#14117605)

The 10 Samsung laptops in the temporary installation will be manned from 0700 to 1900 by Google employees from across the organisation, with some flown in especially to help out.

Take a look at this [zdnet.co.uk] photo and all the sudden it makes sense...

Re:Attractive Assistants (1)

Rob_Ogilvie (872621) | more than 7 years ago | (#14117611)

Doesn't she look British, though?

Re:Attractive Assistants (1)

GoombaJones (932386) | more than 7 years ago | (#14117699)

That's a good thing. You should see these Brit girls party down here in Greece! They're awesome... [Ahem...] Of course as a geek I wouldn't know any further... :)
*Runs away in fear of having his geek ID revoked!*

Re:Attractive Assistants (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#14117785)

Greeks are mixed with niggers.

No thanks.

Re:Attractive Assistants (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#14117833)

I see you're afraid of big cock you fascist troll.

Couldn't be (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#14118268)

Couldn't be a Brit lass - she has all her teeth.

Re:Attractive Assistants (2, Insightful)

joelsanda (619660) | more than 7 years ago | (#14117707)

10:1 says that, after a shift, she's the only one saying to her co-workers "I just can't believe how nice people are."

Only there for the photo... (1)

Slashamatic (553801) | more than 7 years ago | (#14118408)

When I was there early on Friday evening, she most definitely wasn't. It was just a bunch of Google (male) nerds.

whats next? (1)

rbreve (94225) | more than 7 years ago | (#14117612)

google restaurants, google hotels, google drinks, google tv!

Table of Contents for all Google News (5, Funny)

kai.chan (795863) | more than 7 years ago | (#14117640)

To save Slashdot readers some time in the future in all Google related News Stories. Let me provide a universal Table of Contents to summarize the posts that will inevitably follow:

Introduction of our Overlord:
- How many Google News Stories will we see today?
- "I am tired of hearing about Google!"
- I, for one, welcome our Google (topic) overlords

Chapter 1 Obligatory:
- Imagine a Beowulf Cluster of (topic)
- Does (topic) run Linux
- Step1: (topic), Step2: ???, Step3: Profit

Chapter 2 Conspiracy:
- Google = New Microsoft??
- Google = Skynet
- Is Google only friendly on the outside?
- Case Study: a guy who knows a guy that works at some company claiming Google as the next biggest competitor!!!
- Google Fight claims that all of the above are true!

Chapter 3 Downfall
- Is Google too big?
- Does Google have enough funding to branch out so much?

Conclusion Finale:
- Is Google going to be hit by a flying chair?
- Future of Google, such as GoogleOS and Google Condoms



You all know that it is true.

Re:Table of Contents for all Google News (2, Insightful)

Omestes (471991) | more than 7 years ago | (#14117768)

Footnote:
- Meta google story analysis.

Re:Table of Contents for all Google News (1)

david.given (6740) | more than 7 years ago | (#14118257)

...Google Condoms...

Specially designed for people who can't find their dick with both hands.

Re:Table of Contents for all Google News (2, Funny)

ethzer0 (603146) | more than 7 years ago | (#14118264)

Conclusion Finale:
- Is Google going to be hit by a flying chair?
- Future of Google, such as GoogleOS and Google Condoms



Googledoms?

o Protect yourself against viruses?
o They'd probably come in blue, red, yellow and green.
o If my query returns more results, do I get more OOOooooooo's ?

an ad: (1)

roman_mir (125474) | more than 7 years ago | (#14118568)

buy Google Condoms and she will want to see your OO-OO-OO face tonight!

Googleopoly (1)

OBeardedOne (700849) | more than 7 years ago | (#14117655)

Google is entering, threatening and in many cases on the verge of dominating so many markets that it is both exciting and very scary. It seems that you can't go a whole week without hearing of a new venture or rumour of a new venture. The markets they are entering are mostly very well targeted with the potential for massive payoffs. Even if half fail the few that succeed seem capable of making up for those lossess 50 fold. Their brand name (which is still synonymous with success, and good - just) coupled with their fiscal might and innovative and flexible business model, makes for one hell of a formiddable company.

I give it 5 years or less before the term "Googleopoly" or similar is a commonly used business lexicon and dictionary term.

Re:Googleopoly (1)

multipartmixed (163409) | more than 7 years ago | (#14118612)

How about "Googleplex"?

So... (1)

jouvart (915737) | more than 7 years ago | (#14117745)

Is she [zdnet.co.uk] one of the new applications for "physical testing" too? I mean, it'd fit in with their goals for more wireless technology [theregister.co.uk] development.

Big Brother... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#14117823)

...*IS* watching you.

offtopic: what happened to slash? (1)

dubbreak (623656) | more than 7 years ago | (#14117860)

I could swear there were way more posts than there are currently (36 at time of this post), and a bunch of threads I was following disapeared in the last 30minutes - hour (man how coding C can make you lose track of time).

Done already (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#14117877)

Google have done this already. Follows from a usability interview I had with them recently in which they said that they have a couple of public cafe's in San Fransisco which they use to "observe" people.

Critical Feedback (3, Interesting)

mcrbids (148650) | more than 7 years ago | (#14117938)

As a freelance software engineer, I routinely run into the same problem: I write software to address a niche need - but have no idea what the needs of the users actually are.

Towards this end, it's typical for me to spend 25% of my time on the phone to various people, asking loads of questions, just so I can understand what the expectations are of the end users. What do they think when they see a button titled "Expand"?

I never cease to be amazed at how much difference it can make to end users to change a button or link from "Reports" to "Export", or from "Course" to "Class". Putting a "Save" button at the right location can make the difference between happy customer and pissed off, irate enemy. .

Getting UI stuff rght is much tougher than you'd think. I remember reading about the intense amount of time and money spent making the iPod nano "perfect".

PS: I LOVE the iPod nano - why can't they get the software right? I hvae a rather large MP3 collection on a network drive, and trying to get the iPod to work with the MP3 collection has been very, very, very frustrating... I have a song on a network drive. I can play said song. I double-click, and I hear the song I like. It's in a playlist, and when I double-click the playlist, I still hear said song.

I synchronize the iPod, and I don't get the song. No message explaining why, no errors noted anywhere, I can't drag/drop the file, even though I get a flash when I drag said file over the iPod icon. WTF?!?!

I love the nano - but the software for it SUCKS REAL BAD.

Re: Nano Syncing (1)

cybernanga (921667) | more than 8 years ago | (#14122737)

Heya, Your problem is fixable. I was in the same situation, and figured it out. I have an iBook with a 20GB hard drive but I have 27Gigs of MP3's. I also have a 30GB iPod Photo. Here is what I did All the MP3's are on a PC which I can see from my iBook over the network. In the preferences for iTunes on the iBook, Change the location of the iTunes Library to the parent folder of the MP3's on the PC (obviously you must be networked when doing this) Now, when I add music to iTunes (on the iBook) it stores the mp3's on the PC's Hard Drive. There are no mp3's on my iBook, but I can connect my iPod to the iBook, and everything syncs perfectly. and I have "lots" of free space on the iBook. This suits me fine, as I only ever use the PC for playing solitare, and the occasional test run of some win software that I'm trying to port to Mac. I hope this helps

Re: Nano Syncing (1)

Morgalyn (605015) | more than 8 years ago | (#14130842)

Thanks for this, I was planning on embarking on a similar project this week to move all the music files from my husband's and mine's laptops to our PC we hardly use any more except for some legacy apps. My laptop is an iBook, and I have an iPod, so I was curious about sync'ing/loading songs over the network. Good to hear that it will work. Did you have to set up the PC's mp3 folder(s) as a network drive, or just do a standard share of it over the network?

Re: Nano Syncing (1)

cybernanga (921667) | more than 8 years ago | (#14131183)

Glad to be of some help. I just did a standard share of the C Drive on the PC, and connected to it from the iBook. Once the PC Drive is mounted on the iBook, then tell iTunes (on the iBook) to use whichever folder you want as it's library. Depending on the sped of your network, loading/syncing songs may take a just little bit longer than reading from the iBooks drive, but the space saving makes it worth it, and it isn't really that noticable anyway.

Re: Nano Syncing (1)

Morgalyn (605015) | more than 8 years ago | (#14131796)

You shared your whole drive?? Are your system files etc. on another drive? I guess you must have good intra to inter network security, to go and do something like that. Another question: Does the iPod think its PC-formatted or Mac-formatted when you do this? I would assume Mac, since as far as it knows its getting the music from the iBook.

Re: Nano Syncing (1)

cybernanga (921667) | more than 8 years ago | (#14134034)

Yes, I shared my whole drive. The system files are on this drive. No reall security in place, just a reckless fellow. All my MP3's are backed up onto recordable DVD's, and there is nothing else on that machine that I'm really interested in. Oh, and the iPod is MAc Formatted, and can't tell that the files are actually on a PC. You are right that it is safer just to share the relevant folder, and I wouldn't recommend doing my (reckless) way.

We are now going to see... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#14118030)

...Microsoft Space Live! (beta)

Terminal blues (3, Insightful)

FishandChips (695645) | more than 7 years ago | (#14118037)

This is just a temporary booth that will run for only two months with only ten computers. Any one of dozens of other companies could have done something similar promoting music, cars, books, mobiles, even candy bars, etc, etc., instead of the internet. This Google venture comes over as a rather tacky and ephermeral trade/marketing stand and the Slashdot headline is completely misleading, imho.

The place is awash with stories about Google taking over the world and putting the fear of god into corporate behemoths everywhere. But take a hard look at what Google is actually doing rather than what analysts are saying. Google is a not very large company which runs the world's best search/advertising engine and has a number of frankly rather modest beta projects going. And that is all. In many ways, Google has yet to prove itself. Sooner or later, the Google boys and girls are going to have to come out with some aggressive killer moves or folks might just conclude that the story is a soap opera about California cool with, alas, little more substance than a completely crazy stock price.

Re:Terminal blues (2, Interesting)

Chris Bradshaw (933608) | more than 7 years ago | (#14118425)

"Sooner or later, the Google boys and girls are going to have to come out with some aggressive killer moves or folks might just conclude that the story is a soap opera about California cool with, alas, little more substance than a completely crazy stock price."

Perhaps you have been vacationing on the new Forward Moon base...?

Have you seen what Google has done/is doing with Google Earth? If this isn't a "Killer Move" then I don't know what is. Think about it, say you wanted to organize the Earths data, then wouldn't you do so by first modeling the world around you at the most generic level? Perhaps starting with physical dimensions, makeup, etc...? :You Create objects and define the relationships between those objects...? And so on, and so on...

Who know's...pretty soon you could perform calculations on and with those objects (Google Maps), maybe even release an API for Google, Google Maps, Google Earth... See where this is going?

Hey, then they could start binding data types by location.... Hmmm, how do we find where are users are located? Tah Daah, Gmail and the "Personalized Home Page (complete with weather for your Zip Code, or region..., News, Your Stock Prefs, interests, etc..) Couple that with a few strategically placed cookies... You do the math.

If you take what Google has accomplished in managing raw data on the internet, and couple it with their having successfully captured the physical world as well (demographically, etc...) Not to mention "Google Base" and Gmail which give them unbridled access to even more Data. Throw in an API... Good Lord

Let's face it, Google's IT, and they litteraly got "The Whole World in their Hands". I wouldn't expect them to be going anywhere but up anytime soon (barring Government intervention of course).

To be honest, It's pretty damn scary - the potential of Google...

Re:Terminal blues (1)

FishandChips (695645) | more than 7 years ago | (#14118508)

But that's exactly my point. Everyone talks about "the potential of Google". But where is the real beef? It's no good going to a butcher and asking for a string of next week's sausages. And maybe it isn't wise to read too much into Google maps or gmail, for example. Most folks I know have never heard of either and I doubt they would use them even if they had. They have, though, heard of Windows and Word, not least because they can walk into 1001 stores and buy them.

Somewhere out there, there's probably a bunch of kids busy re-engineering Open Office (or something similar) on an Ajax basis. And if they do it well, chances are they'll be millionaires very quickly. And chances are they'll have done something that is more genuinely useful to more people than all Google's "potential". It's what you do right now, not what you say you'll do.

Re:Terminal blues (1)

Chris Bradshaw (933608) | more than 7 years ago | (#14119176)

This is a bit off-topic, and I don't want to hash up the "Is Google working on oo.Org" spin, however; this is an interesting and informative link in response to you comment:

"Somewhere out there, there's probably a bunch of kids busy re-engineering Open Office and an Ajax basis"

http://online.thinkfree.com/learnmore/index.jsp [thinkfree.com]

If you follow the link you'll see that the kids have already done it, and it in the form of a J2EE web-service and is being offered for free (for a basic home user account, last I checked anyway).

Re:Terminal blues (1)

spac (125766) | more than 8 years ago | (#14120877)

"Google is a not very large company which runs the world's best search/advertising engine and has a number of frankly rather modest beta projects going. And that is all"

You're right, their search engine stinks and their betas are pretty crappy. I'm off to query hotbot. See ya!

What next (2, Interesting)

earthshake (908804) | more than 7 years ago | (#14118079)

"Google makes earth-wide, free, wi-fi internet access entitled: Google Net" In 10 years... "The US Government has switched to holding all of it's data on a remote server down in Google's mountain view home, it has proven a big success, allowing people to tour the setup entitled "Google Worldplex". You can check out all of Google's new services in one nice page at Xtra Google [xtragoogle.com]

Been there, - nothing much to say (3, Informative)

Slashamatic (553801) | more than 7 years ago | (#14118389)

I have the (mis)fortune to fly via Heathrow T1 a lot of the time so I suddenly saw the Google sign yesterday in the international departures area and had a quick look.

Heathrow T1 is heavily covered by commercial hot-spots. I can't imagine anyone (except the passengers) being happy if Google offered free coverage. There were people there, but they were hardly queueing for seats (there was a couple of spaces free when I had my look). However some ten metres away people were happily using a pay-hotspot organised by T-mobile. They could use their own PCs (big advantage). Hey, if the company is paying, where is the problem?

As a frequent flyer, I have access to a lounge. Although the lounge has only pay-hot-spots, they have a free internet cafe and being an airline lounge, free drinks and munchies. There having been a number of delayed flights earlier, the munchies were limited but at least I could sit there with a free orange juice.

Re:Been there, - nothing much to say (1)

MartinB (51897) | more than 7 years ago | (#14119268)

Yeah, the BA T1 domestic lounge is nice, isn't it?

My flight out of there on Thursday was delayed over 2 hours, so I didn't get home until midnight...

Still, being able to IRC (mmmm irc.cgi) with mates from their terminals was good as always.

Thank god! Heathrow airport is BORING! (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#14118502)

I was stuck at Heathrow airport once for about 10 hours. There are only so many cool people you can meet at an airport. I remember these terminals that were there 4 or 5 years ago where you had to fill out a survey about the airport and could use the internet for about 5-10 minutes. I must have filled out that survey atleast 10 times. Obviously it didn't work because I bet there was a lot of bad data that was collected because of people like me. This is a much better idea.

YUO FAIL TIT! (-1, Redundant)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#14118507)

I burnt out. I anybody's guess Provide sodas, schemes. Frankly posts. Due to the The project as a despite the

Link to official Google Space website (2, Informative)

Lord Satri (609291) | more than 7 years ago | (#14119056)

The official link for this project, called Google Space, has not yet been indicated:
http://www.google.co.uk/googlespace/ [google.co.uk]

It was first mentioned on http://www.ogleearth.com/2005/11/google_space.html [ogleearth.com] and on two [slashdot.org] previous [slashdot.org] /. comments. I submitted this story a few days ago, but I agree with the /. eds, the url I provided were not as interesting as in today's story...

Re:Link to official Google Space website (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#14120334)

The official link for this project, called Google Space, has not yet been indicated:
http://www.google.co.uk/googlespace/ [google.co.uk] [google.co.uk]

It was first mentioned on http://www.ogleearth.com/2005/11/google_space.html [ogleearth.com] [ogleearth.com] and on two [slashdot.org] previous [slashdot.org] /. comments. I submitted this story a few days ago, but I agree with the /. eds, the url I provided were not as interesting as in today's story...
--
SlashGISRS.org [slashgisrs.org] - In+ersec+ion for Spatial People
GIS and Remote Sensing
Check for New Comments
Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?