Linux & Open Source Software, the Present 73
Mark writes to tell us that LinuxForums is running the second in a series of articles designed to reflect on "what Linux is, where it came from, where it's going, how to use it and why you should." With all of the recent talk about the perceived difficulties within the OSS community sometimes it is just good to take a look at our roots.
Kubuntu Kinte, I've found you! (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Kubuntu Kinte, I've found you! (Score:1, Funny)
linux is good, very good, we're THIS close! (Score:5, Interesting)
A good introduction. I have to chuckle a bit at the Fragmentation section, not because it's not valid but because I've always marveled anyone got away with trying to banish Un*x with it.
Even at its most fragmented (IBM/AIX, are you listening?) I was still able to sit down in front of any flavor Un*x and be instantly productive. Jumping from one version of Windows to the others doesn't hold the same promise of portable skills.
Regardless, more good information, always useful. Let me point to this article/blog: 10,000 bugs away from World Domination [keithcu.com] as a worthwhile read -- I have no vested interest in this author's (Keith Curtis, a former 10+ year Microsoft programmer) readership, but I think it is a great article with valuable insight into how close linux is and how far away it is at the same time. A good read, highly recommended.
Re:linux is good, very good, we're THIS close! (Score:2, Insightful)
No offense, but if you want to present an objective argument, don't use FUD. There hasn't been a version of Windows released since 1994 that isn't 95% identical in interface or configuration. If you stuck someone familiar with only Win95 or NT4 in front of an XP deskto
Re:linux is good, very good, we're THIS close! (Score:2)
You make an interesting point, I'll meet you half way. While the versions as far as user interface (GUI Shell) were concerned were of the Windows
What 98 introduced, XP taketh away! (Score:1)
As much as I like Linux... (Score:2)
Could this be reduced to the point where the general user would be satisfied? Well, I believe it to be already superior to many other popular general-purpose
sounds like a good marketing tool... (Score:1)
BAD CAR ANALOGY TIME
I can see the TV commercial, new shiny whizzbang motors latest release
Re:linux is good, very good, we're THIS close! (Score:5, Insightful)
In contrast OSS new features arise either in response to features seen in proprietary software, or simply because a developer discovers how to do something cool and suggests that it be included.
Wow, what a great picture. OSS coders are either lazy, unimaginitive losers who copy MS, or freaks fascinated by new, shiny things.
What about features that appear because a developer needs them? You know, like how 90% of all successful OSS projects start?
I've made some (minor) contributions to OSS projects, and in no case was it because I was copying a closed source feature or because I "discovered how to do something cool". It's because I needed a feature that didn't exist, so I made it happen.
Related link (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Related link (Score:2, Insightful)
Rare Statement (Score:4, Insightful)
In my line of work (system administration in a medium sized business) I'm often having to integrate closed source and open source solutions (or at least make them play nice). I like a lot of Microsoft's products. I also like a lot of OSS. But I find that (generally) whenever I look to the OSS community for help integrating the two solutions, I'm met with resistance or flat out rudeness.
For example, if I'm seeking help with getting samba working nicely in a mixed environment or figuring out how to run a PHP app on a windows box, I get responses like, "Just ditch XP, d00d, it sux", and "Apache is better than IIS".
I think if the community, in general, could adopt the idea quoted in TFA, a "newbie's perceived difficulties" with the OSS community would be drastically different.
Re:Rare Statement (Score:1, Funny)
Re:Rare Statement (Score:2)
I don't go directly to MS for help. Just like I don't go directly to RedHat or SuSE for help. I go here [microsoft.com] and here [macromedia.com] and here [ibm.com].
Re:Rare Statement (Score:3, Insightful)
Not that I'm defending said attitude, but...
How come you don't look for help on the other side?
What would be, say, Microsoft's reaction if you asked them for help on plugging your Windows box in a mixed network using Samba?
Especially in the light of Microsoft's intentional changing (i.e. breaking) the SMB, so that it wouldn't work with Samba.
Let's face it... more often than not,
Re:Rare Statement (Score:2)
I see your point, and I often search for help on both sides...
What would be, say, Microsoft's reaction if you asked them for help on plugging your Windows box in a mixed network using Samba?
To be fair, that would be like going directly to RedHat or SuSE for help, which I don't. We're talking about the community, so I end up going here [microsoft.com] and here [macromedia.com] and here [ibm.com].
Especially in the light of Microsoft's intentional changing (i.e. breaking) the SMB, so that it w
Re:Rare Statement (Score:2)
Especially in the light of Microsoft's intentional changing (i.e. breaking) the SMB, so that it wouldn't work with Samba.
Do you have something to support this? I'm not being sarcastic... Is it generally accepted that MS broke SMB for this purpose?
As it is not anywhere near my immediate area of interest, no, I do not have anything to prove it with.
Actually, were it not for Slashdot, I wouldn't have known of it.
However, although it is a theory I encountered here, I've never actually found anyone willing
Re:Rare Statement (Score:2)
I think it's generally accepted by the sort of people who read slashdot, but it's not like Microsoft have issued a statement about it or anything. Microsoft have had a history of doing the sort of thing with standards (like
Re:Rare Statement (Score:5, Informative)
Many people underestimate the differences between the two platforms. Often there are odd problems such that even if the app is supported on Windows, it may have limited functionality. For example, HERMES (a PHP app) is a pain to install on Windows because of a lack of symlinks, and SQL-Ledger (a Perl app) can't use MD5 authentication with PostgreSQL on Windows, nor does the LaTeX support work right if you are trying to print directly to a printer. In once case, it is a DBD::Pg versioning issue, and on the other, it is a limitation with the printing mechanism.
My advice to you is this: If it is designed for Linux, run it on Linux. If it is designed for Windows run it on Windows. If you need to consolidate, use SFU and Apache on Windows (I have never gotten Apache on Cygwin to work properly with PHP and even if it did, I suspect there would be performance issues).
Otherwise, if you need help integrating even if you don't like my advice, you can pay for our services
Translation (Score:4, Insightful)
Translation: "I don't know because I've never had the desire to try it, but my ego doesn't allow me to admit that I don't know."
Re:Rare Statement (Score:1)
LOL, thanks for helping to prove my point. =)
Oh, come on, now. None of the above could possibly be true...
This is a nice touch too... Maybe I should say, "Oh, come on! You couldn't have possibly had a good support experience! I've had bad ones!
Re:Rare Statement (Score:2, Funny)
Shaking hands. Sticking tongue out. (Score:3, Insightful)
But also remember Linux is it's community. I might not write the software I use, but those who to are in my reach and willing to discuss. If I feel there is a problem, I can make others aware of that problem, leading to a solution. Microsoft doesn't have a community, there's no dialogue between consumer and producer. The backlash of Linux users against Windows users is a reaction against Microsoft not playing fair.
Microsoft purposely make their
Re:Shaking hands. Sticking tongue out. (Score:2)
I understand that Microsoft does many things that you might objec
Re:Shaking hands. Sticking tongue out. (Score:1)
It's never hypocritical to make use of something that is provided for free. Unless you would also mean "It's hypocritical to buy a car and then take advantage of the opportunity when you are offered free gasoline."
Re:Rare Statement (Score:1, Informative)
When studying how a closed program interacts with an open one, you can only look at one side for any direct information. The other side is a black box, and you're limited to guess-and-checking to find a solution.
Likewise, many fewer people with knowledge of the code will have posted information online,
Re:Rare Statement (Score:1)
Re:Rare Statement (Score:3, Insightful)
I don't know where you ask, but I've done the same thing a lot of times without getting anything like that. An it's relevant to point out that if you're going to run PHP, Apache _is_ better than IIS.
And BTW: Windows installation of Apache, Apache/win32 installation of PHP, IIS installation of PHP and pretty much anything Samba is described extremely thoroughly in the installation documentation. When looking at support forums and mailing lists, I am really surprised to see how many questions which are answ
Re:Rare Statement (Score:3, Insightful)
The ugly fact is that MS does not want to play nice with OSS products and is especially hostile to the GPLed ones. Nobody in the open source community can help it if exchange, AD, windows file server, etc uses proprietary protocols. Some people risk litig
Re:Rare Statement (Score:1, Troll)
Re:Rare Statement (Score:2)
Perhaps you need to look a bit closer to home
GNOME vs. KDE debate again? (Score:2, Insightful)
Gnome has, with it's "more is less" focus achieved, IMO, a better new user experience than KDE. Not that KDE isn't good, I'm only saying that for people I know that aren't necessarily technical but just want it to work, I set them up with Gnome (on Ubuntu). My biggest success story on that front was setting up a Gnome/Linux PC for my cousin (RedHat in this case, it was a while ago). She used it to do home
Re:GNOME vs. KDE debate again? (Score:4, Interesting)
Look on the bright side... I a couple years, when KDE 0wn3rs the desktop and Gnome is out of business, the flame wars will be over. j/k =P
As a serious response, I think a big part of how a person adopts a desktop preference is based on their personality. I, for example, am the type of person that goes into a store, grabs a pair of jeans, looks them over and says, "these'll do", and leaves without looking at anything else. I was introduced to KDE first... It worked and I had no problems... 3 years later, do I want to learn how to use Gnome? Not really, because like I said, KDE works for me and I have no problems.
My point (if I have one)... From what I can see, most distros tend to default to a KDE installation (even though both are available), and there are a lot of people like me out there. I'm sure I'm be a Gnome guy had that been the first linux desktop for me to use.
Re:GNOME vs. KDE debate again? (Score:4, Interesting)
But it's Gnome that has all the corporate backing!
j/k also, but you bring up a good point (or reinforce my earlier one, or something)... Mainly that as long as it works, for most people Gnome vs KDE vs WindowMaker vs Aqua vs Vista vs XP etcetera makes no difference whatsoever. As long as it works, and continues to work.
The advantage with a Linux system is that it usually doesn't sit and collect spyware, trojans, etcetera and so doesn't have to be completely reinstalled every couple of years, it can run for as long as you want it to, acting exactly like it did the first time you ran it.
Re:GNOME vs. KDE debate again? (Score:2)
When I used to work at Microsoft, occasionally it would come up that Linux was fine for clueless newbies because my violin-teaching mother used it. Boy did I get flack for that....
Re:GNOME vs. KDE debate again? (Score:1)
That sentance is horrible, and I move that it be taken out and shot.
Sorry
Should have said: IMO Gnome, with it's "less is more" focus, has achieved a better new user experience.
Re:GNOME vs. KDE debate again? (Score:1, Troll)
Re:GNOME vs. KDE debate again? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:GNOME vs. KDE debate again? (Score:2)
Let's see now.
Debian, Fedora, Suse/Novell, Ubuntu, Mepis, and knoppix make up the top of the popularity list. Of those only knoppix comes default with KDE.
Since debian, fedora, suse/novell, ubuntu, and sun desktop are the only distros businesses use for business it's unanimous for gnome.
My linux timeline: (Score:3, Funny)
1995 - widespread adoption of desktop linux. yeah right.
1997 - widespread adoption of desktop linux is 3 years away
2000 - widespread adoption of desktop linux is 2 years away
2002 - widespread adoption of desktop linux is 2 years away
2004 - widespread adoption of desktop linux is 2 years way
2006 - widespread adoption of desktop linux is 2 years away
Re:My linux timeline: (Score:1)
Reflect. (Score:3, Informative)
Welcome to part two of a series for beginners explaining what Linux is, where it came from, where it's going, how to use it and why you should.
In short: nothing to see here, except the forever raging flamewar of KDE vs GNOME.
Re:Bullshit! (Score:3, Funny)
Remember from 1st grade? The packman ">" always eats the bigger number...
Re:Bullshit! (Score:2)
Mathman Mathman multiples of three. *chomp*
Re:Bullshit! (Score:1)
I can not stand by and allow you to use improper terminology. Clearly ">" is an alligator.
Re:Bullshit! (Score:5, Interesting)
With Fedora, you can also go to the web site, click on the RPM, type the root password when requested, and it will install it for you or at least tell you what packages you are missing. I prefer to use yum but for those who are afraid of the command line, there are other ways.
As for installation of the distro, Linux is far easier as a distro to install than Windows is. I hate having to come back every 15 minutes and answer a bunch of questions that really should have been asked up front. And don't get me started on product activation.
User: "How do I get Quake 3 to run in Linux?"
Zealot: "Oh that's easy! If you have Redhat, you have to download quake_3_rh_8_i686_010203_glibc.bin, then do chmod +x on the file. Then you have to su to root, make sure you type export LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.2.5 but ONLY if you have that latest libc6 installed.
You do realize you can do essentially all of this in the GUI. And if I have customers that need this done, I usually send them a shell script so that they don't have to worry about it.
In my experience and the experience of my non-techie parents, Linux is as easy to use as Windows, and because once it works, it just works, and because it is comparitively transparent, it is actually easier to learn once you get used to it (but we are not to say that familiarity is the standard of user-friendliness are we? Because if it is, then we should never try to do anything new).
Re:Bullshit! (Score:2)
Here's a screenshot [mac.com].
Re:Bullshit! (Score:1)
If you want to install it
There are still severe disadvantages... (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:There are still severe disadvantages... (Score:3, Insightful)
And binary drivers aren't good, they're just acceptable. We geeks would love it if ATI or NVidia had open source drivers, but they don't, and the free offerings don't work right because NVidia and ATI hide their specs. Not much we can do about it.
It's confusion, but it's also choice. Do a little research an
Re:There are still severe disadvantages... (Score:2, Insightful)
A generic postscript driver just doesn't exist for Windows.
This is true. However the HP Laserjet 4 PS driver does pretty nicely if you need a dummy Postscript printer or some such.
Re:There are still severe disadvantages... (Score:2)
The rest: Go yell at the manufacturers for not providing drivers. Don't ask other people to risk litigation trying to reverse engineer drivers for you. If you want people to risk jail put some money on the table to make the risk worthwhile.
Re:There are still severe disadvantages... (Score:2, Interesting)
I agree that GNU\Linux hasn't been the target platform of many games recently.
This is generally because games development doesn't work very well with the open source development model. Games are developed quickly and then released once.
Printing:
I've always had very good success with CUPS, never had much trouble.
Wireless:
I agree, wireless on GNU\Linux is terrible, due to lack of vendor support.
Video drivers:
I agree again, but again it's a problem created by the hardware vendors. If they released their
Re:There are still severe disadvantages... (Score:2)
+3 for a (albeit sweet) troll?
Why you should (Score:5, Insightful)
Despite continual advances and new wrinkles being thrown at us in the area of graphical user interfaces, for many tasks the console is still fundamental and without peer where speed is concerned. Microsoft and Apple can crow about their own approaches all they like; UNIX existed before both of them, and its' descendants will exist after those two companies' names have passed out of human memory.
On reading Eric Raymond's The Art of UNIX Programming, I came to realise that that book offered not just a methodology for programming, but for life in general. It also describes the thoughts and philosophies of a group of people who were as pioneering, adventurous, and brilliant as any other in human history, and to whom larger humanity will owe a debt of gratitude for at least the next several hundred years to come.
Re:Why you should (Score:2, Funny)
s/God/Intelligent Designer/g
Cygwin (Score:1)
Thought That Counts (Score:2)
Linux... how to use it and why you should. (Score:1)
roots & perceived difficulties (Score:5, Interesting)
using a Wyse terminal and a set of mainframe apps) could never make any sense
of MacOS, OS/2, Windows or Linux
use any of them.
My mother-in-law gave me more calls about her previous Windows installations
(ranging from 95 to 2000) than she now does regarding Slackware 10.2 with
KDE, and needless to say there were no spy-ware removal or virus-cleaning
sessions since.
As far as I'm concerned it depends on the initial set-up, and that's the
case for all current OSes. If you are a geek, or know a geek very well,
you'll be fine. If you simply want to use something, and it's not pre-installed
to perfection (in other words, to how you'd like (it) to work) there's hassle.
Cheers
Re:IF you have to ask if you should use it... (Score:2)
I'm not even sure I know what you're angry at...