Beta

Slashdot: News for Nerds

×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Valve Talks Episode One

Zonk posted more than 8 years ago | from the raising-the-bar dept.

72

Eurogamer had a chance to sit down with Valve designer Gabe Newell, Doug Lombardi, and a bunch of folks from the Valve design house to talk about the process of creating Half-Life 2: Episode One . They discuss the rationale behind going episodic, the development process, why we're unlikely to see a Half-Life movie anytime soon, and the many improvements to the Source engine. From the article: "I think we're better at it, in terms of learning how to anticipate. It's like after you've watched a couple of hundred playtests, you start to develop a much better sense of what are successful and unsuccessful design strategies. And so the thing we're going to do with Episode One is to extend that out to all of the people."

cancel ×

72 comments

Quality counts for something (2, Insightful)

tedgyz (515156) | more than 8 years ago | (#15481677)

I'm glad to see at least one game franchise is focused on quality technology and content.

I wish I could say the same for the Quake franchise.

Re:Quality counts for something (2, Insightful)

Cheapy (809643) | more than 8 years ago | (#15481754)

They also seem to be focusing on making you spend over $100 on a single game.

Re:Quality counts for something (3, Insightful)

Kazzahdrane (882423) | more than 8 years ago | (#15481827)

How exactly? Assuming a constant price of $20 per episode, this would suggest $60 for episodes 1-3. Assuming around 12 hours of playtime this is a "single game" but the standard of many games available today, especially FPS.

And, to be perfectly honest, I enjoyed Episode One so much I thought it was good value.

Re:Quality counts for something (1)

Red Alastor (742410) | more than 8 years ago | (#15482246)

Why assume a constant price ? When the last episode will come out, if you played the two previous ones, how much do you think they can force you to shell out ?

Re:Quality counts for something (1)

RonnyJ (651856) | more than 8 years ago | (#15482348)

Assuming around 12 hours of playtime this is a "single game" but the standard of many games available today, especially FPS.
In one way, this is true - but it's much more of an 'expansion pack' than an entire new game. The game engine, the enemies, the weapons, everything is pretty much the same as in HL2. I can understand that people think it's well worth it - but I wouldn't consider it to be a 'new game'.

Re:Quality counts for something (1)

Elminst (53259) | more than 8 years ago | (#15482766)

Hmmm my calculator tells me I'll be paying $53.85 for all 3 episodes. (17.95 pre-order price x 3)
Which is less than the cost of a new game at best buy. (49.99 plus tax = 54.50)
And if i'm getting 15-30 hours of game play, I'm not feeling ripped off in the least.

Re:Quality counts for something (1)

Tibor the Hun (143056) | more than 8 years ago | (#15482995)

no offence, but if the developers state that it is a 4-6 hour episode then, you're looking at 12-18 hours of gameplay.
now maybe you like to play really slow or something, but all things being equal, you're still getting ripped off.

Re:Quality counts for something (1)

Elminst (53259) | more than 8 years ago | (#15484308)

Replay due to the commentary mode adds another 3-5 hrs per title. + unknown amount of hours from additional multiplayer. (which admittedly I don't play.)

Re:Quality counts for something (1)

Cheapy (809643) | more than 8 years ago | (#15482949)

You're right. $60 for episodes 1-3, plus the $50 (or was it 70?) that you paid for Half-Life 2. I mostly play RPGs, so a 12 hour game is extremely short. That's why it's only one game.

Re:Quality counts for something (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 8 years ago | (#15483520)

I mostly play RPGs, so a 12 hour game is extremely short. That's why it's only one game.

To simulate an RPG within Half-Life 2, simply save before each fight, so you can reload and repeat it 20 or 30 times.

Personally, I prefer 12 hours of content over 8 hours of content and 200 hours of tedious grind, but hey, whatever floats your boat.

Re:Quality counts for something (1)

Kazzahdrane (882423) | more than 8 years ago | (#15483971)

I mostly play RPGs too, doesn't mean I expect all the games I play to be 60+ hour epics where saving the world is the order of the day.

Right now I can't wait for New Super Mario Bros. to be released here in the UK, a game that can apparently be beaten (get to the end without doing every optional thing) in less than 4 hours. Will I pay £30 for it anyway? You betcha, as all the reviews I've read have been stellar.

Fun > Game Length IMO.

Re:Quality counts for something (1)

ScaryFroMan (901163) | more than 8 years ago | (#15484289)

Just adding that HL2 isn't required for the episodes (except for story and such). So the cost of the game is just $60.

Episode One is a sequel, not a rehash or expansion (1)

Cybrex (156654) | more than 8 years ago | (#15486551)

If you choose to include HL2 in the equation, then you're spending $100 for *two* games, not one. Episode One doesn't require that you have HL2 in order to play.

As to the argument that textures, weapons, and many character models are re-used from HL2, so what? Ep 1 takes place immediately after HL2, in the same city, interacting with many of the same characters. Why would I expect everything to look completely different? The plot is engaging, and the action and puzzles are fresh, creative, and fun- even compared to HL2. To me, *that's* what makes it worth my $20. If new graphics were the only point then I'd be playing Doom 3.

Re:Quality counts for something (1)

popeguilty (961923) | more than 8 years ago | (#15486716)

Ahhh, okay. So two kumquats are one fruit, since you prefer apples and kumquats are half the size of apples.

You might avoid academia- you'd find it a scary place.

Re:Quality counts for something (2, Funny)

Ford Prefect (8777) | more than 8 years ago | (#15481836)

They also seem to be focusing on making you spend over $100 on a single game.

Maths for Idiots!

Trilogy. Three parts. Each part costing $19.95 - so that makes a grand total of ...

* frantic tapping away at hyper-reliable, entry-level, emerging-markets calculator *

... $100. Oh. Sorry, you're right. Carry on!

Re:Quality counts for something (1)

Some_Llama (763766) | more than 8 years ago | (#15482390)

HL2 costs 40.00, each episode is 20, for a total of 100. Is anyone playing the episodes who didn't play HL2?

Re:Quality counts for something (2, Funny)

MentlFlos (7345) | more than 8 years ago | (#15482690)

Well if that is how it goes, then I spent over $100000 for HL2. I've got the computer I run it on plus the house I am in to play it plus my computer related furnature. Not to mention the cost of a network connection, power, heat etc.

We could even calculate in the cost of my car and gas because I need to get to work to pay for all this intense gaming.

Re:Quality counts for something (1)

Some_Llama (763766) | more than 8 years ago | (#15488154)

Yah you're right, you could calculate the cost of the original game and each episode to get the total cost of buying it over steam vs the cost of buying HL2 retail and each episode retail to get a comparitive analysis of which is a better value when choosing how you would like to purchase the game.

OR you could calculate every innane cost associated with gaming in general and come off like a big asshole.

Glad to see you take the high road.

Re:Quality counts for something (-1, Flamebait)

Anonymous Coward | more than 8 years ago | (#15481832)

A troll paying Slashdot for the opportunity to troll...now that's dedication. Get out much?

Just kidding, I know you don't get out much.

Re:Quality counts for something (1)

nanowired (881497) | more than 8 years ago | (#15481983)

Quake 4 was short, used a lot of the same textures and content as doom 3(Anyone remember the silly bridges that assembled? Its a neat trick, but by now its old. Very old. Stop repeating it!), and probably has just as limiting as multiplayer(I'll try it out in a bit, but if its just quake 3 arena all over again, I'll be soarly dissapointed) - HOWEVER, atleast ID is upfront about screwing you. They werent hiding behind Buzzwords and schemes, like Episodic content. They're making you pay more for an expansion(not the 100 dollars others have claimed, but more to the tune of 64 dollars) and fewer hours of gameplay. In closing, This episodic content would only work out if theres more content in the next 2, than in this one. IF not, and they put the same half-bun effort into it, I'd rather not waste the money. Note: I understand that its cheaper from steam, but coincidently isnt halflife 2 also cheaper? wouldnt an expansion be cheaper as well? Prices would probably offset accordingly, and still remain true.

my post explained (1)

nanowired (881497) | more than 8 years ago | (#15482142)

Yes yes, spelling errors aboud. Wheres the blasted Edit button! The following refers to Valve. They're making you pay more for an expansion(not the 100 dollars others have claimed, but more to the tune of 64 dollars) and fewer hours of gameplay. In closing, This episodic content would only work out if theres more content in the next 2, than in this one. IF not, and they put the same half-bun effort into it, I'd rather not waste the money. Note: I understand that its cheaper from steam, but coincidently isnt halflife 2 also cheaper? wouldnt an expansion be cheaper as well? Prices would probably offset accordingly, and still remain true.

Re:Quality counts for something (1)

Tibor the Hun (143056) | more than 8 years ago | (#15483014)

don't waste your time with quake multiplayer.
quake wars: enemy territory is coming out soon.
get a feel for it by playing free wolfenstein enemy territory.

Re:Quality counts for something (1)

Tibor the Hun (143056) | more than 8 years ago | (#15482965)

perhaps you've never heard of quake wars? from the same folks that brought us wolfenstein ET. (which is free)

Am I the only one... (3, Insightful)

DaHat (247651) | more than 8 years ago | (#15481764)

Who feels a little... jibbed that after buying one of the larger packages when HL2 came out that they are trying to get you to pay another $20 for Episode 1? Granted I'd love to get it for free, I'm kind of let down that they wont even cut you a deal for it... so I suppose I'll wait until all 3 Episodes are out and hope that they'll have a special package deal for them that doesn't involve buying another copy of HL2.

Re:Am I the only one... (1)

GeekyMike (575177) | more than 8 years ago | (#15481954)

You aren't the only one, but on the plus side, we got CS source and DOD source. CS source is so much better than CS in my humble opinion. I like the cover that reacts to bullets/explosives.

Re:Am I the only one... (1)

DDLKermit007 (911046) | more than 8 years ago | (#15482236)

I'm sorry...CS sucks wether it's Source or not. It's sucked ass since shortly after beta 7 when the glitching, cheating, and 1337ism went into overdrive. Anyone playing Source likely has no idea what beta 7 is.

Re:Am I the only one... (1)

GeekyMike (575177) | more than 8 years ago | (#15482339)

I enjoyed it, I started playing CS late in the game (when I got cs source). Natural Selection is an excellent game, as is dystopia. BrainBread isn't too bad either, shooting zombies in the face is a great way to vent

Re:Am I the only one... (1)

Danse (1026) | more than 8 years ago | (#15482917)

I'm sorry...CS sucks wether it's Source or not. It's sucked ass since shortly after beta 7 when the glitching, cheating, and 1337ism went into overdrive. Anyone playing Source likely has no idea what beta 7 is.

If you play on decent servers with decent admins, then it's great. Other than that, it can be a hackfest. It has become quite a bit better over time though.

Re:Am I the only one... (1)

rsmith-mac (639075) | more than 8 years ago | (#15483067)

I don't know about you, but I ended up picking up the Silver package right when HL2 was first released. Valve threw in HL2, their entire back catalog, and everything they've made since(except HL2:EP1); I'd call a heck of deal on its own.

Unfortunately, they're a lot more stingy now, none of the packages offered are nearly as good.

Re:Am I the only one... (1)

tedgyz (515156) | more than 8 years ago | (#15484387)

They DID cut a deal. Pre-order was $17.95

I can't WAIT!!!! (1)

trak0r (839081) | more than 8 years ago | (#15481784)

Even though it is supposed to be short, it is only $20. I think they should come out with a new episode every year at least.

They still haven't explained... (2, Interesting)

Flimzy (657419) | more than 8 years ago | (#15481785)

...why the sequel is called Episode One.

Re:They still haven't explained... (1)

longbot (789962) | more than 8 years ago | (#15481831)

Perhaps we can lay the blame on George Lucas? That was my first thought when I saw the title...

Yes, they did. (0, Flamebait)

Anonymous Coward | more than 8 years ago | (#15481843)

RTFA, they mention in there that it should be called Half-Life 3, Episode One. They're viewing this as Half-Life 3, not an expansion to HL2.

Re:Yes, they did. (1)

Flimzy (657419) | more than 8 years ago | (#15481989)

I did RTFA...

That comment explains why it should not be called Half-Life 2: Episode One. Not why it should be.

Re:They still haven't explained... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 8 years ago | (#15481861)

You must be one of those Visual Basic type programmers. Everyone knows you start with 0 (zero).

Re:They still haven't explained... (1)

WilliamSChips (793741) | more than 8 years ago | (#15482792)

Actually, even VB starts at 0. I think it's only PHP or some other even-worse-than-VB language like that that starts with 1.

Re:They still haven't explained... (1)

Reason58 (775044) | more than 8 years ago | (#15481877)

[i]...why the sequel is called Episode One.[/i] It is the first in a series of episodes.

Re:They still haven't explained... (1)

Reason58 (775044) | more than 8 years ago | (#15481903)

Ssssss forgot which forum software I was on for a minute.

Re:They still haven't explained... (3, Funny)

Ford Prefect (8777) | more than 8 years ago | (#15481943)

[quote=Reason58]Ssssss forgot which forum software I was on for a minute.[/quote]

You should be ashamed of yourself. With a user ID like that, you must have been on Slashdot for at [i]least[/i] a year or two!

Re:They still haven't explained... (1)

Reason58 (775044) | more than 8 years ago | (#15482449)

Not to mention my extensive post history consisting of about three replies. /wrists

Re:They still haven't explained... (1)

zaguar (881743) | more than 8 years ago | (#15486345)

And with your UID, you should know that BBCode doesn't work on Slashdot.

Re:They still haven't explained... (0, Flamebait)

nanowired (881497) | more than 8 years ago | (#15481940)

Its episode one of three parts.

Basicly, Episodic content is a cheap trick to get you to pay more for an expansion than you normally would.
For those who find math necessary, 3 x 19.99, with 7 percent sales tax, equals 64 bucks.

Thats if They dont raise or lower the price.

Overall, the company doesnt have to give you a finished product, and you pay more for it. Oh, and 5 hours game play is far too generous. Try 2. 10 bucks an hour!

Re:They still haven't explained... (1)

goodcow (654816) | more than 8 years ago | (#15482113)

It's only $16.99 at Amazon.com, and the quality I think, is far greater done in pieces like this, rather than a long haul like Half Life 2 itself.

Besides which, as was already mentioned, they'll probably be a "package deal discount" if you do want to wait and just treat this as a full game sequel, rather than episodes.

Re:They still haven't explained... (1)

moe.ron (953702) | more than 8 years ago | (#15482184)

Overall, the company doesnt have to give you a finished product, and you pay more for it. Oh, and 5 hours game play is far too generous. Try 2. 10 bucks an hour!

No, its not 2 hours; you're not counting the commentary (which is enjoyable) or the new multiplayer modes. And Episode one is a very finished product. Everything is polished and I didn't come across a single bug.

But that's not the point. The point is that EP1 is a good game. If it was like any other FPS out there, I would be pissed about the price, but I think that in this case it was worth the money. You're too used to get cheap deals on shitty games. Well this isn't a shitty game and is worth the money. Maybe not your money, you don't seem to be the type to appreciate quality workmanship but for the rest of us out there who are tired of the same old bullshit shooters, it is nice to have a company like Valve releasing a quality product.

Besides, it is only a third of what you're calling a "finished product". The trilogy will be the complete product, so why don't you just wait until they're done before you complain about the $64 you haven't spent yet?

And anyway, after playing games from the guys at Valve (from before they were Valve, team fortress anyone) I happy about their turn towards episodic content. Valve takes a long time in releasing anything because of their attention to detail and quality. I am happy to play a third of the game every 12 months as opposed to waiting 3 or 4 years for the whole thing. They've shortened the development cycle on their engine and they've streamlined content production. Episodic content seems to me to be the perfect way for a company like this to put out a quality product in a shorter amount of time. And like I said, I am happy they are.

Oh yea, another question just occured to me, have you even played it yet? :P

Re:They still haven't explained... (1)

Jett (135113) | more than 8 years ago | (#15483608)

what new multiplayer modes?

they're programmers (2, Funny)

fbartho (840012) | more than 8 years ago | (#15482385)

The answer is that they're programmers... and any true programmer knows that index numbers start at 0;

Re:They still haven't explained... (1)

enderwiggen (174235) | more than 8 years ago | (#15483288)

The name of the game is Half-Life 2: Aftermath, Episode One... I imagine the next part will be called Half-Life 2: Aftermath, Episode Two and so on...

Con artists (-1, Troll)

Anonymous Coward | more than 8 years ago | (#15481939)

Hey Gabe, you fat fuck, when the hell are you going to refund money to all the people you scammed? You money grubbers haven't come out with an original idea since 1998. How much longer are you frauds going to milk the tired, hackneyed Half-Life?

episode content aka (1)

Truekaiser (724672) | more than 8 years ago | (#15481994)

how to jipe customers out of over $100 for the whole game when sold normaly would only cost $50.

Joss Whedon, Please (0, Offtopic)

DigitalRaptor (815681) | more than 8 years ago | (#15482080)

If Joss Whedon fell in love with the Half-Life universe (`verse for all you browncoats) and chose to write the script for a Half-Life movie, I'd go see it in a heartbeat.

Serenity and Firefly were brilliant.

Re:Joss Whedon, Please (1)

dyslexicbunny (940925) | more than 8 years ago | (#15482279)

An interesting choice. I would think Ron Moore would do a solid job as well.

Within the past month, I think I have gotten three or four of my neighbors hooked on BSG. Granted, my next project is Firefly, not that there's much. Thanks for ruining everything Fox.

Re:Joss Whedon, Please (1)

DigitalRaptor (815681) | more than 8 years ago | (#15482482)

Too true. BSG is hot, hot, hot! I can't wait until the next season begins.

Ron Moore vs. Joss Whedon is a win-win decision. You can't go wrong.

Re:Joss Whedon, Please (1)

dyslexicbunny (940925) | more than 8 years ago | (#15482950)

Why have it as a versus? Why not make it a joint project instead?

Hell, I saw Earth, Wind, and Fire and Chicago in concert on HD during the rain delay of Giants/Mets. I think it was a great deal, all things considered. It could be just as equally a good thing as this was.

Re:Joss Whedon, Please (1)

Deadguy2322 (761832) | more than 8 years ago | (#15483984)

MVW: Moore Vs. Whedon. Whoever wins, we ALL lose!

Re:Joss Whedon, Please (1)

WilliamSChips (793741) | more than 8 years ago | (#15482824)

I think you need to do it in the order Fox showed the Firefly episodes so that they understand: ".xoF gnihtyreve gniniur rof sknahT"
That way they'll be able to understand it correctly.

Re:Joss Whedon, Please (1)

dyslexicbunny (940925) | more than 8 years ago | (#15482923)

I think you need to do it in the order Fox showed the Firefly episodes so that they understand: ".xoF gnihtyreve gniniur rof sknahT"

Shouldn't "ks for ruining everythi Th" be more accurately reflect the order it was played? Remember, they didn't show the last three episodes and the first two out of order.

Spying (2, Insightful)

caramelcarrot (778148) | more than 8 years ago | (#15482088)

Gabe Newell: Rather than having hundreds of playtesters, there are eight million Steam accounts right now, so we'll have eight million playtesters. It tells us which weapons they're using, so we can say "they're not using this weapon, why not?", here's where people are getting stuck "huh, ok, they're not supposed to be stuck here". Here's the stuff they like, here's the stuff they don't like.

Eurogamer: So Steam effectively creates a report every time you log in and play Episode One?

Gabe Newell: Yeah. We started this process with the hardware survey and that turned out to be incredibly valuable - it just helps you make really good decision.


Was there an option for this anywhere that I missed? I'm not exactly up in arms about it, since it is useful information for making their games better, not junk they're going to be selling for advertising money, but it's still slightly disturbing.

Re:Spying (1)

HillBilly (120575) | more than 8 years ago | (#15482104)

I would assume that its all stated in the EULA, not that anyone has read it.

Re:Spying (2, Informative)

Ford Prefect (8777) | more than 8 years ago | (#15482191)

Was there an option for this anywhere that I missed?

Yup - every so often, when Steam starts it comes up with a brief message asking if you'd like to take part in the hardware survey. If you click yes, it detects what you've got, presents you with what it's found and then asks if it can send it off to Valve. If you do, it then links you to the results [steampowered.com] .

Evil. Pure evil.

My poor MacBook Pro [hylobatidae.org] got abused in this way. :-(

Re:Spying (1)

Some_Llama (763766) | more than 8 years ago | (#15482460)

"Yup - every so often, when Steam starts it comes up with a brief message asking if you'd like to take part in the hardware survey."

I don't think that the hardware survey option disabled the log report for people playing Episode 1, the only relation Gabe speaks of is that the hardware survey proved very valuable and was the premise for implementing the Episode 1 log feature.

Now if you know how to disable that, please share...

Re:Spying (2, Insightful)

jalefkowit (101585) | more than 8 years ago | (#15482714)

This sure sounds different to me than the hardware survey. I've taken the hardware survey (twice) and I don't remember it ever asking me if it was OK to monitor me as I play the game -- I was only asked if it was OK if information about my hardware was sent to Valve.

As privacy issues go, this is relatively minor, but it's still annoying. Why ask about the one case and not the other?

Re:Spying (1)

Aranth Brainfire (905606) | more than 8 years ago | (#15482913)

Where is the moderation option "Wrong"?

Re:Spying (1)

Ford Prefect (8777) | more than 8 years ago | (#15485715)

Where is the moderation option "Wrong"?

I realised I'd misread the interview and quickly typed up another comment saying that I was wrong - and it appears I went and closed the browser before going past just the preview of said comment. Oops.

I wasn't having a very good day yesterday. :-(

Not the same thing (1)

spoco2 (322835) | more than 8 years ago | (#15484953)

They mention the hardware survey, and they say that it was very successful, which is why they've started this play monitoring as well. Therefore they are two different things.

Re:Spying (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 8 years ago | (#15482218)

On the other hand, they could use this information to place strategic in game bill boards...those crafty bastards...

I can't decide... (2, Interesting)

PFI_Optix (936301) | more than 8 years ago | (#15482103)

...whether I like episodic content or not.

Three episodes adds up to the price of a full game, and if they deliver the same amount ot content I don't see where there's a significant difference. Though I suppose a story that takes 20 hours to tell is a lot more interesting and engrossing to me than three stories that take 6-7 hours to tell. But episodic content allows them to finish, test, and deliver content faster, meaning that I have something new to play with more frequently rather than waiting 2+ years between releases from them.

I guess I'm gonna have to get Ep 1 after I reinstall Windows (blowing away a bad partition scheme after 4 years of tolerating my own stupidity, yay) to find out if it's worth the money.

Re:I can't decide... (1)

Khuffie (818093) | more than 8 years ago | (#15482304)

I don't get the difference between 'episodic content' and what we were used to: 'expansion packs'. Expansion packs allow developers to finish, test and deliver content faster, allowing players to have something more frequent to play with, and usually cost less than the full game. The only real difference here is rather than selling them in store, you get to download them.

Re:I can't decide... (1)

Aranth Brainfire (905606) | more than 8 years ago | (#15482945)

I don't think it's a big difference. Mainly because it's a convenient term to use- rather than saying "we released a full game that costs less than most full games, is shorter than most full games, and is the lead-in for two more shorter cheaper games" they can say "this is episodic!"

Something along the lines of "Web 2.0", it's not really anything new, just a term probably invented to drum up interest that also allows for some easier distinguishing between different, similar, things without using 20 words.

Re:I can't decide... (1)

dbhankins (688931) | more than 8 years ago | (#15483392)

Expansion packs, while taking advantage of the base game assets and engine, generally offer a self-contained story.

Something episodic makes no attempt to be self-contained; you want to find out how the story ends, you'll need the succeeding episodes.

Dan

Short Game = Less Filler (1)

NPN_Transistor (844657) | more than 8 years ago | (#15486327)

I actually like the fact that Episode 1 is short. A lot of games attempt to be long and attempt to include many hours of gameplay, and all too often, the game developers stuff the game up with boring, repetitive, filler. (Do the words "Water Hazard" or "Highway 17" come to mind?) A short game with good gameplay is better than a long game that's full of filler.

Re:Short Game = Less Filler (1)

Kelbear (870538) | more than 8 years ago | (#15487906)

This is what jumped out at me in my play through HL2: Episode One. In many other FPS games, you're basically fighting through the same corridors continually against faceless hordes for no particular reason. In my mind I'm thinking, "I'm grinding up for the next plot event or cutscene."

Battles in this little episode were quite well focused, with little filler combat when venturing about. Then you hit an "action sequence"(This kind of mentality is described in the Lost Coast commentary). In these scenes they tried putting little twists on the action each time to make them more engaging and memorable. Most of these action sequences are primed with a few bits of dialogue to let you know you're getting somewhere and that the "corridor" is getting somewhere.

Alyx, managed to be a useful asset. The increased amount of quips and interaction made her seem a bit less of an annoying bot on follow, and more of a significant plot character. This suprised me really.

This episode really didn't add much technologically that we haven't seen elsewhere. Didn't even change gameplay significantly. What Episode One really did was take HL2's gameplay and just did it better. It's more content in the same vein just a bit higher quality. Enough reason for me to feel like I got my value from the 20 bucks I shelled out(didn't pre-order, wanted to wait to hear some opinions).

Sin episodes? I felt limited. I saw a lot of "corridors". Not nearly as good as HL2:Episode One. Still, I must note that Sin's 1st episode is starting fresh, while Episode One is continuing a finished product. I may or may not get the 2nd Sin episode depending on if they fix what they did wrong in the first iteration.

But Episodic content allows me to choose not to get the 2nd episode instead of buying the whole game at once. As for HL2: Episode One, I liked it enough that I'm certain I'll buy the remaining episodes.
Check for New Comments
Slashdot Account

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?

Don't worry, we never post anything without your permission.

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>
Create a Slashdot Account

Loading...