Apache down, IIS up 282
Doctor Memory writes "Netcraft's June 2006 web server survey is out, and it shows IIS taking a dramatic upturn, at the expense of Apache. One of the biggest reasons cited is domain registrar Go Daddy switching to IIS for the domains it "parks". The report does go on to note that IIS is also making solid gains in active sites (including some large blog hosts), and further notes that it appears that large hosting companies are dropping Linux." Statistics are fun to play with, of course, but note that Apache's market share is approximately 30% higher than IIS's at the moment.
probably on Microsoft's list of next important tar (Score:5, Insightful)
Just a thought, but Microsoft is probably as primed as ever to move aggressively on the Web Server market. Why not sooner? For one thing they've been busy locking down or trying to lock down everything else and manage the legal and foreign consortium attacks.
And, the first few generations of IIS weren't hardened. While Microsoft can (and has) dominated markets with non-superior products (not trolling, not saying "inferior", just not the best of breed), Apache got the classical head start on Microsoft, not necessarily (if ever) assurance of ultimate victory.
I've read articles, heard people talk -- it's hard to sort fact from fiction -- but I've heard stories of Microsoft coming in with big dollars and technical help to convert high profile and LARGE targets (Go Daddy, perhaps?) to their Web Server technology.
How do you resist that? If I had a large company and had ANY issues with Apache (who doesn't have any issues with any technology?, there's always something), I'd find it tempting to accept overtures from Microsoft.... "We'll come in and convert you to IIS, AND we'll help you do it, AND we'll give you money. All you have to do is brag on it in return."
I cringe just a little when I hear reassurances like (from the slashdot summary): "but note that Apache's marketshare is approximately 30% higher than IIS's at the moment..." I remember using that as reason to be confident about the browser market... there was a time when Microsoft IE's share was less than 5%. We all know how that bad boy ended.
If this is what Microsoft is doing (and IMO I suspect it is) this smells of once again abusing their monopoly in OS to extend their control of new markets at the expense of fair competition.
Doesn't seem to matter much if it's true, the current administration (in general) has shown little interest or appetite in reining Microsoft in.
Re:probably on Microsoft's list of next important (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:probably on Microsoft's list of next important (Score:4, Insightful)
I'm afraid I have to disagree.
It's not like they can pay large percentages of the industry to switch over.
What makes you think they can't? They certainly have the scratch, and as they've shown in the past, they're not at all averse to taking large financial hits to ruin a competitor.
At some point it has to come down to merit, and which server sys admins prefer to use.
Sure, until your PHB strolls in and declares that "we're switching to Microsoft!". Remember, Microsoft doesn't have to buy^H^H^Hconvince you, they just have to convince the guy who holds the purse strings.
Money doesn't always get you everything (Score:4, Informative)
What makes you think they can't?
Little things like...oh...the Sherman Antitrust Act, anti-dumping provisions in the WTO, and likely future court rulings and legislation that might result from that sort of behaviour (especially from the EU and Asian countries that are slowly growing more hostile to Microsoft).
It is one thing to offer your your software for free as has been done with IE since the start. Even when Microsoft moved IE from the "Plus! Pack" onto the Windows install CD when they supplanted Win95 with Win95A there was not much to complain about. MS' practices became questionable by the time Win98 came out, when IE became a required part of the OS install and applications started coming out with IE dependencies as this put competitors at a disadvantage. I say questionable because even after a decade it is still a point of debate if such practices should be regulated.
With Windows Server, IIS is right on the OS install CD and is increasingly integrated with the OS and other server software (SQL reporting services, sharepoint, team foundation server, etc). This is reaching the point of being questionable behaviour, however I think the competition has accepted that MS has decided such things as web browsers and HTTP servers are "components" of desktop and server OSes respectively--and it is a bit difficult to complain about it when Linux distributions almost universally bundle such applications with their OS installs too.
as they've shown in the past, they're not at all averse to taking large financial hits to ruin a competitor
Absolutely. However, selling at a loss or giving software away for free (as in beer) is one thing. Bribing your competitor's customers to switch, especially when your competitor is non-commercial, is not only ethically and morally unacceptable to most people--it is almost always illegal too. The most definite line that would be crossed is going from discounts, to give-aways, to actually offering money or gifts to potential customers. At my place of employment, it is made very clear to everyone that exchanging anything but the most nominal gift with potential customers--even if it doesn't involve luring them from a competitor--is an offence punishable by immediate dismissal even on the first offence.
Sure, until your PHB strolls in and declares that "we're switching to Microsoft!".
I feel fortunate that the economic climate where I'm at right now is a job-hunter's market and a person can be selective. Even if it weren't, however, if *my* PHB were to just stroll in and pronounce that we were making major, disruptive IT infrastructure changes without previous consultation with others just because some salesbot from MS offered him some swag then I'd immedately set about updating my resume and finding work elsewhere. Not only do I not like at a job where the opinions and concerns of employees are not considered--it has also been my experience that organisations with managers that "stroll in and declare" such things are destined to fail if they do not change. This goes both ways, by the way--I think that it would be equally as bad if the PHB at an all-MS shop were to stroll in and declare "we are switching to Linux" without any apparent good reason.
Money *does* always get you everything (Score:3, Insightful)
OK, so let me just get this straight. You're actually serious here...
You think, that what's gonna stop MICROSOFT from doing something grossly unethical would be...
THE LAW?! LMAO!
Mod me down if you want for pointing it out, but the law has about as much effect on Microsoft as I do. They've PROVEN that they're above the law
Re: US DoJ is the biggest joke in the world. (Score:3, Informative)
Lately the DoJ has gotten really tough, because msft has not complied with any DoJ ruling. The DoJ had decided they would continue to watch msft. Oh boy, *that* will teach msft!
MS "walks the line" (Score:3, Insightful)
That is the fine line Microsoft historically walks, and has done so with great success in the past. That is why IE is dominant--they took the hit offering it for free to cut the legs out from under Netscape and other competitors. As an aside, they also did it for another reason--IE started life as a Microsoft-branded version of Spyglass Mosaic. BillG absolutely abhors paying royalties based on sales and
Re:probably on Microsoft's list of next important (Score:5, Insightful)
Build a better mouse trap . .
Market an inferior mouse trap and get rich.
Ever notice that car companies tout the fact that their product is the number one seller in something or other? Why do they do that when what someone else buys doesn't actually have anything to do with my taste and needs?
Because it works. The great masses are herd animals. They instinctively incline to doing what they see others doing. This is an overall positive virtue in a tribe seeking tribal survival. It is also extremely easy to exploit.
Back in the day sysadmins were taken largely from the highly educated, highly cynical, highly independent portion of the population, motivated by their own drummer, the computers themselves. Nowadays most of them are just typical examples of herd members who got into computers because that's what they saw everyone else doing; and, of course, that's "where the money was."
They can be led. And if they can't be led, they can be ordered.
KFG
Re:probably on Microsoft's list of next important (Score:2)
This is literally true. The Victor company actually did invent a better mousetrap [acehardware.com], designed so that you can't snap your fingers while setting it. It isn't very strongly marketted though, and mindshare for the traditional style of mousetrap is so strong that most people still use old style traps.
Re:probably on Microsoft's list of next important (Score:2)
Why would anyone buy a better mouse trap? they are nearly perfect.
Re:probably on Microsoft's list of next important (Score:4, Insightful)
Going into a business and offering to help convert to IIS isn't abusing its OS monopoly. They don't have anywhere near a monopoly on server OSs anyway. But of course I agree Microsoft is using its financial power and businesses shouldn't be quick to oblige.
Doesn't seem to matter much if it's true, the current administration (in general) has shown little interest or appetite in reining Microsoft in.
In fact one of the very first things Bush did when he entered the White House was remove all of the DOJ lawyers on the Microsoft monopoly case who had any legal experience with monopolies. Young lawyers replaced those already working on the case. And the expert independant counsil was fired without any explanation. Bush intentionally sabotaged the case against Microsoft.
Re:probably on Microsoft's list of next important (Score:2)
Re:probably on Microsoft's list of next important (Score:4, Informative)
Google is your friend. [justfuckinggoogleit.com]
Especially this article from the first page of results: Slap on the wrist? [salon.com] (Salon.com)
Re:probably on Microsoft's list of next important (Score:2, Funny)
Message ID: Blocked by Websense Category: Tasteless
Problem Description: Your system was configured to deny access to this URL.
Possible Problem Cause: Request denied, as specified in the local filter list configuration.
Possible Solution: Traffic to and from the internet is being filtered and logged. Access to thi
Re:probably on Microsoft's list of next important (Score:3, Funny)
What, haven't you gotten the memo? One needn't back up anything bad one says about the current administration. Why, I heard that Bush is in league with the Martians in a plot to detonate the Sun!!!!!!!!
Re:probably on Microsoft's list of next important (Score:2)
You don't know how right you are! See here [evilconservatives.com].
Re:probably on Microsoft's list of next important (Score:2)
Re:probably on Microsoft's list of next important (Score:5, Informative)
Re:probably on Microsoft's list of next important (Score:2)
My company is partnered with about a half dozen companies, so far Microsoft has been the most supportive, and has made me the most money out of all the partnerships my business has established. And the grand partner poster is right, good or bad having Microsoft on your mailers opens doors in many cases.
Re:probably on Microsoft's list of next important (Score:5, Informative)
Yesterday, I went to start my new job at Microsoft. I arrived just after 9:30 and informed the receptionist I had arrived and needed to be escorted into the building. I filled out my parking form, and went to wait. This began the....
https://www.darklock.com/blog/?p=74 [darklock.com]All you have to do is *read* the blog, just read.
Re:probably on Microsoft's list of next important (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:probably on Microsoft's list of next important (Score:4, Insightful)
I left a high paying Microsoft-related job for a low paying open source job. And I'm much happier now. You obviously invested all of your time and money in the wrong market. Don't blame your own failure on open source. That's childish.
Screw you people, I know who butters my bread.
You don't butter your own bread? You apparently don't own your own company for the pleasure of being independant. And if you think you must work with Microsoft to make a living then you're very ignorant.
Re:probably on Microsoft's list of next important (Score:3, Funny)
Catch 22 [imdb.com]
Lt. Col. Korn, XO: All you have to do is be our pal.
Colonel Cathcart: Say nice things about us.
Lt. Col. Korn, XO: Tell the folks at home what a good job we're doing. Take our offer...
Colonel Cathcart: Either that or a court-martial for desertion.
Just look at the graph (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:probably on Microsoft's list of next important (Score:3, Interesting)
Personally, I cringe when I see editors making comments like that up there on the summary, rather than down here with the rest of us.
Apart from that, I agree with you; if one is serious about trying to keep IIS out of the web server business (for whatever reason), then the time to be complacent is when it no longer exists.
Re:probably on Microsoft's list of next important (Score:5, Insightful)
When you get into custom developed sites, there's a few things to note -- (A) A large percentage run behind firewalls and will never be counted by Netcraft. (B) People tend to use Java or
The truth is nobody cares what GoDaddy uses to park domains. Maybe it's a technical test of IIS in some fashion, but is it really worth it for Microsoft to convert sites that aren't doing anything? Windows/IIS will never compete in the $20/month free PHP package market, so it's not really worth bothering about.
Re:probably on Microsoft's list of next important (Score:4, Interesting)
That might have been true a few years ago but not now. Have a look at the Windows (and Linux) offerings, including SQL Server, at JodoHost [jodohost.com]. I'm not connected with them other than as a happy customer. There are plenty of bad Windows hosting companies out there but there are also good ones with prices pretty much the same as LAMP.
I've done a few spare time projects for non-profits. Previously my only realistic choice for these was PHP / MySQL mostly because of hosting and tool costs but my latest project uses
Re:probably on Microsoft's list of next important (Score:4, Insightful)
In a web server environment, Windows costs more than Linux, period. Administration is more complex, downtime is more frequent (Windows requires you to reboot for a large number of security fixes,) site intrusions more destructive and harder to remove, and Windows Server 2003 gets very expensive in a server farm. Web hosting is a bottom dollar business; companies are trying to reduce IT costs, not raise them.
Windows is well suited for many environments. Web hosting is not one of them.
Re:probably on Microsoft's list of next important (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:probably on Microsoft's list of next important (Score:4, Interesting)
If management find a great application that cheaper to run, and maybe has a great support contract at a low price, they buy into the idea, and don't really bother about the fact that they have to move the front end web server technology from say IIS to Apache.
I've been in a situation when a brilliant Apache / Java / Broadvision combination, was replaced by an IIS /
However in my particular situation, us "Sys Admins" loved apache so much, we decided to leave it in at the front end, to serve media, protect the front end and internal-proxy the IIS data, and then have IIS as the middle layer just doing the
So at the end of the day, Netcraft reports apache, but the real grunt of the work is being done by IIS.
Mike
Re:probably on Microsoft's list of next important (Score:2, Informative)
I know that personally, i'd host my asp apps on a Linux box if chillisoft was more common, but it's tricky to find a host with decent support, and all the features needed to run an asp or asp.net.
Re:probably on Microsoft's list of next important (Score:2, Interesting)
http://www.twingalaxies.com/ [twingalaxies.com]
Error message below:
Server Error in '/' Application.
Configuration Error
Description: An error occurred during the processing of a configuration file required to service this request. Please review the specific error details below and modify your configuration file appropriately.
Parser Error Message: The XML file c:\winnt\microsoft.net\framework\v1.
Re:probably on Microsoft's list of next important (Score:4, Interesting)
So as I'm in the meeting with these guys all I hear them talk about is their technology. Java this and Java that, scalability, DB2, XML addons, etc. It was all very impressive until I asked them a question for which they had no answer.
What business problem does our current technology fail to solve that your new technology can?
The fact is they had no idea. They didn't care at all about our business, only their technology. Our LAMP system already did what we wanted and I communicated to IBM that our business success had nothing to do with technology, but everything to do with the business model behind it. I'd be willing to bet that Microsoft isn't solving any business problems by converting anyone to IIS.
Fishy... (Score:3, Informative)
Stumbled across this tidbit from a NewsForge article [newsforge.com] on the Go Daddy move:
So, it appears that IIS is the webserver of choice for websites that don't actually need to be viewed. Hmm...
Also from the NewsForge article:
That sounds an awful lot like a 'yes' to me...sure, I can't prove it, but if Microsoft didn't pay or offer incentives, I don't think Adelman would have had any trouble making that known.
So, basically, it looks like Microsoft paid Go Daddy to switch to IIS for their domains, the vast majority of which were parked anyway, in a rather transparent attempt to massage the numbers. Quelle suprise.
Re:Fishy... (Score:5, Insightful)
As everybody with a brain will say, so what? For Microsoft to win this one big they need to get everyone to move to
Re:Fishy... (Score:3, Informative)
Technically, you need one CAL (client access license) for every unique Windows/Active Directory user that you authenticate. This means that you need one CAL if you're hosting an application that uses the standard anonymous Internet account (and does its own authentication for some other way). This would be the majority of the sites on the Int
Re:Fishy... (Score:3, Insightful)
I disagree. The standard response "We can't comment on rumors or speculation" (of which this is a variation) is given regardless of whether the rumor is true or not. Think about it: if a company said "We can't comment on rumors or speculation" when the rumor was true, but clearly said "No" when the rumor was false, they'd
Re:Fishy... (Score:3, Insightful)
Or maybe Godaddy just wants to experiment with IIS and is starting with non-critical systems. It makes a hell of a lot more sense than this all being a crazy conspiracy.
Wait for it.... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Wait for it.... (Score:2, Informative)
None of our web boxes - all apache 2 (upgraded from 1.3) where being monitored by Netcraft thus it is not definitve imho.
Our .eu hosts where not included either. - Somebodies been getting a cheque from Microsoft i sense....
some important information for you.. (Score:2)
google (Score:2, Funny)
GO SOFTWARE! Woo! (Score:4, Insightful)
Thank God. Why does it seem like if your favorite server software lost too much market share to Microsoft, you would pretty much be emasculated? Do geeks latch on to software like jocks latch on to sports teams, or what? No matter what is said, it always has to be punctuated by "but my team is the best." Sometimes OSSers have more in common with Christian Evangelicals and cheeseheads than geeks...
Re:GO SOFTWARE! Woo! (Score:5, Insightful)
Bullshit (Score:2)
Like, for example, what?
>> everything is managed through the clicky interface from hell
Bullshit. You can manage everything from script or even by editing metabase (which is an XML file) or web.config or machine.config by hand.
>> ISAPI hurts my brain
Yeah, it hurt Microsoft developers' brain, too. So now you can do just about anything from ASP.NET which doesn't hurt.
Re:Bullshit (Score:2)
Re:Bullshit (Score:2)
Now I know someone will reply that this isn't that easy to do and jobs aren't out there or whatever. But if you're unhappy at your job, it causes stress, which causes tension, which causes problems. I know. I'm in a manufacturing job and I'm actively working towards certs in Solaris so I can get the hell out. But I'm worki
Re:Bullshit (Score:2)
Re:GO SOFTWARE! Woo! (Score:2)
This situation exists in every industry -- there are gearheads who prefer Ford over Chevy, gardeners who prefers Craftsman tools over another brand, or darners who prefer one brand of yarn over another.
With OSS, we also have phi
Re:GO SOFTWARE! Woo! (Score:5, Insightful)
Do you really need to ask this question? Of course geeks do that. Unless they aren't computer geeks. Star Trek geeks battle over favorite episodes or captains, RPG geeks can't suffer a criticism of "their" game system, and I'm sure some Paleontologists geeks get their knickers in a twist when someone disses their favorite dinosaur, "Tarbosaurus could totally kick Dryptosaurus' ass!" "Could not!" "Could so!"
Sometimes OSSers have more in common with Christian Evangelicals and cheeseheads than geeks...
This is a human thing, most everyone is fundamentalist about something, and most people identify more with a particular group than they do with humanity as a whole. Should geeks be above this kind of thing? Maybe, but very few people have the emotional and moral intelligence to rise above their upbringing.
Re:GO SOFTWARE! Woo! (Score:2)
Well, I'd say it's often closer to the former rather than the latter, and for good reason. The difference for many OSSers between open and closed source is an issue of basic liberty, not just cheering for the "home team". More people using OSS means more people who know about OSS, better press for OSS, more people who will be willing to choose OSS, and generally a more OSS-oriented software industry. It's lik
What good is that?! (Score:5, Funny)
So, after much years of expensive research dollars, Microsoft IE server has FINALLY become a highly optimized and finely honed webserver that serves just a single static page?
Most lopsided lie (um,,, I meant statistic) I've ever seen.
Re:What good is that?! (Score:2, Funny)
Let's get real (Score:5, Insightful)
What possible difference could it make to me whether godaddy parks domains with IIS or apache? If godaddy's choice moves the stats in a significant way, then the stats aren't meaningful.
Re:Let's get real (Score:2)
It makes no technical difference. But when PHBs see numbers dropping for Apache they'll think twice before choosing it.
Re:Let's get real (Score:2)
Re:Let's get real (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Let's get real (Score:3, Insightful)
erm.. (Score:2, Funny)
Statistics are fun to play with, of course, but note that --INSERT ANOTHER STATISTIC HERE EVEN THOUGH IVE JUST MADE AN INSINUATION THAT STATISTICS ARE TO BE TAKEN WITH A GRAIN OF SALT--
Let me give it a go (Score:5, Funny)
Password:
Starting httpd:
OK, try it now.
Apache vs. Linux (Score:4, Interesting)
All this tells you is that the majority of "sites" (that being a nebulous term) are using Apache on some OS as at least their front-line Web servers. They might still be back-ending to whatever, and that would not show up.
Personally, I don't think you can use Netcraft for any purpose other than to say "IIS and Apache are the most popular Web servers."
Re:Apache vs. Linux (Score:2)
I totally agree [netcraft.com]. I mean the top 3 servers listed in the uptime report are supposedly using a BSD OS running IIS. How likely is that? ;) Anyone from NEC want to tell us what the real story is?
[rant]On an unrelated and slightly offtopic note I'd like to just say here that domain parkers suck hard. I mean, if you figure that there are 1,000,000 words in the English language which are common enough to make good domain names (in reality probably far
Has the survey been credible in the past? (Score:2, Interesting)
However, since this survey is done monthly, the question is has it been credible in the past? Is the survey only being called in to question over it's validity now, because it reports on good news for Microsoft? Are we really so eager to turn on anything that provides positive news of any kind for Microsoft?
I've always thought it was credible. (Score:2)
All this shows is that Microsoft also reads it and has decided to make the biggest change in those statistics with the smallest effort.
Last month, there was a 40% difference in marketshare between Apache and IIS.
This month, the difference is 30%.
And it only took half a dozen companies migrating to make that big of a difference.
But that seems to be it. Those were the big players. They've been converted. That's the best Microsoft can do. We'll see how the numbers play out ove
Re:Has the survey been credible in the past? (Score:3, Insightful)
I don't think that's necessarily what it was saying, just that statistics only say what they say. The statistics are probably 100% accurate in what they're saying, the important thing is to make sure that you don't read too much into them (which people are known to do).
Re:Has the survey been credible in the past? (Score:2)
It is. (Score:3, Informative)
If you read the link, the largest movement of sites from Apache to IIS was once again at Go Daddy, with over 1.6M hostnames moving from Apache to IIS this month. If you read netcraft news periodically, you'll find that in the past mont [netcraft.com] they said: The shift is driven by changes at domain registrar Go Daddy, which has just migrated more than 3.5 million hostnames from Linux to Windows. Go Daddy, which had been the worl
And you know what else is up??? (Score:2, Interesting)
I also get a lot of php 'sploits too but I am seeing an increase in IIS "features" hitting my web servers. Wow, to be so popular... sigh.
Re:And you know what else is up??? (Score:2)
I don't understand... (Score:2)
Could the whole GoDaddy deal really be that significant or is there another source?
Yet another unbiased Slashdot posting... (Score:2, Insightful)
Has anyone else noticed that Slashdot is pretty much incapable of publishing any story with so much as a tiny semblance of being pro-Microsoft without taking some sort of potshot somewhere in the summary?
Re:Yet another unbiased Slashdot posting... (Score:2, Redundant)
Re:Yet another unbiased Slashdot posting... (Score:3, Insightful)
We owe no love or respect to them.
Conflicting stats (Score:2, Informative)
This doesn't follow my experience (Score:4, Insightful)
I've rolled my own self-healing scripts that manage my Apache servers and warn me if something is amiss. Our IIS servers can be a pain at times...
a much more interesting statistic would be.. (Score:2)
"total websites hosted" is meaningless, as I could set up a hosting/registrar company, park ten bazillion domains and offer to sell my domain parking service to the highest bidding server vendor (or just pick my favorite (KHTTPD? matchbox-PIC-server?????) to screw the other guys.
Comment removed (Score:4, Insightful)
Or then again, (Score:2)
Re:Or then again, (Score:2)
what's ironic... (Score:2)
When Intel's market share vastly outstrips AMD's, the anti-Wintel crowd cheers loudly about AMD's solid gains at Intel's expense.
When IIS makes solid gains in market share at the expense of Apache, the same crowd cheers loudly about how Apache still has 30% more share.
Guess it's all about the spin.
Who cares? (Score:3, Insightful)
For those who actually care or might need to know which software serves up the most active domains, a report on just those is more beneficial.
Even then, why does anyone care how many domains are on what software? After all, a domain could be served up by multiple machines running different OS/Software combinations. So those numbers wouldn't be accurate either. Further, for those who may need to know "what server is best" these numbers only add confusion due to irrelevance. If you are setting up a truly large site, you'd better already know your stuff and don't need this kind of 'data'. The only data of this type that would be useful to you would be what the really busy sites run. Even then it also depends on active vs. dynamic.
As far as hostnames running a given OS, this too is not valuable due to key factor assumptions. The assumption underlying this statistic is that more is better. This is beyond mere OS capability. All hosts are not equal. A Linux box running a website(s) on 400MHz Pentium is not comparable to a Windows box on say a DL580, or vica versa. Regardless of OS in this case the DL580 will be capable of serving "more" of whatever it is serving.
The Netcraft web server report is a curious statistic and should be taken as nothing more.
I love the retoric here (Score:2, Insightful)
But soon as MS gets some positive numbers. "OH THOSE ARE ALL INFLATED NUMBERS THAT MEAN NOTHING!"
Guys pick a standard to hold things too and stick to it.
Personally I don't care who's on top, long as what I use works for me.
Bleah to IIS (Score:2)
Apache doesn't. Just set it run as u/g nobody and mostly forget about it.
Confess to anything (Score:3, Insightful)
"If you torture data long enough, it will confess to anything."
I don't know who said this originally, but it's a great comment.
I'd rather think Web edition is a large cause... (Score:2)
Linux i
C# (Score:2)
Stupid Slashdroids (Score:3, Interesting)
Now they win over a domain parking service and everyone want to say the statistics are unfairly in their favor? What about all the years those statistics worked against them, I didn't see you complaining then.
I like to work with Apache, but 2k3 server is a large improvement from MS. If MS finally getting their act together on the server front means they win back some of the "Netcraft share" than great.
What an easy -speaking blabber, like Bush speeches (Score:2)
The report does go on to note that IIS is also making solid gains in active sites (including some large blog hosts), and further notes that it appears that large hosting companies are dropping Linux." Check out the bold words above.
Noticed how similar do they sound like Bush's crapola 'address to nation' speeches, with so called 'strong' words ?
Not only vague and generic, but also giving a 'solid','definitive' direction to the paragrap
It's happening again. (Score:2, Funny)
If Netcraft confirms it... (Score:2)
Egypt and /.ers (Score:2)
"Parked" domains shouldn't count EVER (Score:2)
In other news... (Score:4, Funny)
Just another Microsoft Advertising Campaign (Score:2)
To coordinate with this, they also have been getting
Here's a ? (Score:2)
@ the end of the article:
Sun is the sum of sites running SunONE, iPlanet-Enterprise, Netscape-Enterprise, Netscape-FastTrack, Netscape-Commerce, Netscape-Communications, Netsite-Commerce & Netsite-Communications.
Microsoft is the sum of sites running Microsoft-Internet-Information-Server, Microsoft-IIS, Microsoft-IIS-W, Microsoft-PWS-95, & Microsoft-PWS.
Nothing states what the sum of Apac
Apache down?? (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Hypocrits (Score:2)
For free software, the only thing likely to cause an increase in market share is that it is better than the commercial version.
Manipulating the market doesn't result in better product (which should cause sadness), releasi
Subtraction, not division. (Score:2)
Re:Subtraction, not division. (Score:2)
This is an incredibly common mistake; I even see it in professional publications.
Re:Scalibility (Score:2)
What you run depends on what you need to do. For some companies