Tracking Your Cell Phone for Traffic Reports 129
BostonBTS writes "IntelliOne Technologies has just launched a real-world test of Need4Speed, a real-time traffic-monitoring system that tracks drivers' cell phones. From their website: 'Unlike any other solution available today, the IntelliOne Roadway Speed Measurement System produces live roadway speeds for all highways and surface streets where mobile phone coverage exists, accurate to within three miles per hour.'
Of course, any compulsory phone-tracking system raises privacy concerns. According to an article on LiveScience, 'the personal identification data of users will be stripped from cell phone signals before they are processed by IntelliOne's software.' The cell phone companies have this data, but IntelliOne says they won't be keeping their copy."
Privacy Concerns (Score:4, Funny)
Yes... and only their 10 digit user id/phone number will be left behind.. no names...
Oh wait... sorry... wrong company
We have something similar in the UK... (Score:2)
Re:We have something similar in the UK... (Score:2)
Now all they need (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Now all they need (Score:3, Interesting)
If they were going to re-route people they could send a couple of SMSs (or the entire message if you have a decent cell phone that merges "large" SMSs into one) with the text directions of where they need to go.
That way it might be worth the privacy imp
Re:Now all they need (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Now all they need (Score:1)
Re:Now all they need (Score:1)
OTOH, when traveling, I can't say it wouldn't be nice if I received a TXT message letting me know to detour before getting stuck in a traffic jam as a result of an accident. But only at the user's request.
I also don't like the idea that I'm walking around with homing beacon in my pocket.
All your phone are belong to us.
Re:Now all they need (Score:2)
I'd just soon opt out for all the tracking programs...I'd like to stay as invisible and anonymous as possible. Please don't get the gov. involved in all this.
Re:Now all they need (Score:1)
Of course! (Score:4, Insightful)
Hi, my name is Pat Riot (Score:5, Funny)
[end neo con parody]
Re:Hi, my name is Pat Riot (Score:2)
DSD will be sent to Guantanamo for being an enemy noncombatant, having uttered demoralizing words against the corpocracy. Travoltus, will be sent to Guantanamo for being suspiciously patriotic.
I will, of course, be sent there for having revealed the truth about you two being sent there.
Anyone reading this comment will be sent there for reading classified information which, when you read it was declassified, however since new rules apply, well
Oh,
Re:Hi, my name is Pat Riot (Score:1)
Re:Hi, my name is Pat Riot (Score:1)
Re:Of course! (Score:1)
Tracking Your Cell Phone for Traffic Reports (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Tracking Your Cell Phone for Traffic Reports (Score:3, Insightful)
1) the war on terror
2) tracking deadbeat dads
3) think of the childr-er, the insurance companies!
Not saved in their copy (Score:1)
Comment removed (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Oh yeah, like it's going to be anonymous (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Oh yeah, like it's going to be anonymous (Score:2)
I only bring this up due to the dent in my buddies car from a cell phone road rage incident.
Re:Oh yeah, like it's going to be anonymous (Score:2)
Re:Oh yeah, like it's going to be anonymous (Score:1)
Re:Oh yeah, like it's going to be anonymous (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Oh yeah, like it's going to be anonymous (Score:2)
The US is in the grip of an Orwellian fear epidemic. There is no doub
Re:Oh yeah, like it's going to be anonymous (Score:2)
This is not GPS (Score:2, Interesting)
Is it possible for this system to be abused? Sure. Is it likely? Not really. The amount of data the company will be dealing with would make extended storage retarded. Most likely they'll be purging data as soon as the can convert it to summarized information
Re:This is not GPS (Score:5, Insightful)
Well that's the best case, but I'd find it much more likely that the state would look for stretches of road where the average speed exceeds the speed limit, aka "areas of potential revenue and quota filling."
Re:This is not GPS (Score:2)
Except that the cell providers themesevles could then enter the market themselves and then undercut the service price of the company that developed the software. The phone companies are experts in this type of competition. After all, the phone company won't really be paying itself for the raw data, much like they don't really pay themselves for the wire pair that the use to provide your
Re:This is not GPS (Score:2)
Ahh the joys of patents, copyright, and licensing. Sure, they would need one hell of a legal team to squash anyone who may have so much as glanced at their code with the intent in making a competetive package, but again, the money is in the contract, not the software.
-Rick
Re:This is not GPS (Score:2)
On a good no
Re:This is not GPS (Score:2)
-Rick
Re:This is not GPS (Score:1)
Funny, I thought that is what accident reports were for. It is law to fill them out (for more than X dollars of damages). An accident report includes details. Just having data saying that the
Re:Oh yeah, like it's going to be anonymous (Score:2)
Re:Oh yeah, like it's going to be anonymous (Score:2)
Re:Oh yeah, like it's going to be anonymous (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Oh yeah, like it's going to be anonymous (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Oh yeah, like it's going to be anonymous (Score:2)
2. that speed is a Criminal offense in many jurisdictions
3. Mandatory loss of license
Although, there are decent cops out there who acknowledge that insanely fast is not always a safety hazard.
Re:Oh yeah, like it's going to be anonymous (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Oh yeah, like it's going to be anonymous (Score:2)
1. Build a custom Faraday cage for GPS and cell phone signals. Dump phone in box when you get cranky. This will probably become illegal.
2. Find and disable the GPS chipset in your cell phone. Some Nokia models, I'm told, have removable faceplates that access the chipset. Dunno if the phone works after you laser the chipset dead. And they'll probably make that act illegal, prolly using the DMCA or some new "security" law.
3. Get REALLY cute: enclose the cell phone in a custom Faraday cage that interc
Re:Oh yeah, like it's going to be anonymous (Score:2)
You couldn't turn-off your "Soviet-style internal passports" whenever you felt like it, and they certainly weren't opt-in (this is just one more reason to trash your cellphone).
Ridiculous paranoid extremism is just as bad as (the more common) public apathy.
Wanna build something similar with open source? (Score:2, Interesting)
There's an interesting project called Place Lab [placelab.org] that is building a database of, among other things, cell tower ID to physical location mappings. Their goal is to allow you to "[provide] low-cost, easy-to-use device positioning for location-enhanced computing applications."
Now, they don't have all the data that these guys have, since they just sample the tower that your phone currently happens to be talking to, so you may not be able to get accurate short-term speed readings, but I bet a lot of you could t
paper weight (Score:3, Funny)
Re:paper weight (Score:3, Funny)
The doubleplusgood combination retro-style and cellular safety will have millions of sheeple clamoring to buy a Cell-be-safe signal blocking case.
Oh shit, I just said this out loud didn't I?
Oh well, first one to the patent office wins. Runner up might be able patent doing it on the i
Re:paper weight (Score:2)
A lead box? I hadn't realized that they were selling atomic-powered cell phones.
Re:paper weight (Score:2)
Systematic error in the speed (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Systematic error in the speed (Score:2)
Re:Systematic error in the speed (Score:2)
What "rest"? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:What "rest"? (Score:2)
Congratulations on blandly demonstrating that different countries are not exactly the same as every other.
Re:Systematic error in the speed (Score:2)
Warning Calls (Score:1)
Cell1 is infront of Cell2 by about 50 yards.
Cell1: 50mph Cell2: 50mph
Cell1: 40mph Cell2: 50mph
Cell1: 30mph Cell2: 50mph
Cell1: 20mph Cell2: 50mph
Cell1: 10mph Cell2: 50mph
Cell1: 00mph Cell2: 50mph
Cell2: 00mph Cell1: involuntarily 10mph
Can I have a special warning ring tone for when the idiot behind me is on his/her cell and paying no attention whatsoever to my speed. One that I don't have to worry about picking up - just a ring tone that warns me I'll get hit if I d
Re:Warning Calls (Score:2)
It may vary by region, but here (Pacific Northwest) it actually does work. Most people will stay in their own lane. A few people will pull in front of you, in which case you just back off and let them in; it's not that many people and will only
Works for me (Score:1)
Re:Warning Calls (Score:3, Interesting)
It didn't work well.
First, I could only poll it every 15 minutes. Secondly, cells overlap. Thirdly, it just gives you a triangulation based on which towers you can see.
So basically, on a drive to London along the M4, I stuck at exactly 70mph for the test, and it showed me doing everything from 59 to about 84, with one sector at 97. It's not accurate enough. Un
Re:Warning Calls (Score:2)
Re:Systematic error in the speed (Score:1)
Cell phones retransmit periodically, and towers keep some level of estimate of where their subscribers are, whether they're talking or not. How do you think you can receive phone calls when tooling down the Interstate at 70MPH? If you don't believe me, put your cell phone next to an amplified speaker some time. Every so often you'll hear a "bipida bipida bipida," or some other pattern, depending on what standard your carrier runs.
When you're stationary, such events are widely spaced. But, when your pho
A rational thought (Score:2)
Personally, I look at this as a nice benefit of data mining techniques.
Tickets for all (Score:2, Interesting)
Can you imagine if anytime you happen to go above the speedlimit in cell range you get a ticket? Everyone will be driving 5 miles under the speed limit all the time to "protect" themselves. I can also see this being used by insurance companies to increase rates on people who
Re:Tickets for all (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Tickets for all (Score:2)
Re:Tickets for all (Score:1)
Re:Tickets for all (Score:2)
Re:Tickets for all (Score:1)
Re:Tickets for all (Score:2)
Re:Tickets for all (Score:2)
Increasing spee limits with, say, 10, would do almost nothing to how fast you get to your destination (those three minutes you save are totally irrelevant) except on very long trips, while at the same time drastically increasing damage, injury, and chance of fatality in the event of an accident.
And if I choose to take the risk of damage/injury or death that's my right. The interstate highways were designed with 75-85mph in mind. Why are most of them posted 55-65? Could it be a revenue source perhaps?
Re:Tickets for all (Score:2)
You have no right to cause damage or injury to anyone else on the highway.
And you can prove that my driving at the speed the highway was designed for is going to cause injury or damage? To others that made the informed choice to use a controled access highway?
Oh wait, your just a troll. N/m then.
"PI will be stripped" (Score:2)
This should be an opt-in thing (Score:1)
Re:This should be an opt-in thing (Score:2)
This shouldn't work on single occupant vehicles (Score:3, Insightful)
This shouldn't work on single occupant vehicles, since drivers should have their phones turned off at all times on the road for safety.
But I'm sure it will work anyway because enough drivers will ignore safety concerns and leave their phones turned on to allow good coverage.
Re:This shouldn't work on single occupant vehicles (Score:1)
What planet are you on?
Since when does having a phone turned on, but not in use, constitute a safety issue?
Using a phone (hell, talking to the passenger, eating, pretty much anything) diverts your concentration and possibly your hands, and thus represents a danger as far as that goes. In some estimates it's as bad or worse than being drunk. However, I can see no reason having a phone turned on is going to cause this sort of trouble.
Re:This shouldn't work on single occupant vehicles (Score:3, Insightful)
Then, answering the phone involves fumbling for it, looking at the caller ID, finding the right button to press in order to answer it, etc. Talking on the phone while driving has been discussed at length in other forums and I won't go into it here, but let's just say that I (and many others) agree that it's a Bad Idea.
Re:This shouldn't work on single occupant vehicles (Score:1)
Too any people seem to think that phones demand attention. A ring is a request, nothing more. Anyone who's been "on-call" should have worked that out.
Re:This shouldn't work on single occupant vehicles (Score:1)
Re:This shouldn't work on single occupant vehicles (Score:2)
Although I agree that the majority of people having their phone turned on while driving without a passenger won't have a hands free phone.
Maybe learn to let it ring to voicemail!? (Score:2)
I probably let it ring through to voicemail more than half the time. It's a good habit to make sure people don't expect you to answer the phone 24x7.
Fly's Open (Score:2)
When will my mobile phone encrypt everything it transmits? Privacy violation over wires was bad enough, but broadcasting traffic over the air is begging for trouble, even if practically no one realizes it.
Solution for getting tracked: (Score:3, Funny)
The only way to track you would be to visually notice the HAM Radio license plates and two-meter antenna stuck to your hatchback. What could be less suspicious!
Re:Solution for getting tracked: (Score:2)
However, encryption over unlicensed (ISM) bands is wide open AFAIK.
Won't Pedestrians Sque This Data/Reports (Score:1)
Re:Won't Pedestrians Sque This Data/Reports (Score:1)
Slashdot's Most Duped Story (Score:1)
Okay... I admit, there's new information here, so it's not exactly a dupe... but still. Observe:
Note that the second and third links were actually duped in the same day.
Track you home (Score:1)
But of course they can just track you to your house.
I'm glad Australia takes a few years to take away our rights (DMCA) when the US tells it to.
Land of the free my ass.
Re:Track you home (Score:1)
Re:Track you home (Score:2)
Remember, remember, the 7th of
Where have I heard this before? (Score:5, Informative)
You can read more here:
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/11/19/14324
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/11/19/07452
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/11/01/15924
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/10/16/07621
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/12/30/12432
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/06/13/04282
There, that's better. Hopefully, one day they'll come to their senses, and post a story or two on the subject.
Re:Where have I heard this before? (Score:2)
Called Need4Speed, the test will run from Aug. 7 to 18.
All of the stories you link to talk about how our phones "are going to be" tracked by such systems in the future. This is the first Slashdot mention of a system currently in use.
Re:Where have I heard this before? (Score:2)
Re:Where have I heard this before? (Score:2)
More than that, all the stories are quite old,
Déja-vu (Score:1)
This technology already exists (Score:1)
Obligatory slashdot joke (Score:1)
Walk Run Sprint Drive (Score:2)
I can't see it working until lots of people subscribe, and lots of people will not subscribe to inaccurate data...
But officer I was not speeding (Score:1)
anonomization (Score:1)
Does this mean .... (Score:2)
I'd be really concerned about any third party being given free access to my cell location records without my permission. And I don't believe anyone who says they'll strip data they have in order to protect my provacy. They shouldn't ever see that data, then they'll have nothing to strip, and not
Re:Don't worry about law enforcement using this da (Score:2)
The end total of the IT that I'd like to give to my cops would be a virtual police state.
Why would you even consider this? Have you seen how they behave now?