Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Yahoo Tries to Woo Facebook With $900 Million

Zonk posted more than 7 years ago | from the web-bubble-2.0-in-full-effect dept.


Krishna Dagli writes writes to mention a New York Times article on Yahoo!'s attempt to buy Facebook. Their current standing offer is $900 Million, with the deal including a degree of autonomy for the site and founder Mark Zuckerberg still in charge. From the article: "When Viacom offered $750 million for Facebook in January, he asked for $2 billion and was rebuffed, according to a person involved in the negotiations. Now, he remains undecided about the latest offer, made in the last few weeks by Yahoo. That offer, first reported by The Wall Street Journal, was confirmed yesterday by two industry executives, one briefed on the deal by Facebook and the other by Yahoo. Both spoke on the condition of anonymity because the negotiations are continuing."

cancel ×
This is a preview of your comment

No Comment Title Entered

Anonymous Coward 1 minute ago

No Comment Entered


my advice . . . (5, Insightful)

recordMyRides (995726) | more than 7 years ago | (#16163276)

Take it you fool!

Go On! (1)

djdavetrouble (442175) | more than 7 years ago | (#16163338)

Take the money and RUN!

the "bubble" (and JCM) taught me that..

Re:Go On! (1)

fastgood (714723) | more than 7 years ago | (#16163511)

As the original push technology web site, Pointcast [wikipedia.org] finally sold for just $7 million, less than eighteen months after turning down [forbes.com] very close to half a billion dollars from Rupert Murdoch.

Re:my advice . . . (2, Interesting)

RovingSlug (26517) | more than 7 years ago | (#16163902)

Or more likely, the founders got screwed on terms from their investors (Accel, for instance) and a $2 billion sale translates to like $2 million for the founders. Just guessing.

Hmmm... (5, Insightful)

Otter (3800) | more than 7 years ago | (#16163296)

I dunno ... $900 million from Yahoo is enough to buy a basketball team, pay exorbitant fines to the NBA and periodically hold forth on business as though you're Henry Ford, not some clown who unloaded his dot-bomb on some suckers just before it imploded.

Re:Hmmm... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#16163342)

You say this as though Mark Cuban didn't successfully unload a dot-com for big bucks before it imploded.

I suppose the responsible thing would have been to use supernatural clairvoyance to predict how the bubble burst would affect his business, and then choose to go down with the ship. That insensitive clod! Didn't he know companies are obligated to do everything possible to protect other companies!

I, for one, welcome Dallas's non-eternal-losers Maverick basketball team, ushered in by Cuban.

Re:Hmmm... (4, Interesting)

megaditto (982598) | more than 7 years ago | (#16163403)

It sure sounds like much, but it isn't. Some of it will be in Yahoo stock (PITA to unload), and nearly half of it will be taken away in taxes!

Instead, the owner currently has $50m/year tax-free (since he re-invests ALL of it into the company). This is projected to double next year.

Also, considering his aspirations of becoming the next Jobs or Brin, perhaps selling off is not the best idea?

Re:Hmmm... (1, Interesting)

Jeff DeMaagd (2015) | more than 7 years ago | (#16164108)

The chances of being the "next" Jobs, etc. is very, very low, though if you are right, the owner of Facebook has a better shot than most people, a better shot than any Slashdot reader of course. Even for him, it is still very low. I can't even imagine that a Mark-note about where Facebook is headed would interest very many people, not nearly as many as a Steve-note.

It also really depends on whether the site can be constantly re-invented to keep up with what keeps its users interested. If they miss a trend and its users wander off elsewhere, that can really hurt.

That's just one of the things that bother me whenever I consider investing in or starting a technology company. One might say that for technology, fate and success are fickle mistresses. Product development cycles are often longer than fad cycles so it's hard to target of hold onto a technology fad. Far too many tech companies have simply died because they chose the wrong development path or simply lost its competitive edge at the wrong time.

Re:Hmmm... (1)

robertjw (728654) | more than 7 years ago | (#16164326)

The chances of being the "next" Jobs, etc. is very, very low

True enough, but building a webite that makes $50 Million a year or sells for $900 Million is very, very, very low as well. Someone is goning to be the next Jobs, Gates, Brin, whatever. This guy's odds probably increased significantly since he already has a wildly successful dot com.

Re:Hmmm... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#16164393)

Folks at Google seem to have found a way to deal with the issue you raise: collect enough smart people and throw money at any idea they come up with, and see what comes out.

With a large (and captive) audience and just enough innovation one cannot lose (look at Microsoft).

Re:Hmmm... (1)

TubeSteak (669689) | more than 7 years ago | (#16163490)

When someone offers you $750 Million and you respond with "Two Billion",
it's a subtle way of saying "F*ck you"

When someone offers you $900 Million and you seriously consider it...
1. You don't think your property is now worth $2 Billion
2. You like the company offering to buy
3. He needs the money?

Re:Hmmm... (2, Interesting)

Ruff_ilb (769396) | more than 7 years ago | (#16163573)

Alternatively, the value that he got for $750 mil might not have offered him the amount of autonomy he wanted; if, for example, they wanted to buy him out and shut him out of the loop, he might have wanted 2000 mil for that. Now, if yahoo is going to buy him but still allow him to do his own thing, he might consider a lot less - in this case, 900 mil.

Re:Hmmm... (1)

Fear the Clam (230933) | more than 7 years ago | (#16164025)

if, for example, they wanted to buy him out and shut him out of the loop, he might have wanted 2000 mil for that

Dude, it's fucking facebook. You think anyone aside from dim investors actually cares about being in that loop?

Sell the stock and get out of the dotcom biz. The only thing more depressing than being known as 'the dumbass who could have had $750 mil but held out for more' is being known as 'the next Marc Andreessen.'

Re:Hmmm... (1)

Typhon100 (641308) | more than 7 years ago | (#16164377)

Just because you don't care about facebook doesn't mean other people don't. Especially those who devoted over 2 years of their lives to creating it. If you took something from a fun little project in the science center basement to a $50 million dollar/year, $900 million dollar company with almost 10 million users, you might care about it too.

Re:Hmmm... (1)

Fear the Clam (230933) | more than 7 years ago | (#16164570)

Ummmm, no.

The fun part is already over. Now it's just about marketing deals and tie-ins, which is not nearly as much fun as watching the thing get off the ground.

Re:Hmmm... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#16164037)

There are several reasons that Mark might not consider the buyou--

Sorry! an unexpected error has occurred.
This error has been forwarded to MySpace's technical group.

Take the Money and Run (3, Interesting)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#16163302)

Congrats! You won the lotto. Twice. You can always quit and go do something fun with your 900 million dollars, but only if you have that money. Don't worry about us, we can make another site with the same functionality. We are the world, we'll be ok. Now go cash in!

Re:Take the Money and Run (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#16163589)

Except Zuckerberg only owns 30% of Facebook, so he'd just get $270 million from the deal...

Jackpot (5, Insightful)

AnotherAnonymousUser (972204) | more than 7 years ago | (#16163308)

Chances like this are one in a million. You had a great idea and millions have enjoyed it. Take the money with some terms of autonomy and keep giving people the service they've come to expect. Worst case, just use even a fraction of the money to create a Facebook clone and have all of your users migrate.

Re:Jackpot (4, Insightful)

Quadraginta (902985) | more than 7 years ago | (#16163545)

Well...first of all, he's not going to get the whole 900 megabucks. He doesn't own the entire company, only a majority of its stock. The deal may not be strictly cash, too -- it may well involve quantities of Yahoo stock valued at their trading price on the day of the acquisition.

Secondly, the guy is already fairly rich. Going from being a millionaire to a half-billionaire (say) is nice in many ways, but it's going from riches to more riches, not rags to riches.

Third, one suspects he actually gets more out of the power and glory of running a successful company. It doesn't sound like his Main Goal is to have lots of money. It sounds like he enjoys more the constructive pleasures of building a massively successful venture. Who wouldn't? I mean, unless you're a total slacker, then being successful, admired, influential and seeing your ideas come to fruition exactly as you'd want them to is much more rewarding than the next million (once you already have a few million in the bank already).

What happens if he sells the company? Sure, he's got a lot of dough, but he's no longer in sole control of the company. He's working for Yahoo. He's got a boss. Not likely he's going to enjoy that very much.

He could take his big chunk o' change and his fame and go start another copmany. But no doubt the deal would include a non-compete clause, so it can't be the same type of company. Got to be a totally new venture. What are the odds lightning will strike twice? That the next "brilliant" idea he has about a company is going to work out as well? He's going to be worrying about that.

If he had run the company for 10 years already and had had all the fun there was to have in it, I think he'd sell. But he's only run it for a very short time. On the other hand, he also knows what the commenters here are saying, which is that this is probably his best golden opportunity. I'd say the guy's in a bit of a bind.

Re:Jackpot (2, Interesting)

inKubus (199753) | more than 7 years ago | (#16163612)

There's no bind. You take the 900M in stock or whatever, you sell it, you pay your taxes on the full amount, and you stick it in a 5% savings account and go buy an island somewhere. WhyTF would you not take $900M?! Power? Money IS power. How many users does he have now? 9 Million. He could start an ad campaign with a different, easy to make product (say a video on demand service), take 300million and basically pay 1 million college students $300 a piece to use the service, provided they bring in at least 5 new accounts in the next year. Then you charge $5 a month or $60 for a yearly subscription and you pocket all your money back in the first year. He thinks he's being smart by holding out for the best offer, but he's going to get screwed and lose it all. 12 months from now, when Facebook is dead and he's broke, we're going to see a headline of his suicide. If he doesn't take the deal, that is.

Re:Jackpot (1)

Quadraginta (902985) | more than 7 years ago | (#16163962)

WhyTF would you not take $900M?! Power? Money IS power.

Alas, no. It's certainly the next best thing, and can often be turned into power with judicious and wise use, but money is not synonymous with power. Just ask, oh, say Martha Stewart or Ken Lay.

He could....[insert random business plan here]...

No doubt. But what makes you think your plan would work? For every 100,000 "brilliant" ideas to make a bazillion dollars that one can think up, you'd be unbelievably lucky to find even one that actually works out in the real world.

That's the problem. He knows that this idea works (so far, at least). He doesn't know if he has, or will ever have, another idea that will work. Yes it would be nice to have half a billion dollars. But it would be very sad to have the experience of working out your (only!) good idea begun and ended before you turn 25.

Re:Jackpot (1)

ronark (803478) | more than 7 years ago | (#16163955)

Dude, I totally agree with everything you just said, but I'd still take the money. College loans are stacking up, car insurance blows in New Jersey, gas prices are still tough, food costs money, etc. For me, I'd sell at $1 million simply to get out of the debt I have. I definitely agree that money is not everything, but life is very hard without it.

Re:Jackpot (1)

Quadraginta (902985) | more than 7 years ago | (#16164101)

Well...fair enough, but I'd probably trade places with you in a New York minute. Not worry about whether I've given the daughter the right kind of guidance as she begins high school. Be able to re-make the decision of who to marry and get it right this time. Be able to move anywhere I like, take any job I want, change the career in any direction I please, because it's just me (and maybe a young partner) and we could work 80-hour weeks and eat out of cans while I came up to speed. Not to mention be (I assume) about twenty years younger and not have my back hurt every God-damned morning when I get up, or need a separate pair of glasses to make out the print on the computer screen.

Grass is always greener on the other side of the fence, huh? Sheesh. What a world.

Re:Jackpot (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#16164177)

Just a note, from a Wall Street Journal article yesterday, M. Zuckerberg's stake in the company is actually around 30%. That would give him $270 million.

i read this yesterday (-1)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#16163311)

i read this yesterday on digg.

Social Networking.. (1, Funny)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#16163312)

It's going to be hilarious when this latest fad gets old...


Hmmm... (4, Insightful)

RichPowers (998637) | more than 7 years ago | (#16163320)

So Yahoo! wants to shell out $900 mill for a service that's fast becoming another MySpace? Instead of maintaining its brilliant niche market - appealing to college kids through closed registration - Facebook decides to open registration. I fail to see the wisdom of that decision; MySpace already exists for everyone else. Facebook was, in a way, the anti-MySpace, a cooler, less annoying networking site. Users were PO'd about recent additions like the news ticker...just wait until the flood gates open and every emo, pedophile, jerk, and jackass on the Web starts signing up. PS: Web 2.0 bubble burst rapidly approaching, captain.

Re:Hmmm... (2, Insightful)

xENoLocO (773565) | more than 7 years ago | (#16163387)

And why would open registration make it fail? Just because you dislike the additions doesn't mean everyone else will. In fact, I would rather point out that you're in the minority in that thought. These guys are going to do whats best for the business, and opening registration means more money... plain and simple.

Re:Hmmm... (3, Informative)

larry bagina (561269) | more than 7 years ago | (#16163476)

The open registration uses the facebook infrastructure, but is in a completely different, walled off partition than the existing college user space facebook.

Orkut has a closed registration system and nobody gives a shit about them. There are obviously other factors involved.

Not bad... (3, Interesting)

cunina (986893) | more than 7 years ago | (#16163335)

... for an idea notorious scumbag Zuckerberg stole from his friends.

Re:Not bad... (3, Insightful)

davidu (18) | more than 7 years ago | (#16163593)

I don't know if what you say is true or not but it doesn't really matter (and sounds like someone has sour grapes).

But I'll tell you this:

Ideas aren't worth much if you can't execute on them.


Re:Not bad... (-1, Troll)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#16163609)

I'll remember that when I make lots of money publishing your daughter's diary. Maybe the contents were her ideas, but I executed on them.

Re:Not bad... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#16163643)

Ideas aren't worth much if you can't execute on them.

Major bumps. People should really grasp this before making statements like "oh it is easy to make a video upload site" Well maybe it is, but I don't see you out doing it.

Re:Not bad... (2, Interesting)

LilBlackDemon (604917) | more than 7 years ago | (#16164530)

Mr. Zuckerberg actually worked on a site that already existed (I believe it was called ConnectU.com). Zuckerberg was hired to redisgn the site. However, after the three month contract was up, ConnectU releaunched with a rather shaky design (the site would sometimes crash its servers the coding was so bad) and Facebook was launched, as Zuckerberg's own project, around the same time. The two contain many elements in common, but because Facebook was more stable and happened to hit at the right time and have the right publicity (and name, even) it became the smash hit it is today.

When it first happened, there was a bit of controversy as to if Facebook might even contain some ConnectU code. It was a sticky situation for a bit.

Re:Not bad... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#16166833)

Oh, its true. He worked under me for all of 2 weeks and he was fired for basically doing nothing. I think all he ended up doing was taking the code we wrote in house and applying it to his site, as I've seen stylesheets and javascript on facebook that looks earily similar to the stuff I had worked on as well.

As for stealing the idea, from what I know he was paid to work on another similar site for three months from another group of students. During that time, he implemented the work and made the idea "his", leaving them 3 months behind and without anything to show for it.

Amusingly enough, the word ingrate showed up for my verification!

The Year 2000 Is Calling (0, Redundant)

mpapet (761907) | more than 7 years ago | (#16163340)

and they want their dot-com bubble back.

Is the "value" here equivalent to television? Something to flush time down the toilet?

Please enlighten me.

Re:The Year 2000 Is Calling (1)

Sporkinum (655143) | more than 7 years ago | (#16163478)

Exactly! What the hell is facebook, and why should anyone care? I never heard of it until some news story said it was being offered cubic dollars to sell.

If Yahoo buys, it will fail (4, Insightful)

Capt'n Hector (650760) | more than 7 years ago | (#16163353)

If Yahoo bought facebook and stuck the little Y! icon in the corner, I would leave. The whole reason us college students liked facebook in the first place was that was made by and for us, the college students. The only way for Yahoo to make back their money would be for them to sell the personal information (unless somehow the EULA prohibits it, which I hope is the case). If they do that, then we will revolt (see how well the "feed" feature went over, and that was information we already had), and facebook will be nothing more than a less neurotic version of myspace. Zukerberg, please don't sell. I LIKE facebook the way it is.

Re:If Yahoo buys, it will fail (3, Insightful)

protohiro1 (590732) | more than 7 years ago | (#16163532)

I don't think Yahoo would sell the personal information because that would be suicidal, for the reasons you said. Yahoo wants facebook to fight off myspace. I question the widsom of this purchase, but I doubt their will be a mass defection. If you like facebook, why would a Y! scare you off? Has everyone deserted Flickr? I think $1 billion is way too much to pay for facebook, but I find it unlikely that yahoo would ruin the service.

Re:If Yahoo buys, it will fail (1, Insightful)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#16163568)

It won't fail. At worst, the users will whine(that wasn't a revolt, that was a whine-fest); they're certainly not going to go through the effort to rebuild their social networks just because Facebook has gone commercial. This isn't the 60's, modern college students won't stick to their ideological beliefs through hard times.

Re:If Yahoo buys, it will fail (1)

dancingyel (981935) | more than 7 years ago | (#16163688)

they're certainly not going to go through the effort to rebuild their social networks just because Facebook has gone commercial.
And really, why should they? It's not like Facebook was some sort of idealistic, let's-be-counter-culture site. It was always a social networking site, albeit smaller and more specialized than others. I don't think it has a lot of things that will be ruined by it going commercial.

Flickr? (1)

merreborn (853723) | more than 7 years ago | (#16163604)

If Yahoo buys, it will fail

As far as I can tell, Flickr has boomed since Yahoo! came into the picture. If they can avoid trashing Flickr, maybe they can keep Facebook cool too, eh?

Re:If Yahoo buys, it will fail (2, Informative)

kenneth_martens (320269) | more than 7 years ago | (#16163676)

The whole reason us college students liked facebook in the first place was that was made by and for us, the college students.

Climb down off your high horse. I've been a college student, and I'm also currently working on a Master's degree. Students don't sign up for Facebook because it's a snobby exclusive club just for them. They sign up because 1) it works, 2) it isn't ugly like Myspace, and 3) it offers reasonable privacy protection. Nobody really cares who made it or who runs it.

Whether or not it's owned by Yahoo doesn't change anything. If Yahoo buys it and screws with the privacy settings (e.g., if they let everyone view your profile) then there will be a user revolt. But users won't revolt en masse just because Facebook is bought out by a *gasp* commercial company. As long as Facebook keeps working, ownership just isn't that big of a deal.

EULA Gonna screw you! (1)

cinexero (983612) | more than 7 years ago | (#16163898)

I would strongly reccomend reading the EULA, I did when I heard about it opening up. There is a nice phrase in there about "distributing your information to third parties without consent". Watch out.

Remember, the way facebook makes money is through its users, leave and all these issues will be resolved.

Re:If Yahoo buys, it will fail (1)

macx666 (194150) | more than 7 years ago | (#16164190)

Wow. You should read the EULA. No, seriously. It isn't that painful. While they can not sell your personal information directly (as in, here is joe blow's last list of girlfriends), they can agrigate it and show advertisers x% of students enjoy watching football and drinking beer. This is normal, done in tons of other places, and doesn't hurt you one bit. Frankly I am shocked that Facebook (at least not that I could find) is not selling aggregate statistics. Various university marketing departments would pay a fortune for some kind of data mining ability.

In any event, get over yourself. If you didn't like the EULA (not reading it is not an excuse), then why in the hell did you agree to it?

Dear Mark Zuckerberg.. (2, Insightful)

Vellmont (569020) | more than 7 years ago | (#16163360)

Your plan worked! You managed to create a fad website and idiots are willing to give you 900 frickin million dollars for it! Take the money before they realize that Facebook is just a passing fad like boy-bands! Don't over-play your hand. Even Yahoo and Viacom aren't dumb enough to give you anything like 2 billion dollars for it.

Re:Dear Mark Zuckerberg.. (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#16163503)

Only the out of touch people think that it will just be a fad. In fact it is getting worse every year

facebook isnt going anywhere

900 MILLION DOLLARS, PALO ALTO (1, Insightful)

mr_stinky_britches (926212) | more than 7 years ago | (#16163372)

Dear Mr. Zuckerberg,

Like you, I am from Palo Alto. I graduated from PALY. I think facebook is a pretty cool website (most of the time). However, I would strongly encourage you to take the money and run. Facebook is definately not worth that much money. Consumers are fickle, and most the users of facebook hate you anyways (perhaps because they are ignorant, but the fact remains..). Why bust your chops and lose $1BN for people who generally don't appreciate you nearly as much as they should?

Good luck,


merreborn (853723) | more than 7 years ago | (#16163656)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Zuckerberg [wikipedia.org]

He's from the east coast. He just works in Palo Alto. Seems he, Dustin Moskovitz and Chris Hughes met at Harvard.

Had any of them attended Paly I believe they would have been class of '02. I was class of '01 at Paly. I'm pretty sure none of the three of 'em are in the yearbook.

who cares? (-1, Troll)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#16163374)

I sure don't.

Re:Facebook is run by nazis. (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#16163411)

And populated by people who can't follow the TOS, apparently.

You're a Nazi (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#16163416)

You had it coming,
You had it coming,
You only had yourself to blame...


Re:Facebook is run by nazis. (1, Insightful)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#16163425)

Wow, and you went to school? Nevertheless, I know your problem! You should log into myspace instead, you'll be more at home. You can say what you want, no matter how inappropriate and immature (considering facebook tries not to be so immature and inappropriate). I'm sure you can even put your text in huge glittery animated gif fonts!

Re:Facebook is run by nazis. (0, Offtopic)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#16163427)

Hey, Taco! We need a mod selection for "-1 Jackass"!

Re:Facebook is run by nazis. (1, Informative)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#16163467)

Seems to me like you got what you deserved, Bobby.

Sorry, I mean Robert Persinger.

Seems to me like you're basically a frat boy troll and FaceBook put you in your place.

There's no anonymity on the internet. Between knowing "spazntwich@yahoo.com" and "Robert" I tracked down your name & status at the school.

3rd year English major with Sophmore standing.
Way To Go Bert.

Re:Facebook is run by nazis. (1)

Spazntwich (208070) | more than 7 years ago | (#16163520)

Ahahaha. Well done. I knew someone would take the initiative.

But your info is a little out of date, as I'm no longer an English major.

Wouldn't 900 million be enought to build (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#16163378)

a face book site from scratch. I guess dollars lose value when they accumulate.

Re:Wouldn't 900 million be enought to build (1)

larry bagina (561269) | more than 7 years ago | (#16163516)

they're not buying the code and rackspace needed to host it, they're buying the users and brand name.

Re:Wouldn't 900 million be enought to build (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#16164626)

$900 million will buy you a pretty good advertising campaign, too.

how soon before (1)

Cartack (628620) | more than 7 years ago | (#16163404)

myspace and facebook become full featured portals... yahoo and google must be shaking in their boots.

You may now kill yourself. (4, Insightful)

DysenteryInTheRanks (902824) | more than 7 years ago | (#16163501)

I like Gawker's take [gawker.com] on this:

The 22-year-old founder of Facebook wants to sell for $1.5 billion, and the twit just might get away with it. You ready to kill yourself yet? Here, use our knife and be sure to cut vertically.

I think anyone with any modicum of programming skill has been repeatedly slapping their forehead over the last year at the money being made from some very basic PHP scripts and what SEEMED like really silly ideas.

Seriously -- if someone came to you a few years ago and was like, "Umm, ya, we're looking to take, like, Geocities, and mash it up with Blogger, and AOL Instant Messenger, except uglier than any of those things, and maybe graft on some awkward MP3.com type capabilities, and leverage the awesome power of ColdFusion [google.com] , and we've registered an awesome domain name -- MYSPACE, get it, like My Space, like My Web Space ...", I mean -- really. Would you have been able to STOP laughing?

Or if someone was like, "ya, I envision this site where everyone at every college can just upload all their personal info, pictures, basically just like Blogger, except only other people at their college can see it, and they can like join clubs and stuff, and groups, like any group they want, and post pictures of themselves doing bong hits, put the whole thing on a PHP/MySQL ball..."

I'd be like, "ya, I don't see college kids posting pictures of themselves doing illegal things, first of all, dumbass. Secondly, why join an online group when you can join a REAL group, in real life, with live members of the opposite sex present? And thirdly, why should they use YOUR facebook when their college prolly has one of its own? Even if they did, why wouldn't they use Yahoo Groups and Blogger and AIM just like everyone else?"

Shows how much I know.

Ya, I could have built this stuff. I'm not even a CS major or programmer, but I know enough scripting (perl/ruby) and server admin I could have pulled it together. But I didn't! It never would have occured to me to make something so bloody simple and so minimally better than what is already out there.

Just goes to show, it's all about the users, and if you're not a user, if you're not in their shoes, it's really hard to anticipate what will be exciting to them.

Re:You may now kill yourself. (1)

nb caffeine (448698) | more than 7 years ago | (#16163544)

yeah, f'in A man. I was in college when these sites all started gaining popularity. I had an idea a day, now they've all been done and sold for $500m+.

Even if this guy wants to be like jobs or something, take the fuckin money and run. 900 mil (even if he ends up with much less after taxes, etc) would be plenty to pick and choose funding of the Real Next Big Thing (Tm). But, thats just what I would do.

Re:You may now kill yourself. (1)

inKubus (199753) | more than 7 years ago | (#16163584)

Try being in a band. It has nothing to do with the quality of the music or the songs. It's about getting people to listen. Likewise, social networking sites are sort of like the Amway of websites, because they make the users advertise (bring in new people) for them, in order to make the site more useful to the users. It's brilliant, but shaky. So, yes, ANYONE can start a social networking site, and some of them might be better, but you need people people people to make money money money.

Re:You may now kill yourself. (2, Insightful)

MP3Chuck (652277) | more than 7 years ago | (#16164602)

Thing is, anything sounds simple boiled down into one sentence. Slashdot is a "tech news aggregator" but it's one of the most popular sites on the internet. Same goes for Digg. deviantART is just an "online art community" but it's got 25 million submissions and a couple million members. The list goes on. Like some others said above, ideas are worthless without an execution. And even then, the quality of the execution makes all the difference.

Why even bother buying (1)

BionicPimp (562378) | more than 7 years ago | (#16163625)

why don't they just make their own...or make yahoo mail a social network eg. just take all the yahoo mail accounts and create a yahoo "network" account for them. next time they log in, ask if they can send an invite to everyone in their address book. bickety bam. done. and pretty much "free" in that it won't cost them almost a billion dollars.

Because they've already tried - and failed (1)

saddino (183491) | more than 7 years ago | (#16163642)

Yahoo! already has their own social networking site: Yahoo! 360 [yahoo.com] . But as the article states, 360 has failed to attract the kids, and so now their only option is to buy their way into an established userbase.

bizNatch (-1, Flamebait)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#16163633)

big picture. What clothes or be a of variOus BSD documents like a confirming 7he Your own beer And has instead

Let's Make A Deal! (1)

qzulla (600807) | more than 7 years ago | (#16163901)

Ok, contestant, do you want door number one, door number two or door number three?
I want... door number one... TWO! No, wait... oh Monty!
Your time is running out, contestant...
Ok, ok... door number THREE!!!!
Carol, show our contestant what she won...
Look! You have won... a donkey! Not just any donkey but a real live one from Pedros Farm in Mexico!!!

Gotta love journalists' ethics... (1)

glitch23 (557124) | more than 7 years ago | (#16163908)

when they report on something that is still ongoing and even they even state "Both spoke on the condition of anonymity because the negotiations are continuing." To SAUL HANSELL: Maybe you should have the decency to not report on something when negotiations are still ongoing and afterwards report on it all you want because then you can even name your sources. I don't give creedence to reporters who don't divulge their sources, especially when they report on a story and divulge information that isn't supposed to be divulged yet. It's like when a woman says no before being raped and the guy thinks that means do it anyway.

So, essentially... (1)

Tarlus (1000874) | more than 7 years ago | (#16164018)

"Their current standing offer is $900 Million, with the deal including a degree of autonomy for the site and founder Mark Zuckerberg still in charge."

He could be paid a batshit fucking insane amount of money to continue to be in charge of Facebook, meaning that he'll still have a say in the direction that it goes. I am interested, however, in how Yahoo would change it if they bought it, and if they'd tie it to existing Yahoo user accounts or turn it into another MySpace.

I don't mind who owns Facebook, but if it turns into MySpace (where people can customize their page layout) then I'll quit using it. Having two songs and a movie file playing AT THE SAME TIME while having text that perfectly blends in with an excessively busy fixed background is something up with which I will not put.

Re:So, essentially... (1)

AmberBlackCat (829689) | more than 7 years ago | (#16165639)

I don't like it either, but if it's the most popular site on the internet then there must be somebody who likes it. And I guarantee you there are people who have equally harsh comments about the layout and format of Slashdot. Just as you'd call their stuff bloated and busy, they might call your stuff dull and dead.

Dont let this slip by google (1)

Viper_Viper (881780) | more than 7 years ago | (#16164118)

Sooo, why does google not just drop 2 really big ones for facebook. Google could easily incoperate everything together, mixing your blog with your notes and stuff like that. But it will never happen, I dont see google wanting facebook. Everyone please respond with why this is a bad idea.

Re:Dont let this slip by google (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#16164567)

Hahaha. Google could make something better than Facebook in a couple of months and it would only cost them a couple hundred grand, not $1.5bn.

Re:Dont let this slip by google (1)

Bert690 (540293) | more than 7 years ago | (#16164607)

Hahaha. Google could make something better than Facebook in a couple of months and it would only cost them a couple hundred grand, not $1.5bn.

Right, and it's called Orkut [orkut.com] , currently used by just about everybody in Brazil.

What a waste of money (1)

Mantrid Drone (699799) | more than 7 years ago | (#16164306)

What a horrible, horrible waste of money. Think of what you could build from scratch for $900M. Teenybopper internet users being as fickle as they are, they'll happily switch to the next flash-in-the-pan social networking site if it's better/flashier/trendier, and you could certainly one-up Fa(r)cebook with those kinds of dollars.

Re:What a waste of money (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#16166163)

You miss the point. People pay for users, not for the technology, in aquisitions like this.

How do these people think? (2, Funny)

Plutonite (999141) | more than 7 years ago | (#16164321)

I dunno, I'm just confused. What's the difference between $900 million and $1500 million? Or $2000 million? Or 5000?

What goes on inside people's minds when they are debating this sort of shite?

[CEO Thought Bubble]: $1 Billion dollars means a baseball team, 2 small Islands and a nice fleet of cars and jets. Probably enough remaining in stocks for a comfortable living and the odd shopping spree.

[devil]But 2 billion...now we're really talking. Just think of the possibilities. More celebrities to screw, 3 times the number of cars possible. Maybe another Island off the Brazilian coast. Plus, 1 is a small number. Insecure, ya know. 2 is plain solid. Go for 2. 2 billion dollars man. 2 f*cking billion. [/devil]

[angel] If they say no you won't have much to screw, will ya cowboy. 1 billiondollars ought to be enough for anybody. IF you ask for more, you should and will go to hell[/angel]

[/CEO Thought Bubble]

CEO: Give me time to think, please. You can't rush this kind of decision.

So the "News Feeds" Were a Test Run... (1)

L33tminion (908158) | more than 7 years ago | (#16164536)

... to see how many customers actually leave when major changes piss them off. Since the answer is "almost none", they now know it's safe to sell the site to whoever without fear of the userbase jumping ship.

(Okay, so I don't actually believe that. But if I were more of a conspiracy theorist...)

Damn! That's a lot of money (1)

vz3phyre (1003163) | more than 7 years ago | (#16166227)

Oh my GOD!!! He refuse to take it. If i am the owner, i will sell it for 899 mil. Its a deal man!! but no one want my websites :(

may be the my idea not original enough :(
Load More Comments
Slashdot Account

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?

Don't worry, we never post anything without your permission.

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>
Sign up for Slashdot Newsletters
Create a Slashdot Account