PS3 Japanese Price Drop 'Ridiculous' 70
Gamasutra reports on comments from a Japanese analyst group, characterizing the pre-launch price drop for the Japanese market as ridiculous. From the article: "Meanwhile, Naoki Fujiwara of Shinkin Asset Management suggested that the price reduction was 'negative for the short term because the company may not be able to sell enough consoles to cover an instant loss caused by the price cut.' The PlayStation 3 was already expected to be sold at a loss, with Sony allowing up to five years to recoup the costs. Shares in Sony fell 1.9 percent following the announcement, although this coincided with a generally poor day for the Tokyo Stock Exchange and may not be entirely related to the price cut."
Wait what? (Score:1)
the company may not be able to sell enough consoles to cover an instant loss caused by the price cut.
What the? Wouldn't selling more units mean more loss if the thing's sold at a loss per unit?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
console normally, and that's where they intend to make the money.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Obligatory (Score:4, Funny)
It may be a loss, but they make it up in volume, goddamnit!
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
"One word my elven friend: volume!"
Re:Wait what? (Score:5, Funny)
If that doesn't sell more Wiis, nothing will.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
The purpose of the *fake* commercial was NOT to give you a chubby. It was to compare the differences in the two systems, using "Apple" methods, in a fun way. IE: let you decide which girl (game system) was more fun to be with, the overly complex and bloated PS3 or the "peppy and cute" Wii.
But perhaps that is too complicated for you, like logging in with a user name. That or you are suffering from what is ailing many slashdotters in t
Re: (Score:1, Interesting)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
More importantly however your point is flawed, startup costs like factory tooling/building are far greater then cost per unit without that built in. Sony's already spent billions before even making one ps3 unit, that is where most of the money went.
You will get far closer to profitability if you keep on churning units at the max capacity of the factory to regain the cost of building it.
Seriously what is getting attached to that HDTV (Score:2, Insightful)
Selling points of the PS3 (Score:3, Interesting)
Also Blu-Ray is going to provide a much better display that DVD's even on lower end equipment - I have an 600x800 projector and 1080i content downsampled to that device looks MUCH better than DVD's. You don't have t
Re: (Score:2)
How can you make that assertion? It only works if, somehow, the PS3 manages to obtain a dominant position in the [Japanese] marketplace (more consoles = better chance an offbeat title will make money). There are many reasons to think that the Wii is in a far better position to get these "interesting games" you speak of, given its more attracti
Re: (Score:1)
I did not say th
Re: (Score:2)
Please explain how. I'm gonna assume you mean 800x600, a typical DVD is 720 × 480. The most you can get out of a 800x600 projector widescreen is 800x450. Unless you are viewing fullscreen HD content and comparing it with fullscreen DVDs, I don't think the difference is as drastic as you claim. I think you are likely playing the DVDs on a composite output DVD player and comparing it to a computer
Re: (Score:2)
Please explain how. I'm gonna assume you mean 800x600, a typical DVD is 720 × 480. The most you can get out of a 800x600 projector widescreen is 800x450. Unless you are viewing fullscreen HD content and comparing it with fullscreen DVDs, I don't think the difference is as drastic as you claim. I think you are likely playing the DVDs on a composite output DVD player and comparing it to a computer hook
Re: (Score:2)
No cropping... (Score:1)
From the Article: (Score:2, Interesting)
That's an improvement, but $430 is still very high for a game system! Yes, yes, it's also a Blue Laser media player, but since I had no plan to buy one of those, I still think of the PS3 as a vastly overpriced gaming system.
As a side note, given that Dead Rising for the X-Box 360 apparently requires HD [slashdot.org] to dispay so
Re: Don't forget the Wii. (Score:1)
Yes it is. (Score:1)
Re:Yes it is. (Score:5, Interesting)
Tough isn't it? We in Japan got to play the system 1st as well. I've just gotten back from the Tokyo Game Show. Played a few PS3 demo's there. Nice graphics, reminds me of PC games. But to be honest, the thing I noticed most about the PS3 was that it felt and played almost exactly like a PS2. That isn't really a bad thing, the PS2 was a nice system, but the PS3 doesn't really offer that much more than the PS2 does as far as game experience goes.
Overall impression? I'll probably end up buying a PS3, it's a nice gaming machine, but not at launch. Even with the price drop, it's still more expensive than Wii with 4 games and a few extra controllers. I'll wait for the 1st or 2nd price drop before buying or until a killer game comes out. There were quite a few there that I'd like to play, but none that sold the system.
Back on topic, market share is everything at this stage of the game. Japanese have a tendency to follow trends. The console that gets the largest market share at the start will set the trend. This means Sony have thier work cut out for them because not only does thier closest competitor have a cheaper console, it's also smaller, cuter and it's controller has a larger 'wow' effect than the PS3's graphics do. This doesn't even take into account that Nintendo will probably out produce Sony. So every little helps I guess.
As for why Japan is important, well it's Sony's home market. It's also the home to the development teams for a fair number of core PS franchises. If it loses Japan the effect on the other markets will be significant.
well, (Score:2)
I've actually been thinking of getting a PS3 (or at least looking into it when they come out). I've heard that it can run linux and that the hardware seems pretty good. If I could get Fedora to work on it I co
Re: (Score:1)
Great (Score:3, Funny)
2. Sell Japanese PS3s
3. ???^WPROFIT!!!
We need a new term to replace "region free." (Score:2, Informative)
Both Sony and Nintendo(before Nintendo corrected their mispoken PR person) heads said that "region free" support was up to the developers/publishers. In other words, companies can decided whether or not to let their games work on -- still region encoded -- consoles from different regions.
Does that really sound like being REAL "region free" to you? Because it sure doesn't to me.....
Not sure what it should be called, maybe "region friendly"?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Not Blu-Ray movies (Score:2)
Even if US games work on your imported Japanese console, are local Blu-Ray movies going to play?
From what I've heard, game region locking is optional for the publisher, but Blu-Ray movie region locking is still there.
Besides, good luck trying to import one of those 100K launch units.
Given the option between 2 scenarios... (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Recall: Intel's Free 4004 CPU, You buy the RAM (Score:2)
Free razor, you buy the blades...
Sony subsidizes the PS3 & wants to sell content...
---
All examples of tried & ture business practices
So, what's newsworthy here?
Or... is this another "sponsored news article"...?
Re:Recall: Intel's Free 4004 CPU, You buy the RAM (Score:5, Interesting)
Idiots keep quoting the razorblade thing. Guess what. The razor is just a handle. Its is the CHEAP part of the package. You can afford to give those away because the next time someone buys a blade you make a profit. Sony only makes about $10 per third party game sold. If they are loosing an extra $85 per consol sold that means they must sell an additional 8 games before they break even. This mean the consumer has shelled out more then $900 and you have yet to see any profit. Here is the worst part. The average attach rate for a consol is only 9-10. The highest attach rate has been the PS1 at 13.2 games per consol (as of June 2005 in Japan) and this is only after a decade of being on the market. What does this mean? If Sony losses $100 per consol they will probably NEVER see a profit. And we are only talking about hardware here. This does not take into account the cost of marketing, shipping, QA, or the initial development costs.
The dirty secret of the consol business is HAVING A LARGER INSTALL BASE DOES NOT SELL GAMES!
Here are a list of attach rates from the last generation.
GameCube (End of 2005)
Japan - 6.693
America - 9.838
Other - 8.550
Total - 8.945
PlayStation 2 (End of 2005)
Japan - 8.454
America - 11.222
Europe - 9.294
Total - 9.885
Xbox (Unofficial, End of 2004)
Asia - 4.706
America - 9.773
Europe - 8.200
Total - 8.945
What does all this mean? The average consumer will only buy 9-10 games! The time you own the consol makes no difference either. (The PS1 average attach rate is only 9.3, The NES rate was about 8, SNES 7) Each consol sold has a total expected revenue from games of only $100.
So what exactly are Microsoft and Sony doing?
Microsoft is simply trying to buy mindshare. They expect to eventually make money on selling services over Xbox live and software that ties your Xbox to your PC (running windows) and your set top box (running Media center). They are willing to pour money into the black hole because in order to sell you high margin item at a later date. Microsoft has the financials to support this indefinably by using their profits from Windows and Office.
Sony is a different beast. Sony intends to make money off of Blueray royalties. As it stands, if Blueray fails (like betamax, Memory Stick, Atrack, and UMD) Sony will be in deep financial trouble. On the other hand if Blueray takes off like DVD did Sony stands to reap huge profits.
Personally I do not see Blueray being the next big thing. Consumers are not going to shell out real money on HD yet. The players are expensive, the standards are confusing, and most people don't yet have a HDTV. It will be years before the number of households with HDTV reaches the critical mass needed to make Blueray a success. In that time, it is likely that there will be other options. Blueray may very well turn out like laserdisc and VCD did.
Re: (Score:2)
With the PS2, Sony actially made a profit on the hardware for a signifigant portion of the console's lifespan (which isn't over yet). They started making a profit on the hardware well before they said they were going to be able to. Perhaps this is their plan now, as well.
Also, you forgot to include accessory sales in your numbers. PS2 memory cards wre 70-80% profit from the beginning. Controllers, extension cords, S-Video cables.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
If Blueray follows the same adoption rate as DVD then in four years Blueray players will still cost $250!
Unlike the previous generation of video players, the current generation re-uses most of the technology from high speed DVD readers.
Re: (Score:1)
I have to disagree. A larger install base DOES sell more games although indirectly. We see proof of this with the Gamecube.
gamecube with smaller install base = less 3rd party support = less games available = less attractive to potential adopters = weak overall sales = gamecube dies ugly slow death by starvation.
PS2 with huge install base = lots of 3rd party support = tons of available games and choices = attra
Re: (Score:1, Insightful)
Um, sure. Too bad Sony has said absolutely nothing about how much each unit costs to produce.
Re: (Score:1)
Now, which option is most likely?
Re: (Score:1)
The Blueray players out now are expensive for several reasons. One is simple economics, where we have a very small supply of players, driving up the price. Another reason is that the players you can buy today are basically "rough drafts", as Samsung et al basically slapped together a bunch of components to get them out the door as soon as possible. They now can refine their process, removing unneeded or overpowered components, and taking advantage of things like Moore
Price drop meant to prevent Wii purchases (Score:2)
With only 100 000 PS3s available in Japan at launch, even people who would pay $600 for a console will not receive one. However, there will be plenty of Wiis available. This was designed to stop gamers from buying a Wii, encouraging them to hold off purchasing a next gen console until a PS3 is available. If Sony had not dropped the price, a lot of Japanese gamers would purchase a Wii and then consider purchasing a PS3 when the price dropped. Barring a miracle for Microsoft, the Xbox 360 will not be a fa
Wii vs Xbox360 vs PS3 prices in Canada (Score:2)
Xbox 360 = 500$CAD (Xbox360 core = 400$CAD, still 120$CAD more expensive than a Wii)
PS3 (20GB) = 550$CAD
IMHO, it's the Xbox360 that's overpriced. No wonder nobody's got one here (people rent them, nobody buys them).