Beta
×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Yahoo Shakes Things Up

CmdrTaco posted more than 7 years ago | from the they-aren't-the-only-ones dept.

Yahoo! 73

PreacherTom writes "Growing strife inside Yahoo! has erupted into a sweeping management and organizational shakeup. CEO Terry Semel announced yesterday that the company will be reordered into three groups: one to focus on advertisers and publishers, another to focus on Yahoo!'s base of over 500 million users, and a third on technology and development. While Semel denies layoffs are in the future, there will be replacements in the upper echelon for the world's most popular website. The changes, the most extensive at Yahoo in more than five years, cap months of speculation about how it would respond to slowing sales growth, a slumping stock price, and a steady stream of executive departures in the past year."

cancel ×

73 comments

Sorry! There are no comments related to the filter you selected.

Yahoo is in trouble (4, Interesting)

filenavigator (944290) | more than 7 years ago | (#17128298)

I think Yahoo has been coasting for years. If my website logs are a reflection of their popularity they are in big trouble. Google beats them at a rate of 100 to 1. On top of that their version of 'adwords' is the worst I have seen (From an ad buyer's perspective). It takes days for them to approve the ad (Google takes minutes) Then when they do approve it they change the wording - usually done by a non native English speaker! I have had my software adverts changed to include the word warez. WAREZ! They need to clean house or they will need to fire more until they do.

Steve Wiseman
http://www.windows-admin-tools.com [windows-admin-tools.com]

Re:Yahoo is in trouble (4, Interesting)

eln (21727) | more than 7 years ago | (#17128466)

You're right that Yahoo is in trouble, but this looks like a panic move that won't really change much. They don't know what to do, they only know something drastic has to be done. So, they throw out the executives they don't like, and shuffle the others around. As each executive takes over their new role, they will have massive layoffs in order to "streamline" the business, but they still won't really know what that business is.

Yahoo has spent too much time accumulating services that are not "best of breed" by any means, but are simply reactions to the offerings of others. They don't even really know what kind of company they want to be, or even what business they're in (other than "the web"), and until they figure that out, they're going to continue to flail madly while they spiral down the drain.

Re:Yahoo is in trouble (1)

drooling-dog (189103) | more than 7 years ago | (#17129310)

They don't know what to do, they only know something drastic has to be done. So, they throw out the executives they don't like, and shuffle the others around.

That's pretty common in business. The last thing you want to be accused of as an exec is being passive in the face of danger, and so any action is better than none (which is arguably true!). Sometimes reorganization - even aimless reorganization - is the one tool you have in your box, and the adage about everything looking like a nail when all you have is a hammer applies.

My ex once worked at a company that went through panic reorganizations no less than every 6 months or so, and that went on for years. It got to the point that no one knew what their job was or who they were supposed to be reporting to anymore (except that you could count on both being different in a few months). It was a happy day for both of us when she got out of there...

Re:Yahoo is in trouble (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#17143396)

Let me guess, Xerox?

Re:Yahoo is in trouble (1)

drooling-dog (189103) | more than 7 years ago | (#17152178)

Let me guess, Xerox?

A subsidiary at the time, as I recall...

Re:Yahoo is in trouble (5, Funny)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#17128476)

I clicked all around your site, and I couldn't find the warez. No cracked Vista, no Photoshop ISOs, nothing! I'm severely disappointed, and I'm suing you for false advertising.

Re:Yahoo is in trouble (1)

DoorFrame (22108) | more than 7 years ago | (#17128656)

Man, if only your site really had Warez I'd spend all my time there. Those Yahoo guys are marketing genuises.

Re:Yahoo is in trouble (-1, Offtopic)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#17128698)

CD-Key pLz!!

Re:Yahoo is in trouble (3, Insightful)

badasscat (563442) | more than 7 years ago | (#17129852)

If my website logs are a reflection of their popularity they are in big trouble. Google beats them at a rate of 100 to 1.

Yahoo is a lot more than just search. Google is too, but the point is your web site results are not reflective of Yahoo's business as a whole. While they do want a bigger piece of the search advertising pie, I don't think even they really consider search their core business anymore. (It never really was to begin with; they were always more of a directory than a search company, though they've tried to change that in recent years.)

All you need to do is go to Yahoo's web site and then go to Google's web site to see their different business models.

Just for one example, though, I bought my house through Yahoo Real Estate, which partnered with Prudential in my area to give local online real estate listings. Google has no such thing (even though with Google Maps, it would seem a natural fit). Yahoo has many facets like this that you probably don't even realize.

Re:Yahoo is in trouble (1)

zeromorph (1009305) | more than 7 years ago | (#17134602)

Yahoo has many facets like this that you probably don't even realize.

Neither do I nor many others. So?

Maybe their facets aren't that interesting for most people...
...or they hide them in more facets
...or their products aren't that good
...or don't have the right timing
...or what ever.

Take it how you want, they are having a problem somewhere and not being a search company anymore might be one part of it.

Re:Yahoo is in trouble (1)

DeadboltX (751907) | more than 7 years ago | (#17133092)

Well think of the bright side, you may have gotten more hits from people looking for warez...
Since they could not find any on the first page, you may have gotten subsequent page hits while they scour your site for download links.

Re:Yahoo is in trouble (1)

Neoncow (802085) | more than 7 years ago | (#17140482)

Ummm.. Hits == profit only works for Yahoo! You pay them for those 'hits'

Re:Yahoo is in trouble (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#17136690)

A little over two years ago, Yahoo tried to hire me. After making clear that I'm not available, I asked why they couldn't get sufficient talent closer to home.

The gist was that the upper management had been convinced that to go forward meant the whole company required spectacularly well-coded web interfaces and applications. To start this, they had asked their current IT staff to name 'dream hires'. They bluntly wanted to hire and fund the best-known people of all the acronyms, and were backing this with 90s-boom offers.

My conclusion at the time was they'd realized there would be no future as a comfortable #2 to Google. That simply to survive as a serious player meant trying very hard to be #1.

Years later, any Yahoo site I can think of still has terrible code and interface. I don't know who, if anyone, they managed to hire, and obviously implementation did not follow.

So yeah, if they blew that attempt that badly, I'd say Yahoo is in trouble. It's like watching the desperate reorganizations of American car companies; a lot of insincere noise on the way down. It must be very frustrating to work there.

Re:Yahoo is in trouble (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#17136728)

Yup, my web logs also bear this out for retail comics at
http://www.nostalgiazone.com/ [nostalgiazone.com] 100 to one referrals. About two years ago it was
2 to one. But MS search has dropped even farther!

Re:Yahoo is in trouble (1)

Mr.Scott88 (929708) | more than 7 years ago | (#17142200)

You are right there. The discussion groups have a lot of no-brain people posting messages. Sometimes when you post something worthwhile, your post doesn't take. Sometimes the discussion groups don't work. News articles are a day late and several dollars short, of not outdated. If you don't use a Windows based PC, you are SOL and half the stuff, if not more, just doesn't work. Support for problems are non-existent. Searching returns useless junk. I'm surprised they still in existence.

In related news... (4, Insightful)

denebian devil (944045) | more than 7 years ago | (#17128350)

In related news, Yahoo also makes sweeping changes to their site design, leading to buggy site behavior, slower load times, and general unrest among Yahoo's populace.

Re:In related news... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#17129786)

It's fine to want to be like Google, but please, get it right!

Re:In related news... (1)

Reziac (43301) | more than 7 years ago | (#17137546)

I was about to post the same complaint. A while back I had to give up using Yahoo's finance page because it's no longer usable, and last weekend they buggered up the TV listings too, so they take forever to load (30+ seconds on broadband?!!) and then they only halfway work. (I'm now using the NYTimes TV listings, which are still FAST and PLAIN and FUNCTIONAL, and even have a text-only option.)

I'm expecting Yahoo's Movies section to get unusable next.

And last time I tried to access the "old" Yahoo mail, I couldn't get to it. I can't use the new one.

Yahoo used to be my portal of choice for many such functions, but they're rapidly making themselves into a site I want to AVOID.

And I doubt we're alone in that.

TV Listings (1)

Rick Richardson (87058) | more than 7 years ago | (#17128390)

http://tv.yahoo.com/listings;_ylt=Av10rj4CcfmHR7cY IFFvYySAo9EF [yahoo.com]

Beta??? This came out two weeks ago. It is *SLOW*.

I went to AOL!TV instead.

Re:TV Listings (2, Interesting)

Bill Dimm (463823) | more than 7 years ago | (#17128836)

Yeah, and they've gotten tons of feedback on it [yahoo.com] in their own blog. I gave up on them and switched to AOL TV [aol.com] too. I've never used AOL for anything before. Go figure.

Re:TV Listings (2, Interesting)

roaddemon (666475) | more than 7 years ago | (#17129300)

Ditto, I absolutely can't believe that got released to production. I've been using tv.yahoo.com for years now and had to switch when they "upgraded". It seems that they are throwing changes at the wall now just to see what will stick.

Re:TV Listings (1)

SCHecklerX (229973) | more than 7 years ago | (#17134752)

Me Too </AOL>

I discovered tv.com is good. And I also discovered excite.com has a great tv listing! Too bad they don't let you store your settings (maybe they do if you have an account with them, but I didn't want to do that).

It's a shame. The Yahoo TV listings used to be the best. Of course, so did their mapping before google maps became so amazing. Maybe we'll get lucky and soon get tv.google.com...

Re:TV Listings (1)

Jzor (982679) | more than 7 years ago | (#17129594)

Have you tried MeeVee [meevee.com] ?
I've been using this site for a little while.

Re:TV Listings (1)

coats (1068) | more than 7 years ago | (#17129948)

I've tried it and I don't like it: their page is a piece of pure-Javascript shit that isn't readable (fonts don't fit into the table fields -- for both Firefox/Windows and Mozilla(SeaMonkey)/Linux) and doesn't follow any of the user-interface stuff I expect (mouse wheel doesn't work, nor do CONTROL-PLUS nor CONTROL-MINUS to try to fix the font size).

TV Guide's listing do OK for SeaMonkey/Linux but just hang and don't deliver anything on my wife's Firefox/Windows machine.

Sorry. At this point, the New York Times listings are leading my list, but they're still less than ideal. There's altogether too much Flash blaring at me, and I don't like the only-20-stations-at-a-time format; it feels like it takes five minutes to see the seventy-odd stations my cable provider supplies.

Re:TV Listings (1)

Jzor (982679) | more than 7 years ago | (#17132822)

I am looking at MeeVee right now and the fonts all fit, mousewheel works and resizing the fonts work also. The little pop-overs that come up when you click the show title works too. Everything works using Firefox on Windows. :)

Re:TV Listings (1)

Rick Richardson (87058) | more than 7 years ago | (#17130030)

MeeVee advances to the hour ahead. Not for me. I want the hour behind.

E.G. 9:43AM. I want the 9AM listings, not the 10AM listings.

Re:TV Listings (1)

Jzor (982679) | more than 7 years ago | (#17132898)

It is 11:50 AM here and I am seeing the listings for 11:00 AM currently.

What do you expect? (3, Funny)

Dareth (47614) | more than 7 years ago | (#17128398)

I mean this is the one company you know for a fact is run by a bunch of "Yahoos"!

Here's an idea (2, Funny)

SNR monkey (1021747) | more than 7 years ago | (#17128486)

Maybe they should relaunch their website as Houyhnhnm.com. I am sure it would be much more peaceful and rational than a company run by a bunch of yahoos.

Would you please... (1)

Dareth (47614) | more than 7 years ago | (#17128590)

... let the rest of us now how to pronounce Houyhnhnm.com ?

Feared!

Re:Would you please... (3, Informative)

SNR monkey (1021747) | more than 7 years ago | (#17128902)

Sure [wikipedia.org] I hope that helps. I wasn't sure how the reference would go over.

Thank you (1)

Dareth (47614) | more than 7 years ago | (#17130134)

That was an informative reply. Still can't pronounce it... but recognize the reference.

Re:Thank you (1)

SNR monkey (1021747) | more than 7 years ago | (#17130666)

Anytime. For what it's worth, I can't pronounce "Houyhnhnm" either. =)

Re:Here's an idea (1)

Reziac (43301) | more than 7 years ago | (#17137616)

Given the recent defunctionalization of many of their sites (finance, TV, mail) methinks "Yahoo.com" is the PERFECT name for them :/

Tho give 'em a couple more years to finish cutting themselves down to size, and "Lilliputian.com" may be more appropriate.

Three divisions... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#17128412)

... the company will be reordered into three groups: one to focus on advertisers and publishers, another to focus on Yahoo!'s base of over 500 million users, and a third on technology and development. ... informally known as users, lusers, and nerds.

Note that only the first division actually makes money. Let the infighting begin.

* runs like the AC he is.

The problem with going public (2, Insightful)

BadAnalogyGuy (945258) | more than 7 years ago | (#17128444)

Beholden to its investors, Yahoo can't push through hard times with grit and wisdom. It must bow to its ever-fluctuating market value and carve itself into living and dead tissue like a wolf caught in a trap. To emerge from a downturn is to have rent itself into a skeleton of its original physique, and the remaining body is less able to handle the next downturn, especially as those dips never stop coming for a flailing company.

In private hands the company leaders may be indulged to take risks that a public company would never be allowed to contemplate. Jerry Yang sits quietly in his house thankful for getting on the train early, but the company itself dies slowly as its blood gushes into the heads of other Silicon Valley firms.

*Cough* Bullh!t *Cough* (1, Interesting)

malsdavis (542216) | more than 7 years ago | (#17128450)

base of over 500 million users


right, 500 million unique users? I'm surprised they didn't claim to still be the world's most popular search engine, surely they would with those figures.

Re:*Cough* Bullh!t *Cough* (2, Informative)

X (1235) | more than 7 years ago | (#17129302)

right, 500 million unique users? I'm surprised they didn't claim to still be the world's most popular search engine, surely they would with those figures.


That's a real number. Yahoo actually has some fairly strict auditing process for calculating those numbers. Why doesn't this make them the most popular search engine? The reasons are many:

  • Many of Yahoo's visitors are using services other than search (I believe the home page, mail, and my yahoo service all have more visitors, not to mention all the other services like chat, messenger, news, finance, personals, hot jobs, games, etc. which collectively might add up to a good chunk of those visitors.
  • Search engine popularity tends to be measured by number of searches, rather than unique visitors. If someone uses Yahoo once for every thousand times they use Google, that hardly gives Yahoo an equivalent share to Google.
  • Unique users is useful in an advertising context (although traffic is still pretty important even in that context), but it is a lousy measure of popularity.
  • I believe folks who just go to the home page still count as a unique user, and that page was, up until recently, the highest traffic page on the Internet. That's a lot of unique users right there.

Re:*Cough* Bullh!t *Cough* (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#17136228)

You might get 500M "unique" users if you could people that go to yahoo.com, flickr.com, use Yahoo Groups, and have an IM account as seperate people. I doubt if there's 75M unique internet users in the US right now -- even if 100% of them went to Yahoo they would still need 7 more US sized countries to be 100% users of Yahoo.

Re:*Cough* Bullh!t *Cough* (1)

X (1235) | more than 7 years ago | (#17160312)

Unique users are not counted by user id. That's registered users, and IIRC that figure is less than 1/4 the unique users figure. The "unique users" figure is based on standard external audit processes. You can question it's accuracy, but it's as accurate as any other site's figures.

As for the number of unique users on the Internet, the estimates I've seen put it at ~1 billion, which means roughly half of them visit Yahoo once a month (the "unique visitors" figure is always couched in the context of "per month"), which is consistent with what the audits turn up.

Re:*Cough* Bullh!t *Cough* (1)

teh_chrizzle (963897) | more than 7 years ago | (#17130126)

500 million is not unreasonable if you count every im/spam/porn bot as a unique, then i would have figured their number of "users" is acutally in the billions.

well,+ (1)

jrwr00 (1035020) | more than 7 years ago | (#17128496)

google is just out doing yahoo in all fields now, i mean there where the days when yahoo was the all mighty website, but now it has become just another annoying site.

Yahoo Spread Itself Thin (5, Insightful)

organgtool (966989) | more than 7 years ago | (#17128694)

The problem is that they try to offer too many services and can't dedicate enough resources to keep those features growing. Therefore, other companies who focus on one only service that competes with Yahoo can do a better job of catering to their users. I have used several of Yahoo's services for a few years and I have watched competing services expand to provide more features than Yahoo. It's not that Yahoo's services are bad - their competitors are simply growing faster since they only focus on one service.

Oddly enough, I have found Yahoo's search to be more accurate than Google for certain topics. Google has always been great when doing narrow searches and it used to be pretty good at wide searches too, but lately I have been finding that I need to go through several pages to find what I am looking for on a wide Google search. I got fed up with this, so I tried Yahoo search and I was pleasantly surprised. Yahoo seems to consistently provide the results I look for within the first few entries. I'm not saying that Yahoo search is better than Google, but it seems like Google doesn't appear to be the magic bullet that it used to be.

Yahoo really went down the shitter (1)

Average_Joe_Sixpack (534373) | more than 7 years ago | (#17128790)

Example of a company completely taken over and ruined by marketing dweebs. Whoever is responsible for this train wreck needs to hang: The 9 [yahoo.com]

Three envelopes (4, Funny)

rlp (11898) | more than 7 years ago | (#17128970)

A new CEO is starting work. He walks into his new office, and the old CEO that he's replacing is packing up his stuff. The former CEO wishes his successor well and hands him three numbered envelopes which contain the solutions to any serious management problems.

After about six months, the stock slumps. The new CEO opens the first envelope. It says "Blame your predecessor". He holds a press conference and confidence in the company is restored.

Another six months pass and another crisis arises. He opens the second envelope. It says "Reorganize the company". He does so and the crisis passes.

After a year, things are terrible. The stock price is in a downward spiral. The CEO opens the third envelope. It says "Go get three envelopes ...".

Re: Predecessors (1)

TaoPhoenix (980487) | more than 7 years ago | (#17139240)

Where's Brad Garlinghouse these days? Wasn't he the darling of a nice little story some time back?

Woot. 7p (-1, Troll)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#17129056)

If Google only had (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#17129136)

a fantasy sports site, they would bury yahoo once and for all.

Will they start listening to their users? (1)

Bill Dimm (463823) | more than 7 years ago | (#17129230)

I hope the changes mean that they will start listing to their site users. They mangled tv.yahoo.com recently, and received plenty of feedback [yahoo.com] about it. I wrote to them years ago pointing out that their finance section really needs to have an option for graphing "adjusted price" (which they do list in their historic table, so they clearly have the data) or "growth of a $1000 investment" to smooth out the jumps from dividends and capital gains distributions that have no economic meaning, but nothing ever happened. Comparing a graph of a mutual fund to an index like the S&P 500 isn't very easy when the mutual fund price drops by 10% in December because it paid out a capital gains distribution (no money was lost -- they just gave 10% of it back to the investor).

Playing fast and loose with the numbers (1)

Adult film producer (866485) | more than 7 years ago | (#17129414)

Where do they come up with this 500 million users rubbish? If Yahoo has that many than I would guesstimate that Google has 1.8 billion users, closing in on 6 billion very fast. But whatever, last time I went to yahoo to get some email, it was very difficult to actually find the "mail" link... it's so cluttered with media & celebrity bullshit.. a painful experience.

Re:Playing fast and loose with the numbers (1)

X (1235) | more than 7 years ago | (#17134940)

Where do they come up with this 500 million users rubbish? If Yahoo has that many than I would guesstimate that Google has 1.8 billion users, closing in on 6 billion very fast.

Yes, that makes sense. Surely Google has more people than actually use the Internet.... ;-)

Seriously, Yahoo is rated (by third parties) as having more traffic than any other site (the home page used to be #1, by has been eclipsed by MySpace, and yes, that means both get more traffic than Google's home page). Most of Yahoo's services are in the top 3 online, and more than a few of them are #1. Google may have the market lead in search, and now video thanks to the acquisition of YouTube, but most of their other forays haven't yet achieved much in the way of market share. So, it's not surprising that Yahoo has more users than anyone else.

Of course, this is actually good news for Google share holders, as it'd be hard for them to sustain their growth rate if they actually already had 1.8 billion users.

But whatever, last time I went to yahoo to get some email, it was very difficult to actually find the "mail" link... it's so cluttered with media & celebrity bullshit.. a painful experience.

I'm starting to think we have a case of PEBKAC here... First the weird notions about how many users Google has, and now there is this inability to find the mail link from the home page.

If you check out the current interface [yahoo.com] , you'll find a big button that says "My Mail" right under the giant Yahoo logo in the top left of the screen (not to mention the link in the personalized area if you have that set up). That whole bar has links in it for My Yahoo, Yahoo Mail, Yahoo Search, and Yahoo Answers, and really only a little bit of space is allocated for Answers. The old interface [archive.org] also had a link to Yahoo Mail just to the right of the giant Yahoo logo. Seriously, it's got to be their most popular service, so they make it really easy to find.

The appeal of working for Yahoo... (2, Interesting)

coleopterana (932651) | more than 7 years ago | (#17129456)

What is it? There's a generic appeal to working for web companies like Yahoo and Google, but there's a specific appeal to some of them, like putting out new projects, working on your interests, so on. I see Yahoo as having shared the generic appeal of those company types in the past and now they feel more second tier, both to users and to jobseekers. If you aren't appealing as more than just a job in the field, it's going to be hard to get the people that can really help you be innovative, flexible and forward-thinking, especially when you're competing with companies (like Google) that not only have that image publicly but (at least in my experience) deliver for their employees. Anyone out there working for Yahoo? What drew you to it, what keeps you there, what seems to be the type of new hire, and what draws them?

Re:The appeal of working for Yahoo... (4, Interesting)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#17130638)

I work for Yahoo! (note the "!" :) ).

Judging the appeal of a company based on the CEO (or even the top management) is like judging the ride of a car by looking at the hood ornament.

Yahoo! is a great place to work. We may not have officially sanctioned "20% time off" policies, but there's a lot of freedom to find your own calling.

Tomorrow (Thursday) is an internal "Hack Day", and Yahoo!s all over the world will be churning out interesting/cool projects in an informal competition. It's loads of fun.

The biggest advantage of Yahoo! as an employer is that there is such a wide variety of projects to work on. You want to work on a project doing, say, TV on a mobile device? I'm sure there's a group working on that.

Re:The appeal of working for Yahoo... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#17133218)

also, we get free coffee and espresso

CEO is no hood ornament (1)

imaginaryelf (862886) | more than 7 years ago | (#17133372)

The hood ornament analogy is very bad.

Like it or not, the execs control the fate of the company much more than the workers. The CEO can single handedly ruin the company - a single foot soldier cannot - this is why the person at the top gets paid the big bucks.

The key for the execs is to bring all of that coolness you describe into alignment with business goals - which is easier said than done.

Re:The appeal of working for Yahoo... (1)

poopie (35416) | more than 7 years ago | (#17157576)

We may not have officially sanctioned "20% time off" policies, but there's a lot of freedom to find your own calling.

Tomorrow (Thursday) is an internal "Hack Day", and Yahoo!s all over the world will be churning out interesting/cool projects in an informal competition. It's loads of fun.

Perfect example of what is wrong with Yahoo! This reads like something out of 2000 during the dot com boom -- not 2006.

20% time off?!?! How about 20% pay cut?

Re:The appeal of working for Yahoo... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#17141992)

What drew you to it, what keeps you there, what seems to be the type of new hire, and what draws them?

I work at Y.

What drew me to it? I had written lots of web code, but never faced serious scaling issues. I had read Google's papers on GFS, etc. and was curious to see the methods and infrastructure behind truly high volume sites. I knew that Y and G wrote a lot of code in C++, and had never worked on web C++.

Y offered me a chance to work on new, customer-facing code. All the other offers I got were either maintenance or developing internal apps. (Actually I work on back-end stuff, so my code isn't literally customer-facing; it's customer-affecting).

What keeps me here?
  • I feel more appreciated here than at any previous job. It's a good place for self-starters and problem solvers.
  • Engineering decisions are made by engineers; no Microsoft crap, no shiny shrinkwrap garbage software. Y is fundamentally a technology maker, not consumer.
  • Languages and technologies are usually the ones I would have picked. Perl, C++, FreeBSD, CVS, Apache, MySQL, etc.
  • I keep learning from Y's core technologies.
  • I have substantial freedom to develop new software.
  • The hours are reasonable (in my group.)


New hires? Don't know enough to generalize. We've expanded greatly in the last year.

no more casual TV listings (1)

m0llusk (789903) | more than 7 years ago | (#17129774)

It used to be easy to get TV listings from Yahoo. They just changed it so that you need to be signed into an account to get them.

The TV listings were the last reason I had to go use Yahoo, which is sad in a way as I used to be a big fan of almost everything they did before they went all corporate.

I can see it now... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#17129950)

The laptop will come with a picture of Bill Gates holding the laptop high in one arm and the following written below...

Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send to these, the homeless, tempest-tossed,
This LAPTOP with VISTA and an Activation Key.

Why yahoo sucks... (1)

bayankaran (446245) | more than 7 years ago | (#17130332)

I was a Yahoo email and messenger user for years - because there were no decent alternatives to many of the services they offer.

Till GMAIL introduced the increased storage limits the yahoos who run Yahoo was sleeping. The interface of Yahoo Mail is the worst. The standard webmail interface of my company is better designed.

The Yahoo messenger in its default installed state is a classic example of a cluttered bloated design. Plus why should I see an annoying flash ad in the bottom pane? At least put a text ad which does not flash itself every millisecond.

Re:Why yahoo sucks... (1)

X (1235) | more than 7 years ago | (#17134604)

Till GMAIL introduced the increased storage limits the yahoos who run Yahoo was sleeping. The interface of Yahoo Mail is the worst. The standard webmail interface of my company is better designed.

I think it's fair to say that the gmail move caught everyone by surprise. That said Yahoo responded with increased limits within a month (which is very impressive if you consider they had to scale up to *100 million users* having that increased storage in that time, while gmail still doesn't have to worry about that level of a storage). There is now a new version of the Yahoo mail interface, which meets and exceeds gmail's AJAX-iness, but a lot of users (not surprisingly) actually prefer the old interface. What's nice is that at least for now you have a choice.

too little too late? (1)

treak007 (985345) | more than 7 years ago | (#17130758)

Can Yahoo really catch up with Google? Perhaps they waited too long to do this. Right now they need to do their own thing and try to do something that Google isn't.

Need to fire more people (1)

bofar (902274) | more than 7 years ago | (#17132064)

I worked at Yahoo for a year, in the Media Group. While the departure of Lloyd Braun is a step in the right direction for the Media Group at least, it is not enough to solve Yahoo's problems. The technology leaders at Yahoo, starting with Farzad Nazeem and including others such as Phu Hoang, provide no leadership. There is no organized approach to development, just a bunch of people randomly creating product. The lead technologists think PHP is a good language. Worse than that, the ineptitude of the technical management drives good people out of the company.

And don't get me started about the inane architecture decisions that come out of the hardware review committee.

Re:Need to fire more people (1)

thilmony (248711) | more than 7 years ago | (#17132416)

Serenity now! There was really a Lloyd Braun there? He was in an insane asylum ya know!

Re:Need to fire more people (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#17135932)

It helps when you have Rasmus Lerdorf [wikipedia.org] available to help out.

Re:Need to fire more people (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#17142122)

I'm at Y.
There is no organized approach to development...

Do you really want someone dictating the "one true way", so you work extra to circumvent his obsolete or brain-dead decisions? I've seen enough of that BS at previous companies, and welcome the relative freedom of Y.

So you had a bad HRC experience. Did Filo catch you asking for too many servers? I think we need the HRC to prevent massive over-ordering of hardware. I've found them reasonable.

Ad department should pay a visit to a users' one (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#17132646)

Their completely pathetic "The Da Vinci Code" campaign on Yahoo Chess is the worst I've seen in my life. They turned all the game pieces into some nightmare caricatures that I still confuse and wrote "The Da Vince Code" in big fancy letters across the board. And no option to change back to the normal theme! I mean, I can't even tell a difference between black and white pieces without giving it some major thought, how are people supposed to play? No player I asked liked this theme and many said that they wrote to Yahoo telling them to stop this torture (and so did I, twice), but they don't care. How can they think this ad campaign is effective if everyone hates it? Bad publicity is also publicity?

No Layoffs? (2, Funny)

hondo77 (324058) | more than 7 years ago | (#17132654)

Layoffs, which at least one Yahoo executive had called for, are not in the plans.

Yahoo! also announced that they expect to overtake Google, in both market share and profitability, later this month thanks to their new strategic partnership with Santa Claus. An expected deal with the Easter Bunny should enhance their second quarter results.

Yahoo search suck because of paid inclusion (1)

Trieuvan (789695) | more than 7 years ago | (#17133856)

You cant have good result if you allow paid to include. Paid result cant provide good quality (if they are good, you should find it in first place). If you want to monetize, just use sponsor links.

frIst psot (-1, Flamebait)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#17135860)

United States of as to w4ich *BSD

They don't care about users. (1)

jotaeleemeese (303437) | more than 7 years ago | (#17189162)

I have been a Yahoo email user for at least 7 years (or very close to that, I just can't remember).

Somehow my Inbox got screwed and that started a voyage of pain I wish not in my worst enemy.

Basically every person that replied to me thought either:

a) I was computer illiterate.
b) I was an idiot.

the tone of the messages was patronizing to the extreme and nobody seemed to be prepared to engage in trying to solve the issue.

Their last message basically confirmed that I am derranged:

> Thank you for writing to Yahoo! Mail.
>
> We have investigated the issue you mentioned in your email and at
> this time your account appears to be in full working order. We
> apologize for any inconvenience. If you continue to experience problems, or if
> we can be of assistance in another matter, please let us know.
>
> Thank you again for contacting Yahoo! Customer Care.
>
> Regards,
>
> Flora
>
> Yahoo! Customer Care

My reply:

> Thank you.
>
> I am moving to gmail already.
>
> Bye.

What a pain, but I can't take this kind of service any longer.
Check for New Comments
Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>