Beta
×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Google NASA Partnership Announced

Hemos posted more than 7 years ago | from the word-hit-the-paper dept.

NASA 154

eldavojohn writes "Google & NASA announced their partnership today with many benefits. The director of a NASA site said 'Just a few examples are new sensors and materials from collaborations on bio-info-nano convergence, improved analysis of engineering problems, as well as Earth, life and space science discoveries from supercomputing and data mining, and bringing entrepreneurs into the space program.'" Update 23:51 by SM As pointed out by so many readers the GoogleNASA site originally linked was completely bogus.

Sorry! There are no comments related to the filter you selected.

Gah! (5, Funny)

Karganeth (1017580) | more than 7 years ago | (#17288444)

Apparantly, taking over Earth isn't enough for Google...

Re:Gah! (0)

pair-a-noyd (594371) | more than 7 years ago | (#17289156)

Thank you. Someone please mod parent +5 insightful

I wonder if Google will patent image analisis. (1)

GR8_GRM_RPR (1019770) | more than 7 years ago | (#17289462)

This would run afoul of the paintbrushed lunar base photos. "Google Moon plan your next alien abduction in advance." Sort of like mapquest only with real zoom. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K0a3BIknRLc [youtube.com] http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/02/05/041424 9 [slashdot.org] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Aep-U7IScRs&mode=re lated&search= [youtube.com]

Re:Gah! (3, Funny)

Ngarrang (1023425) | more than 7 years ago | (#17289588)

I, for one, welcome our new search engine overlord.

Re:Gah! (1)

extern_void (1041264) | more than 7 years ago | (#17289712)

Everything started a long time ago, just look at one dollar sign "In Google we trust".

fear

Re:Gah! (1)

FhnuZoag (875558) | more than 7 years ago | (#17289760)

Well, I'm feeling lucky.

Now I know... (3, Funny)

Stanistani (808333) | more than 7 years ago | (#17288448)

The next flag on the moon will be Blue, Red, Yellow, and Green.

Re:Now I know... (3, Funny)

spellraiser (764337) | more than 7 years ago | (#17288564)

Yeah, it's true. They were offering jobs [google.com] on the Moon as early as April 1, 2004!

Re:Now I know... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#17289108)

I may be missing the joke... is this legit? I don't expect to be launched to the moon but is there something to this? Does anyone know? Am I about to be come the laughing stock of /.? Dag, better post AC... too scared of /back effect

Re:Now I know... (2, Informative)

ZiakII (829432) | more than 7 years ago | (#17289202)

I may be missing the joke... is this legit? I don't expect to be launched to the moon but is there something to this? Does anyone know? Am I about to be come the laughing stock of /.? Dag, better post AC... too scared of /back effect

Yes its a joke they had that as an April Fool's Joke.......

Re:Now I know... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#17289320)

I applied. *shrug*

Overlords (1)

RMB2 (936187) | more than 7 years ago | (#17288464)

All our base will belong to them.....

Well... Duh! (3, Funny)

smbarbour (893880) | more than 7 years ago | (#17288512)

How else will they get their employees to the Google Copernicus Center [google.com] ?!

They've got a lot of work to do though if they plan to open it in late spring, 2007.

PHISHING ATTEMPT, TAKE THAT DAMN LINK DOWN (5, Informative)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#17289560)

GoogleNasa is NOT an official Google site, and is just phishing for Google account information. What the fuck, Slashdot - do you EVER look at these links? Such incompetence...

Mod parent up! (3, Informative)

FhnuZoag (875558) | more than 7 years ago | (#17289836)

Checking whois leads to Chris C Kemp: (Notice website similarities)

http://www.chrisckemp.com/ [chrisckemp.com]

This guy doesn't seem to have any connections to google or NASA, true, though I don't know if phishing is an accurate accusation.

But be careful, folks.

Re:PHISHING ATTEMPT, TAKE THAT DAMN LINK DOWN (2, Informative)

smbarbour (893880) | more than 7 years ago | (#17289942)

A: The site is only open to EMPLOYEES of Google and NASA. (Who would know better if it were a phishing attempt)
B: The partnership was announced by NASA in September of 2005.

Not only is this old news, but the registered "owner" of the site is a well-respected member of the tech community.

Re:PHISHING ATTEMPT, TAKE THAT DAMN LINK DOWN (1)

Trieuvan (789695) | more than 7 years ago | (#17290214)

Not a problem. It've been slashdot anyway.

Google Base (-1, Redundant)

GarfBond (565331) | more than 7 years ago | (#17288530)

Can't wait for the new Google location [google.com] !

Land rush is on!!! (4, Insightful)

Average_Joe_Sixpack (534373) | more than 7 years ago | (#17288532)

www.gogglenasa.com
www.googelnasa.com
www.nasagoogle.com
www.googlnasa.com

Re:Land rush is on!!! (1)

Turn-X Alphonse (789240) | more than 7 years ago | (#17288914)

you missed Nasgel.com but maybe that's a little too "great things become twisted and evil" like.

Re:Land rush is on!!! (3, Funny)

aelbric (145391) | more than 7 years ago | (#17290000)

I guess NasGool.com is over the top then?

if i had google stock (1)

stoolpigeon (454276) | more than 7 years ago | (#17288536)

i think i'd be pretty happy about this.

Well that's just funny... (3, Informative)

pclminion (145572) | more than 7 years ago | (#17288538)

A friend who works at Google took me on a tour of a few of their buildings a little over a year ago. It was the weekend and hardly anybody was there, but I did remember noticing a big whiteboard (Google has thousands of whiteboards, which seem to be the primary medium for communication and development of ideas) with the headline "Google And NASA in 2007" at the top. I remember thinking at the time how odd that seemed. But it looks like out of all the zany ideas at Google this was one that actually survived for over a year and came to fruition.

Re:Well that's just funny... (1)

BSAtHome (455370) | more than 7 years ago | (#17288896)

The coop with Nasa is to get the whiteboards imaged with satellites and then distrubute them with Google WhiteSearch [beta] (TM).

The site is running on IIS 6.0 (3, Informative)

ranperry (757673) | more than 7 years ago | (#17288546)

Google? IIS 6.0? Helllooooo?

Re:The site is running on IIS 6.0 (4, Funny)

MyLongNickName (822545) | more than 7 years ago | (#17288980)

You misread. It is ISS 6.0. However, it is still in beta. Google corporate culture taking over already.

Re:The site is running on IIS 6.0 (1)

CaymanIslandCarpedie (868408) | more than 7 years ago | (#17289598)

Looks like they are running DotNetNuke [dotnetnuke.com] . If you can overlook its use of ASP.NET, it is a great (and open source) little web portal app.

Partners with benefits?!? (0, Offtopic)

IgLou (732042) | more than 7 years ago | (#17288554)

Eww, so wrong, so many bad, bad jokes. It's not fair! How do I begin??? Damn you, slashdot for bringing this up on a Monday!

Computronium Cloud ... (5, Funny)

lysdexia (897) | more than 7 years ago | (#17288562)

Slashdot - Space - December 2014

GoogleNASA Announces Dissassembly of Mercury and Venus

GoogleNASA's strategic alliance with FungibleNano has pushed their disassembly of the "useless" innerplanets into a computronium cloud. The "Massively Massive Massive 4D Quantuum Processor Fog" will reportedly use 10 years of spam filtered from gmail users to train an AI to solve large N-Body problems and appreciate fine wine.

google on the moon... (-1, Redundant)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#17288580)

The difference between Google and NASA is that people actually believed Google could build a lunar outpost when they started this: http://www.google.com/jobs/lunar_job.html [google.com]

Fake (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#17288592)

If I hadn't seen the announcement, I would have thought the page was a fake. Come on, it looks like a state-of-the-art website from '99.

Anyhow, interesting collaboration. I wonder how this will play out in the coming years.....

Re:Fake (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#17288656)

LOL! Registrant: Personal 1942 Westlake Ave Seattle, WA 98101 US Registrar: DOTSTER Domain Name: GOOGLENASA.COM Created on: 29-SEP-05 Expires on: 29-SEP-07 Last Updated on: 13-JUL-06 Administrative, Technical Contact: Kemp, Chris junk@chrisckemp.com Personal 1942 Westlake Ave Seattle, WA 98101 US (206) 770-9799 (206)686-6860 Domain servers in listed order: NS2.INTERMEDIA.NET NS3.INTERMEDIA.NET End of Whois Information Registry Status: REGISTRAR-LOCK Registry Status: clientDeleteProhibited Registry Status: clientTransferProhibited Registry Status: clientUpdateProhibited

Yep! It's a fake. (2, Informative)

morgan_greywolf (835522) | more than 7 years ago | (#17288988)

Let's see:

1. It's running IIS 6.0.
2. googlenasa.com registered to a Chris Kemp at 1942 Westlake Ave., Seattle, WA 98101
3. The aforementioned address is a high-rise apartment building [google.com] .
4. The Web design, as you say, is horrible.

Re:Yep! It's a fake. (1)

morgan_greywolf (835522) | more than 7 years ago | (#17289074)

Oh, yeah, and the site was registered in September 29, 2005

Re:Yep! It's a fake. (1)

ps_inkling (525251) | more than 7 years ago | (#17289902)

Google cache link: cache [google.com]

Cache date is December 1 of 2006. They registered google-nasa.com as well. Mentions Megan Smith and Chris Kemp on front page.

Re:Yep! It's a fake. (1)

michaelvkim (981938) | more than 7 years ago | (#17289206)

Chris Kemp works for NASA in Business Development.

Re:Yep! It's a fake. / its all big conspiracy (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#17289632)

Google and NASA are obviously teaming up together for the new "Fake Moon Station" program, similar to the fake Appollo landings.

Re:Sounds like shit... (1)

iknowwhatismyname (948542) | more than 7 years ago | (#17289654)

The name in the Nasa news aren't the same

http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2006/dec/HQ_06371_ Ames_Google.html [nasa.gov]
Michael Mewhinney
Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, Calif.
650-604-3937

Jon Murchinson
Google Inc., Mountain View, Calif.
650-253-4437

VS

http://googlenasa.com/ [googlenasa.com]
Megan Smith
Business Development
Meghan.Smith@google.com

Chris C. Kemp
Business Development
Chris.C.Kemp@nasa.gov

This sounds like shit to me

Not fake. (2, Informative)

farker haiku (883529) | more than 7 years ago | (#17289708)

Here's a nasa link [nasa.gov] admitting the disclosure of the joint venture.

Re:Not fake. (1)

Neoncow (802085) | more than 7 years ago | (#17290070)

Where do they link to the website in question?

Hey, I recognize that CMS! (4, Interesting)

theGreater (596196) | more than 7 years ago | (#17288604)

That's Dot Net Nuke, with an altered default blue theme. Good enough for Google, good enough for NASA, good enough for me.

Hey, it's at least mildly ontopic, and it proves I actually FOLLOWED A LINK!

-theGreater.

captcha: outrages

Re:Hey, I recognize that CMS! (1)

Frosty Piss (770223) | more than 7 years ago | (#17289576)

That's Dot Net Nuke, with an altered default blue theme. Good enough for Google, good enough for NASA, good enough for me.

GoogleNasa.com? It's running on Apache, with domain servers at InterMedia.net. The registrant is:

Kemp, Chris junk@chrisckemp.com

Personal

1942 Westlake Ave

Seattle, WA 98101

US

(206) 770-9799

(206)686-6860

Re:Hey, I recognize that CMS! (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#17290046)

So it's not really a Google / NASA site? It's asking for Google employee passwords. Is it a phishing site?

Partnership with benefits? (2, Funny)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#17288610)

Is that anything like "Friends with benefits"? Because that would be hot in orbit.

Google/NASA partner to change name... (1, Funny)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#17288628)

...to Cyberdyne Systems.

I, for one, welcome our new...

Ah, nevermind.

Re:Google/NASA partnership to change name... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#17288798)

...and that was the last anyone heard out of a certain software company from Redmond, Washington...

Re:Google/NASA partnership to change name... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#17288922)

Why... what do they plan to do with Nintendo of America?

Google Earth improvement? (2, Interesting)

tarlos25 (1036572) | more than 7 years ago | (#17288630)

Hopefully we'll get decently up-to-date satellite photos for Google Earth now. I'm tired of seeing my town as some vaguely greenish-brown blur.

Re:Google Earth improvement? (2, Funny)

Rob T Firefly (844560) | more than 7 years ago | (#17288860)

Hopefully we'll get decently up-to-date satellite photos for Google Earth now. I'm tired of seeing my town as some vaguely greenish-brown blur.
I'd agree with you, except my town actually is a vaguely greenish-brown blur.

Re:Google Earth improvement? (1)

Ngarrang (1023425) | more than 7 years ago | (#17289688)

Hopefully we'll get decently up-to-date satellite photos for Google Earth now. I'm tired of seeing my town as some vaguely greenish-brown blur.
I you certain that is not just a sad statement of the reality that is your hometown? It certainly is of mine.

Space Elevator? (1)

greyhill (992638) | more than 7 years ago | (#17288636)

Does this mean we'll see the google space elevator anytime soon?

Megan or Meghan? (1, Funny)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#17288640)

Anyone else notice that on http://www.googlenasa.com/ [googlenasa.com] , the Google Business Development contact is captioned as "Megan Smith" but her email address is "Meghan.Smith"?

Re:Megan or Meghan? (1)

aristotle-dude (626586) | more than 7 years ago | (#17289376)

That is quite common in companies. They will often use the proper "legal" name for the email address and display the preferred spelling elsewhere.

Re:Megan or Meghan? (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#17290196)

...but her email address is "Meghan.Smith"?

That's because she puts the "H" in "Hot".

Corporate partner (2, Insightful)

dawnzer (981212) | more than 7 years ago | (#17288650)

I think this is a great idea for NASA to take on a corporate partner. Not only does it look promising from a financial viewpoint, but it greatly expands the knowledge base and brainpower from using brainiacs from both the govement and corporate pools that are generally kept separate. I think there are several government agencies that would benefit from a corporate viewpoint.

Re:Corporate partner (1)

Mr. Hankey (95668) | more than 7 years ago | (#17289272)

NASA has plenty of corporate partners, including several large players in the aerospace industry. Lockheed Martin has a facility right next to Ames. The NASA/Google partnership is old news though, we were joking about GAmes (Google/Ames) maybe a year ago. This is just some guy setting up a website for publicity purposes, which is definitely not NASA-sponsored. There's no responsible official named at the bottom.

Seems perfect to me (4, Funny)

Kuukai (865890) | more than 7 years ago | (#17288678)

Yes, a search company teaming up with an agency that's always losing things! Maybe now they can find that Mars lander, those Moon photos, and what exactly Neil Armstrong said...

Interesting... (2, Funny)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#17288684)

But will it ever get out of beta?

Wait...date confusion? (1)

Jarjarthejedi (996957) | more than 7 years ago | (#17288716)

"FEATURE - NASA Takes Google on a Journey into Space - 09.28.05 "

September 28th of last year? Either that's some horrible dating software (which I doubt because the information isn't in and of NASA's recent news area and has to be found by searching for google) or this /. article was submitted last year and not approved till today or something. But that's impossible, no /. article is more than 5 min. old right? Right? Come on, where's my false hope going to be if /. isn't up to the minute!?

(I have found other evidence, the googlenasa site was created 09.29.05...it's a conspiracy I tell you!)

Re:Wait...date confusion? (5, Informative)

PerfectSmurf (882935) | more than 7 years ago | (#17288846)

I noticed that too. Seems someone posted the url for a year old announcement instead of the current one http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2006/dec/HQ_06371_ Ames_Google.html [nasa.gov]

Re:Wait...date confusion? (1)

Jarjarthejedi (996957) | more than 7 years ago | (#17288888)

Ahh...that's much better, though it still doesn't explain the site being registered last year after the announcement...maybe it wasn't noticed so NASA decided to repeat it or something...or maybe it's a dupe :P

budget (4, Funny)

michaelvkim (981938) | more than 7 years ago | (#17288720)

Maybe now NASA will have the budget to do some really cool stuff!

Disappointing (2, Interesting)

Anonymous Cowdog (154277) | more than 7 years ago | (#17288724)

I was expecting an announcement about Hubble images. There must be millions of them by now, but there isn't a great way to access them. Sure, NASA announces a new image once in a while; they come out in dribs and drabs. It would be great to see Google's take on Hubble image accessibility.

Nerd Porn (2, Funny)

derrickh (157646) | more than 7 years ago | (#17288744)

To 99.5% of the population, the following sentence is pure gibberish. But for the chosen few, it's like porn and candy all rolled up into one.

"Just a few examples are new sensors and materials from collaborations on bio-info-nano convergence, improved analysis of engineering problems, as well as Earth, life and space science discoveries from supercomputing and data mining, and bringing entrepreneurs into the space program."

D

Breaking News! (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#17288756)

Googe and NASA announced a partnership to relocate Microsoft to a moon farm!

Beware: probable phishing attempt (2, Funny)

VeryProfessional (805174) | more than 7 years ago | (#17288926)

To me, the site http://googlenasa.com/ [googlenasa.com] seems extremely suspect. It looks like a targeted phishing scam to get the personal details of Google and NASA employees. Slashdot, you owe us better.

Re:Beware: probable phishing attempt (1)

psililisp (323492) | more than 7 years ago | (#17289184)

Whois shows a personal registration to a Chris Kemp - http://chrisckemp.com/ [chrisckemp.com] .
Good for him, I guess.

it's genuine (1)

Fanther (949376) | more than 7 years ago | (#17289350)

No, it is by Google, the site's search engine is written in ASP.NET.
--
Friskr - Multi Search [friskr.com]

Am I missing something? (2, Informative)

jmerelo (216716) | more than 7 years ago | (#17288952)

The news release is one year old [nasa.gov] . And the site is neither registered to NASA or to Google, but to INTERMEDIA.NET [intermedia.net] . It's basically PR, anyways.

Re:Am I missing something? (1)

silentounce (1004459) | more than 7 years ago | (#17289342)

This [slashdot.org] is one year old, too.

World (1)

certel (849946) | more than 7 years ago | (#17288956)

Google is taking over the World! *Rubs his hands evily*

mo3 up (-1, Offtopic)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#17288958)

corpse turned over arrogance was everwy chance I got as to which *BSD

Its been done before (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#17288972)

I was always able to google NASA. Just add a "site:nasa.gov" to your search.

The search for ET just got easier (3, Funny)

blueZ3 (744446) | more than 7 years ago | (#17289034)

for NASA. Who knew you could just Google "alien lifeforms"? All that SETI CPU time was wasted

I can hear it now. "They were right..... (1)

3seas (184403) | more than 7 years ago | (#17289096)

...we never made it to the moon, it was all done on earth, google's earth."

Maybe we can call it the Googleplex.

If only we can find it thru google/nasa earth search engine.

The simple logic question the above is based on is:
What does a web search engine and web based advertising company have in common with NASA?

Seek and ye shall find?

Sweet, Can't wait for Moon Ads! (2, Funny)

WiiVault (1039946) | more than 7 years ago | (#17289098)

Yay now when I'm looking at the moon through the 'ole telescope with the kids I also get the latest deals from Amazon, Ebay, and whoever else uses their ad system.

The New Name (3, Funny)

Cytlid (95255) | more than 7 years ago | (#17289166)

I'm hoping for GASA and not Noogle.

Re:The New Name (1)

pavkb (247665) | more than 7 years ago | (#17290028)

Could be GOOOSA

Perfect match (4, Funny)

Fujisawa Sensei (207127) | more than 7 years ago | (#17289274)

Perfect match. Google makes money, NASA spends money.

New Google gooddie (1)

extern_void (1041264) | more than 7 years ago | (#17289474)

Just after Google Earth, Google Moon!

Re: New Google goodie (1)

fgb (62123) | more than 7 years ago | (#17290104)

was that sarcasm? [google.com]

Re: New Google goodie (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#17290262)

zoom in to see what the moon is really made of.

NASA, not NASCAR - whew! (1)

twocents (310492) | more than 7 years ago | (#17289668)

Wow, I glanced over the headline and thought I had read that Google was partnering with NASCAR. The vision of Jeff Gorgon with a Google logo next to the Pepsi/Coke/Pringles/Jiffy Lube/Dupont/Kwiki Mart/Kroger/Wal Mart/Coppertone/Bosch logos.

Space-based Contextual Advertising (1)

writerjosh (862522) | more than 7 years ago | (#17289734)

A few good points that were overlooked in the original article:

"...First, Google and Ames will focus on cataloguing NASA's "most useful" information and making it available on the Internet. This includes real-time weather visualization and forecasting, high-resolution 3-D maps of the moon and Mars, and real-time tracking of the International Space Station and the space shuttle.

No, there was no mention of space-based contextual advertising...

...This agreement between NASA and Google will soon allow every American to experience a virtual flight over the surface of the moon or through the canyons of Mars," said NASA Administrator Michael Griffin at Headquarters in Washington..." [source] [webpronews.com]

High quality fake though... (1)

Bif Powell (726774) | more than 7 years ago | (#17289804)

...as it's appearance is similar to many other professionally run sites. Runtime Error Description: An application error occurred on the server. The current custom error settings for this application prevent the details of the application error from being viewed remotely (for security reasons). It could, however, be viewed by browsers running on the local server machine. Details: To enable the details of this specific error message to be viewable on remote machines, please create a tag within a "web.config" configuration file located in the root directory of the current web application. This tag should then have its "mode" attribute set to "Off". Notes: The current error page you are seeing can be replaced by a custom error page by modifying the "defaultRedirect" attribute of the application's configuration tag to point to a custom error page URL.

Search Ranking (1)

bigbang19 (958410) | more than 7 years ago | (#17289892)

Users have complained that search results from pages originating in Mars have been artificially boosted over those from Venus thus creating a gender bias.

googlenasa - its dead, Jim. (1)

ekimminau (775300) | more than 7 years ago | (#17289948)

Server Error in '/' Application.


Runtime Error

Description: An application error occurred on the server. The current custom error settings for this application prevent the details of the application error from being viewed remotely (for security reasons). It could, however, be viewed by browsers running on the local server machine.


Details: To enable the details of this specific error message to be viewable on remote machines, please create a tag within a "web.config" configuration file located in the root directory of the current web application. This tag should then have its "mode" attribute set to "Off".


(code removed)

Notes: The current error page you are seeing can be replaced by a custom error page by modifying the "defaultRedirect" attribute of the application's configuration tag to point to a custom error page URL.


(code removed to get past slash. junk filters)

NASA has found a black hole of buzzwords? (1)

Mr. Underbridge (666784) | more than 7 years ago | (#17289968)

"bio-info-nano convergence"

We have found your singularity, Mr Hawking, and it appears it is made out of meaningless buzzwords. They seem to have zero volume and an infinite density.

Site seems to be down (1)

fullphaser (939696) | more than 7 years ago | (#17290002)

Server Error in '/' Application.

Along with other details as I went on to the site, just another sign to add to the growing list that the idea that google would actually make such a site is insane. Yes google does do the occasional server failure, but nothing quite like this, bad coding just isn't on google's list of things to release to the public, best look into it a bit more before jumping the boat.

Does this mean... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#17290050)

NASA is going to force Google to fix the bug in this page [google.com] that occurs when it is zoomed in all the way?

Obvious use (1)

ari_j (90255) | more than 7 years ago | (#17290060)

Your search for "pioneer 1 probe" has returned approximately 3 objects.

Behold the power of /. ers google/NASA (1)

sundru (709023) | more than 7 years ago | (#17290068)

Server Error in '/' Application.
Runtime Error
Description: An application error occurred on the server. The current custom error settings for this application prevent the details of the application error from being viewed remotely (for security reasons). It could, however, be viewed by browsers running on the local server machine.

Details: To enable the details of this specific error message to be viewable on remote machines, please create a tag within a "web.config" configuration file located in the root directory of the current web application. This tag should then have its "mode" attribute set to "Off".

Notes: The current error page you are seeing can be replaced by a custom error page by modifying the "defaultRedirect" attribute of the application's configuration tag to point to a custom error page URL.

The chairs will be flying in Redmond today (3, Funny)

QuietLagoon (813062) | more than 7 years ago | (#17290208)

Just wait until Ballmer hears that google has outmaneuvered Microsoft in courting NASA and all its data.

Yep - that is definitely Dot Net Nuke (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#17290292)

Notes: The current error page you are seeing can be replaced by a custom error page by modifying the "defaultRedirect" attribute of the application's configuration tag to point to a custom error page URL.

Yep, that's definitely Dot Net Nuke

And now it's broken (1)

Espinas217 (677297) | more than 7 years ago | (#17290394)

I don't know what it was but it's broken now. Server Error in '/' Application. Runtime Error Description: An application error occurred on the server. The current custom error settings for this application prevent the details of the application error from being viewed remotely (for security reasons). It could, however, be viewed by browsers running on the local server machine.

How does a soft company matter in a hard industry? (1)

heroine (1220) | more than 7 years ago | (#17290466)

Not sure how an internet startup is going to improve materials with revolutionary finite element analysis. Sounds like the only thing Google can do for NASA is either organize their data or improve their image by being affiliated with a corporate hero.

Load More Comments
Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?