Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Where Do You Go for Worthwhile Product Reviews?

Cliff posted more than 7 years ago | from the head-to-head dept.

Media 88

An anonymous reader asks: "What's the deal with reviews and product comparisons? My boss wants independent comparative reviews of proxy and web servers to use to make/justify his decision. We all know that what the vendors write about their own (and competitive) products, so I tried searching for 3rd party reviews. I can find heaps of articles on the web telling us how great IIS is or how good Microsoft's Proxy server is, but nothing showing a back-to-back comparison of Squid vs. Sun Java Proxy vs. Microsoft Proxy, and the same for Apache and IIS. What's happening here? Where can I find an honest back-to-back product comparison?"

Sorry! There are no comments related to the filter you selected.

Reminds of a KKK rally I once attended (4, Funny)

BadAnalogyGuy (945258) | more than 7 years ago | (#17677506)

I was a student at the time. I was interested in race relations, so what better way to get the 'inside scoop' on the whole deal than to see the KKK in action. Know your enemy, and all that. After the rally I sat down with the Grand Cyclops and asked him point blank, 'Why can't I find any good information regarding the superiority of any given race over any other given race?'

Your question reminded me of that, for some reason.

Re:Reminds of a KKK rally I once attended (-1, Troll)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#17677544)

I think I was at that rally. Thankfully we had us some rope and a heck of a good time.

Re:Reminds of a KKK rally I once attended (-1, Troll)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#17677690)

Why can't I find any good information regarding the superiority of any given race over any other given race?

If you have to ask, you're probably not white.

Re:Reminds of a KKK rally I once attended (-1, Flamebait)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#17678968)

black men have longer hamstrings and can run faster.
White men have guns

Re:Reminds of a KKK rally I once attended (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#17677752)

I wish I could mod you +1 funny, BadAnalogyGuy.

Re:Reminds of a KKK rally I once attended (1)

coolgeek (140561) | more than 7 years ago | (#17677756)

Certainly living up to your namesake there, Bad.

Re:Reminds of a KKK rally I once attended (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#17680556)

According to most definitions of success, and within reasonable probability bounds, you can actually.

Just since you make a point of asking.

Re:Reminds of a KKK rally I once attended (1)

Arslan ibn Da'ud (636514) | more than 7 years ago | (#17680568)

Right now, your post is +3 Funny, but I find it more insightful. Funny that.

So how did the Grand Cyclops respond? Or is my imagination better than reality again here? ;)

Re:Reminds of a KKK rally I once attended (1)

RealGrouchy (943109) | more than 7 years ago | (#17692006)

So how did the Grand Cyclops respond? Or is my imagination better than reality again here? ;)

I know that the OP was kidding, but I can't tell whether or not you are...

- RG>

La Griffe du Lion (0, Offtopic)

mosel-saar-ruwer (732341) | more than 7 years ago | (#17680834)

'Why can't I find any good information regarding the superiority of any given race over any other given race?'

Because you've never spent an afternoon with La Griffe du Lion [] .

Be afraid, people, be very, very afraid [] .

Re:Reminds of a KKK rally I once attended (2, Funny)

Absolut187 (816431) | more than 7 years ago | (#17683372)

Your problem is you used at least 3 words with over 4 syllables.
If you want to talk to the KKK, try using shorter words and maybe grunts.

you need a new boss (0, Insightful)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#17677542)

quit and work for a real company with employees who don't believe published trade media "review" propaganda.

Re:you need a new boss (2, Insightful)

coolgeek (140561) | more than 7 years ago | (#17677784)

Seriously. The way I was taught this biz, is don't believe anything anybody tells you. Set the stuff up and evaluate it yourself.

If your associates there have made decisions based upon what they have read, and not what they have experienced, there are probably some really nasty timebombs waiting to go off. Hopefully you'll be far far away by then...

Re:you need a new boss (1)

dangitman (862676) | more than 7 years ago | (#17678840)

Set the stuff up and evaluate it yourself.

So, how do I set up the tests to evaluate the best race?

Re:you need a new boss (1)

Overzeetop (214511) | more than 7 years ago | (#17679598)

Which races are you considering purchasing, and what will be their function in your organization?

C'mon - you've got to start with the basics! We can't do everything for you here on /.!

Re:you need a new boss (1)

dangitman (862676) | more than 7 years ago | (#17680404)

Well, I'm looking for experienced fnord handlers, and so far we are considering Asians and Maoris.

Wish it was that simple (4, Insightful)

Moraelin (679338) | more than 7 years ago | (#17678162)

quit and work for a real company with employees who don't believe published trade media "review" propaganda.

I can only wish it was that simple. But other than keeping quitting and moving to fresh small startups (which probably don't exactly pay a lot for an admin), it's not really practicable.

And even as a startup, if your work isn't purely developping your own product, you end up doing stuff for various clients. Which have their own ideas set in stone, based on reading some IT-for-retards ragazine or on a golf round with the nice salesman from MS/IBM/whatever. And we all know that you can't trust those techies with their techno-babble speak, whereas a salesman would never tell a lie ;) So even at a startup you may not as shielded as you'd think.

An as soon as the company grows past a certain size, and doubly so for companies whose primary product aren't programs or IT services, well, my favourite metaphor is: clue is heavier than air. The higher you go up the hierarchy pyramid, the thinner it gets. If clue were oxygen, you'd see higher level managers blue in the face like they're Smurfs.

To their defense, it's not their job to know the finer points and differences between web servers, but then it also shouldn't be their job to take such low level decisions. So you have a bunch of people taking decisions about stuff that they knew nothing about, and it wasn't their job to know anything about. What really makes it worse is having several layers of shielding against the effects of bad decisions. He made some "strategic decision" to go all-IIS, and can claim credit for any positive results (even coincidental or immaginary), but it's _your_ fault if something goes wrong with it or it takes too long to port your application to it. And whenever such shielding is in place, out goes the incentive to get any real clue or to refrain from taking bad decisions.

But, to get back on topic, you'll find very few large companies where such shielding from responsibility isn't in place. So you're limiting your employment oportunities drastically if you only accept jobs from the few who aren't led by people who don't take their IT info from ads and salesmen.

Probably a more realistic thing to do is realize that, in the end, few things matter _that_ horribly much. Some people have a penchant for blowing minor differences out of proportion, and make mountains out of molehills. There _are_ product issues that matter, and there _are_ awfully bad management decisions, but there's also a lot of stuff which really isn't as critical as the "either something is perfect or it's complete crap" gang makes it sound. If some proxy is 5% faster than another, pfft, it doesn't even start to matter. You'll want plenty of margin for when you get slashdotted anyway, but 99% of the time it'll be _way_ under-used. Having 5% or even 10% less unused capacity isn't the end of the world.

And once you do a realistic assessment of how bad it really is, a lot of things aren't _that_ horrible after all. So management picked a less than optimal proxy. Who cares? Compared to some other decisions I've seen various managers take, this doesn't even start to matter. If you're going to quit a job solely because of something like that, methinks you need to rethink your standards. And maybe look for an OCPD support group in your area.

Re:Wish it was that simple (-1, Troll)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#17686024)

Keep in mind, Slashdot seems to attract people who feel the need to shove their pedantic, oversimplified solution at anyone they can, probably as an attempt to fill the social void they have in meatspace where their repulsive attitude starves them of attention. The given solution of "quit your job" as a catch-all response to any friendly requests for on-the-job advice comes from the same mentality as "it's open source, shut up and go fix it yourself" whenever someone even politely mentions a bug they have come across in some open source app.

Depends on the product/application/environment... (4, Insightful)

A. Lynch (17937) | more than 7 years ago | (#17677560)

Everyone's use will be different... For production use, I've rarely found independent reviews that test what I want tested, in the conditions I want, doing the same things I'm looking to do.

For your example case, I'd personally test each product in-house, drawing up conditions and test plans ahead of time. If you're planning a significant deployment, vendors will generally supply product for you to evaluate. Sometimes if you ask nicely, too.

Just my two cents... And yes, I get that it may not be feasible. Its labor and time-intensive. But in-house testing and evaluation almost always beats 3rd party reviews, in my book.

Re:Depends on the product/application/environment. (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#17677712)

> vendors will generally supply product for you to evaluate

It's getting harder and harder to find one that will. Even though we bought 90 750 GByte drives from Newegg, the wouldn't even let us borrow a selection of controllers to try with the drives. We were buying either 45 2 port or 23 4 port controllers along with a $30,000 hard drive order, but they still wouldn't do it. I had heard those drives were finiky with controllers, and that was correct since we found only a single controller that would work even though we bought one of each that Newegg carries that was less than $100 each. We now have to RMA each of the controllers that wouldn't work and eat the 15% restocking fee.

Aside: the big new Seagates are very picky about controllers. The Promise SATA300 TX4 was the only one that would work with them. Unfortunately it's $60. Nice drives, but I thought at first we had received a bad batch of 90 drives.

Re:Depends on the product/application/environment. (2, Informative)

lukas84 (912874) | more than 7 years ago | (#17677930)

Erm, 750GB drives from Newegg are SOHO equipment. I'm sure, if you as a company asked IBM, HP, or whichever your server supplier is for a evaluation pack of one of their SAN appliances, that would've happened in a rather short space of time.

We usually do that for our regular customers (i work for an IBM BP).

Re:Depends on the product/application/environment. (1)

stunted (855225) | more than 7 years ago | (#17678826)

I have 3 SATA Seagate 500GB 7200.10s hanging of a Sil3124 with no problems, Silicon Image provide specks for the Linux driver (which I always like to support) and they're supposed to play nicely with FIS based port multipliers so in theory this controller can have 60 drives hung off it.

Re:Depends on the product/application/environment. (1)

Propaganda13 (312548) | more than 7 years ago | (#17679832)

Newegg has great prices and good service for a distributor. They're a big warehouse, don't expect anything beyond basic order information. You want low prices, great. You want technical support, forget it. Go with someone else and pay more for that support.

Re:Depends on the product/application/environment. (1)

hawg2k (628081) | more than 7 years ago | (#17679022)

These won't be cheap, but you said business, not personal, so give these a try.

The Burton Group []

Forrester Research []

too expensive! (can I have your discards? :-) ) (1)

fantomas (94850) | more than 7 years ago | (#17679398)

Sometimes its too expensive to run in-house tests. I work with a variety of small community groups that use IT, and also advise friends who are students and low income. I can't turn round to these people and tell them -

"Buy a laptop (/digital camera/access point/ etc) randomly and if it doesn't come up with the goods throw it in the garbage can out the back of your property and buy another one and test that, continue until you find the right one"

- I'm afraid that's just not a solution for people/organisations on limited income. Useful advice for good reviews to read is really useful.

p.s. can I have all the brand new kit that you throw out for not being up to standard after you've tested it? :-)

Very true--some of my techniques. (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#17685844)

For things like monitors / TVs, screw reviews. Go evaluate a lot of different models in person. Then you can see just how much the pixel size and contrast compare without having to wade through tons of numbers that may not even have much bearing on the actual picture quality.

For computers, I read the reviews at somewhere like Tom's Hardware. But not the hardware reviews, the software benchmarks. Then I take a look at what they're using for the test setups. Buy up those parts, slap them together, and you have a rather good system. You might need to look up older software benchmarks, though, if you're not trying to build a higher-end system.

You can also, to a lesser extent, go by brand reputation to a degree: e.g. Sony sucks hard, Maxtor sucks, but maybe Crucial has been pretty good to you, etc. Of course, you may find that one particular product in their lineup is the black sheep, so that's by no means perfect.

To a lesser extent, you can also search for "$PRODUCT sucks" and compare the hit counts, assuming that higher means worse. But that's highly unscientific, and if it ever becomes widespread, you can expect them to start manipulating the results via spam pages, etc.

The right way in corporate America (4, Funny)

heinousjay (683506) | more than 7 years ago | (#17677562)

Lie about it, and recommend whichever vendor gives you the most kickbacks.

Re:The right way in corporate America (4, Interesting)

clickclickdrone (964164) | more than 7 years ago | (#17679242)

Alas, this seems to be the norm amongst the US reviewing magazines. I've worked on and off in the UK arena and have heard some truly scary tales about how the US market works i.e. the PR company provides the copy, the advertising dept drives the editorial dept and so on. That would get seriously frowned upon here. Indeed, I know one editor whose ad dept wouldn't talk to him because he got so stroppy with them when they suggested he couldn't hammer a product whose manufacturer had just taken out a full page ad.

choice (2, Informative)

aerthling (796790) | more than 7 years ago | (#17677604)

Choice [] magazine does unbiased, in-depth reviews, comparisons and evaluations, although from what I've seen so far their software reviews are more consumer oriented.

Google is your friend... (5, Insightful)

RuBLed (995686) | more than 7 years ago | (#17677608)

Search in google the product you want to review then add the following phrase ", problems"

I'm sure you would get all the bad side, then weigh which one of the products are the lesser evil :)

sample query: iis, problems

Re:Google is your friend... (-1, Offtopic)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#17678798)

I'm on to you! You must work for Yahoo.

Re:Google is your friend... (5, Interesting)

Aladrin (926209) | more than 7 years ago | (#17678872)

While I don't use ", problems" on my search, this is basically exactly how I judge products now. I search for the "productx review" on Google, then I open all the links with reviews. I read a few good user reviews, a couple paid reviews, and then I read a TON of bad reviews. If nobody can find anything bad to say about the product, then I know I've found the one I want. If anyone can find bad things to say, I weigh those failings against what I want the product for and whether it will affect me.

Example: I recently decided I needed a toaster oven. Instead of rushing down to kmart and buying just any old oven, I went online and started doing reviews. Everyone I have told this to basically called me crazy. ("You searched for reviews for a TOASTER OVEN!?") I found that Euro Pro makes an amazing $80 (Macy's) oven. I then looked it up at local stores and found that KMart carries that brand. Unfortunately, the 'best' model was on sale that week for only $5 more than the cheapest Euro Pro, and they were sold out of it and the middle one, too. ($35, $40 and $50 normal prices.) I bought the cheap one anyhow, because I didn't feel like waiting. (KMart doesn't bother to restock things they put on sale because they'll have to honor their rainchecks.)

It's an amazing toaster oven. I absolutely love it.

I've used this technique for years. The only downside to it is that you tend to start thinking negatively first, and many products that had you hyped, you will end up not buying them. Kind of a downer. (But at least you didn't waste your money, which is more of a downer.)

I think if many people started using this method, either product quality would get a lot better, or there'd be a hell of a lot of astroturfing.

Re:Google is your friend... (3, Insightful)

TheLink (130905) | more than 7 years ago | (#17680300)

Sometimes if you don't get bad reviews it means nobody bought them, and all the good reviews are astroturf...

Google "sucks" & "teh sux0r". (3, Funny)

mosel-saar-ruwer (732341) | more than 7 years ago | (#17680928)

...and then I read a TON of bad reviews. If nobody can find anything bad to say about the product, then I know I've found the one I want...

If I'm thinking about purchasing an Acme Widget, I google something like acme widget sucks .

Or if it's a technical product, like the Acme Flux Capacitor, I might google acme flux capacitor teh sux0r .

Because a bad review is worth its weight in gold.

Re:Google "sucks" & "teh sux0r". (1)

Kelbear (870538) | more than 7 years ago | (#17683636)

Same here, I will only buy a product after reading a review with negative comments.

If they haven't taken the time to make note of negative qualities, then anything positive they have to say is suspect. No product is perfect. If I wanted only positive comments I could read the product summary from the manufacturer. I read review to see the negative comments. If they didn't mention negatives I could buy the product and get slapped in the face by a suprise flaw. If they mentioned small ones, then I would be at least a little more confident that I won't be finding unwelcome suprises.

The ideal review for a product will have good points, followed by several small flaws, followed by a comment stating that the owner enjoyed the product despite the shortcomings. That's when I feel safe to buy something.

That's Awesome! Let's Try It Out. (1)

Petersko (564140) | more than 7 years ago | (#17688138)

Search Phrase: linux sucks 1,630,000 hits Well then. Good enough for me! Tonight the linux server in my closet gets wiped and Solaris goes on. Unless... Search Phrase: Solaris sucks 602,000 hits Damn. Linux sucks 2.7 times worse than Solaris, but apparently Solaris still sucks.

Re:Google is your friend... (2, Informative)

oliderid (710055) | more than 7 years ago | (#17678874)

There are a lot of "price aggregators" out there.
So you could also add "--order" to your search request (banning it).

Re:Google is your friend... (1)

BobPaul (710574) | more than 7 years ago | (#17683428)

Your comma is superfluous. Google returns the same results for "iss problems" and "iss, problems"

Fighting Carpal Tunnel 1 key at a time

Google. (3, Insightful)

RyanFenton (230700) | more than 7 years ago | (#17677660)

There's just too many product types out there to expect any site to track the feedback of, well, the entire market of stuff that's out there. For stuff I've looked for recently, garden equipment and robotic vacuums (ends up there's a bit more than just Roomba out there), I've found specialist forums and even commercial ads to be useful in tracking down details to search further on.

As far as generalist sites - I've found the eclectic community over at [] to be fairly useful in getting a quick grip on what to look for - but forum-goers there are intentionally against bad-mouthing products (thread-crapping), so you have to take a large variety of recommendations there with much due skepticism. Great place for leads though.

Then, of course, there's the Resellerratings [] -style sites. Once you've scoped product details, it's quite important to get feedback on who you're buying from. Again - due skepticism in all regards will help you in various ways, but large negatives or fake praise for rarely-rated stores can be an important part of an investigation for a large purchase.

If it's not a big purchase though, I'm usually comfortable just hitting Froogle [] , Amazon [] , or NewEgg [] and being done with it.

Ryan Fenton

Re:Google. (2, Insightful)

BillGatesLoveChild (1046184) | more than 7 years ago | (#17677818)

Google is lousy for Product Reviews. Seach for a review on anything, and you'll get pages of web shops with the text "Add your own review" (invariably empty). I guess many people searching for "reviews" are consumers, rather than frustrated product review authors!

I've stuck in a few feedback items for Google to clean this up. No luck yet. Hopefully Google will get around to fixing it.

Meanwhile and are good places to start for mainstream PC products. For example: =500300_5120955_ []

It's tough (4, Insightful)

Beryllium Sphere(tm) (193358) | more than 7 years ago | (#17677688)

I've given up searching "$PRODUCT review".

If you're lucky, a magazine will have a comparative review and will have taken roughly equal amounts of ad revenue from each of the competing vendors. Useful search terms include "shootout" and "versus".

Anecdotal evidence from the tech community can be a heuristic if you're wondering about general bugginess and hassle factor. If you need real benchmarks, the only ones that mean a thing are those you run yourself.

Are you running a mixed shop or a single-vendor one? Don't underestimate the pain of interoperability and equipment management hassles if you've never experienced them.

Work as hard as you can to pin down what you need: good scaling on SMP machines? Easy management? Particular features? Good local talent pool for running/fixing it? Low purchase price? Support contracts? The more questions like that you answer, the clearer the choice will be and the easier the web searching will be. "Apache scale SMP OR cluster" is likely to get more informative results than "Apache IIS comparison".

If you are worried about security, then abandon all hope of useful information from the press, concentrate more on lockdown and scheduling updates then on the choice of product (but never install IIS 5), and keep an eye on the news.

Cultivate sysadmins in other places who have environments about your size and with similar needs.

Re:It's tough (1)

dangitman (862676) | more than 7 years ago | (#17678978)

"Apache scale SMP OR cluster" is likely to get more informative results than "Apache IIS comparison".

I don't know what alternatives there are for other platforms, but DEVONagent [] has advanced search features, like boolean operations and plug-ins for various specialty search engines. It can also do deep-scanning searches (following links) and is good at filtering out junk. I find the NEAR operator is immensely useful for day-to-day searches, finding terms that are closely related - but rejecting terms that simply appear on the same page in different contexts, while not requiring them to be in an exact sequence like using quotes would.

Your boss is stupid (3, Insightful)

dtfinch (661405) | more than 7 years ago | (#17677698)

Can't he trust you to decide what fits your needs?
IIS and Apache are _very_ different, for example, and you can't choose between them based on product reviews.

Re:Your boss is stupid (3, Insightful)

CastrTroy (595695) | more than 7 years ago | (#17679758)

Exactly. Apache and IIS fulfill completely different roles. They are both web servers, but look at it like this. Windows, Linux, And QNX are all operating systems. However, I'd probably never recommend putting QNX on a home desktop machine. At least not for the average Joe. In the same light, if you're developers use .Net, you'll probably want to choose IIS. Even though you could use Mono, and run the .Net code on Apache, it makes much more sense to use IIS. However, if your developers use PHP or perl, it's still possible to use IIS, but I think you'd get a much better experience with Apache. Basically choosing your web server determines a lot of other things. If you choose IIS, you'll have to run windows, and most likely will need SQL Server, although many other databases work. If you choose apache, you'll probably be running linux, and MySQL or PostGres. Oracle will work on either of these choices. Anyway, my point is, is that you pick one that fits your needs. Unless you have 2 products that actually do perform the same role, like Hard Drive A VS. Hard Drive B, then you probably won't find a useful comparison.

Re:Your boss is stupid (1)

amper (33785) | more than 7 years ago | (#17713844)

Hmm...your post left me wondering whether or not you've ever run QNX on a home desktop machine. QNX for many years made available a fully-functional desktop environment that they called the Internet Access Terminal or IAT (among other names). Somewhere around here, I still have a QNX v6.2.1 CD (I think it's 6.2.1, anyway) with this environment. Had QNX ever bothered to expand upon this concept, we might have a serious contender for the desktop computer market. You should check out QNX more if you haven't; their stuff is really good. I'm actually surprised that QNX hasn't gone further with the concept, or that another company hasn't attempted to purchase QNX and continue development along those lines.

QNX's OS is a microkernel, real-time, multi-threaded, multi-processor, POSIX compliant OS that runs on practically every major line of CPUs. It would make a great basis for a full-featured consumer OS. The only real drawback is that it isn't Free Software, but I think there are situations in which Non-Free software can provide superior functionality to Free software, so I'm not totally against Non-Free software.

I'm not sure, but you may still be able to obtain the QNX development for free to check it out.

Not everything is in the press (0)

bill_mcgonigle (4333) | more than 7 years ago | (#17677702)

There might not be a huge market for reviews of proxy servers, which means it doesn't sell ad space which means it doesn't get done there. And, even if there were I'm not sure there's a Consumer Reports level of integrity in any of the IT periodicals that you might be looking in, they all take ad money.

Is this important to your business? Then why not hire someone who's done this before to talk to you about how the different products work and how they might apply to your specific situation? That's why consultants exist - you usually don't need someone with this skillset in your business, but today you do, so you hire him in for a day or so and you learn alot of specialized information really quickly.

If it is an important business decision and you're limiting yourself to magazines or serendipitous website reviews you're probably not considering the costs of the project as a whole.

Oh, and for hardware reviews NewEgg is pretty good. Amazon is not so bad for published software. These are obviously simple cases.

Re:Not everything is in the press (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#17682850)

Don't know about newegg, but amazons "reviews" are screened by amazon. Anything or nothing about the product, but some amazon praise will get you in. Amazon criticism even when bundled with relevant information about the product won't. Criticism of the product (no mention of Amazon) *might* be accepted, but it's less likely than for praise. Test it out, you can always delete reviews again.

Re:Not everything is in the press (1, Informative)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#17682908)

NewEgg...for reviews? You're joking, right?
See, all of the reviews on NewEgg are concocted by 'customers', not a 'journalist' or a 'staff reviewer'. With that in mind, most of the user reviews on there fall into one of two categories:
1. fanboys who give 5 stars to a product because it's made by a certain company that can do no wrong in their eyes (This new Athlon64 is awesome! Way better than anything stinky old Intel can make!), or
2. 'impatient' people who post a review on a product that was DOA and give it 1 start and call it 'the worst product ever'; sure receiving a DOA item sucks, but don't give the item a negative review before even installing it.

People suck. Go to Anandtech and read reviews, and look under their news section for 'daily hardware reviews' for hardware reviews from all over the Interweb.

I Get Best Reviews In Forums (4, Informative)

chromozone (847904) | more than 7 years ago | (#17677778)

If you go to a related forum you can often post asking about a couple products and often get a reply from someone who used both. Forums can be pretty useful and users can have great expertise. I suspect some manufacturers even let forums do problem solving for them. I got much better advice for a new ASUS mobo from a user in a photography forum then I could get from the ASUS forum. If you go to a forum for webmasters you can get all sorts of advice on servers. I don't trust a lot of published reviews in magazines that take advertising. Recently I was shopping for an LCD monitor and reviews often use wrong specs and don't seem to understand the product very well (they won't even mention if a panel is S-IPS or S-PVA etc). Certain brands seem to get a lot of wiggle room and a look at the ads on the bottom of the page usually shows why. One good site for head-to-head comparisons for monitors is &mo1=149&p1=1606&ma2=36&mo2=105&p2=1041&ph=6 [] .

I know monitors are not what you asked about but I still think forums are best bet. You may be lucky not many reviews exist because I find its a good way to get hung out to fry.

Re:I Get Best Reviews In Forums (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#17682390)

Try asking "What is better: Microsoft IIS or OpenSource Apache?" on
Best forum to do so!

Well (2, Insightful)

kitsunewarlock (971818) | more than 7 years ago | (#17677946)

I usually type in "product manufacturer's name" .com and read the opposing arguments. Whichever spouts the most useless, redundant statistics about their product ("This printer has USB AND plug and play support! PLUS it can print 8.5x11 and is composed of protons, neutrons AND electrons!") or the most bullshit ("MADE FOR GAMERS!") obviously is trying to overcompensate for a lack of serious ware.

Reviews are for end users, not it departments! (1)

lukas84 (912874) | more than 7 years ago | (#17677972)

Reviews aren't for you.

If you're in a deciding position (i.E. CIO/CTO), and your boss doesn't trust your decision, it isn't going to be easy anyway.
But if your real question is "how should i decide?", then here's the answer:

Evaluate! It's to only way to be sure the product meets your needs completely. Yes, it costs alot of money and time. The alternative is to guess a product.

E.g. if you're already using a Windows Environment with Active Directory (and like it), going for Exchange as a Groupware isn't a stupid idea. Or for ISA as a Proxy/PF solution.

Re:Reviews are for end users, not it departments! (1)

Anaxagor (211917) | more than 7 years ago | (#17678172)

Evaluate! It's to only way to be sure the product meets your needs completely. Yes, it costs alot of money and time.

I agree that evaluation is the only way to go, because it's the only way you'll know how the product will operate in your environment. I disagree, however, that it will cost a lot of time and money if you are evaluating software. You can download VMWare Server for Windows or Linux from VMWare for free. Create virtual testing labs using distros you also can download for free. Microsoft are also now very generous with their evaluation products, with most durations between 60 and 180 days. All it takes is your time, but again, once you have a basic Windows 2003 Server image, take a copy or snapshot of it, and clone other virtual machines from it rather than sitting through the install every time (just remember to use something like NewSID to change the SID each time, or you can get really weird errors when machines with the same SID are members of the same domain).

A lot of hardware/appliance vendors will also do a free eval, direct or via a channel partner, if you seem like a legitimate opportunity. You'll have to be prepared to deal with the sales people, though, because once a company has done an on-site eval they really, really want to make the sale.

Re:Reviews are for end users, not it departments! (1)

lukas84 (912874) | more than 7 years ago | (#17678226)

I disagree, however, that it will cost a lot of time and money if you are evaluating software.
Of course, using Virtual Machines saves some time and effort, but this only goes as for as you're evaluating software. But even then, you will need to learn a lot about the product, in order to implement a good and working evaluation environment. This can take several days, depending on the complexity of the product, maybe even weeks (e.g. a large Exchange vs. Notes test).

And evaluating hardware usually involves making down payments for the time you have the equipment (this depends a lot though).

Employee time costs as lot of money :)

Re:Reviews are for end users, not it departments! (1)

arachnoprobe (945081) | more than 7 years ago | (#17679114)

Evaluate! It's to only way to be sure the product meets your needs completely. Yes, it costs alot of money and time. The alternative is to guess a product.
Depending on your available manpower, the nature of the project and you company-structure you could do the following:
Make a quick (1 week) selection of you available choices.
Select the n options of these, which look most promisin
Setup of each of them with one "pilotgroup"
Get feedback from them, then select the choice with the best feedback.

test test test! (0, Flamebait)

Pegasus (13291) | more than 7 years ago | (#17678306)

Where can I find an honest back-to-back product comparison?"

In your test lab, stupid. I havent yet found a vendor that would deny an evaluation of their product.

I am going for the truth (1)

zoftie (195518) | more than 7 years ago | (#17678578)

Going for what single product review will recommend is silly. I rather go for infomration on quality in many reviews, collect thoughts that are very similar, discard that are wildly different, to get understand what the product is *about*, in terms of use and see wether I like it or not. My preference is with manufacturers that don't boost specs, on monitors, like Samsung does: ital/ls19mewsfxaa.asp []

vs: JLK/viewproduct/Samsung_SyncMaster_931BW/ []

But I go for hidden gems like: E16824116381 []

What's wrong with you people? (3, Funny)

dangitman (862676) | more than 7 years ago | (#17678824)

I find the best source of information about a product is the manufacturer's website. Or just ask a salesperson in a distributor's showroom. They'd never give me bad advice, would they? You're not going to rely on some random "third party" on the internet, are you?

Re:What's wrong with you people? (1)

wanax (46819) | more than 7 years ago | (#17689538)

In all seriousness, going to the manufacturer's website is a great idea if they have a support forum. No quicker way to get a feel for the bugs and problems you may encounter.

Here is a good place for unbiased reviews (5, Funny)

nightowl03d (882197) | more than 7 years ago | (#17678950)

I find out everything I needed to know at []

Some things I learned include...

1. The only job a real programmer will take must involve Ruby on Rails

2. Never buy a MS product

3. Filesharing music is "fair use"

4. Programmers should not create closed source programs EVER.

5. Linux sucks, BSD sucks, MacOS sucks, and Windows sucks. (I am posting from an IBM/360)

6. The only safe browser is Lynx

Re:Here is a good place for unbiased reviews (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#17682456)

You call that funny, but the advice no.2 should be taken serious. That's my experience.
No, i'm not trying to be funny, I'm dead serious.

Who's driving it? Who's fixing it? (2, Insightful)

spywhere (824072) | more than 7 years ago | (#17679014)

What's the best car to buy? Although some brands have quality issues that rule them out, ultimately the question "which car is best?" depends on who will be driving it.
I'm a former cabdriver, so I'd be happiest in a Dodge Charger police package; my ex-wife hates big cars, so her Saturn is perfect for her.

Similarly, I'm a Windows geek/MCP. I'm better at installing, configuring and running M$ products, so IIS would be best for an environment I had to design and support.
Others who read this would be far better off (and happier) running *nix, so a non-M$ solution would best meet their needs.

Choose the one you want, then find facts to support your preference... they're out there somewhere.

Re:Who's driving it? Who's fixing it? (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#17682694)

If someone hacking your system once a month is not an option, try to find facts to support YOUR preference.

my main place (1)

gEvil (beta) (945888) | more than 7 years ago | (#17679018)

I get all my product reviews from the front page of Slashdot. I know they're particularly trustworthy when they're in the form of an article about the product, rather than a "proper" review. It helps when I can google certain key phrases from the article and find identical matches in other articles about the product. I also pay close attention to the square and rectangular colored boxes that announce products on the different pages of Slashdot. They really get my attention when they flash or make sounds.

How do we know reviews are worthwhile? (3, Funny)

Kohath (38547) | more than 7 years ago | (#17679136)

Clearly, we need people to write reviews of reviews and post them.

Slashdot, of course (2, Funny)

hsoft (742011) | more than 7 years ago | (#17679146)

Thanks to slashdot, I know that the PS3 is total crap, and that the Wii is the best thing since sliced bread. I also know that Vista is nothing compared to Mac OS X. vi is better than emacs.

Oops, I can see the -1 Redundant coming (1)

hsoft (742011) | more than 7 years ago | (#17679166)

That's what happen when you don't carefully read other comments before posting :)

Rule of Thumb (1)

clickclickdrone (964164) | more than 7 years ago | (#17679302)

The more complex the software, the less useful the review will be. Unless it's something major like Office 2007 which will get a 25 page special, with almost anything else journalist paid the same amount whether it's twenty hours work or 30mins and in most cases, it's only just about worth it for a 30min one.
In some ways, those that write for free, the so called vanity writers, are producing better stuff because they'll quite happily produce a ten page review with dozens of images for pretty much anything whereas a 'proper' journalist will only have time to do a single page if they are to keep the food in their families mouths.
As someone else suggested, the best bet is to google on the product and 'problem'.

RTFM (3, Insightful)

mwvdlee (775178) | more than 7 years ago | (#17679360)


Before I buy any piece of electical equipment or software, I download the manuals first and then compare these.

Advertisements can juggle around with specs and features and make all sorts of claims which they don't need to keep, or atleast can be interpreted to fit the actual lack of features.

Manuals have much less room for this and will typically expose problems with a product, since manuals have to help the user get around these problems. They're also invaluable in determining whether a product will be user-friendly and whether the features claimed do what you need them for.

There's nothing that beats evaluating it yourself, since even manuals don't mention every single fact you might want to know. For instance, one deciding factor when I bought my TV was the speed by which I could change channels (which can vary a lot!); manuals and reviews typically don't mention this, so I tried out the remotes in the store.

Re:RTFM (1)

TheLink (130905) | more than 7 years ago | (#17680360)

Mod parent up.

When I was deciding on which music keyboard to buy I downloaded the online manuals and compared them.

I also searched forums and newsgroups for comments on them.

No regrets over my purchase (Casio WK3500 - was good bang for buck).

Some that I use (1)

pcause (209643) | more than 7 years ago | (#17679464)

It really depends on the type of product. For computer and related stuff I use CNet and PCWorld and also go to the forums that seem to cover the product or category. For PDA stuff I go to and read reviews/post questions. Fr software, I usually go toe the appropriate support board and read the posts to learn about bugs, vendor responsiveness, etc.

review aggregator (2, Interesting)

HeyBob! (111243) | more than 7 years ago | (#17679676)

I just found this site yesterday: [] while looking for reviews of Syncmaster 244T
It seems to pull in reviews from many different sources.

Find out first if PHB has a preference (2, Interesting)

RPGonAS400 (956583) | more than 7 years ago | (#17679926)

I was new at a job about 9 years ago and I had to find a new printer for printing certain bar codes. It had to accept a specific language. My boss was a former IBMer and liked IBM equipment and told me that. I spent literally a week coming up with my recommendation. My findings came up up with 3 that would work. Genicom, IBM, and Printronix. The IBM one was ruled out notwithstanding my bosses preference and I recommended the Genicom and gave my reasons. As soon as I did that, he told me he wanted the Printronix all along (we were replacing an older worn out Printronix) and made me order that. The Genicom sales rep had already dropped $4000 to match the $12000 Printronix price. I ordered the Printronix and felt like I had wasted a week.

In the end it was worth it, however, since the Printronix company never sent us the $12k bill and we got the printer for free. I still wish I had asked PHB right after I ruled out IBM.

Depends on the product/need (3, Informative)

jbarr (2233) | more than 7 years ago | (#17679930)

For IT-related stuff, it's Google or your favorite industry-specific newsgroups.

For general "gadget" related items, I typically check out The Gadgeteer [] first, then Google.

For digital cameras, it's Steve's Digicams [] all the way, then Google.

For cars, it's AutoTrend [] or Consumer Reports Autos [] , then Google.

For general household stuff, it's Consumer Reports [] , then Google.

And in pretty much every case, I check Google.

on the same subject, but different (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#17680042)

I work in the embedded industry, and I've found that it's impossible to find non-biased product reviews on cpu nodes and switches for the associated architectures (ATCA, cPCI, ETX, uTCA, etc..). Everything is a press release from the manufacturing company.

I had an idea to create a site that would rely on submitted product reviews by engineers who had actually used each product. I kind of gave up on it, because I figured it might be too niche of a market to actually generate the traffic needed to drive the content.

I guess here is as good a place as any to ask what you guys think...

Reviews (1)

dlhm (739554) | more than 7 years ago | (#17680094)

I use [] for the best reviews on the internet! I also just google the item/product.

Your boss is giving you a "make work" project... (1)

xxxJonBoyxxx (565205) | more than 7 years ago | (#17680102)

My boss wants independent comparative reviews of proxy and web servers to use to make/justify his decision.

Your boss is giving you a "make work" project; any (non-government, non-union) IT employee ought to be find such reviews (biased, of course to his/her particular leaning) in about 15 minutes. Is it possible you've done something to cause your boss to no longer trust your judgement?

Here's one method... (2, Insightful)

ZenFu (692407) | more than 7 years ago | (#17680118)

I don't know of any general product evaluation sites so I don't think you'll find a standard research approach. In gathing and organizing information from a multitude of diverse sources, I would do the following:

* get a spreadsheet...
* define what you want. This should become a long list of function points.
* evaluate the importance by weighting the important of each function point (eg. 1 to 10)
* get your stakeholders to review and approve your list if they haven't already when providing the importance score
* start looking at potential solutions. For each function point, input a percent of coverage provided by that solution. Footnote your source for future reference.
* group related function points for clarity so you can evaluate a products weaknesses at a higher level
* Scores will be higher for packages providing better function point coverage * start communicating your findings via charts, graphs, etc.

For extra credit, you can correlate your function points with gross margin (i.e., to what extent and to what level of impact a given function point will have on gross margin). Get with the accounting or operations folks.

That's my approach. It's not cool, but I haven't found anything better.

Google Groups (1)

JoeCommodore (567479) | more than 7 years ago | (#17680370)

I search the Google Groups [] discussions for people who comment on whatever it is, what problems they were having, what works, what doesn't. Sometimes you se shill postings and wide ranging opinions, so you need to read between the lines and see if it is a real topic or just some frustrated new buyer.

Nowadays with blogging as a profession, as that a lot of the postings are rants and opinions of people who have never actually bought or used the item (case in point - PS3 or Wii).

I still search USENET for opinions on products. (1)

Richard Steiner (1585) | more than 7 years ago | (#17682508)

I've found over the years that reading about the issues folks are having with Product X in one of the technical newsgroups is often quite worthwhile. It doesn't always cover enterprise stuff, but that isn't normally my area of interest anyway...

Re:I still search USENET for opinions on products. (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#17689650)

Good choice. I check a few vendor sites, head to the library for Consumer Reports and for enterprise products, where i work we have logins and access to Gartner and 2 other competitor research firms. These professional reviewers are good at making certain you don't miss asking important questions, but aren't a replacement for meeting with each vendor, discussing your needs and running a few trials in-house.

For example, what spam filtering products should be used when your company receives 20M emails each day with less than 20% estimated to be non-spam? USENET might be able to help, but how do you know if the person on the other side isn't a troll or not? OTOH, sometimes THE EXPERT in a field is there and helps you beyond belief.

Product research 101 (2, Informative)

mabu (178417) | more than 7 years ago | (#17683240)

Here are some of my tips to avoid products that suck.

1. If the product is available on, check out its reviews. Also note that sometimes slightly different/older versions of the same product have more reviews. It takes some time to sift through the sycophants and astroturf but it's a great source.

2. Search for negatives. Try google searches on "*product* sucks" or "*product* problems" and other permutations to find peoples' complaints about a product or its company.

3. Look for refurbs.... if you see a lot of refurbished versions of your product in the marketplace, this is a bad sign usually.

4. eBay... search completed auctions to see what the going value and interest is in the product. Also eBay auctions tend to have the most comprehensive array of specs on these products, often more informative than the manufacturer's web site.

5. Avoid all the large web sites with the bogus reviews and meaningless content. If you search on "*product* reviews" you're guaranteed to get a bunch of shill web sites that are worthless.

Search The Net (0, Redundant)

sciop101 (583286) | more than 7 years ago | (#17683586)

I cannot and will not rely on a single source.

Oracle White Papers (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#17684476)

They're NEVER wrong!

Simple... (1)

frank_adrian314159 (469671) | more than 7 years ago | (#17687222)

Just make up your own numbers and write a fake review on your website that says the manufacturer giving you the largest kickback is best. Show that review to your boss for validation - it's not like he has time to check. Sheesh. The things you have to teach kids these days...

I just ask Steve. (1)

Pink Tinkletini (978889) | more than 7 years ago | (#17691442)

Now there's a guy who knows what's what.
Check for New Comments
Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?