Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Future Game Coders - Online Education or College?

Cliff posted more than 7 years ago | from the a-fork-in-the-road dept.

Education 143

An anonymous reader asks: "My cousin is about to graduate high school and wants to enter the game industry. I told him to get a day job (possibly as QA in a game studio) and get an online degree like DeVry's Game and Simulation Programming degree or The Art Institute of Pittsburgh's Game Art & Design degree. I have a BS and an MS in Computer Science, and I've only found what I learned mildly useful for my game programming hobby. Should he suck it up and get a 4-year degree, or is taking online courses focused on game development the way to go? Has anybody gotten one of these degrees and done well for themselves?"

Sorry! There are no comments related to the filter you selected.

That's ridiculous (5, Insightful)

Hawkxor (693408) | more than 7 years ago | (#18509459)

A 4-year degree is better than a fake degree

Re:That's ridiculous (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#18510453)

The OP probably equivilantly poor BS/MS if he's recomending against a university degree.

Re:That's ridiculous (3, Insightful)

Grrreat (584733) | more than 7 years ago | (#18514285)

Yes a 4 year degree is very important and shouldn't be blown off. But one thing thats equally important as gaining knowledge, is being able to use that knowledge. There are allot of professionals out there with BS and MS degrees that are quite useless. Knowledge isn't everything, the most important thing to have is ability to use what you know. So if you are capable of using what you know then definitely shoot for at least a BS degree from a state college.

Re:That's ridiculous (2, Informative)

PrescriptionWarning (932687) | more than 7 years ago | (#18514445)

There's also the chance that the guy won't even be game programming material... sure its every gamer/programmer's wet dream, but come on there's only so many positions. Going to college and getting a real degree will at least give you more of a fighting chance for other jobs.

oh, and I should also mention that some top schools for programming/engineering, such as NCSU, are also offering a game programming course for CS students :)

Art, art, and more art (-1, Troll)

Marxist Hacker 42 (638312) | more than 7 years ago | (#18509461)

Video games today are about graphics and music, not about actual programming. All of the primary game companies already have set game engines of various types (board game, turn based, side scroller, flight/driving simulator, world simulator, or first person shooter) that can be ported to any platform. The only difference is in the graphics and music.

It isn't 1984 anymore. There is nothing new in video games to warrent actually having a computer science degree. Get the art, learn the tools needed to edit the game on top of the high level engine- and forget about the rest.

Re:Art, art, and more art (5, Insightful)

namityadav (989838) | more than 7 years ago | (#18509697)

It isn't 1984 anymore. There is nothing new in video games to warrent actually having a computer science degree..
I can't stress enough on how nonsensical this statement is. I find statements like, "There's nothing left here to research" very silly.
Please note that the questions is about "Game coders", not about music developers or graphics developers. The reason it's better to educate yourself in Computer Science and Software Engineering is because you want to be a scientist / engineer, not a mechanic. Game programming is still programming and has all the requirements (In fact, at times more challenging requirements) as any other sort of programming. And don't we all keep telling college kids to focus on the "Science" aspect of "Computer Science" for the long run benefits?
A Compsci degree will train the student to think in an analytical way to solve problems and understand the mathematical background of games. While a game design specific degree will train the student to follow an already defined path (Which will get obsolete in a couple of years anyway). A computer science student will be able to handle all problems technical or otherwise reasonably well. Game programming is a complex field. Not having thorough understanding of maths and computer science can only produce average-at-best programmers. In fact, in some cases, even maths and physics graduates will be more valuable to a game programming task than a game design degree holder.
For now, knowing game programming doesn't mean that you understand computer science. But the other way round is true (To some extent).

Re:Art, art, and more art (1)

Broken scope (973885) | more than 7 years ago | (#18509915)

Best of both worlds. I can get a BS in "computational media" and some extra stuff then stay for another 5 semesters and have a MS in CompSci. I can try the games industry and if it proves I'm not cut out for it or I don't enjoy it as much as I think I will I can go somewhere outside the industry and get a job that will do me well.

Re:Art, art, and more art (1)

daVinci1980 (73174) | more than 7 years ago | (#18509823)

You are simply wrong. Why do you think that game coders lament the fact that everytime we start a new game, we reinvent the camera? [] Hobby coding is just that, a hobby. It's totally different than doing it professionally.

I'll give you a hint, it's not because we're reusing the stock engine for the game we just finished, or any other stock game engine, for that matter.

As for the original question, get a four year college degree. Good fundamentals are the most important thing I care about when looking to hire someone. I think we've covered this topic pretty thoroughly [] already on slashdot (and my specific take [] ).

Re:Art, art, and more art (3, Interesting)

JFitzsimmons (764599) | more than 7 years ago | (#18509895)

As someone who works at simply modding other people's game engines, I can easily say that you have no idea what the fuck you're talking about. Games aren't just about having an engine that you can simply throw assets at and run off the assembly line (well, EA may think so). Coding is an extremely important part of game design. Even if I were to agree with your point, SOMEONE has to make these engines that you speak of.

Depending on where you'd like to go with it, you may or may not require a computer science degree. If you're looking to get into the hardcore parts of engine design then computer science may be for you. There's an awful lot of complicated concepts required at that level, both in terms of application design, and mathematics. For 3d engines you need to know a good deal about 3d vectors, matrices, quaternions. If you're looking at programming AI then you've got to have not only a solid foundation of understanding the mathematics of the engine but also AI's own fun programming style, such as finite state machines, and graphs (especially with respect to pathfinding), just to throw a couple of the more popular AI paradigms out there.

On the other hand, if you're just looking at doing game logic code, which is still vastly important to a game (since it handles the details of gameplay), then CS might not be as important. A strong foundation in programming and at least an understanding of some of the topics stated above is an asset. As a modder, this is where I stand now. My education isn't complete, and I simply don't have the time to be fiddling around with creating my own engines or modifying those that already exist.

Game logic includes things like defining how items are stored in a player's inventory, building the bridge between the inventory UI and the inventory in memory, how enemies are spawned, the interaction of agents with the environment, etc. While some may describe it as being more "menial" (i.e. some may claim that there is not a lot of challenge when hooking up an interface with an API), I would say that game logic is still highly stimulating and provides a good degree of challenging problems to be overcome. While engine designers may be making interesting innovations in the world of graphics and physics, the logic coders are the ones making interesting innovations in the world of gameplay. To pull a quick example, Gears of War's "active reload" is something that is handled by game logic and not the engine, and I consider this to be at least a little innovative.

To further a counter-point to parent, the Doom 3 engine was licenced to Human Head for the production of Prey. Human Head did not simply have a team of artists that put assets and maps into the engine until they had a game. There was still a vast amount of change that needed to be made to the engine and the game code to handle the new things that happened in Prey. Portals that could be shot and seen through, anti-gravity, the ability to leave your body, etc. all did not exist in Doom 3. These had to come from somewhere; the coders from Human Head, that worked on a pre-designed engine. "Completed" engines do not preclude programmers.

From an employment standpoint, I can offer no advice. I have never been employed at a development studio nor have I applied.

Re:Art, art, and more art (-1, Flamebait)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#18509997)

Mod parent -1 Retard.

Re:Art, art, and more art (1)

Marxist Hacker 42 (638312) | more than 7 years ago | (#18510017)

Even wrong can be interesting. I've learned a lot from this thread- turns out code reuse isn't as prevelant in the gaming industry as it appeared to be to me (I happen to be the type of person who HATES First Person Shooter games- and DOOM3's engine seems to have taken over 95% of the gaming industry).

Re:Art, art, and more art (1)

mikael (484) | more than 7 years ago | (#18510039)

Perhaps the original poster of the article wishes to set up his own game company - it certainly is possible in the UK. Put together your own team (find some entry-level animators/artists and put together a game engine demo to show to publishers).

Re:Art, art, and more art (1)

ewanm89 (1052822) | more than 7 years ago | (#18512423)

Introversion are doing well out of it!

Re:Art, art, and more art (2, Informative)

big4ared (1029122) | more than 7 years ago | (#18510357)

Total BS. The staff on most games is about 40% engineering. There are more artists per title than programmers, but the programmers make more money. I know because I work as a Rendering Engineer for a game company.

Programmers are needed to do everything from writing the code to optimize a mesh's index list for the GPU's post-transform cache, to writing blinn shaders, to making sure that the sliders work in the game so that the artists can work. The visual quality of a game depends on both artists and engineers. You need both, and even if you have an engine like Unreal, there is always more work to do.

Re:Art, art, and more art (5, Insightful)

UnknownSoldier (67820) | more than 7 years ago | (#18510759)

As someone who has worked on PC, PSX, PS2 games, and currently a Wii title, you're talking out of your @$$, because not everyone works for EA, THQ, etc...

Here's WHY you want a 4 yr B. Sc. degree:

* You will be exposed to the breadth of comp sci. Games are one of the few applications that require you to know a little of EVERYTHING. Specifically:
  • hardware (timers, interrupts, input),
  • math,
  • graphics (and why and where you need to use the various "cheats/hacks" such as simulating a stencil buffer with alpha, etc.)
  • audio,
  • real-time computing,
  • networking,
  • compiler optimization (i.e. why you need to know asm, so you can see why gcc sucks so bad generating bloated STL code, and replace it with your own...)
  • memory management
  • audio
  • AI
  • scripting & language design (i.e. ok, LUA doesn't suck so bad now, now that I've replaced it's memory management...)
  • software engineering (knowing the trade offs of various designs)
  • optimization (standard speed vs flexibility)
  • database design and management (including file formats), and last but not least,
  • User Interface Design.

If games sound a lot like an Operating System, it is because they practically are!

* Sure some of the classes you will never use again, but at least you'll have the language and the background to know WHEN you should choose one algorithm over another, and the pros/cons of each. i.e. static arrays over dynamic lists, etc. Learning big O notation will help in this.

* YES, you probably could be be a great games programmer without a degree, but it's hard to prove it without experience. To get experience you have to demonstrate you have the knowledge. (classic chicken-egg) That piece of paper shows that at least you
  a) understand the basics, and
  b) were committed to finish getting it.

* Lastly, don't get into game programmers for the money. The pay stinks, & the are hours long. (BOO Crunch Time). Only the crazy ones survive in this industry (avg turn around time is There is always something NEW to learn, especially when the "next-gen" consoles come out. (Usually scratching your head at trying to figure out how to best make efficient use of the hardware)


Re:Art, art, and more art (1)

UnknownSoldier (67820) | more than 7 years ago | (#18510783)

sorry, last paragraph got munched....

* Lastly, don't get into game programmers for the money. The pay stinks, & the are hours long. (BOO Crunch Time). Only the crazy ones survive in this industry (avg turn around time is less then 5 years before jumping to another industry) because we eat, breath, and live code, and like constantly being challenged. There is always something NEW to learn, especially when the "next-gen" consoles come out. (Usually scratching your head at trying to figure out how to best make efficient use of the hardware)

Re:Art, art, and more art (1)

Chelloveck (14643) | more than 7 years ago | (#18514539)

I just want to add a big "Me, too!" to everything Unknown Soldier has said. I'm one of those who was programming games for <5 years before getting out of the industry. From the perspective of the work, it's great. You do need to use a huge range of skills. In a year and a half I'd done everything on his list, and more. It's incredibly challenging stuff.

But you've got to love it. And I mean you've got to want to eat, drink, and breathe game programming. Because that's what you're going to do. I got called on the carpet by my manager one day. He'd noticed that I was only working a 9-hour day, and that I wasn't going to get very far in the company if that kept up. Mind you, this wasn't "crunch time" and everything was completely on schedule. We had one guy who only went home to shower once or twice a week; he slept under his desk and lived on Chinese take-out. I have a wife and two kids, and I actually like to spend time with them. I got out of that hell-hole.

There were lots of other things wrong with the company contributing to its being a hell-hole. The whole "work harder, not smarter" mentality was only one of them. But from what I could tell, the whole experience wasn't an atypical for that industry.

Game programming (and art, sound, design, and all the rest of it) is only for those who really love it.

"/.", "/.", and more "/." (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#18511309)

Well IMHO The OP said that his cousin is interested in getting into the game industry. How everyone interprets that as "I want to be a programmer", says more about the poster than it does the cousin. There's a wide range of jobs that involve games, that also apply outside the industry.

Now as far as the industry is concerned, with increasing complexity all around. There will be greater specialization with a smaller number overall. There will be the game engine/middleware companies and the content creators (with a smaller amount of programming). There may even be the stock assets company.

"The Future" or "the future" (5, Insightful)

SyniK (11922) | more than 7 years ago | (#18509467)

If he will love game programming for the rest of his life, skip the 4-year degree.
If he might want to change to something else later, say outside of computer programming even, get the 4-year degree.

Re:"The Future" or "the future" (1)

DesertBlade (741219) | more than 7 years ago | (#18509975)

He already has BS and a MS so either option is moot for the future. He needs to learn new skills quickly so either on-line or one-off college course from the university. I would recommend the later just in case he does want to get another degree.

Re:"The Future" or "the future" (1)

sarahbau (692647) | more than 7 years ago | (#18510397)

The poster has a BS and MS. The person in question has yet to graduate from high school.

Re:"The Future" or "the future" (4, Insightful)

ottothecow (600101) | more than 7 years ago | (#18512043)

in which case he should get the 4 year degree.

the 4-year degree is more about improving yourself as a person and learning how to learn than it is about training for a specific career. An added bonus is that it looks significantly better on a resume than a "fake degree"

Go to college, have fun, major in what you find interesting (you may discover you dont really want to be a game programmer at all and instead love cell biology...who knows) and take classes that will allow you to branch out in different directions (learn how to code...take a microeconomics course...make sure you can write all of those and you will be fine no matter what you want to do)

Re:"The Future" or "the future" (1)

geekster (87252) | more than 7 years ago | (#18510499)

Just posted to remove my "overrated" moderation which wasn't meant for you.

Re:"The Future" or "the future" (1)

ggKimmieGal (982958) | more than 7 years ago | (#18514293)

I don't think college is something you should skip if you have the chance to go. It's four years when you learn more than just a skill set. You make friends that you'll have for the rest of your life. He might meet a special lady friend there. You become interested in things you never thought you would. There's nothing than can compare with the college experience. Plus, if he really loves video games that much, he can teach himself what he wants to know during his free time. The fact is though, for the most part, people don't really know what they want to do with their lives at 18. Most people have an idea of what they want, or some kind of direction. College will open up more possibilities for the future. And I hate to say it, but most 18 year olds don't know how to take care of themselves. College is a nice buffer time in which people figure out how to do laundry and how to use coupons at a grocery store.

Get a real degree (1)

stratjakt (596332) | more than 7 years ago | (#18509469)

Neither course will guarantee him a spot (or even help) designing the great games of the future. Those are designed by suits in boardrooms, for the most part.

But at least a real degree is worth a little more than a comparable size of toilet paper.

Computer science, by far (5, Informative)

Shados (741919) | more than 7 years ago | (#18509487)

Unless the university totally sucks, a computer science degree contains most of the important stuff for game development: maths, maths, applied maths, more maths. Did I mention some math? Oh, and some system programming.

In the end, thats all what games are about.

I didn't check by myself, but my girlfriend who goes to CMU told me they have a graduate program for game programming thats fairly popular with EA too I think, so then one can kill 2 birds with one stone: have a fairly decent CS degree, and game specific education, with a potential big name having you in their line of sight as soon as you graduate... Its almost a flawless plan, if it is true.

Re:Computer science, by far (1)

nuzak (959558) | more than 7 years ago | (#18509765)

Being a game programmer for EA is like being an animator for Disney. You're a temp that they'll use up and throw away.

Re:Computer science, by far (1)

Cyberax (705495) | more than 7 years ago | (#18509887)

You don't need a lot of math in game programming. Just some linear algebra (up to eigenvalues and eigenvectors) and analytic geometry. I've learned these things when I was at school, it's not hard at all.

Well, if you want to implement a physics engine you'll need some tensor calculus and differential equations. That was covered in a single year at my university (I don't remember if it was the first or second year).

Re:Computer science, by far (1)

Shados (741919) | more than 7 years ago | (#18509981)

Thats already more math than 99% of other programming related jobs :)

Re:Computer science, by far (1)

Pseudonym (62607) | more than 7 years ago | (#18510321)

And if you want to implement AI? What if you're working for a company that isn't interested in last years' games, but next years', which might feature fluid simulation or something? And what about the next generation of multi-core CPUs where locking will be so expensive that you'll need to start using lock-free programming?

It might just be me, but I would not hire anyone who deliberately learned as little as possible, to do only just what was required to do last years' job.

The best favour you can do yourself is get a general education in computer science, with a thorough grounding in software engineering and pure/applied maths.

Re:Computer science, by far (1)

Cyberax (705495) | more than 7 years ago | (#18510425)

What kind of AI? Image-recognition or bot-like intelligence?

I've worked in image recognition field, it doesn't really need much math too. Intelligence of game bots needs even less math.

As for parallel programming (BTW, one of my favorite languages is Erlang) - you don't need math at all for it. You do need a good knowledge of CS, but it's not university math.

But you might just like math :) I still read new books on mathematical logic even though I don't need it at work.

Re:Computer science, by far (1)

Pseudonym (62607) | more than 7 years ago | (#18510541)

For the record, I'm specifically talking about a general computer science education, with maths. Now read on...

Intelligence of game bots needs even less math.

No, it doesn't, but how can you make an informed choice between two path-finding algorithms? No, you don't have to have seen and analysed them both before, but you at least need to be able to do the analysis.

As for parallel programming (BTW, one of my favorite languages is Erlang) - you don't need math at all for it. You do need a good knowledge of CS, but it's not university math.

Again, sure. But consider the next generation of lock-free programming. To understand that, you need to be able to reason through cases, understand transactions, and have a pretty thorough knowledge of how the different levels computer cache (including store buffers) work.

What I'm saying is that a specific "games-only" web qualification is no replacement for a decent general computer science education. To be a modern software developer, be it in games or whatever, you need to know how to learn and adapt, far more than you need to know specific industry-specific factoids. And any company that values the latter over the former is not a company that you want to work for.

Re:Computer science, by far (2, Informative)

Drawkcab (550036) | more than 7 years ago | (#18510333)

You don't need extremely high level math, but the further you go with it, the more likely you are to be able to retain and apply the basics in appropriate situations. A 2 year certification program generally isn't going to cover much university level math at all. When it comes right down to it, you could learn almost anything on your own without a degree, but if you have the skills for it, just get a real degree and make yourself employable.

Re:Computer science, by far (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#18514993)

But for game design? How much of game design isn't linear algebra or Markov models?

Re:Computer science, by far (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#18515141)

Propably most scare skill needed in game industry is artistic skills. Art dudes know zero math and dont need to, all been implemented in the tools they use. See any Einsteins in those Starwars about films? Pretty sure same apply to games these days...

My advice (2, Interesting)

ajenteks (943860) | more than 7 years ago | (#18509489)

Get the dayjob being a game tester, see how demanding and unlike playing games working in the field really is, and then go from there. Granted, it looks and sounds fun, but for every person who's bragging about how cool there job is there's probably a horror story to match it.

There's no real need to rush to college or start paying for speciality education right out of highschool. Make sure you like the smell the roses before you want to grow them.

Re:My advice (1)

JNighthawk (769575) | more than 7 years ago | (#18511589)

That's a pretty good idea to see whether he wants to actually be in the industry or not. Go with this, submitter's cousin, and first find out if you actually want to work on games before devoting your life to it.

Re:My advice (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#18511953)

One of those horror stories is that of one of my friends. He was a tester for a major game company and loving his job. I mean, what's not to like when his job was testing the multiplayer version of a not so buggy FPS?

Things started to change for him after his assignment got switched to testing a horribly buggy game for little girls. I can't say if it was the rainbows, the ponies or the excessive use of pink, but two months later he snapped and quit his job.

Neither! (1)

garnetlion (786722) | more than 7 years ago | (#18509499)

I found both to be a waste of time

Re:Neither! (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#18509813)

Doesn't surprise me since the only successful game programmer I know is self taught. He never went to school for anything other than public school. But while most kids were playing or dating or any number of other things, he was teaching himself more programming languages than I can name. I guess you can say it was his hobby. Now it is his job.

Re:Neither! (1)

Monchanger (637670) | more than 7 years ago | (#18510905)

And you back that up with what? Why do people like you even bother posting when you know you'll get rated a 1 at best?

Oh, let me guess. You dropped out a few semesters after starting college to start an evil empire that sells second-rate operating systems and bloated word-processors.

Greater options with a regular degree (4, Insightful)

eric76 (679787) | more than 7 years ago | (#18509503)

He will have far greater options with a regular degree.

An on-line degree is unlikely to open the doors that a degree from a regular college or university will.

Even from a regular college or university, the choice of the school can make a big difference. Years ago, I sent in an application to one company in New York City but never heard back. I mentioned that to someone who was familiar with that company. According to him, it is nearly impossible for anyone without a degree from an Ivy League School to get any kind of development job there.

So the choice of school does matter. A degree from an on-line school won't open near as many doors as from a regular school.

suck it up (1)

Neotrantor (597070) | more than 7 years ago | (#18509515)

when he grows up and wants to be something more than a code monkey hacking away at a game he'll be glad he went the full four years

what 4 year degrees are for (4, Insightful)

PhrostyMcByte (589271) | more than 7 years ago | (#18509545)

College is there for four things:
a) to further prepare you for a professional working life.
b) to give hands-on training with hardware you couldn't afford at home.
c) for people who can't learn as well on their own.
d) breaking into a career that heavily depends on diplomas.

Ask your cousin if he needs any of this, and he'll know his answer. D is definately a hurdle for programming jobs, but it fades as you gain experience to vouch for your skills.

Re:what 4 year degrees are for (1)

fred fleenblat (463628) | more than 7 years ago | (#18509621)

I don't think (b) is quite right. College CS programs tend to have the same desktop/windows/visual studio setups as anywhere else. The unix machines (if they even have them) are probably donations of obsolete hardware, stuff you could get on ebay for $500.

a, c, d and right on the mark though.

Re:what 4 year degrees are for (2, Insightful)

Metasquares (555685) | more than 7 years ago | (#18509927)

I was going to agree, but I just got access to my school's supercomputer today. If you're fortunate enough to go to a school with good computing resources, there are many opportunities to play with some really incredible machines that you'd probably never get access to in any other way.

(Of course, my first thought when logging on and noticing that I currently had the whole system to myself was "is there really anything I'll need this much power for?")

Re:what 4 year degrees are for (1, Funny)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#18511769)

(Of course, my first thought when logging on and noticing that I currently had the whole system to myself was "is there really anything I'll need this much power for?")

Running Vista perhaps?

Re:what 4 year degrees are for (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#18509685)

And here I thought college was there to provide the opportunity for young minds to learn for learning's sake.

Re:what 4 year degrees are for (1)

Clover_Kicker (20761) | more than 7 years ago | (#18510489)

You forgot the substance abuse, and hopefully getting laid.

Re:what 4 year degrees are for (4, Interesting)

GT_Alias (551463) | more than 7 years ago | (#18510669)

I think "friends and networking" deserved its own bullet point (unless it fell under A). I wouldn't have imagined I'd maintain some of the contacts I have to-date, and they've led me to opportunities that would have been difficult to come by otherwise.

RPI's new Game major! (2, Insightful)

Mr_eX9 (800448) | more than 7 years ago | (#18509549)

Begin shameless plug:

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute just got their new Games and Simulation Arts and Sciences program out the door--your son can get a four-year education in Game Design with one of five concentrations, or elect to take a dual-major or dual-degree with GSAS and a more traditional major like CS, Psychology, or something else.

I'm a freshman at RPI and I'm not planning on transferring into this program, but I am planning on taking a minor in Game Design Studies, which has been available for a couple of years now. I know some of the professors involved in making this program happen, and they've really been busting their asses to make the school faculty and the Regents of New York happy with it.

Read all about it here: []

Re:RPI's new Game major! (1)

BadERA (107121) | more than 7 years ago | (#18509675)

Nice! I live across the river from RPI, I got my associate's in IT from RIT, I'm a mostly self-taught enterprise .NET software engineer for a major vision company with its computing center in Latham ... I've been looking to go back to school, RPI, being so close, is on my list for consideration. This might be soem motivation ... I wonder how part-time friendly it is.

Get a regular degree (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#18509595)

Having a BS in computer science from a regular university won't hurt his ability to get a job working on games and it will definately help him should he decide he wants to work in a different area of software development.

Please, before you post.. (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#18509623)

This debate always overlaps with one of my pet peeves.

Namely, that people say "I did x, without going to (Univeristy|College|Dog Show|HS|...)" that is good for you. But you can't talk about how successful your career is until you've retired or have enough money to retire. And even still, the industry isn't like it was in 1999, and I doubt it'll look the same in 2047 (when this kid's about to retire).

I've been hearing stories for years about discrimination against older programmers. What happens if we programmers have to face stiffer competition in the future (against cheap foreign programmers, or languages that significantly boost productivity, or degree inflation caused by a horde of people like me worring about what is going to happen to them 30 years from now)? I'll take only one bet, of all the things that will change, HR trolls never will.

So just be careful before you tell a kid that the easy way pays off. Think not only of the present, but also of the future.

Community College is the better option (1)

KU_Fletch (678324) | more than 7 years ago | (#18509637)

I work in the industry (art side, not code side), and I can say that at the end of the day it doesn't matter where you got your skills, as long as you have them.

We've got coders who are self taught, coders from 4 year programs, and across the spectrum in between. I would mainly suggest NOT going to DeVry or a vocational program like it. They don't offer a very strong foundation or practical projects to learn on. Go to a local community college and start working on mods if you want the cheaper/faster approach. Good C and .NET skills coupled with a good feel of game code (gained through modding) will be the foundation you need. From there, look at studios that have internship programs or offer short contracts for people new to the industry (do or die contracts).

Re:Community College is the better option (1)

Lord Kano (13027) | more than 7 years ago | (#18511189)

I second that motion.

Just a few years ago, I decided to return to college to finish the degree that I abandoned when I was 18. I started off at the local Community College and have since earned two AS degrees there. Those degrees were enough to land me a good job programming and will help me to finance the time I'll spend at a regular college getting the B.S. degree.


A few points (3, Insightful)

subreality (157447) | more than 7 years ago | (#18509669)

Coding games as a hobby and working in the games industry are *vastly* different experiences. If he's hoping to find a career doing what you do for a hobby, he's in for a rough time.

Vocational education will teach him how to code. A college education will teach a much broader range of things. Note that the games industry isn't all about coding, and if/when he gets sick of it, the college degree will be applicable to a much wider range of jobs.

I'd suggest that he intern at a games company for a little while and see if it's really what he has in mind. And if he thinks it is, then he can choose between learning to code and learning a broad range of skills, depending what he sees himself doing there.

What does he want to do? (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#18509687)

It all depends what role your cousin wants to fill. If he wants to produce, he may be better served by entering the industry immediately as QA, since a large amount of producers move up from QA. If he wants to be a programmer, he definitely should go to college to some degree. I would suggest a standard CS program to get good fundamentals, but I have heard good things about the programs at DigiPen and Guildhall at SMU for undergraduate. If he wants to be in design, it's a little less solid. He could go to a program like those above and train for it, or he could just start authoring levels and mods for existing games. Both seem to have some credence, though generally I have found that companies prefer one or the other. Art he could go to a program for, but if he already has Maya or Max skills, his portfolio will be what makes or breaks him.

The CMU grad program is excellent, as mentioned by someone, though that would obviously be further down the line. I came through it myself, after a standard CS degree. It is an excellent all around primer on the team oriented entertainment technology industry.

Code Monkey vs Code Scholar (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#18509705)

A technical degree will teach the specific technologies for whatever part of game development your friend wants to get into. The question is whether your friend just wants to be a technician, or is he interested in understanding the systems he'll be working on. It's the latter skill that will allow him to switch careers, or advance beyond being just another code monkey.

I'll be honest, in my world, there isn't a lot of respect for people coming up from technical degrees.

My advice would be to go for a college degree, but dedicate units of spare time to learning the specific technologies for game programming, or slowly getting one of those online certs if he wants some sort of paper proof of knowledge.

Better solution (4, Insightful)

Overzeetop (214511) | more than 7 years ago | (#18509707)

Rather than spending four (or more) years in college up front, perhaps a better choice would be to get into the lifestyle for 6-8 months first.

I would recommend 8-10 cups of strong coffee per day, so that he can stay up writing code for 12-16 hours, 7 days a week (start slow - 10x6, then work up to 16x7). Not fun code, but really mind numbing stuff. Get a good test project, then let him go at it. Figure a good project might be 4-6 weeks long (say, 500-600 hours of programming). When he gets about 75% of the way through - ideally when he starts seeing the light at the end of the tunnel - change the specs. This will be hardest for you, as you'll need to phase the changes so that there are 2-3 new things that need to be incorporated each week, plus 2-3 things that will need to be rewritten. Make sure that you throw in the rolling-rewrite or two - somehting he's already rewritten that "needs" to be changed...again. If you're certain he's not saving old code, do a re-set once in a while to make him re-code something he's deleted as not needed anymore.

If he's not a slobbering idiot in 8 months, he'll at least be ready to save yoy a year's worth of tuition by taking 22-24 credits per semester. And you'll know he can hack the EA deathmarch. Well, at least until he has a family.

Get a 4-year degree (1)

davidwr (791652) | more than 7 years ago | (#18509715)

It doesn't matter what major, just get a 4-year degree from a respected school, preferably the toughest school he's qualified for that won't overstress him.

Education: you reap what you sow (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#18509855)

I completed my BSCS at ACCIS (now American Sentinel University [] ).
I would say it was as hard as many brick-and-mortar schools, but I couldn't say how it compares to an Ivy league school. My employer at the time made me a software engineer once I graduated. It took me almost 3 years (got a little head start at a JC). Most of the learning goes on at home, reading through work books and the text book. I think that distance education is getting better all the time, and most employers don't have a problem hiring people who complete their degrees this way. Experience ends up saying a lot more about a candidate anyhow.
Just my 2c.

I work in the industry... (4, Interesting)

badboy_tw2002 (524611) | more than 7 years ago | (#18509857)

...and regularly hire programmers. The job interview generally goes pretty much like any other engineering position. If he wants to code, he needs to know how to code. Don't know how to write multi-threaded code? Sorry, no job. Never heard of a pointer? Don't need you. That's not to say a four year program is required, we've hired people from game schools as well. Generally they have a background in CS (working in IT, another BS, hobby programmer) that has given them exposure to hard programming topics. I've found that in general game college doesn't give you any real rigorous CS training, and if you want to be a programmer its no different in this industry than any other.

Oh, and QA won't help you get an engineering job. It will take time away from school. Better off spending that time writing a demo or something, as that would be more impressive than saying how you tested X and thought Y would be a better way to do it.

Re:I work in the industry... (1)

linuxrocks123 (905424) | more than 7 years ago | (#18510297)

> Don't know how to write multi-threaded code? Sorry, no job.

Heh ... so /that's/ why games crash so often and never get fixed.

Re:I work in the industry... (1)

badboy_tw2002 (524611) | more than 7 years ago | (#18510651)

Nah, 9/10 that's just poor memory or resource management. Don't worry, I have lots of questions around that too :)

4-year degree trumps. (1)

SocialEngineer (673690) | more than 7 years ago | (#18509889)

I could just say "specialization breeds weakness", but I'll actually give a little more this time, I think :)

The usefulness of a 4 year degree is obvious - although game dev is gaining more and more cred, I would wager that many non-gaming businesses would hesitate to hire someone with a gaming degree (you don't always get to jump right into your ideal career, in many cases). Beyond that, the experiences from a good 4 year program are more than just learning how to make games - think of it like Public School, 400 level. Social interaction (read: networking with potential clients, employers, and coworkers) is a big part of the college experience for any would-be-professional.

Of course, one important aspect of becoming a professional in any tech industry is having experience BEFORE you get you got to school for it. I myself was involved in tech work a number of years before I started college. It'll give you a bit of an edge, or will at least put you on the same level as your peers.

Advice from a professional game software engineer (5, Insightful)

MaineCoon (12585) | more than 7 years ago | (#18509973)

I've been programming video games on for about 9 years now, with many shipped commercial titles on various platforms.

For the love of god, get a real degree. "Game" degrees are useless outside the game industry, and a joke and target of pity from within the industry.

Re:Advice from a professional game software engine (1, Flamebait)

JNighthawk (769575) | more than 7 years ago | (#18511379)

"Game" degrees are useless outside the game industry, and a joke and target of pity from within the industry.

Oh? Hm. Guess I should of thought about that before I went and got a bachelor's of Game Development and got hired at a respected game studio. Probably would have saved from this whole "being a professional game developer" thing.

Re:Advice from a professional game software engine (3, Insightful)

Broken scope (973885) | more than 7 years ago | (#18511693)

Just curious. Where the hell is another freespace game?

Re:Advice from a professional game software engine (1)

DingerX (847589) | more than 7 years ago | (#18512353)

Well, DeVry degrees are generally a joke and target of pity.

Heck, heavily advertised degree programs come in two sorts: Diploma Mills, which make their money by selling degrees with no value, and Turnover Engines, which make their money by enrolling people who subsequently drop out due to real life constraints, dissonance (it was harder than I expected) or disillusionment (I'm paying for what?).

A degree in video games is ideal for a Turnover Engine school: people think, "hey I like games, maybe I should work on them." They go to a course taught by an underpaid CS MA, and drop out: either they realize there's stuff like math and work involved and bail, or they engage the subject and realize that the degree is gonna be worthless.

However, there are some "serious" game schools, whose employees do get jobs in the industry. Read what people say about DigiPen, or, for example, the guy above me responding to this thread went to Full Sail. He also seems to like GuildHall. Look at where the graduates go, and how many of them. Also note what the students do while there: what courses are they taking?

There should be a difference between CS and Computer Game Design. A proper Computer Game Design course should apply CS theory to the fundamentally creative and collaborative endeavor of making games. So students should come out with a portfolio that demonstrates their capabilities individually and as members of teams. Again, go to those websites and download some student projects.

Degrees are for showing you can do work (1)

Sloppy (14984) | more than 7 years ago | (#18509999)

The longer and harder the degree, the more someone will believe you can learn and do work, in a very generic sort of way. If his vision of a career in games is working for someone else to make their games, then this is going to have an upside. So spend as much time and effort as possible; it's all about sending a message.

If he wants to make games and isn't thinking in terms of working for someone else, then top priority is to start writing games. Right now. If that's the way he wants to go, then CS may be useful, as education rather than as building credentials -- it depends on his existing programming skill.

Computer Science is a Mathematics degree. (1)

nbritton (823086) | more than 7 years ago | (#18510123)

How can you be a game dev without the calculus and linear algebra? The fact that you haven't used your CS degree simply means that your job may be outsourced soon. Computer science is a degree in applied mathematics; Mathematical logic, Number theory, Graph theory, Type Theory, Automata theory, Computability theory, Computational complexity theory, Quantum computing theory, Analysis of algorithms, Algorithms, Data structures, etc... A real computer science degree will not, and should not, teach you about practical programming, you should be able to pick that up on your own.

I recommend anyone looking for a real computer science degree to pursue a computer engineering degree instead.

Re:Computer Science is a Mathematics degree. (1, Offtopic)

Shados (741919) | more than 7 years ago | (#18510405)

Warning, this is a little offtopic.

No, just no. While Computer Science is definately extremely useful, and many jobs (like game development) are nice bets for it, saying that a CS degree should not teach you about practical programming because you can pick that up on your own is insanity. CS Degree should not focus on programming, that is correct (it should have a little bit, since it is applied math, but not much, you are right).

However, practical programming also is taught in school: its called software engineering. CS majors from schools where they teach "true" computer science, trying to pick up practical programming on their own, is simply a disaster waiting to happen. And since its by FAR the norm, the software development field currently IS a disaster. Programming is much more than just coding, and has its own set of theoritical concepts, from design patterns to architecture. You CAN pick that up on your own: more or less as easily as you can pick up all the theories you mentionned (which is not easy at all). Its possible, but simply put, most people require schooling to get it right.

Re:Computer Science is a Mathematics degree. (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#18512211)

is definately extremely useful

Its 'definitely'. Get it right. Retard.

Re:Computer Science is a Mathematics degree. (1)

Oxygen99 (634999) | more than 7 years ago | (#18513541)

Methinks the person more likely to suffer an imminent outsource related surprise is you, not the original poster.

Having worked in several organisations who've used outsourcing, the first ones to go are usually the ones with the technical, day to day programming skills while the ones who remain are the ones who understand the business processes. Hell, I've got a CS degree from a good university. Big wow. You know what? I've barely used any of it since I graduated. Have I ever been, or do I consider myself in danger of being outsourced? No. Have I seen lots and lots of coal-face technical jobs outsourced? Yes. I'm not knocking a CS degree, but in general, it seems the likelihood of being outsourced is directly correlational with the level of dependence your position has on knowing pointer operations, memory management, algorithmic theory and data structures.

A change of mind (1)

Braedley (887013) | more than 7 years ago | (#18510249)

After reading some of these comments, I have come to realize that a CS, CmpE or preferably a SWE degree would be better. If your cousin is dead set against a four or five year program, then he should at least consider a diploma program in a classroom setting, such as at the International Academy of Design and Technology [] in Toronto, or some similar institution. Nothing compares to being able to talk to your profs face to face.

College, definitely college (1)

plopez (54068) | more than 7 years ago | (#18510251)

By which I mean, clown college. As we all know, offshored humor is just not funny.

From someone who just got a game job... (2, Informative)

Herak (557381) | more than 7 years ago | (#18510337)

I'm about to finish a BS in Computer Engineering. I just landed a programming job at a fairly prestigious game company.

I think the 4-year degree is the way to go, assuming you are looking at a programming career path. Here's why:
  • Game programming is hard. You need to be a first-class programmer (seriously), and I think the DeVry's degree would put you at a disadvantage.
  • The game industry has a bias against online degrees (because of the above).
  • The game industry often pays less than other software jobs. Having a better/more flexible degree might get you a better salary, since they will be competing against offers from non-game companies.
  • College is fun. You might learn other things not directly related to game programming, and that's a good thing.
As for the path you suggested... as I understand it, QA is not usually a very good path for a job as a programmer, anyway. QA usually feeds more into producer/designer type jobs. To get a job as a programmer, what matters is to get as much programming skill/experience as possible - get part-time coding jobs and summer internships (even if they aren't in games) and try to do at least one really impressive games-related hobby project.

One more thing I'll throw out there... if your cousin is only interested in programming because he wants to do video games, it's possible that game programming isn't the job for him. He might be better off as a producer or designer.

Re:From someone who just got a game job... (1)

jhoger (519683) | more than 7 years ago | (#18511371)

Actually V&V, or non-auditing SQA is a reasonable path to becoming a programmer, since, if done right, the meat of V&V work *is* programming.

That said, game programmers are, as you say, underpaid, and I'd only assume it is worse for game testers.

My advice would be to stay well clear of the game industry altogether.

But to think of it another way, being a game programmer is a reasonable path to becoming a well-paid, professional programmer. It just won't happen while you're actually writing games. Game programming, like embedded software development is one of the more challenging, hard core types of software development. Apparently though it is so fun though that employers can get away with underpaying you for it. So do that for a while, but plan to move to another programming specialty that pays once you get your chops.

-- John.

College, no question about it.... (1)

Fallen Kell (165468) | more than 7 years ago | (#18510429)

Why? Because with a real college degree there will be very little question about his ability to learn something new. Or the ability to fully understand and comprehend a problem. Critical thinking and full problem analysis are skills that are only really developed at a good university. Sure you can learn a computer language on your own and learn the current tricks of the trade outside a university setting. But, if that is the case, you will only ever be a code monkey writing some sub function or routine. You will have a much harder time becomming the overall code designer, as your background doesn't show any experience at all with understanding full complex systems.

In other words, you may get into the industry, but getting higher then the bottom floor will be more difficult.

Besides, what will he do when the game industry decides to outsource to India? At least with a college degree in Computer Science or Engineering he has a chance to move to another industry. Just about every industry needs computer programmers, and many of them can not easily outsource (some can not do so by law). But with an industry certificate degree (i.e. DeVry Gaming, or similar), he will have an extremely hard time, and may in fact have to go back to school before being able to find other work. An engineering firm won't hire him for building their simulation tools if he has a degree from those types of institutes/schools, even if his last 2 years of work was building the physics model for outdoor environements in Half-Life Episode 9...

Oh man, online is crap. (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#18510463)

Check it out, there are many ways to get into, and stay out of the games industry. You are promoting two methods that will keep your family member on the periphery of the industry.

First: Don't be a QA. Yes, people think it's a great way to get in... yeah well no. In reality, QA isn't very much respected, and in the words of the director of SCEA product evaluations... "QA are little more than trained monkeys. It just isn't feasible yet to outsource them." - from a personal conversation during the GDC.

Now, we move on to the online degree aspect... are you kidding me? Online degree? Why not just buy a printer and print your own degree? Seriously, the only reason online degrees exist is for lazy people, shutins, and desperate people to spend enormous amounts of money on a degree of questionable quality. DeVry? HAHAHAHAHA. Take a look at for a great article regarding these for-profit game design degrees. If your family member is really interested in going that route, take a look at sending him to Carnegie Mellon, UCLA, Digipen (they are one of the best consistently.).

So what should he do if he wants to get into the games industry? Get good in traditional art if he wants to be an artist, or get good with programming. Get a traditional 4 year degree, and tell him not to screw off. Tell him to be smart about internships, and to learn on his own how to develop assets, or code. whichever is his choice. He can also go the route of getting one of many games available that can be modified, and have him make his own assets, get them in an engine, etc.

Another option available to him if he is the programmer type... explore Microsoft's XNA. This is a great framework to develop a small game quickly. Next, meet some IGDA members, keep an eye on what the industry is doing, and research the future. He needs to be able to speak well, write well, and generate code, design concepts, or art assets quickly and in high quality.

Do those few ever so simple things, and he'll be making Halo part 5.

4 Years (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#18510511)

The vast majority of the people I know who got jobs directly out of college got jobs at places they interned at during college. I've seen this is true of the world at large, the software industry, and the game industry. With a 4 year degree you have three summers to build up your work experience, resume and contacts.

Also, college is an experience. I don't think I know anyone who would have traded away their college experience for their current job (I know people who would trade it away for their current grad school, but the point is most people wouldn't).

Get the 4 year degree (1)

tomaasz (5800) | more than 7 years ago | (#18510515)

Make sure he understands that game development != real science. Constant crunch time, (relatively) low salaries, stress and deadly deadlines - what you usually hear about working in the game industry is true. It's really not so good.

Get the 4 year degree and a proper job outside game development, make your own games on the side. You can even sell them online on your own if they're good. You will enjoy it much better. I know I do.

Well... (1)

fitten (521191) | more than 7 years ago | (#18510611)

You couldn't count the number of highschool students who want to go off to be a game programmer because 'games are so fun'. They tend to think that it's two hours a day coding and six hours a day having fun playing games.

The real life of a game developer is 60-80 hour weeks, running the same code over and over trying to find some obscure bug in some function that performs some obtuse mathmatical function. There's incredible pressure to deliver before a competitor delivers something similar. After a couple months, the stuff you're working on will make you want to cry because you've done it so much. Then, if your game flops, you get to look for another job.

You should first talk to him to discuss the lifestyle that he'll have to follow in most of that line of work and ask if he wants to devote several years of his life to that. It seems glamorous from the outside as a game player but it is a type job where your life will completely pass you by and all you'll have to show for it is poor health, poor eyesight, and little money.

Four year degree and demonstratable skill (1)

Rob Kestler (694439) | more than 7 years ago | (#18510657)

Definitely a four year degree is going to massively help your case, especially as a "game programmer" (especially if you plan on being an engine programmer). But on top of that, look at most game position ads. They're usually looking for at least 1 shipped title. Trust me, spend some time actually making a gameplay example. It shows initiative as well as gives physical evidence of your abilities and why you would be a good hire DESPITE not having a shipped title. Oh, and don't think that you'll be driving a Ferrari either.

I have my own question... (1)

revlayle (964221) | more than 7 years ago | (#18511149)

(if anyone answers : )

How hard is it to get into the game development field for a programmer who has done 15 years of programming, but not game programming (for example in my case: desktop and web development (2/3rds desktop development) doing all sort of languages (my strongest being, these days, C#, C++, and (unfortunately, and outdated) VB 6). Have a 4-year Computer Science degree from University of Tulsa (got it in 93) and been programming ever since.

I was curious on the feedback (if at all to my query). I have always been interested in the game development field... i just ended up doing classic IT and business desktop software over the years as the job availability in the area I lived was basically that (and was kinda tied to the area for a time). Now, I don't hat my current profession and specialties therein, just always looking at something new.

Re:I have my own question... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#18511307)

You might be able to get your foot in the door as a tools programmer. Anything else is going to require some more game-specific skills. I recommend you find one of the free 3D engines that are out there, work with it, build something cool and make a demo out of it. It will both teach you the skills/language you're missing, and give you something concrete to show off. Make the code clean and solid and be prepared to show it. Bring a laptop to the interview to show it, don't bring a disc and rely on their machines. Good luck.

Re:I have my own question... (1)

JNighthawk (769575) | more than 7 years ago | (#18511473)

Well, it's definitely going to be harder since a good portion of the work that goes into games is games-specific, or at least altered enough from the mainstream way to make it much different. However, having a solid coding background and knowing your C/C++ fundamentals will definitely help.

My best suggestion to you would be to start coding games. Come up with a simple idea and go at it. Make a blackjack game, or maybe an asteroids clone, something like that. Making games is the best way to learn to be a game programmer. All in all, I can't really answer the question since I'm fairly new to the industry myself :-)

Re:I have my own question... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#18515107)

Since you have a solid programming background, it shouldn't be too hard to pick up game programming. My own path was: 4 year degree + 2 year M.S., one course in 3D computer graphics which got me interested. 6-7 years of business programming with 3D tinkering on the side. Landed a 3-month contract with a museum to program a 3D demo. At the same time I wrote a textbook on 3D graphics and got involved in some open source 3D projects. With that experience, I landed a 2-year contract as lead programmer for an arcade title (this company was moving from 2D to 3D titles, and I was their first 3D programmer). After that I left the industry and am doing my PhD now. I probably won't return to the industry - pay and stress levels are better elsewhere.

But, it you want to give it a shot, my advice is to download as many 3D engines as you can from and play with them. Pick one simple one and debug it and understand every line of code. Look on the net for 1990's VGA 3D tutorials - they teach the basics of 3D graphics well. One source is the PC Game Programmer's Encyclopedia, PCGPE. This is ancient stuff now, but it's a good start. After you digest that, write your own simple 3D engine, from scratch. After that, download a modern 3D engine (Ogre3D, Irrlicht, etc) and understand its basic architecture - it will use a modern graphics API (OpenGL, or Direct3D) and use techniques like shaders, level-of-detail, culling, state sorting, resource management, etc.

After that, you will have a good idea about graphics programming - which is maybe half of game programming. The rest is stuff like scripting languages, tools and dataflow for 3D models, networking code, AI, persistence, physics, etc. Two other packages you should look at are Blender (free 3D modeling program) and ODE (Open Dynamics Engine, free 3D rigid-body physics library).

Also check out forums like and (latter recently closed but there's a link to new forums somewhere).

That should be enough to get you well on your way.

P.S. University of Oklahoma alumnus, myself. Grew up in Jenks. Small world, huh? :-)

Get a degree (1, Informative)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#18511245)

I work in the gaming industry as a programmer. I have 13 years experience. I have hired (and fired) programmers of all stripes.

Some places are more snobby than others about your educational background, and I find that generally comes from the group in charge of hiring - a bunch of academics will want more schooling than a group of self-taught programmers. Having a degree will make it easier to get past the snobs, and the others won't really care about it because it's really not worth much. At the end of the day if you can walk into a game studio, sound intelligent and discuss programming topics with confidence you will eventually get a job no matter what the source of your knowledge.

I get asked this question periodically. I always recommend that the person get a degree at a reputable university. Not because it will help in getting into the gaming industry, but because you won't be in the industry forever. Most people drop out around the age of 30-35 because they want families, need to spend time with their wives and kids and that doesn't go well with crunch. People like to shit on EA, but they are far from the only company crunching. It shouldn't be that way, but it is. Having the degree smooths your exit to less stressful jobs outside the industry when you inevitably want that.

Another thing that I don't think anybody has touched on is talking the talk - I hire people who are passionate and interested in games. You obviously have to play them (although I get people who think games are for kids and are therefore trivial to make) but you also need to think about them, understand the common mechanisms involved and be able to discuss why some ideas worked and others flopped. Learn what kind of games the company makes before you apply and study both their games and competitors games. People working in any particular genre have a specific working language, and it makes you easier to work with if you already speak it.

Making games is definitely not "all fun and games". It can be fun, I still enjoy it 13 years later. It is very hard work and more challenging than non-industry programmers realize. A few years experience will grind those rose colored glasses away. Choose the company you work for carefully. Research them, if possible talk to people who work there. Try to get into conventions and talk to anyone whose ear you can bend. Go to the IGDA message boards and ask questions. Working at the wrong place will sour you quickly, but there are some good places out there that do give a shit about your health and welfare.

Re:Get a degree (1)

JNighthawk (769575) | more than 7 years ago | (#18511631)

Mod this man up, he knows what he's talking about.

Game programming IS hard. (1)

Codeweasel (1080953) | more than 7 years ago | (#18511273)

Game programming IS hard. It is much harder than anything you will encounter in the typical IT world. Having a solid engineering foundation, whether from a university or acquired from experience, will be a major advantage. I regularly interview many candidates with CS/MS degrees and others with IT programming experience who are unable to pass our technical interview, which is NOT specific to games. I'm talking about your standard Algorithms, Data structures and OOP type of stuff.

IMHO (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#18511373)

IMHO college teaches you more than just your technical training (provided you move away from home) and the skills that you learn outside of class may be just as important as the ones that you learn in class. Living at home attending school right now my life is basically the same as high school. Ive made no connections outside my local community and the best job opportunity is still the grocery store in town. By GOING to college or university you learn to meet people and make connections and these skills are what can get you a job beyond just technical ability.

Why do people hate on game degrees? (1)

JNighthawk (769575) | more than 7 years ago | (#18511437)

I've got a bachelor's of Game Design and Development and, not so coincidentally, a job at a game studio. Sure, the game degrees that are advertised on TV with hit phrases such as "tighten up the graphics on level 3" or "I make a living playing games all day!" are crap, but the real ones, such as Full Sail's, Digipen's, or Guild Hall's are nothing to snub your nose at.

Instead of going and getting a degree in a tangentially related field, such as mathematics or computer science, why not get a degree in game development? Of course, I'd only suggest that if he's *sure* he wants to be a game programmer. Otherwise, a more general degree might be the way to go.

As far as online classes... the only ones I've taken were for classes that were idiotic no matter what setting they were taken in (I'm looking at you, gen. ed. fluffer classes), so I can't really render an opinion either way other than saying classroom learning enforces some things better than an online class would and is more personal.

Re:Why do people hate on game degrees? (1)

280Z28 (896335) | more than 7 years ago | (#18512023)

People hate on all degrees that aren't the one they chose. It's just part of the college "game." If a small company has 15 employees with 2 game degree holders and 13 various cs, engineering, business/management, etc. degrees, then the 2 game degree holders are an easy common target to the 13 others.

Two Words: (1)

crhylove (205956) | more than 7 years ago | (#18511977)

Open Source. Get your feet seriously wet. The best education is learning how to do something by doing it.


Degrees? (1)

Sobrique (543255) | more than 7 years ago | (#18512479)

OK. I have a degree, it's a BEng in Computer Systems Engineering.

The subjects they taught me in this degree, are not often directly relevant to my day job - I work as a Storage Analyst, which is basically 'support, design and stuff' of SANs, Backup Systems and Archiving. These aren't really subjects that were covered in my degree.

My previous employer, I was working alongside someone who'd come in through an apprentice ship at 16, and had 4 years on me, with the company.

Which sort of shows, I guess, that experience _is_ a substitute for a degree.

The important point though, is in doing a degree I learned a _lot_ of things, that I'm starting to realise are phenomenally valuable to me. I understand the underlying concepts of so many things, not because I was 'taught' them precisely, but because I was taught how to think.

Once you start to understand what a 'computer system' actually _means_ then you start having an awful lot more ability to think laterally about how things should be done.

I've seen many workmates get into the 'don't understand it, so will put up with it' mindset, that's so _very_ prevalent, and have been shocked when I've pointed out a trivial solution that's just not at the 'layer' they're thinking of.

So, speaking as someone who spent 3 years on a degree. Worked part time for my second/third year, and moved into employment immediately. Have changed jobs 3 times, each time into something that I consider 'proper IT', and have quite a few people I know who _didn't_ do a degree, I would make the assertion that it's DEFINITELY worth it.

You will never have another opportunity to do it, between bills and pressures of work. It will be hard, but ... in my opinion it's an extremely valuable learning and growing experience. Do a degree. Do a degree in a subject you enjoy. It will serve you in good stead for the rest of your life. The subject is actually less important than the skills you gain, but obviously something relevant is more useful.

Skip it! (1)

robcfg (1005359) | more than 7 years ago | (#18512585)

Almost all I learned in the university was completely alien to the real world. There are lots of things you can only learn by doing it, it's the "Thousand books are not worth a trip" effect. If he likes the industry, he should focuse on doing games by himself and entering a game company. That was my experience.

Your best bet (1)

tkdtaylor (1039822) | more than 7 years ago | (#18513985)

Your best bet to get a good education with the highest chance of getting into the game industry when you graduate is to go to Digipen []
As far as I know they're the only school that will teach you relevant information to the game industry and give you a degree at the same time.

I wanted to go there when I was graduating from high school but being a Canadian couldn't get accepted because they weren't an accredited school yet, now they are except you'll have to be an exceptional student to get accepted.

Get the degree (1)

teflaime (738532) | more than 7 years ago | (#18514419)

Not only should he get the degree because of the wide aspects of the tech industry that he should be exposed to then, but also because it gives him something to fall back on if he determines that 22 hour days with no exercise, no sunlight, and no social don't really appeal to him.
Load More Comments
Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?