Beta

Slashdot: News for Nerds

×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Sony Takes on YouTube with Video-Sharing Site

Zonk posted more than 7 years ago | from the because-when-i-think-sony-i-think-wacky-video-clips dept.

Sony 82

thefickler writes "According to Reuters, Sony has announced that it will launch a video-sharing site in Japan as part of its 'quiet software revolution'. Speaking at a press conference in Tokyo, Sony CEO Howard Stringer said that the new site will be 'an opportunity to transmit user-generated video anywhere you want to, anytime to anybody, in a protected environment.' The new site, which will be called eyeVio, will be first launched in Japan, although Sony hopes to also launch it overseas should the Japanese version prove a success. It will be free to users, and the idea is that Sony will eventually generate revenue through advertising."

cancel ×

82 comments

Sony's hand up (1)

jshriverWVU (810740) | more than 7 years ago | (#18891301)

They can always design dedicated hardware to interface into it. New cell phones? game units? all able to use a propietary YouTube like thing. Possibility it seems at least.

Sony-Come-Lately (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#18892535)

Good luck getting people to pick your new service over the one that is already well-established and just as good.

Re:Sony's hand up (1)

Xymor (943922) | more than 7 years ago | (#18892751)

Dedicated hardware to interface with only one unproven service, that has youtube as competitor that can be accessed from any browser? That's crazy even for Sony standards...

It could be part of, or a service provided through Home. They centralize everything in Home: Joost like TV and movies, user created content(video, audio, text), internet radio, telecomunications, gaming, chatting, e-commence(like in second life), etc.... All services inside one virtual environment and then sell hardware to access it, mobile(umpc, smartphones, etc) or not(vaios, ps3, etc). All that ad supported like google.

Is that Bold, Stupid or do I need more coffe?

Re:Sony's hand up (2, Informative)

Verunks (1000826) | more than 7 years ago | (#18892859)

the article it's not complete, today sony also announced the new eyetoy for ps3 [ign.com] that can save video to the ps3's hdd and then they can be also edited with a bundled software, so they probabily want to push ps3 + playstation eye with this new site

Not news (1)

h2g2bob (948006) | more than 7 years ago | (#18893053)

There are hundreds of user-generated video hosting sites. Just today I was making this list [wikipedia.org] on Wikipedia. My own longer list [mozdev.org] lists about 150 sites with video (mainly user generated) but there are probably a whole heap of others I've missed! And yes, there are Japanese competitors already out there: mainly Tudou.com [tudou.com] and Ameba.jp [ameba.jp] . This will be no easy ride for Sony.

Re:Not news (1)

chrnb (243739) | more than 7 years ago | (#18943801)

...Japanese competitors already out there: mainly Tudou.com...


tudou.com is actually Chinese, and 'tudou' means potato in chinese, go figure ^^

Re:Sony's hand up (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#18894407)

They can always design dedicated hardware to interface into it. New cell phones? game units? all able to use a propietary YouTube like thing. Possibility it seems at least.

... and best of all, you get a free rootkit with each download.

'in a protected environment'. (1)

Mr EdgEy (983285) | more than 7 years ago | (#18891313)

This is news?

Does it have... (5, Funny)

Starteck81 (917280) | more than 7 years ago | (#18891363)

...any videos of a lithium ion laptop batteries catching on fire?

Re:Does it have... (1)

TheGratefulNet (143330) | more than 7 years ago | (#18891643)

you'd find those on BLEWtube, I reckon.

Re:Does it have... (1)

Sillygates (967271) | more than 7 years ago | (#18894967)

only if you install their content control daemon.

Re:Does it have... (1)

cbiltcliffe (186293) | more than 7 years ago | (#18899185)

No, but it'll install a rootkit on your machine if you visit with an unpatched IE.

Viva la? (5, Insightful)

Manos_Of_Fate (1092793) | more than 7 years ago | (#18891365)

"This is part of Sony's quiet software revolution," CEO Howard Stringer said at a news conference.
Revolution? Since when did jumping on the internet bandwagon constitute a revolution? Not to mention that anything that involves a press release isn't really that quiet...

Re:Viva la? (5, Funny)

Wandering Wombat (531833) | more than 7 years ago | (#18891695)

That's the NEW definition of "revolution". Now since "revolution" means "going around and coming back", the bandwagon must be on a sort of a loop, and after the fifth or sixth pass, Sony decided to hop on. By now, though, YouTube's made friends with everybody on the wagon, and Sony's just taking up a lot of space.

The next revolution... Sony decides to create dedicated software to let you talk to other people instantaneously, just by typing words into a computer!

It's a portal to your gadgets (2, Insightful)

sectionboy (930605) | more than 7 years ago | (#18892169)

Given Sony's background at consumer electronics, it won't be surprising if they put a direct link on their PSP, PS3, cell phone... anything has network capability. Basically, you edit and upload on your pc, you watch it on your gadgets. IMHO, that's a viable plan to take on youtube.

Re:It's a portal to your gadgets (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#18892553)

Unfortunately for Sony, the PSP, the PS3, and almost all Sony Ericsson phones suck.

Hard.

Re:Viva la? (1)

EggyToast (858951) | more than 7 years ago | (#18893987)

Hey, they could call it eye-M!

Re:Viva la? (5, Funny)

FlyingSquidStudios (1031284) | more than 7 years ago | (#18892255)

The Revolution Will Not Be Televised! (Because it's in a Sony proprietary format)

Re:Viva la? (1)

spongman (182339) | more than 7 years ago | (#18896457)

didn't sony already jump on the bandwagon by buying Grouper? sure, two heads are better than one, but this seems a little strange...

Re:Viva la? (1)

gad_zuki! (70830) | more than 7 years ago | (#18900281)

Its a revolution because by 'download video' they mean you pay 19.99 shipping for them to send you a MemoryStick 256meg that will only work on a VAIO. You will then have to export the video file and the sound file to a CD and a minidisc. The video is in a non-standard mp4 format that only your Playstation 3 can play and the sound is an ATRAC format that requires a Genuine Sony Minidisc player. When the video starts on the PS3, quickly press the play button on your minidisc player and get ready for some proprietary fun. Take that youtube!

Now thats revolutionary.

What the hell? (-1, Flamebait)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#18891367)

Sony takes Youtube up the ass with cum-sharing cocks

foosball (-1, Offtopic)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#18891369)

sony is da devil!!!

eyeVio? (2, Insightful)

pixelpusher220 (529617) | more than 7 years ago | (#18891399)

oy, not only will the service absolutely suck, the name is ridiculous. How much money did they pay a focus group for that?

How about a better name

UsTube

or

MeTube

Just so it's crystal clear this is an also ran to the big player in the space and an attempt to take the YOU out of the experience.

Besides, exactly why does *user generated* content need protection?


Ah, Sony.... Playing the ol' game of (1, Funny)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#18891629)

MeToo(be)

Re:eyeVio? (1)

DMNT (754837) | more than 7 years ago | (#18892327)

They wanted to name it as "eyeDiot", but the name was already taken. The userbase would have been then simply called "eye-diots" or "I-Diots" (spelling varies) and the system "I-diocy" ("eyeDiocy").

Besides, exactly why does *user generated* content need protection?

See, it's not the content that will be protected but it will be protected from having content. Anything that looks worth watching will be filtered.

Re:eyeVio? (2, Funny)

dorianh49 (988940) | more than 7 years ago | (#18892815)

I guess their marketing people passed on RootTube.

So (3, Insightful)

UPZ (947916) | more than 7 years ago | (#18891411)

How is it better than youtube?

Re:So (1)

jrumney (197329) | more than 7 years ago | (#18891807)

There are plenty of ways to improve on YouTube. Ditching the proprietary Flash video for a more portable standard like H.264 for starters.

Re:So (1)

RalphSleigh (899929) | more than 7 years ago | (#18892961)

Nope. Flash video is the only reason we have sites like youtube. Remember before it came along how hard it was faffing around with the windows media and realplayer plugins that never really worked very well. Now everyone* has flash and it just works, its great.

*except linux people ofcourse, but surely they have better things to do than waste time on youtube.

Re:So (1)

misleb (129952) | more than 7 years ago | (#18896523)

Linux has Flash Player. I believe it is even up to the same version as Windows and OS X versions. That's one of the reasons why Flash is such a great way of doing video on the web. Despite the proprietary file format, it is, overall, the most portable method of delivering video in a browser.

-matthew

Re:So (1)

misleb (129952) | more than 7 years ago | (#18896465)

What's wrong with Flash video? I find that it works the most consistently and reliably of all the ways of doing video that I've seen so far. I think it is great. So what if it is a proprietary format? You're not meant to download the video files anyway.

I am working a site that accepts video upload (not a YouTube knock-off) and I just started implementing a transcoding system to convert all videos to FLV so we can quit our dependence on Quicktime which not everyone has. Flash is much more portable. Remember, it isn't just about the file format. It is also about embedding the video in the web page. Fact is that Flash is currently the most portable and reliable way of doing it. Plus, we get to control the player.

-matthew

Re:So (1)

jrumney (197329) | more than 7 years ago | (#18897467)

Flash Video is tied to the Flash Desktop Player. More and more people are starting to take their video watching beyond the desktop - portable media players, PSP's, PDA's, mobile phones, set-top-boxes on your large TV screen are all candidates for video watching, especially short videos such as found on YouTube, and none are served by non-standard formats like Flash Video. While there is a flash player available for some PDAs and smartphones, it does not support the video codecs used by youtube, google, atomfilms and others.

Re:So (1)

misleb (129952) | more than 7 years ago | (#18900469)

lash Video is tied to the Flash Desktop Player. More and more people are starting to take their video watching beyond the desktop - portable media players, PSP's, PDA's, mobile phones, set-top-boxes on your large TV screen are all candidates for video watching, especially short videos such as found on YouTube,


YouTube style video is exactly NOT the type of video that people want to watch on a set-top-box, mobile, etc. YouTube is something you view when you're bored at home surfing the web. Who'd want to stretch that overcompressed video to a large screen TV? That would just look stupid. And besides, the videos are like 4 minutes long. That isn't something you sit down on your couch to watch. YouTube is interactive. It is not a service where you queue up a bunch of videos and just sit back and watch.

Well, if it really matters, they'll GET support for the flash video format. But for now, YouTube, Google Video, etc are aimed at the browser.

-matthew

Re:So (1)

misleb (129952) | more than 7 years ago | (#18901869)

Oops, that last bit was supposed to be a response to your last sentence. Preview preview preview...

Re:So (3, Insightful)

Hennell (1005107) | more than 7 years ago | (#18891821)

Its better for them because Google doesn't make money off of it, Sony does. Of course the advantage to the user is less obvious. That side of things seems to get mysteriously lost when companies plan these things, once they know how their money is coming they are happy. Some companies seem to think just because they have something new with x and y feature people will flock to it.
---
I'm not wasting time, I'm rehearsing my retirement
---

Huh? (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#18891425)

protected environment


Protected from who?

Re:Huh? (2, Funny)

Odiumjunkie (926074) | more than 7 years ago | (#18891525)

Standard rules of grammar, apparently.

(whom*)

GPL = Twofo = GNAA (-1, Offtopic)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#18891449)

GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE [twofo.co.uk]
                              Version 2, June 1991

  Copyright (C) 1989, 1991 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
          59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA
  Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies
  of this license document, but changing it is not allowed.

                                Preamble

    The licenses for most software are designed to take away your
freedom to share and change it. By contrast, the GNU General Public
License is intended to guarantee your freedom to share and change free
software--to make sure the software is free for all its users. This
General Public License applies to most of the Free Software
Foundation's software and to any other program whose authors commit to
using it. (Some other Free Software Foundation software is covered by
the GNU Library General Public License instead.) You can apply it to
your programs, too.

    When we speak of free software, we are referring to freedom, not
price. Our General Public Licenses are designed to make sure that you
have the freedom to distribute copies of free software (and charge for
this service if you wish), that you receive source code or can get it
if you want it, that you can change the software or use pieces of it
in new free programs; and that you know you can do these things.

    To protect your rights, we need to make restrictions that forbid
anyone to deny you these rights or to ask you to surrender the rights.
These restrictions translate to certain responsibilities for you if you
distribute copies of the software, or if you modify it.

    For example, if you distribute copies of such a program, whether
gratis or for a fee, you must give the recipients all the rights that
you have. You must make sure that they, too, receive or can get the
source code. And you must show them these terms so they know their
rights.

    We protect your rights with two steps: (1) copyright the software, and
(2) offer you this license which gives you legal permission to copy,
distribute and/or modify the software.

    Also, for each author's protection and ours, we want to make certain
that everyone understands that there is no warranty for this free
software. If the software is modified by somImportant Stuff

        * Please try to keep posts on topic.
        * Try to reply to other people's comments instead of starting new threads.
        * Read other people's messages before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating what has already been said.
        * Use a clear subject that describes what your message is about.
        * Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated. (You can read everything, even moderated posts, by adjusting your threshold on the User Preferences Page)
        * If you want replies to your comments sent to you, consider logging in or creating an account.

Problems regarding accounts or comment posting should be sent to CowboyNeal.
Search
Most of your faults are not your fault.

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the Poster. The Rest © 1997-2007 OSTG.

        * home
        * awards
        * contribute story
        * older articles
eone else and passed on, we
want its recipients to know that what they have is not the original, so
that any problems introduced by others will not reflect on the original
authors' reputations.

    Finally, any free program is threatened constantly by software
patents. We wish to avoid the danger that redistributors of a free
program will individually obtain patent licenses, in effect making the
program proprietary. To prevent this, we have made it clear that any
patent must be licensed for everyone's free use or not licensed at all.

    The precise terms and conditions for copying, distribution and
modification follow.

                        GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
      TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR COPYING, DISTRIBUTION AND MODIFICATION

    0. This License applies to any program or other work which contains
a notice placed by the copyright holder saying it may be distributed
under the terms of this General Public License. The "Program", below,
refers to any such program or work, and a "work based on the Program"
means either the Program or any derivative work under copyright law:
that is to say, a work containing the Program or a portion of it,
either verbatim or with modifications and/or translated into another
language. (Hereinafter, translation is included without limitation in
the term "modification".) Each licensee is addressed as "you".

Activities other than copying, distribution and modification are not
covered by this License; they are outside its scope. The act of
running the Program is not restricted, and the output from the Program
is covered only if its contents constitute a work based on the
Program (independent of having been made by running the Program).
Whether that is true depends on what the Program does.

    1. You may copy and distribute verbatim copies of the Program's
source code as you receive it, in any medium, provided that you
conspicuously and appropriately publish on each copy an appropriate
copyright notice and disclaimer of warranty; keep intact all the
notices that refer to this License and to the absence of any warranty;
and give any other recipients of the Program a copy of this License
along with the Program.

You may charge a fee for the physical act of transferring a copy, and
you may at your option offer warranty protection in exchange for a fee.

    2. You may modify your copy or copies of the Program or any portion
of it, thus forming a work based on the Program, and copy and
distribute such modifications or work under the terms of Section 1
above, provided that you also meet all of these conditions:

        a) You must cause the modified files to carry prominent notices
        stating that you changed the files and the date of any change.

        b) You must cause any work that you distImportant Stuff

        * Please try to keep posts on topic.
        * Try to reply to other people's comments instead of starting new threads.
        * Read other people's messages before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating what has already been said.
        * Use a clear subject that describes what your message is about.
        * Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated. (You can read everything, even moderated posts, by adjusting your threshold on the User Preferences Page)
        * If you want replies to your comments sent to you, consider logging in or creating an account.

Problems regarding accounts or comment posting should be sent to CowboyNeal.
Search
Most of your faults are not your fault.

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the Poster. The Rest © 1997-2007 OSTG.

        * home
        * awards
        * contribute story
        * older articles
ribute or publish, that in
        whole or in part contains or is derived from the Program or any
        part thereof, to be licensed as a whole at no charge to all third
        parties under the terms of this License.

        c) If the modified program normally reads commands interactively
        when run, you must cause it, when started running for such
        interactive use in the most ordinary way, to print or display an
        announcement including an appropriate copyright notice and a
        notice that there is no warranty (or else, saying that you provide
        a warranty) and that users may redistribute the program under
        these conditions, and telling the user how to view a copy of this
        License. (Exception: if the Program itself is interactive but
        does not normally print such an announcement, your work based on
        the Program is not required to print an announcement.)

These requirements apply to the modified work as a whole. If
identifiable sections of that work are not derived from the Program,
and can be reasonably considered independent and separate works in
themselves, then this License, and its terms, do not apply to those
sections when you distribute them as separate works. But when you
distribute the same sections as part of a whole which is a work based
on the Program, the distribution of the whole must be on the terms of
this License, whose permissions for other licensees extend to the
entire whole, and thus to each and every part regardless of who wrote it.

Thus, it is not the intent of this section to claim rights or contest
your rights to work written entirely by you; rather, the intent is to
exercise the right to control the distribution of derivative or
collective works based on the Program.

In addition, mere aggregation of another work not based on the Program
with the Program (or with a work based on the Program) on a volume of
a storage or distribution medium does not bring the other work under
the scope of this License.

    3. You may copy and distribute the Program (or a work based on it,
under Section 2) in object code or executable form under the terms of
Sections 1 and 2 above provided that you also do one of the following:

        a) Accompany it with the complete corresponding machine-readable
        source code, which must be distributed under the terms of Sections
        1 and 2 above on a medium customarily used for software interchange; or,

        b) Accompany it with a written offer, valid for at least three
        years, to give any third party, for a charge no more than your
        cost of physically performing source distribution, a complete
        machine-readable copy of the corresponding source code, to be
        distributed under the terms of Sections 1 and 2 above on a medium
        customarily used for software interchange; or,

        c) Accompany it with the information you received as to the offer
        to distribute corresponding source code. (This alternative is
        allowed only for noncommercial distribution and only if you
        received the program in object code or executable form with such
        an offer, in accord with Subsection b above.)

The source code for a work means the preferred form of the work for
making modifications to it. For an executable work, complete source
code means all the source code for all modulImportant Stuff

        * Please try to keep posts on topic.
        * Try to reply to other people's comments instead of starting new threads.
        * Read other people's messages before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating what has already been said.
        * Use a clear subject that describes what your message is about.
        * Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated. (You can read everything, even moderated posts, by adjusting your threshold on the User Preferences Page)
        * If you want replies to your comments sent to you, consider logging in or creating an account.

Problems regarding accounts or comment posting should be sent to CowboyNeal.
Search
Most of your faults are not your fault.

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the Poster. The Rest © 1997-2007 OSTG.

        * home
        * awards
        * contribute story
        * older articles
es it contains, plus any
associated interface definition files, plus the scripts used to
control compilation and installation of the executable. However, as a
special exception, the source code distributed need not include
anything that is normally distributed (in either source or binary
form) with the major components (compiler, kernel, and so on) of the
operating system on which the executable runs, unless that component
itself accompanies the executable.

If distribution of executable or object code is made by offering
access to copy from a designated place, then offering equivalent
access to copy the source code from the same place counts as
distribution of the source code, even though third parties are not
compelled to copy the source along with the object code.

    4. You may not copy, modify, sublicense, or distribute the Program
except as expressly provided under this License. Any attempt
otherwise to copy, modify, sublicense or distribute the Program is
void, and will automatically terminate your rights under this License.
However, parties who have received copies, or rights, from you under
this License will not have their licenses terminated so long as such
parties remain in full compliance.

    5. You are not required to accept this License, since you have not
signed it. However, nothing else grants you permission to modify or
distribute the Program or its derivative works. These actions are
prohibited by law if you do not accept this License. Therefore, by
modifying or distributing the Program (or any work based on the
Program), you indicate your acceptance of this License to do so, and
all its terms and conditions for copying, distributing or modifying
the Program or works based on it.

    6. Each time you redistribute the Program (or any work based on the
Program), the recipient automatically receives a license from the
original licensor to copy, distribute or modify the Program subject to
these terms and conditions. You may not impose any further
restrictions on the recipients' exercise of the rights granted herein.
You are not responsible for enforcing compliance by third parties to
this License.

    7. If, as a consequence of a court judgment or allegation of patent
infringement or for any other reason (not limited to patent issues),
conditions are imposed on you (whether by court order, agreement or
otherwise) that contradict the conditions of this License, they do not
excuse you from the conditions of this License. If you cannot
distribute so as to satisfy simultaneously your obligations under this
License and any other pertinent obligations, then as a consequence you
may not distribute the Program at all. For example, if a patent
license would not permit royalty-free redistribution of the Program by
all those who receive copies directly or indirectly through you, then
the only way you could satisfy both it and this License would be to
refrain entirely from distribution of the Program.

If any portion of this section is held invalid or unenforceable under
any particular circumstance, the balance of the section is intended to
apply and the section as a whole is intended to apply in other
circumstances.

It is not the purpose of this section to induce you to infringe any
patents or other property right claims or to contest validity of any
such claims; this section has the sole purpose of protecting the
integrity of the free software distribution system, which is
implemented by public license practices. Many people have made
generous contributions to the wide range of software distributed
through that system in reliance on consistent application of that
system; it is up to the author/donor to decide if he or she is willing
to distribute software through any other system and a licensee cannot
impose that choice.

This section is intended to make thoroughly clear what is believed to
be a consequence of the rest of this License.

    8. If the distribution and/or use of the Program is restricted in
certain countries either by patents or by copyrighted interfaces, the
original copyright holder who places the Program under this License
may add an explicit geographical distribution limitation excluding
those countries, so that distribution is permitted only in or among
countries not thus excluded. In such case, this License incorporates
the limitation as if written in the body of this License.

    9. The Free Software Foundation may publish revised and/or new versions
of the General Public License from time to time. Such new versions will
be similar in spirit to the present version, but may differ in detail to
address new problems or concerns.

Each version is given a distinguishing version number. If the Program
specifies a version number of this License which applies to it and "any
later version", you have the option of following the terms and conditions
either of that version or of any later version published by the Free
Software Foundation. If the Program does not specify a version number of
this License, you may choose any version ever published by the Free Software
Foundation.

    10. If you wish to incorporate parts of the Program into other free
programs whose distribution conditions are different, write to the author
to ask for permission. For software which is copyrighted by the Free
Software Foundation, write to the Free Software Foundation; we sometimes
make exceptions for this. Our decision will be guided by the two goals
of preserving the free status of all derivatives of our free software and
of promoting the sharing and reuse of softwareImportant Stuff

        * Please try to keep posts on topic.
        * Try to reply to other people's comments instead of starting new threads.
        * Read other people's messages before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating what has already been said.
        * Use a clear subject that describes what your message is about.
        * Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated. (You can read everything, even moderated posts, by adjusting your threshold on the User Preferences Page)
        * If you want replies to your comments sent to you, consider logging in or creating an account.

Problems regarding accounts or comment posting should be sent to CowboyNeal.
Search
Most of your faults are not your fault.

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the Poster. The Rest © 1997-2007 OSTG.

        * home
        * awards
        * contribute story
        * older articles
  generally.

                                NO WARRANTY

    11. BECAUSE THE PROGRAM IS LICENSED FREE OF CHARGE, THERE IS NO WARRANTY
FOR THE PROGRAM, TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW. EXCEPT WHEN
OTHERWISE STATED IN WRITING THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND/OR OTHER PARTIES
PROVIDE THE PROGRAM "AS IS" WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESSED
OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. THE ENTIRE RISK AS
TO THE QUALITY AND PERFORMANCE OF THE PROGRAM IS WITH YOU. SHOULD THE
PROGRAM PROVE DEFECTIVE, YOU ASSUME THE COST OF ALL NECESSARY SERVICING,
REPAIR OR CORRECTION.

    12. IN NO EVENT UNLESS REQUIRED BY APPLICABLE LAW OR AGREED TO IN WRITING
WILL ANY COPYRIGHT HOLDER, OR ANY OTHER PARTY WHO MAY MODIFY AND/OR
REDISTRIBUTE THE PROGRAM AS PERMITTED ABOVE, BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR DAMAGES,
INCLUDING ANY GENERAL, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES ARISING
OUT OF THE USE OR INABILITY TO USE THE PROGRAM (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED
TO LOSS OF DATA OR DATA BEING RENDERED INACCURATE OR LOSSES SUSTAINED BY
YOU OR THIRD PARTIES OR A FAILURE OF THE PROGRAM TO OPERATE WITH ANY OTHER
PROGRAMS), EVEN IF SUCH HOLDER OR OTHER PARTY HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE
POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES.

                          END OF TERMS AND CONDITIONS

                How to Apply These Terms to Your New Programs

    If you develop a new program, and you want it to be of the greatest
possible use to the public, the best way to achieve this is to make it
free software which everyone can redistribute and change under these terms.

    To do so, attach the following notices to the program. It is safest
to attach them to the start of each source file to most effectively
convey the exclusion of warranty; and each file should have at least
the "copyright" line and a pointer to where the full notice is found.

        Copyright (C)

        This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
        it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
        the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
        (at your option) any later version.

        This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
        but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
        MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
        GNU General Public License for more details.

        You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
        along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
        Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA

Also add information on how to contact you by electronic and paper mail.

If the program is interactive, make it output a short notice like this
when it starts in an interactive mode:

        Gnomovision version 69, Copyright (C) year name of author
        Gnomovision comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; for details type `show w'.
        This is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it
        under certain conditions; type `show c' for details.

The hypothetical commands `show w' and `show c' should show the appropriate
parts of the General Public License. Of course, the commands you use may
be called something other than `show w' and `show c'; they could even be
mouse-clicks or menu items--whatever suits your program.

You should also get your employer (if you work as a programmer) or your
school, if any, to sign a "copyright disclaimer" for the program, if
necessary. Here is a sample; alter the names:

    Yoyodyne, Inc., hereby disclaims all copyright interest in the program
    `Gnomovision' (which makes passes at compilers) written by James Hacker.

    , 1 April 1989
    Ty Coon, President of ViceImportant Stuff

        * Please try to keep posts on topic.
        * Try to reply to other people's comments instead of starting new threads.
        * Read other people's messages before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating what has already been said.
        * Use a clear subject that describes what your message is about.
        * Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated. (You can read everything, even moderated posts, by adjusting your threshold on the User Preferences Page)
        * If you want replies to your comments sent to you, consider logging in or creating an account.

Problems regarding accounts or comment posting should be sent to CowboyNeal.
Search
Most of your faults are not your fault.

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the Poster. The Rest © 1997-2007 OSTG.

        * home
        * awards
        * contribute story
        * older articles

This General Public License does not permit incorporating your program into
proprietary programs. If your program is a subroutine library, you may
consider it more useful to permit linking proprietary applications with the
library. If this is what you want to do, use the GNU Library General
Public License instead of this License.

The requirements include... (4, Funny)

redwoodtree (136298) | more than 7 years ago | (#18891451)

You can only watch it on Sony Playstation 3 with 60 GB harddrive, or a PSP with the latest update, but it will check to make sure you're not running homebrew and , you have to provide your credit card number so if you ever watch anything copyrighted they can charge you the fee for the holder of the copyright.

Oh, and you better be ready to provide your SSN because they need to be able to send you to collections if your credit card doesn't go through . . . and, some videos may have viruses, but don't worry about, videos can't have viruses.

To upload, you need to buy a special upload program that only works with Vista!!

I'm so excited about this.

Oh, and ninteno sucks.

Out.

But You're Leaving Out the Best Parts!! (1)

beadfulthings (975812) | more than 7 years ago | (#18892337)

You're probably not going to have to bother providing them with your SSN and credit card because it'll unpack and install a rootkit that checks around for all that great personal stuff and sends it back to the mothership. That should save you a lot of trouble.

Oh. And it's going to be battery operated . . .

Just kindly send me your mother's maiden name.

Good idea (1)

Intron (870560) | more than 7 years ago | (#18891457)

This will make it much easier for Sony to sue most of the people using the site for posting Sony-copywrite files.

Too late (2, Interesting)

memeplex (910698) | more than 7 years ago | (#18891471)

The video sharing game is won. YouTube has already achieved the name recognition and momentum to relegate all others to also-rans. The same reasoning explains why Yahoo still exists as a viable company despite Google providing superior technology and services. Yes, iFilm and other are still pretty good, but YouTube is enshrined. Sorry, Sony.

Re:Too late (1)

Intron (870560) | more than 7 years ago | (#18891815)

First is always best. That's why when we think of search engines, we always think of Lycos and AltaVista.

Re:Too late (2, Insightful)

memeplex (910698) | more than 7 years ago | (#18892287)

Point well taken. Some site may eclipse YouTube down the road, as Google has Yahoo. But just watch any late-night TV show these days. "Already on YouTube," or "The Biggest thing on YouTube" flows from the hosts' mouths effortlessly. It leaps to mind because, as in politics, name recognition is everything. My mom recently asked me how to "log on to YouTube" after her girlfriend wanted to show her a video of her cat chasing a string or something. The Mom Test almost never fails me when it comes to cultural phenomena.

Re:Too late (1)

Hennell (1005107) | more than 7 years ago | (#18893745)

> The Mom Test almost never fails me when it comes to cultural phenomena.
That's pretty much the ultimate measure, brand recognition by people almost totally unknowledgeable about the field the brand is in. When people who don't really understand the idea of the web or internet but know they need to 'Google' something, you know your name can hardly get any bigger.

In the same way that Mp3's is the only music format, iPod the only music player, MySpace the only social networking site and Photoshop the only image editor; YouTube is the only video site. It'll take a long while or something very big to change that. (If it does at all, can't think of many brands that broke that barrier and haven't stayed top in their field.)
---
This signature is remarkably specious
---

Re:Too late (2, Funny)

memeplex (910698) | more than 7 years ago | (#18894269)

I'm going to write that down on a Kleenex, Xerox it, and post it on my Frigidaire!

Re:Too late (1)

kamapuaa (555446) | more than 7 years ago | (#18891865)

Personally, I don't use the social aspects of youtube, I just use it to put videos on my blog, or to look at videos sent as a link. It really doesn't matter at all if the link is to youtube or an equivalent service, as long as it's functionally identical and loads quickly enough. There's no barrier to entry and people, and there's essentially no reason to use it other than habit.

It's also easy to imagine being basically functionally equivalent but better. tudou.com [tudou.com] , for example, is a Chinese site that is basically equivalent to youtube, but doesn't have youtube's time limit to video length, accepts a larger number of file formats, and doesn't really do anything to combat piracy.

"protected environment"? (4, Insightful)

v1 (525388) | more than 7 years ago | (#18891477)

translation: "... with DRM up the wazoo"

(collary: "viewable only with windows vista")

Re:"protected environment"? (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#18892055)

(collary: "viewable only with windows vista")
They only use Macs in Japan.

Proof: http://www.apple.com/jp/getamac/ [apple.com]

The race will soon be on... (4, Funny)

Stanistani (808333) | more than 7 years ago | (#18891481)

First Slashdotter to upload a clip of Google's proprietary content to this site wins...

That was my thought... (1)

Belial6 (794905) | more than 7 years ago | (#18892143)

If Sony cannot effectively filter out content that belongs to Google, they could be in for a world of trouble.

When I think Sony... (2, Interesting)

countSudoku() (1047544) | more than 7 years ago | (#18891681)

I think rootkits! Yep, rookits and handhelds closed to homebrew developers.

Sony, the one and only.

Re:When I think Sony... (1)

AbsoluteXyro (1048620) | more than 7 years ago | (#18893169)

Oh man... that makes me wonder what kind of sneaky stuff Sony might be planning with this video service.

Re:When I think Sony... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#18899769)

A company that would put a rootkit on a music CD is capable of about any transgression against its PAYING customers. If it would do that to a PAYING customer, what would it do to a visitor to a fee web site? I'm thinking the worst sort of spyware imaginable here.

I was pwned by Sony's rootkit (my daughter played a BMG CD in it), and they lost a customer for LIFE. I can't understand why anyone would trust this company at all, why is it still in business?

Of course, I wonder the same thing about Tyson's Chicken, who killed 25 workers in a plant fire because the emergency doors were chained shut to keep the illegal immigrants working there from stealing drumsticks (a man spent two years in jail for those 25 corporate murders), as well as Jack In The Box, who neglegently killed a dozen children with food poisoning! I can NOT for the life of me understand why anyone would take their kid to a Jack In The Box after it has killed children! Oh yeah, Union Carbide...

So I guess compared to Tyson's and Jack In The Box (and Union Carbide), Sony's not that bad... but I won't buy their stuff any more. Die, Sony! And take Jack In The Box and Tyson's to hell with you.

-mcgrew

Another 'quiet software revolution' ? (2, Insightful)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#18891709)

After their last kick at a 'quiet software' [wikipedia.org] , you'd think they wouldn't want to go there.

Hardly a surprise (not-invented-here-syndrome) (4, Insightful)

Lead Butthead (321013) | more than 7 years ago | (#18891757)

Looking at the history of Sony products, it has never been a big fan of interoperability as evident by Beta, Memory Stick, UMD, BlueRay, etc. Is it any surprise it's going do its own thing AGAIN?

Re:Hardly a surprise (not-invented-here-syndrome) (1)

owlnation (858981) | more than 7 years ago | (#18893869)

True. I guess I never expected to see the words "Sony" and "sharing" in the same sentence.

Someone has to say it (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#18891773)

so here goes.....

As this story has no technical substance and mentions nothing of merit it's clearly
a piece of paid Sony PR. And I suppose is here only to to seed trolling of Sony.

As you wish...

Sony are criminals, in the strictest and correct legal definition. Because of this fact and this fact alone I am not interested in
any of their products and services.

Sony apologists please form an orderly queue to defend how good they "used to be"

Just what I wanted (2, Insightful)

Das Auge (597142) | more than 7 years ago | (#18891809)

A video sharing site from a company known for DRM and shitting on its customers!

Yeah...

Re:Just what I wanted (1)

AmigaHeretic (991368) | more than 7 years ago | (#18896203)

A video sharing site from a company known for DRM and shitting on its customers!

That's what I was kind of thinking.

Funny thing that... I always make sure to ONLY BUY BLANK Sony Brand DVDs when they're on sale to use when I "Back Up" my original DVD's.
Kinda makes me smile.

And In Other News (2, Funny)

MightyMartian (840721) | more than 7 years ago | (#18891853)

Atlanta, GA - Benjamin Fentwitz, a 35 year old unemployed crash test dummy stand-in and amateur inventor has announced that he plans to take on the Big Three Car makers with his own brand new invention, a four-wheeled automobile he's calling the Wiz3UberPunchFugWugun.

"At first, I'm just going to make it available in Cuba." Fentwitz said in an interview. "But watch out, 'cause in a couple of years, you'll be seeing Wiz3UberPunchFugWugun all over the place."

When asked how it's superior to existing automobiles, Fentwitz explained "It's got... um... four wheels.. and... um... a steering wheel... and... and... brakes! Yeah it's got brakes. It's protected."

Fentwitz further said, "Yeah, I know I'm a little late to the party, but you know, I think I've got a real chance of making it big."

Attempts by Fentwitz to further harass media outlets were responded to with record flatulence, made on a top-end Sony media player.

Sony Connect flopped badly (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#18891869)

Previous Sony sites, here's their music download site:

connect.com the 20,000th site.
connect-europe.com is the 170,000th site.

Sony got bigger than it's customers, they DRM'd those music downloads, even requiring installation of Internet Explorer and the end result is lousy sales and no customers.

I'm a little concerned when Sony says 'in a protected environment', since there history is to DRM and restrict everything till nobody bothers with them.

*Sniff*Sniff*... (1)

Odin_Tiger (585113) | more than 7 years ago | (#18892195)

Does anybody else smell a miserable failure coming this way?

Another Sony-only system? (2, Insightful)

NeutronCowboy (896098) | more than 7 years ago | (#18892347)

Other people touched on it already, but I'll repeat it anyway: this is just another attempt by Sony to create the Sony-net, where only Sony systems (playstations) can connect to it, and where Sony has complete control over what is shown and how. Here's the key portion of the story: "We believe there's a need for a clean and safe place where companies can place their advertisements". This is how the business model will work:
- Companies will pay Sony to play their latest ads, trailers, clips, show excerpts, etc.
- Users will pay Companies (and Sony) to watch ads, trailers, clips, show excerpts, full shows, movies, songs, etc.
- There will be cheap pay-per-view stuff, and expensive full downloads-to-own (complete with heavy duty DRM).
- There will be some user-generated stuff, but it will come from people with a Sony passport equivalent and who can't be arsed to upload stuff to YouTube.

I'm thinking it will be a cross between XBox Live, iTunes and YouTube. The YouTube connection is there to generate buzz (hah! I'm surprised there was no mentioning of the word 'viral' in the story), the XBox Live model is there because Sony sees how this is a money-press for MS, and iTunes is there because everyone's drooling over its market penetration. Except it will combine the sucky aspects of all its components and make them worse: paying for ads in XBox Live (I'm still amazed that MS pulled off that trick), DRM in iTunes and crap content in YouTube.

Could it work? Sure could. Except that I haven't seen anything that tells me that Sony has moved away from its holy grail: to completely lock its users into an all-Sony all the time world. Which means that the DRM will be unwieldy, the network too small and the content too expensive to generate much inroads against the established powers. At least Sony isn't hailing this again as the next coming of YouTube... maybe it has learned after all.

and the site will be full of (2, Funny)

semiotec (948062) | more than 7 years ago | (#18892447)

crappy rap videos made by Sony PR flacks pretending to be kids who want a PSP for Christmas...

Yeah, right. (1)

sabernet (751826) | more than 7 years ago | (#18892601)

A member of the MPAA and RIAA putting up a site claiming to be the new YouTube, and inviting people to upload content.....

"Here are the keys to the slaughterhouse, cow."

Frankly, I sincerely hope they do sue anyone dumb enough to upload anything to that site :|

And the Next Great Copyright Law Court Case is: (2, Funny)

sehlat (180760) | more than 7 years ago | (#18892699)

Sony vs. Sony

Like they took on Mmog gaming with Star wars (1)

unity100 (970058) | more than 7 years ago | (#18892959)

Galaxies ?

boy, if its going to be anything about it - and as this is sony, i bet it will be - i feel sorry for anyone who gets used to that video service.

Too late Sony (1)

techtakeaway (1093005) | more than 7 years ago | (#18893889)

They will never be able to compete with YouTube, I dont know why they are trying, and I agree that it is a terrible name! Sony abanoned their amazing robot research (Aibo [techtakeaway.com] & Qrio [techtakeaway.com] ) to concentrate on the PS3, and now they're spending their time on this video sharing website that has been done before, probably better.

I think that as a big company with lots at stake, they would have to be very careful about users uploading copyrighted clips, they don't want to get sued.

Aibo Porn? (1)

blankoboy (719577) | more than 7 years ago | (#18893961)

I can't think of any other positive with SONY starting it's own video sharing site. Oh, perhaps they can also upload videos showing users how to 'unrootkit' their PC's.

Suckers (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#18894415)

It's funny, how all these big corporations, with all the PhD whatever employees, advisors, board mebers, highly paid CEOs, CTOs, etc. just can't come up with the "next big thing" ideas, and if someone else does, they jump on the bandwagon a year later, while trying to make it look like as if they had invented the best thing after hot water.

Suckers.

mod dbown (-1, Redundant)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#18894425)

little-knoKwn of business and was many of us are perc3nt of the *BSD

SONY declares 'me too' (1)

BillGatesLoveChild (1046184) | more than 7 years ago | (#18894481)

> Sony Takes on YouTube with Video-Sharing Site

Considering how badly SONY has been run, they couldn't take on a 10 year old kid armed with a cardboard box.

Easier to Track Piracy (1)

Archades54 (925582) | more than 7 years ago | (#18896571)

This will just let them track uploaded copyrighted material, and who uploaded it alot faster then trying to ask youtube, etc.

Translation of the Sony eyeVio annouchment (1)

evil_marty (855218) | more than 7 years ago | (#18897123)

"This is part of Sony's quiet software revolution"
We're getting with the times alright but we wont make it easy for you.

"It's an opportunity to transmit user-generated video anywhere you want to, anytime to anybody, in a protected environment"
People like YouTube and Google Video have an awesome idea, the only problem is its not us! We want to milk it for what its worth.

Unlike YouTube, which has drawn criticism that it tolerates user piracy and faces a $1 billion lawsuit from Viacom Inc. alleging copyright violation, Sony said it would closely monitor content on the service.
We want to pull a YouTube but we're pretty confident we can get away with all the legal threats and fines.

Such a model would appeal to companies looking to release content and to protect their image
Screw user content, we want to be paid to host your shit and there are people willing to pay lots of money for us to shove it in your face.

"We believe there's a need for a clean and safe place where companies can place their advertisements"
Theres a slice of the pie for us but we want to eat the whole damn thing!

How to react? (1)

Arancaytar (966377) | more than 7 years ago | (#18897331)

Should I laugh because it's always nice to see the light dawning in some corporate executive's head?

Or should I laugh because, well, it's taken them pretty long to get the idea of trying a new business model that almost every successful internet company is using?

Or should I laugh because the idea of someone abandoning the existing video sites for what will inevitably a pit of censored and heavily DRM'd content is so patently ridiculous?

Ah what the heck, I'll just laugh.

I assume you need special format hardware... (1)

swschrad (312009) | more than 7 years ago | (#18899811)

which just by coincidence only Sony happens to make, for triple market prices.

Too Little, Too Late? (1)

Secret Agent Man (915574) | more than 7 years ago | (#18900297)

If you would ask the common everyday Internet user which video site they visit, it's YouTube. They're not going to switch to another video site with only a fraction of the content that's available on there to begin with. AOL Video is in the same situation.
Check for New Comments
Slashdot Account

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?

Don't worry, we never post anything without your permission.

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>
Create a Slashdot Account

Loading...