Beta
×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Matt Groening to be Final Boss in New Simpsons Game

CowboyNeal posted more than 7 years ago | from the princess-still-in-another-castle dept.

Television 112

eldavojohn writes "Announced at E3, Mr. Groening will be the final boss in the Simpsons game. Mr. Groening commented on the game: 'They did a send-up of videogames. It's a videogame about videogames; and I'm in the videogame. I'm a boss that you have to fight at the end of the game. It was really fun recording a million ways of dying, going "UGGH, ARGGH, EUURGH!"'"

cancel ×

112 comments

Sorry! There are no comments related to the filter you selected.

Pronunciation of his name (-1)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#19780689)

I've noticed over the years that there are very few people who know how to pronounce Matt's last name. I happen to know the answer, but How do you pronounce "Groening"

Grow-ning [impoll.net]
Gray-ning [impoll.net]
Grow-eh-ning [impoll.net]

who cares, NJ Passes Global Warming Law (-1, Offtopic)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#19780739)

globaltics.net [globaltics.net]

Re:Pronunciation of his name (4, Informative)

PresidentEnder (849024) | more than 7 years ago | (#19780897)

The "oe," "ae," and "ue" in English are often representations of the German ö, ä, and ü characters. If Matt Groenings name is such a case, it would be pronounced about like "groon-ing."

Perfect analysis (3, Informative)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#19781007)

Except for the fact that it's pronounced "graining [wikipedia.org] "..

Re:Pronunciation of his name (1)

jdb2 (800046) | more than 7 years ago | (#19781123)

Actually, no. It's approximately equivalent to saying "ee" and then rounding your lips. Technically, it is the IPA [y], a close front rounded vowel. jdb2

Re:Pronunciation of his name (1)

jdb2 (800046) | more than 7 years ago | (#19781271)

D'oh! As Homer would say. I thought you were talking about "ue". For "oe", is the IPA [oe], an open-mid front rounded vowel. Approximately equivalent to saying "ah" and then rounding your lips. (although the English "ah" is more open than mid) -- jdb2

And to correct myself again... (1)

jdb2 (800046) | more than 7 years ago | (#19781327)

...replace "ah" with "eh" (IPA []) and you've almost got it exactly. -- jdb2

Re:And to correct myself again... (2, Interesting)

PresidentEnder (849024) | more than 7 years ago | (#19782799)

Zerstoeren. Koenig. Loewe. Every time I've heard these words, they have the English "oo" sound. Perhaps we have different accents?

Re:And to correct myself again... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#19782885)

The "oo" is the lazy American way to do it, yes. Common, but ultimately wrong. To be precise (and German is a wonderfully precise and organic modern language) it's the third iteration painstakingly described- your maw says "eh" while your pucker says "oo" at least, that's how Frau Klein taught us. Ah Frau Klein- the object of oh so many slashdotter's unknowning fantasy- a hot German professor that wore tight leather and 5" heels to teach class- she knew how to command attention that's for sure- but I digress...

To be honest- you'd only get the occasional raised eyebrow if you used the "oo" all that often.

A harder lesson is the German "R"- which is the soul of all that phlegm (told ya it was organic.) Mastering the "R" properly is something that helps pass for fluency a lot better than the umlaut bedecked vowels.

Re:And to correct myself again... (1)

PresidentEnder (849024) | more than 7 years ago | (#19784001)

Ok, sounds good. Now write that concisely, in such a way that an American can pronounce it first shot. You don't honestly believe that I think "oe" goes exactly to "oo," do you?

Speaking of the German R, I have a friend who studied abroad in Austria last semester. Everyone he met thought he had a Spanish accent. He couldn't figure out why. It turned out that he was compensating for that nice round American "r" sound by rolling his Rs exactly as they do in Spanish, with the tongue against the hard palatte, instead of making the sound with the softer tissues to the back (which is difficult indeed).

Re:And to correct myself again... (1)

The One and Only (691315) | more than 7 years ago | (#19784683)

I thought Austrians trilled their 'r's with the tip of their tongue. Or is that another thing that fell out of fashion after Hitler did it?

Re:And to correct myself again... (1)

wertarbyte (811674) | more than 7 years ago | (#19784503)

Zerstoeren. Koenig. Loewe. Every time I've heard these words, they have the English "oo" sound. Perhaps we have different accents?

"oo"? Like in "moon"? That would be the german letter "u". "ö", the umlaut variant to "o", sounds pretty much like the "u" in "Burns".

Re:And to correct myself again... (1)

Cairnarvon (901868) | more than 7 years ago | (#19785449)

The Dutch oe sounds like the English oo, but not the German one (though the German u does). The German oe (ö) sounds like the Dutch eu, which doesn't really have an equivalent in English, AFAIK.

Re:And to correct myself again... (1)

PresidentEnder (849024) | more than 7 years ago | (#19786621)

You're exactly right- there is no direct equivalent in English. In fact, it's impossible to describe the sound with any sort of accuracy to someone who's never heard it, or never known they heard it. I had this discussion with one of the guys from my German classes, and the best thing he could come up with was it's like the u in lute, but not like the oo in loot, as much sense as that makes.

Re:And to correct myself again... (1)

wertarbyte (811674) | more than 7 years ago | (#19786869)

In fact, it's impossible to describe the sound with any sort of accuracy to someone who's never heard it, or never known they heard it.

"Burns". It sounds exactly as "Börns".

Re:Pronunciation of his name (1)

Deadstick (535032) | more than 7 years ago | (#19781559)

Wikipedia and the AC are probably correct, assuming MG's ancestry is Swabian. If you know anybody named Shrader or Schrader, they're probably descended from Swabians named Schr[o with umlaut]der.

rj

are you sure? (1)

CaptainNerdCave (982411) | more than 7 years ago | (#19781277)

Sind Sie sicher? Verstehen Sie deutsch?

groening is not pronounced correctly anywhere that i've heard people saying it... unless the root of his name is a language other than german. i'm not sure how to explain exactly how the ö in german is pronounced, but i can definitely say that it is not spoken like "ee" (as one of the children suggests) or "oo". it's more like "er" without the "r" sound. you are welcome to doubt me, but i'm warning you that i have taken a course specifically on german pronunciation (entirely in german, if that makes it seem more formidable)

Re:are you sure? (1)

Miseph (979059) | more than 7 years ago | (#19782423)

It depends largely on which version of the German accent one wishes to use.

Re:are you sure? (1)

PresidentEnder (849024) | more than 7 years ago | (#19782787)

Indeed. My accent can't decide where to be from, and I tend to switch back and forth between North German and Viennese frequently, often within the same sentence, depending on which professor or band I learned a word from. The o-umlaut pronunciation is from Rammstein's "Zerstoeren," where the title word is quite clearly pronounced "Tserstooooo-ren."

Re:are you sure? (1)

PresidentEnder (849024) | more than 7 years ago | (#19782827)

Ja, ich bin sicher, und habe seit zwei Jahre Deutsch studiert.

Note that the "oo" is an approximation; Slashdot doesn't like IPA characters (as local comments illustrate). I didn't say his name ought to be exactly "grooning," I said something like "grooning." Besides, it seems that it isn't German after all and rhymes with "raining."

Re:are you sure? (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#19783889)

Du meinst, seit zwei Jahren?

Re:are you sure? (1)

PresidentEnder (849024) | more than 7 years ago | (#19783967)

Natuerlich ;-)

Re:Pronunciation of his name (2, Interesting)

geekoid (135745) | more than 7 years ago | (#19782807)

Fummy, I usualy hear him say it like "Graining"

Re:Pronunciation of his name (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#19787803)

I'm from germany and I can tell you, that it's not at all like "Groon-ing".
The german "ö" get's spoken like "ø" (which might be more known ("A møøse ønce bit")), so it would be "Grøning".

Re:Pronunciation of his name (2, Interesting)

seanadams.com (463190) | more than 7 years ago | (#19781011)

In one of the life in hell books he says it rhymes with "complaining".

Re:Pronunciation of his name (1)

value_added (719364) | more than 7 years ago | (#19781501)

In one of the life in hell books he says it rhymes with "complaining".

That's correct, but it's nice to see someone reference something other than The Simpsons when talking about Matt Groening.

I've read Akbar and Jeff [wikipedia.org] and Life In Hell [wikipedia.org] for years. When The Simpsons came out, I was impressed enough by the writing, but the bombastic Danny Elfman score pushes things so over the top (at least for me) that I couldn't watch it regularly. Somehow, it seemed less intelligent than it really was, sort of like South Park with volume turned way up.

Re:Pronunciation of his name (1)

smookumy (1121273) | more than 7 years ago | (#19785231)

Interesting. One of the primary reasons I started watching the Simspons was beacuse of the 'bombastic' Danny Elfman score.

Re:Pronunciation of his name (2, Interesting)

Beardo the Bearded (321478) | more than 7 years ago | (#19781717)

That's what I came in here to say.

A later book says, "he no longer cares how people pronounce his last name."

Re:Pronunciation of his name (1)

dextromulous (627459) | more than 7 years ago | (#19782711)

At the start of every Simpsons and Futurama DVD commentary (that I remember hearing) he pronounces it Gray-ning.

1st (0, Offtopic)

ScottyMcScott (1003155) | more than 7 years ago | (#19780691)

...long live the simpsons

Re:1st (-1, Offtopic)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#19780811)

The Simpsons hasn't been a good show in years.

Re:1st (3, Funny)

CommunistHamster (949406) | more than 7 years ago | (#19780919)

...long live the simpsons

Done.

And? (1, Insightful)

nlitement (1098451) | more than 7 years ago | (#19780693)

How did this get on the front page of Slashdot?

Re:And? (5, Funny)

Timesprout (579035) | more than 7 years ago | (#19780733)

It's on the front page because Groening has an iPhone.

Re:And? (4, Insightful)

Original Replica (908688) | more than 7 years ago | (#19780785)

Because after the Simpson's game is done he will start making more episodes of Futurama.


hopefully.

Re:And? (1)

Poromenos1 (830658) | more than 7 years ago | (#19781131)

Isn't Futurama slated to begin again next year?

Re:And? (1, Troll)

xENoLocO (773565) | more than 7 years ago | (#19786113)

God I hope not. At least the simpsons had a run of good episodes at the beginning. Futurama has never been funny, imo. There's a reason it was cancelled.

Let me guess... modding me up as flamebait? Grow a pair, we all have opinions. If mine disagrees, it doesn't make me a troll.

Re:And? (1)

evilgrug (915703) | more than 7 years ago | (#19786195)

Even ignoring the fact that it was aired on Fox, land of the mistreated TV show, and showed a marked increase in popularity when it hit DVD and other channels such as Comedy Central... ...there's a reason it was brought back from the dead too.

Re:And? (5, Informative)

Dachannien (617929) | more than 7 years ago | (#19781205)

They've already finished voice recording [gotfuturama.com] on four new Futurama movies that will be shown on Comedy Central as 16 half-hour episodes.

Re:And? (5, Funny)

Cheapy (809643) | more than 7 years ago | (#19780813)

Because Matt Groening is going to make you his bitch.

It's a heads-up really.

Re:And? (1)

snutte (554053) | more than 7 years ago | (#19781495)

Obl: I for one welcome our new overlord.

Re:And? (-1, Troll)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#19780839)

Because there is a worldwide event going on to make people aware of the problems we are facing as a species. We all know that the Simpsons can fix it so it HAS to be on the front page. I love AmeriKa!

Re:And? (1)

the_humeister (922869) | more than 7 years ago | (#19780953)

The Slashdot tagline is "News for nerds. Stuff that matters." Now you could argue that this falls under "Stuff that matters." But I think most people would categorize it under "News for nerds."
Get it now?

Re:And? (-1, Flamebait)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#19781197)

Wow, yeah you're right, that's real news for nerds! I can't wait to find out who the second to last boss is. Please can we learn a new boss from a future video game every day? This is sooo newsworthy for nerds. I can hardly contain the excitement.

Sometimes you have to hope that Slashdot really is paid to run these stories, because then at least there's some point to the story for someone.

Re:And? (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#19781023)

because it was on digg first?

Re:And? (1)

psychokitten (819123) | more than 7 years ago | (#19781211)

"News for Nerds."

The Simpsons. Video games. E3.
If -that- doesn't qualify, then nothing does.

Re:And? (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#19781243)

so are you saying that liking The Simpsons qualifies one as a "nerd"?

Re:And? (1)

Random Destruction (866027) | more than 7 years ago | (#19785521)

All lions are cats.
Therefore all cats are lions.
QED

First! (-1, Offtopic)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#19780709)

Yo yo yo! I be first beeotches!

Re:First! (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#19781065)

actually you lost. by a full 2 minutes. looser.

Comeagain... (3, Interesting)

mathmatt (851301) | more than 7 years ago | (#19780749)

It's a videogame about videogames; and I'm in the videogame.
Wait a minute, does this mean he's just the tiny boss of one of the videogames in the videogame? I'm not buying this just so I can watch Bart defeat MG in a mini-videogame... Someone please clarify this ambiguous statement ASAP.

Re:Comeagain... (1)

The MAZZTer (911996) | more than 7 years ago | (#19781003)

Read the title of this page CAREFULLY. He's the FINAL BOSS of the WHOLE GAME.

Re:Comeagain... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#19781251)

The whole game within the game, or the game itself?

Re:Comeagain... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#19786953)

*sigh*

He's not saying that there are a bunch of minigames. All he's saying is that this video game will make fun of the conventional features of video games.

Hence, "a videogame about videogames."

Re:Comeagain... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#19781491)

I, for one, welcome our overlord of all game overlords.

Obligatory Comic Book Guy (1, Funny)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#19780761)

Worst. Video Game. Ever.

Re:Obligatory Comic Book Guy (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#19781249)

Ha HA!

Simpsons (2, Interesting)

jshriverWVU (810740) | more than 7 years ago | (#19780767)

To each their own, but I would love to see a Futurama game. I tried to get into the simpsons, and the treehouse of horrors always are a treat. But it's just *eh* for me. I think the true talent went into the Futurama scripts.

Just my $0.02

Re:Simpsons (2)

Cap'nPedro (987782) | more than 7 years ago | (#19780843)

Your wish is granted [ign.com] !

It was shit though...

You know what would really be great. (1)

AltGrendel (175092) | more than 7 years ago | (#19781155)

A Futurama MMORPG.

..or a Simpsons MMORPG. Either one, take your pick

Re:You know what would really be great. (1)

Elsapotk421 (1097205) | more than 7 years ago | (#19781207)

I think a Simpsons MMO would be better.

Re:You know what would really be great. (1)

mcmonkey (96054) | more than 7 years ago | (#19785453)

Select a Class:

1. Warrior
2. Cleric
3. Thief
4. Frank Grimes

What class do you wish to be? 4_

Re:Simpsons (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#19781245)

Do you know why Futurama got canceled? Because it SUCKED and got shitty ratings. The only people you ever hear want Futurama back are 35 year old virgins living in their parents' basement.

Re:Simpsons (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#19781343)

Meh, it's better than other shows Fox had at the time. Although that's not saying much.

The fact that no one watched it is irrefutable, though. I have no idea why they're producing DVDs, given that Futurama had practically no audience to begin with. These things are going to be a giant flop. I hadn't even heard anyone talk about Futurama in - well, years, prior to this thread.

Re:Simpsons (2, Insightful)

jeremyp (130771) | more than 7 years ago | (#19781555)

Because the DVDs of the first four Futurama series sold really really well. Futurama is a commercial success.

Re:Simpsons (1)

WilliamSChips (793741) | more than 7 years ago | (#19783475)

DANIEL: No, I'm with Sam on this one. I mean, who makes a movie out a series that only lasted three episodes?
TEAL'C: It allegedly performed well on DVD.

Re:Simpsons (1)

The One and Only (691315) | more than 7 years ago | (#19784717)

Futurama reruns did very well on Adult Swim the same time as Family Guy, and Family Guy was picked up again.

Re:Simpsons (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#19781625)

Frankly, I find the idea of someone who reads slashdot yet does not like Futurama more pathetic than that cliche, if it were true. And it's not true, really.

Re:Simpsons (1)

Random Destruction (866027) | more than 7 years ago | (#19785541)

35 year old: I'm 21
virgin: nope. and my girlfriend likes futurama too.
parents basement: wrong again.
better luck next time.

Re:Simpsons (1)

fuzzix (700457) | more than 7 years ago | (#19782291)

To each their own, but I would love to see a Futurama game...

There was a Futurama game and it stunk up the place. It was the same format as every other cartoon franchise game - third person platformer. I swear they use the same engine for all those games, spend a weekend knocking some new models together, whisk up a few textured boxes to chuck obstacles in and there's your cartoon franchise game!

That said, Simpsons Hit & Run was a blast, which was a surprise as all previous Simpsons games were terrible (I can't remember a good one before that anyway...)

Re:Simpsons (1)

Whyte Panther (868438) | more than 7 years ago | (#19782557)

No love for the Simpsons arcade game? (Which I am still praying will make it's way to XBox Live when the movie hits)

Re:Simpsons (1)

fuzzix (700457) | more than 7 years ago | (#19785107)

No love for the Simpsons arcade game?

Haven't played it... Off the top of my head the timeline of my Simpsons game history is (very roughly) Bart vs the Space Mutants, Something with Krusty (not actual title...) ;), Simpsons Wrestling, Hit & Run. There are probably others but they don't spring to mind immediately.

I'm too old for the arcade but (as with all about to turn 30) I'm drawing up plans for a MAME cab as I have a 21" CRT about to enter retirement and I got a decent enough PC for nothing from a friend recently.

I know the secret of beating him (-1, Troll)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#19780793)

Double tap to jump high and tug on his beard. The fat, drunk, wife beating, gun fetishist will fall right over.

Isn't that Comic Book Store Guy? (2, Funny)

gelfling (6534) | more than 7 years ago | (#19780809)

Just sayin.

Re:Isn't that Comic Book Store Guy? (4, Funny)

Dachannien (617929) | more than 7 years ago | (#19781231)

Worst. Comparison. Ever.

Final Boss: Groening (3, Funny)

lmnfrs (829146) | more than 7 years ago | (#19781067)

GIIIT OUTTA MAH OFFICE!

Re:Final Boss: Groening (2, Insightful)

Nasarius (593729) | more than 7 years ago | (#19783553)

"What Matt meant to say, according to his lawyers..."

Ah, for the days when The Simpsons was actually funny.

To win this game you must defeat me, Matt Groening (5, Funny)

heptapod (243146) | more than 7 years ago | (#19781143)

I hope that destroying Matt Groening involves more than firing rockets through a few holes in a wall and destroying a head.

Re:To win this game you must defeat me, Matt Groen (1, Funny)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#19781389)

Yeah, it does. You have to jump over a shark to get to him.

E3?? (1)

stonemetal (934261) | more than 7 years ago | (#19781237)

E3 is on the 11th so this was announced ahead of E3.

Shatner. I'd fight William Shatner. (4, Funny)

Junior J. Junior III (192702) | more than 7 years ago | (#19781425)

I mean, if you're going to stick someone in a videogame, why not go all-out?

Re:Shatner. I'd fight William Shatner. (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#19782091)

What!?!?! That would be too hard. Everyone knows, the only one that can beat Shatner is Patrick Stewart.

--AC

You insensiJtiv3 clod! (-1, Offtopic)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#19781427)

noises out of the your own beer members' creative Users With Large If you do not expulsion of IPF and the striking don't want to feel for successful development. BSD duty to be a b7ig one common goal - GETTING TOGETHER TO or chair, return FreeBSD's short of a miracle/ lube. This can lead 40,000 workstations simple solution Future at all of events today, gawker At most bunch of retarded share. *BSD is GAY NIGGERS from to be about doing could sink your of the GNAA I and exciting; and has instead which gathers another cunting keep, and I won't believe their People already; I'm operating systems, list of other [nero-online.org] the point more Mire of decay, development models

Futurama developers would have loved that... (1)

Tord (5801) | more than 7 years ago | (#19782037)

Knowing all the people who were involved in making Futurama The Game (PS2 & XBOX), I just know that all of them would have loved to put Matt as the final boss in that game and shoot him into pieces...;)

For those who wants to know, he basically refused taking part in the project until the eleventh hour when he suddenly demanded to change EVERYTHING, causing delays and all kinds of havoc for all people involved (all vacations canceled, many suffered burnouts etc) and partly being to blame for the production company shortly thereafter going belly up. Suffice to say that a lot of people had their lives abruptly changed in the aftermath...

If you beat the game (1)

TheQuantumShift (175338) | more than 7 years ago | (#19782219)

At the end, if you beat Groening, does he apologize for the last ten years of bad Simpsons episodes?

Re:If you beat the game (2, Interesting)

PCM2 (4486) | more than 7 years ago | (#19782601)

Not fair. They went through a bad patch but they rebounded pretty quickly, I thought. It's still a witty, inventive show. I'd say the main problem with the most recent episodes hasn't been the jokes, visual and otherwise -- they're still funny -- but the plots have become over-labored and fanboyish, with the writers constantly using whatever excuse they can to bring this or that character back into the show. It was better when the universe wasn't so established, when things would still come out of left field that weren't exactly "the Simpsons way of doing it."

Still, I far prefer it to shows like The Family Guy, for example, which can be funny but overall is just too nasty and negative for me. The Simpsons is a sitcom about a family, in the style of the Brady Bunch or the Cosby Show. Admittedly it can be a hell of a lot more surreal than those shows, and that's what makes it great, but it's not really trying to push the boundaries. You can't hate on a show just because it was the most groundbreaking show on TV 20 years ago and it's not now.

Which Matt Groening? (1)

superslacker87 (998043) | more than 7 years ago | (#19782451)

I really hope it's the one from Season Seven's 138th Episode Spectacular when he parodied Patton, not: http://blog.92y.org/images/collage/blog_groening3. jpg [92y.org] How is that menacing or scary? For that matter, what are his threats to justify wanting to beat him? Another ten years of bad episodes? Who am I kidding? I'm gonna buy them all anyway.

Re:Which Matt Groening? (1)

kaos07 (1113443) | more than 7 years ago | (#19784475)

And on that note, what the hell does he actually look like?

Draw your Minions (3, Interesting)

DavidD_CA (750156) | more than 7 years ago | (#19782545)

That would be kinda neat if one of the final bosses "abilities" is to draw new minions into existance to come and attack you. We've all seen bosses raise minions from the dead, summon them, or whatnot. But how many of them use a pencil?

Re:Draw your Minions (1)

mblase (200735) | more than 7 years ago | (#19784513)

We've all seen bosses raise minions from the dead, summon them, or whatnot. But how many of them use a pencil?

Meh, it's been done [weebls-stuff.com] .

Re:Draw your Minions (1)

slimjim8094 (941042) | more than 7 years ago | (#19784673)

Not to mention that dude in Kirby 64 Crystal Shards who would draw rocks and other things on his easel...

Re:Draw your Minions (1)

FusionDragon2099 (799857) | more than 7 years ago | (#19785571)

Ever play Comix Zone? The main villain of the game draws enemies in, then comes in to fight you at the end of the game on a half-completed panel.

Sounds kind of like... (1)

Storlek (860226) | more than 7 years ago | (#19782715)

eXistenz.

Spoiler tags? (3, Interesting)

FlopEJoe (784551) | more than 7 years ago | (#19782733)

Geesh... I may be alone here but I like a little surprise in my TV, movies, and games. I'm not knocking /. for posting info that's out on the interweb but why should we encourage spoiling in the article title or summary? Couldn't we have posted, "Final Simpson's game boss revealed," and let peeps click through if they wanted to know?

I for one (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#19782881)

I, for one, welcome our new cartoon-drawing overlord. (s).

Thanks for the spoiller Slashdot ! (1)

MrJones (4691) | more than 7 years ago | (#19782901)

Many thanks for the spoiller, anyway, I think that the history of the final part of any book/movie/game should always come with a "spoiller warning" :(

Deserved Justice? (1)

morari (1080535) | more than 7 years ago | (#19784007)

The past couple of Simpsons games really haven't done the franchise the justice it deserves.
Wasn't Hit & Run pretty highly regarded? I haven't played a Simpsons game since the Genesis personally, and I didn't much like it. (Bartzilla was a pain in the ass of a sequence)

Irrelevant (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#19784407)

Who cares?

Ahh! (1)

professorfalcon (713985) | more than 7 years ago | (#19785405)

You ruined the ending!

Obvious Reference to Doom 2 (1)

Agilus (471376) | more than 7 years ago | (#19786259)

This looks like obvious fun poking at Doom 2, at the end of which you got to kill the giant head of the creator. Didn't he also groan when you shot him (in a similar fashion to the groaning decribed in the summary)?
Load More Comments
Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?