Beta

×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Opportunity Takes a Dip Into Victoria Crater

CmdrTaco posted more than 6 years ago | from the probably-not-skinny dept.

Space 79

Muad'Dave writes "From the NASA News Release 'Today, NASA's Mars Exploration Rover Opportunity entered Victoria Crater for the first time. It radioed home information via a relay by NASA's Mars Odyssey orbiter, reporting its activities for the day. Opportunity drove far enough in — about four meters (13 feet) — to get all six wheels past the crater rim. Then it backed uphill for about three meters (10 feet). The driving commands for the day included a precaution for the rover to stop driving if its wheels were slipping more than 40 percent. Slippage exceeded that amount on the last step of the drive, so Opportunity stopped with its front pair of wheels still inside the crater.' This marks the beginning of perhaps the greatest 'Opportunity' for new discoveries on Mars."

cancel ×

79 comments

Sorry! There are no comments related to the filter you selected.

Eh? (-1, Troll)

Anonymous Coward | more than 6 years ago | (#20574517)

What the fuck does that mean and why is it so important?

Sounds scary (2, Funny)

BadAnalogyGuy (945258) | more than 6 years ago | (#20574519)

I'm no baby, but this kind of sporty chance-taking is just scary. A little less gingerly and we'd be relying on the auspiciousness of luck.

Posh.

Re:Sounds scary (1)

TheLazySci-FiAuthor (1089561) | more than 6 years ago | (#20574781)

Judging by the fortune attained thus far, manifest in the exceptional duration of the rovers, I feel that a little chance-taking is warranted.

Somewhat like betting $100 at medium risk, winning $1,000 and then deciding to bet $100 again at higher risk (and reward).

I consider luck and fortune two different things. Luck just happens: finding a briefcase of money is luck. Fortune happens when you work and work towards a goal and all you need is just a little luck at the end.

Re:Sounds scary (3, Insightful)

MightyMartian (840721) | more than 6 years ago | (#20574915)

The Rovers have exceeded all expectations, and I suspect that the engineers are probably thinking "How much longer can these buggers last." From that, one can easily see why all concerned might feel that if they wait and proceed more cautiously, the Rovers might just become inoperative anyways. What's the old Neil Young song; "Better to burn out than fade away".

Re:Sounds scary (4, Informative)

Afterimage (44695) | more than 6 years ago | (#20576471)

Some of the rover team was through Raleigh a couple/three years back, they said while the rovers exceeded their hopes for lifespan, beforehand, they scaled down public lifespan expectations to ~90 days. So, yes the rovers _have_ exceeded expectations, but they were also hedged. :)

"Better to burn out than fade away" (1)

dargaud (518470) | more than 6 years ago | (#20578331)

That's Achille [wikipedia.org] 's choice, dating back to, oh, about 3 millennia...

Re:Sounds scary (1)

bocaJWho (1080217) | more than 6 years ago | (#20579709)

Just like Voyager 1&2. A lot of what NASA has accomplished in the field of unmanned vehicles is quite epic.

Re:Sounds scary (1)

bkr1_2k (237627) | more than 6 years ago | (#20574795)

Your name isn't right. It should be "BadpunGuy".

Re:Sounds scary (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 6 years ago | (#20575129)

I thought it was oddly phrased, didn't realize what he did there until you pointed it out. :(

Re:Sounds scary (1, Insightful)

Anonymous Coward | more than 6 years ago | (#20575181)

Calm down, lance that boil, and let the pressure out. You don't get anywhere in live without taking risks, and you can't always be concerned with laying a fatone. A man who knows what he wants and chasez it is more likely to succeed that someone who does nothing. Just in case, make contingencies (as I'm sure NASA is doing) and try to keep things synchronized.

- Chris

Just... (4, Funny)

Tastecicles (1153671) | more than 6 years ago | (#20574561)

...jam that sucker into 4WD, drop the clutch and power through that thing. You can make it! That flying saucer's a light-week away!

Re:Just... (2, Insightful)

Daniel_Staal (609844) | more than 6 years ago | (#20574665)

6WD, in this case. It's a 6x6. (I think all wheels are powered...)

Re:Just... (0)

GiMP (10923) | more than 6 years ago | (#20575865)

Perhaps it has 6 wheels, but one is essentially non-functional and it drives only on 5. The 6th wheel is stuck at a 7 degree inward angle..

Re:Just... (3, Informative)

cruff (171569) | more than 6 years ago | (#20575941)

I believe Spirit is the one with the lame wheel. I don't recall reading that Opportunity has any drive problems.

Re:Just... (1)

GiMP (10923) | more than 6 years ago | (#20577639)

Here is a Reference [newscientist.com] , although you're right.. Spirit has had wheel issues as well (and more severe, I believe)

Re:Just... (1)

Tablizer (95088) | more than 6 years ago | (#20583579)

I believe Spirit is the one with the lame wheel. I don't recall reading that Opportunity has any drive problems.

As I remember it, Opportunity has a wheel that is showing friction signs similar to Spirit's bad wheel soon before it went bad. In other words, Oppy's wheel is fairly likely to fail soon. If it fails, they are afraid that Oppy couldn't get out of the crater because of the steep climb needed. But they decided to take that risk. They were also investigating a suspicious infrared spectrometer last I read.
       

Re:Just... (4, Funny)

rubycodez (864176) | more than 6 years ago | (#20578059)

great, we spend all that money for something that acts exactly like an old shopping cart

Re:Just... (3, Funny)

Daniel_Staal (609844) | more than 6 years ago | (#20579103)

Yes, but it does it on Mars.

Re:Just... (1)

cbiltcliffe (186293) | more than 6 years ago | (#20580143)

Yes, but it does it on Mars.
And with a computer !

Re:Just... (1)

DMUTPeregrine (612791) | more than 6 years ago | (#20583515)

Quick, patent it!

At least... (4, Funny)

lucabrasi999 (585141) | more than 6 years ago | (#20574575)

This time, we can take comfort in knowing that someone at NASA is paying attention to the difference between feet and meters.

Re:At least... (1)

Dunbal (464142) | more than 6 years ago | (#20575469)

I wouldn't be so sure: (from the header)

Opportunity drove far enough in -- about four meters (13 feet) -- to get all six wheels past the crater rim.

      Damn, those rovers are bigger than I thought... or are martian meters smaller than terran meters?

Re:At least... (1)

VanessaE (970834) | more than 6 years ago | (#20583713)

If it drives across the rim at anything other than a direct, 90-degree angle, it can easily take far more than rover's own length to get all six wheels past the edge.

Re:At least... (1)

splutty (43475) | more than 6 years ago | (#20587495)

This time, we can take comfort in knowing that someone at NASA is paying attention to the difference between feet and meters.

Yeah. They're now using 6 wheels instead of feet. Those seem to work quite well, too, unless of course one sort of starts wobbling and ceases to function (used to happen to my lego cars all the time for some reason...)

Opportunity enters Victoria Crater (0, Redundant)

Enlarged to Show Tex (911413) | more than 6 years ago | (#20574601)

It seems to me that we should be expecting little Craters about, oh, 9 months from now...

First read (3, Funny)

HangingChad (677530) | more than 6 years ago | (#20574607)

For a second I thought Victoria Crater sounded more like the name of a p0rn star.

That changes the nuance of the headline significantly.

Re:First read (2, Funny)

evil agent (918566) | more than 6 years ago | (#20575439)

Honestly, I wouldn't be surprised if we found new life forms in Victoria's Crater.

Re:First read (2, Insightful)

tgrigsby (164308) | more than 6 years ago | (#20576309)

I would. I think we'll find life where we find water -- near the poles. What irritates me is that we're still sending probes that aren't mobile or don't at least have a mobile component. The Phoenix Mars Lander that blasted off last month (this month?) is a static probe. Why couldn't they at least have a smaller version of the rovers that could run out and bring back samples to be worked on by the probe? Anything that just sits there seems not just boring but underutilized to me. What if the lander continued to function for, say, three years beyond it's life expectancy? What would we do with it? Dig up more of the same dirt and run the same tests over and over?

Re:First read (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 6 years ago | (#20577303)

He was making a sex joke, dude. Stand up and step awayyyyyyyy from your cubicle =)

Re:First read (1)

ResidntGeek (772730) | more than 6 years ago | (#20578991)

I'm no expert, but it seems unlikely that you'd find something in a mile-long path from the landing site that you wouldn't find at the landing site. Life, as we know it at least, spreads wherever there are favorable conditions, so if there's life in one place it should also be in similar places nearby. Only way movement would make a big difference is in landing at boundaries between differing conditions (so you could check two dissimilar places) or difficult-to-land places like craters. Motion takes a lot of energy and a lot of space in the rover, so there's gotta be a compelling reason to use it.

Re:First read (1)

DerekLyons (302214) | more than 6 years ago | (#20581503)

The Phoenix Mars Lander that blasted off last month (this month?) is a static probe. Why couldn't they at least have a smaller version of the rovers that could run out and bring back samples to be worked on by the probe?

Two reasons;
  1. The expected lifetime of the probe is pretty short - even if nuclear powered the odds of it surviving the winter are pretty slim.
  2. Bringing back samples of a useful size means a pretty good sized rover - which leaves no room on the probe for instruments to analyze the samples.

Re:First read (1)

tgrigsby (164308) | more than 6 years ago | (#20672717)

1. The expected lifetime of the probe is pretty short - even if nuclear powered the odds of it surviving the winter are pretty slim.

That doesn't make sense. Voyager is nuclear powered and still running. Battening down the hatches and using the power plant's heat to keep the rover usable is a simple engineering problem.

2. Bringing back samples of a useful size means a pretty good sized rover - which leaves no room on the probe for instruments to analyze the samples.

The probe is working on scoops of dirt. It's not like it has to lug back boulders to be useful.

I'm sorry, I'm just not seeing a good argument against having a mobile component to maximize the usefulness of any lander-based scientific mission we launch. In terms of ROI, the rovers are top of the list.

Re:First read (1)

DerekLyons (302214) | more than 6 years ago | (#20674953)

That doesn't make sense. Voyager is nuclear powered and still running. Battening down the hatches and using the power plant's heat to keep the rover usable is a simple engineering problem.

  Voyager isn't going to be buried in several meters of ice and snow. It's far from a 'simple' engineering problem. Among other things getting rid of the excess heat (from the nuclear power source, as batteries won't cut it) when you don't need it is a significant engineering problem due to the thinness of Mars's atmosphere. Let alone hooking up an encapsulated rover to some form of radiator.
 
 

The probe is working on scoops of dirt. It's not like it has to lug back boulders to be useful.

Nobody asked it to lug back boulders. Even moving a few scoops of dirt (enough to usefully analyze) is going to require a fair sized rover. (Not too much smaller than Opportunity itself.) It takes a lot of power to run the arm, and more to move it to any useful distance away, and more yet for all the systems. That means solar panels or a _big_ battery, which means a rover that is big, or heavy, or both.
 
 

I'm sorry, I'm just not seeing a good argument against having a mobile component to maximize the usefulness of any lander-based scientific mission we launch.

That's a product of your utterly unfamiliarity with the situation coupled with an utter unwillingness to educate yourself.

Re:First read (1)

CopaceticOpus (965603) | more than 6 years ago | (#20577377)

Ew, that's what Victoria's "Secret" is?

Porn Star Considerations (1)

WED Fan (911325) | more than 6 years ago | (#20576007)

Well, considering they are named after their attributes, sometimes ironically:

  • Chesty Lamour
  • Long John
  • Chastity Rains

Then, "Victoria Crater" just sounds scary, and frankly, I think a number of OB/GYN's out there would have to have a second degree in spelunking to treat her.

Re:First read (1)

Basehart (633304) | more than 6 years ago | (#20576621)

If it turns out to be that kind of crater we can expect to find fleets of ships, light aircraft, hamburger stands but no hamburgers, just the stands. A disco in a cruise ship with a pool filled with shit. That would be soo cool:

Derek & Clive [phespirit.info]

Re:First read (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 6 years ago | (#20580813)

Soon we shall know all of Victoria's Secrets.

wow... (2, Insightful)

that IT girl (864406) | more than 6 years ago | (#20574615)

That is really awesome. However, am I the only person who thinks that title sounds dirty?

Re:wow... (1)

imaginaryelf (862886) | more than 6 years ago | (#20574691)

Oh you thought the headline read, "Take the opportunity a dip into victoria's crater."

Re:wow... (1)

that IT girl (864406) | more than 6 years ago | (#20574741)

Yep, I definitely thought "Wow, that sounds like a geeky porno!" Victoria Crater sounds like a Spock-approved lady...

Re:wow... (1)

black_lbi (1107229) | more than 6 years ago | (#20575675)

Really nice sig! But shouldn't you have a space between "byte" and "me"? Maybe an exclamation mark too, at the end ...

Re:wow... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 6 years ago | (#20576045)

I see a space. Look harder.

Re:wow... (1)

that IT girl (864406) | more than 6 years ago | (#20586101)

I tried to put the actual binary for a space, but it said it was too long and that I was posting gibberish. So I had to substitute the clearly inferior "actual" space. :) Thanks!

NOT the first to take the dip (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 6 years ago | (#20574709)

Prince Albert gets that credit!

Discoveries (5, Insightful)

ackthpt (218170) | more than 6 years ago | (#20574761)

This marks the beginning of perhaps the greatest 'Opportunity' for new discoveries on Mars.

Reminds me of the old joke about a mysterious hole being found, experts are looking into it.

That aside, I wonder what they're really expecting to find at the bottom of this crater. Any material from the blast which formed it should be available outside the crater for a large radius. Down in the crater are they expecting to examine strata to search for traces of water, life, indications of Mars earlier life? I suspect most of this, like the debris of the meteorite would be easily found outside the crater without the risk of entering it. I'm afraid once Opportunity enters the crater that's the last of it's exploring days, roaming the surface of Mars and its only Crater News Network from now on.

to the astonishment of NASA a titleist was found at the bottom of the crater

Re:Discoveries (1)

Ellis D. Tripp (755736) | more than 6 years ago | (#20575301)

[quote]to the astonishment of NASA a titleist was found at the bottom of the crater[/quote]

Wow, ol' Alan Shepard really whacked that one, I guess....

http://www.pasturegolf.com/archive/shepard.htm [pasturegolf.com]

The crater is a pre-dug excavation (5, Informative)

Quadraginta (902985) | more than 6 years ago | (#20575523)

Think of the crater as a nice hole already drilled down 20-50 meters or so. A geologist's (or in this case areologist's) dream: you can examine all the strata over a fairly wide horizontal range without having to pick up a pick or shovel (which Opportunity isn't carrying anyway).

Yes, what was once in the crater is now obviously outside the crater, but the ejecta was spread over a large area by the impact that created the crater, and of course that materials was subject to much more violent shock and heating. I expect it wouldn't tell you nearly as much as the layers inside the crater, even assuming you could distinguish between a thin smudge of ejecta and the surrounding desert floor. Any relationship between the layers (this comes above that, et cetera) is also only preserved inside the crater.

I'm afraid once Opportunity enters the crater that's the last of it's exploring days, roaming the surface of Mars

Probably. That's why they waited this long to try it. But they have to balance what they might learn driving around outside the crater and what they might learn driving into the crater (and not getting out). They've probably concluded they've learned about all there is to learn outside the crater, and if they can't get out, it's worth what they'll find in the crater.

Also bear in mind Opportunity's tools are wearing out, so its ability to do geology (as opposed to just sending back pictures) is coming to an end anyway.

Re:Discoveries (3, Informative)

iamlucky13 (795185) | more than 6 years ago | (#20576321)

They'll mostly be looking at geology. Just from a distance they already have noticed several distinct layers in the rocks exposed inside the crater. Examining those layers close up will give them comparisons to see similarities and differences and give them clues as to how they formed (volcanic, sedimentation). Victoria is a fantastic subject because it cuts over 60 feet into the local strata.

Sure there's ejecta outside the crater, but:
1.) Much of it is covered up by blowing sand and it's all scattered about as opposed to conveniently in one place inside the crater.
2.) Ejecta may be more metamorphed by the impact.
3.) You don't know which layer a piece of ejecta comes from.
4.) They've already studied several rocks on plains around the crater.

They're not realistically expecting to find signs of life. The rovers are ill-equipped for that, being primarily geology tools, but they may find more evidence for water and definitely will gather more information about Mars' geological past.

The team is well-aware that going into the crater may be the last thing Opportunity does. It may be stuck inside (although, notice the drive yesterday included a cautious backtrack most of the way out), something important may finally wear out, or the shelter from the wind may allow dust to accumulate on the solar panels to fatal levels. Opportunity has actually been at Victoria Crater, exploring the rim and surrounding area since the end of September...over 11 months ago. They wanted to be extra sure they got a clear picture of what was outside they crater before they move in.

I wouldn't worry about it being utterly boring (except to normal people). Going into the smaller Endurance Crater previously was as cool as anything they'd done before.

The funny part will be the broken wedge and half a dozen divots right next to the golf ball.

most of Opportunity's discoveries early on (4, Interesting)

peter303 (12292) | more than 6 years ago | (#20574787)

Opportunity got lucky and landed in an area with clear evidence of water sedimentation- hematite percipitation nodules and layered rock. Otherwise I expect Victoria to be all not that different from Endurance crater in 2003.

On the other Spirit took a couple of years to find evidence of water. The first couple years it crossed a volcanic basalt landscape, may with slight evidence of water healing in rock cracks. In its current area it has crossed bright sulfer salt soils - a clear sign of water. Spirit is very gimpy now. A couple meters a week is good progress.

Re:most of Opportunity's discoveries early on (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 6 years ago | (#20579437)

It *is* different. In Endurance, they were barely able to see the very top of a layer that appeared to have dune-scale crossbedding in it (think of layering derived from large sand dunes, but whether these are wind-deposited or water-deposited is debatable). It occurred near the base of Burns Cliff [marsgeo.com] (the crossbeds are at the lower left -- see also this discussion [marsgeo.com] ). They tried to drive onto that spot for closer analysis, but couldn't quite get to the outcrop safely, so they had to settle for the highest-resolution pictures they could get from afar.

At Victoria, the same dune-bearing layer appears to be present a few metres down from the surface of the surrounding plateau, but because the crater is deeper and the cliffs higher, the crossbedding is much better exposed and to several more metres depth, and the geometry is easier to see and over a wider cross section. It shows up beautifully in the pictures that have been taken from on top. Going down in there for a closer look is the next logical step, and, if successful, it will indeed be observing things not seen at Endurance close up or completely.

Just as Endurance was a larger crater than Eagle, and therefore showed more of the local stratigraphy, so Victoria will show more than Endurance (well, it has already shown more, but only now is the rover going to try to get up close to it).

Who comes up with the names for these features? (5, Funny)

InvisblePinkUnicorn (1126837) | more than 6 years ago | (#20574819)

So Opportunity is finally descending into Duck Bay, the gentlest slope on the edge of the crater. What other bays were being considered? Check out this map [nasa.gov] . Apparently, the alternatives were named "Bottomless Bay", "Bay of Toil", and "Valley Without Peril". Who comes up with these names, and how can I apply for that job?

Re:Who comes up with the names for these features? (3, Interesting)

peter303 (12292) | more than 6 years ago | (#20574995)

These names are from Captain Cook's south sea expeditions. Once they get a theme for a region, they continue. Otherwise its girlfriends, kids, goofy shapes, etc.

Re:Who comes up with the names for these features? (4, Informative)

AySz88 (1151141) | more than 6 years ago | (#20580545)

The parent post is apparently meant to be a joke. For Victoria Crater, it's actually the places visited by Ferdinand Magellan's ship Victoria (i.e. the ship that completed the first circumnavigation of the globe).

(Source: Steve Squyres, the principal investigator, who told us directly, as he teaches ASTRO 280 at Cornell. Also, this Planetary Society article [planetary.org] , relevant paragraph copied below.)

Following that suit, the MER team has chosen to name the main features around the rim -- the promontories and the alcoves -- after places that were visited by the Victoria by Magellan's expedition during it cruise around the world. "Cape Verde, Cabo Frio, and Duck Bay -- Baía dos Patos in Spanish -- were places that were visited by Magellan while he was still in the Atlantic," informed Squyres. Cape Verde is an archipelago off the west coast of Africa (located at 15.02N, 23.34W) comprised of 10 main islands and some 8 islets. "Cabo Frio and Duck Bay are both on the eastern shore of South America," he continued. "Actually, they called it Baía dos Patos because they thought they saw ducks there, but the ducks were actually penguins. Nobody had ever seen penguins before, so they didn't recognize them for what they were. But that's what they were seeing." Little did anyone realize at the beginning of the mission how much rover fans would learn about their own history through the rover jaunts across the Martian landscape.

Re:Who comes up with the names for these features? (1)

NotmyNick (1089709) | more than 6 years ago | (#20584623)

I hope that when metamodded, whoever modded the parent troll gets their comeuppance. For now, somebody mod the parent informative or underrated to do great justice.

Re:Who comes up with the names for these features? (3, Funny)

Peter Lake (260100) | more than 6 years ago | (#20576693)

Yummy names?

From NASA's Rover Update http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/mission/status.html [nasa.gov] :
"In recent months, rover handlers have been naming local features and targets around Home Plate for deceased members of the All-American Girls Professional Baseball League. Because Home Plate is bowl-shaped, scientists have decided to name features on top of Home Plate after things served in bowls. Stay tuned for upcoming yummy descriptions!"

Yum. I can hardly wait.

Re:Who comes up with the names for these features? (1)

ar1550 (544991) | more than 6 years ago | (#20577893)

NASA needs to turn in its geek credentials. Where is the Botany Bay?

Re:Who comes up with the names for these features? (0, Redundant)

Natales (182136) | more than 6 years ago | (#20580683)

Well, at least this is our opportunity to find out what's Victoria's Secret... ;-)

next Mars lander May 25, 2008 (5, Informative)

peter303 (12292) | more than 6 years ago | (#20574939)

Earth cant send probes to Mars each 26 months when the energy requirements are minimal. the last cycle they just sent two orbiters (getting interesting results). But next year they'll land near the polar and dig for water ice. The 2008 laneder has no wheels, but the next one in 2009 is the largest yet. Its the size of minivan and will use retro-rocket landers instead of air-bags, and will be mostly nuclear powered instead of solar.

I presume they'll keep a low-key program with current Rovers after May. Unexpected longevity complicates NASAs budget. Sometimes they turn them off before they are completely dead like Magellan and Galileo. (Actually they crashed them into Venus and Jupiter for terminal science experiment and to prevent contamination of Europa.)

Re:next Mars lander May 25, 2008 (1)

Jeff DeMaagd (2015) | more than 6 years ago | (#20575297)

I presume they'll keep a low-key program with current Rovers after May. Unexpected longevity complicates NASAs budget.

The odd thing is that once the device is made and fired off on a rocket, far more of the money is spent than with the rest of the project. The cost to continue a project is minimal when the probe is already there.

I don't know about Magellan, but I thought Galileo was a preventative measure, they decided they couldn't risk an uncontrolled failure so they would just kill it when they still had control.

consider both "capital" and "operating" costs (2, Informative)

peter303 (12292) | more than 6 years ago | (#20575627)

Hubble is an extreme case. Its lifetime cost is approaching $5 billion, but is arguably the most productive astronomical device ever. Its initial capital cost was $750 million, doubled by the first shuttle accident delays. Add 3 or 4 half billion dollar service missions and operating costs over $200 million a year.

Re:consider both "capital" and "operating" costs (1)

Jeff DeMaagd (2015) | more than 6 years ago | (#20575925)

Hubble doesn't really apply at all because it was intended to be serviceable. Hubble would only compare to a space probe if you remove the servicing costs, because probes aren't serviced. I'm sure the initial cost was even higher than you stated, I think the average cost of a shuttle launch is just a shade under $1B.

Re:consider both "capital" and "operating" costs (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 6 years ago | (#20581467)

That billion dollar figure is only if you include every penny ever spent on the shuttle program, including R&D and dead-end projects like the liquid fueled booster. The incremental cost of each additional launch is much lower...around $60 million. Counting for miscellaneous costs like the facilities and mission specific preparations (other than the cargo), it's probably around a couple hundred million, which puts it in the same range as a Titan IV. That is how Hubble probably would've been launched had the shuttle not been available. Had that been the case, we wouldn't be able to service it.

Last I read, the cost for the last Hubble servicing mission had been estimated to be around $800 million. That includes the shuttle operations plus designing and building the parts that will be installed.

The Mars rovers costs $820 million all together, including the first year of operations.

Re:consider both "capital" and "operating" costs (2, Informative)

JohnFluxx (413620) | more than 6 years ago | (#20578573)

Numbers mean nothing if you can't be bothered to adjust for inflation.

The construction cost, in todays dollars, of Hubble was closer to about $3 billion.

Re:next Mars lander May 25, 2008 (4, Informative)

iamlucky13 (795185) | more than 6 years ago | (#20576963)

You'd be surprised how much operations costs. The rover operations team size has been reduced at least twice, but their last budget extension was still $8.5 million (I forget is that was for one year or 18 months).

Sure that's a lot less than a new mission, but it's not trivial.

Orbiters, by the way, have a special limitation. Once they run out of manuevering fuel, they eventually become completely useless, even if they're gyro stabilized (the gyros will become saturated). As a result, once the fuel gets low, it's not uncommon to do something crazy with them. To wit:

* Galileo plunged into Jupiter's atmosphere, recording data to the last. This was partially a protection measure to guarantee it would not contaminate Europa.
* Magellan did the same at Venus to develop the aerobraking technique.
* ESA Smart-1 hit the moon. The impact was studied from earth to look for water and study the geology. The same was done with Lunar Prospector.
* Stardust and Deep Impact both have been sent to visit additional comets.
* NEAR actually landed intact on the surface of the asteroid Eros. It was built as a mere orbiter.

Re:next Mars lander May 25, 2008 (3, Funny)

kimvette (919543) | more than 6 years ago | (#20575553)

The 2008 laneder has no wheels, but the next one in 2009 is the largest yet. Its the size of minivan and will use retro-rocket landers instead of air-bags, and will be mostly nuclear powered instead of solar.


Oh good grief, when will our destruction of planets ever end? Mars has been experiencing global warming at an alarming rate, ever since we landed vehicles there, and now we're sending FULL-SIZE SUVs there even though it's obvious we are the cause of global warming? Good lord, what the hell is NASA thinking? ;)

Re:next Mars lander May 25, 2008 (1)

jdelisle (582839) | more than 6 years ago | (#20589945)

Interesting comments. Do you have a link that might provide a little more information? If not, I'm sure I can find something via google.

Warning! Bad Joke Ahead!! (2, Funny)

ashitaka (27544) | more than 6 years ago | (#20575109)

As Opportunity descends into the crater it may come across that one fantastic discovery that reveals without a shadow of a doubt the historic existence of life in the water under Mars' surface. An unbelievable fact that has been hidden for Millenia will be revealed shaking the foundations of human history and culture.

And we will now know that more than just Slashdot geeks look at Victoria's Secret.

Re:Warning! Bad Joke Ahead!! (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 6 years ago | (#20577647)

And we will now know that more than just Slashdot geeks look at Victoria's Secret.

Why is it a secret? I thought all ladies had one?

Should have added more power (1)

hcdejong (561314) | more than 6 years ago | (#20575255)

With a vehicle like this [caranddriver.com] , getting out of the crater would have been a cinch.

communications (0, Offtopic)

donvall (676413) | more than 6 years ago | (#20575387)

What I want to know is how the hell they can communicate with Opportunity on Mars, when I get dropped calls from across the street!!

You get what you pay for (1)

Quadraginta (902985) | more than 6 years ago | (#20575613)

(no comment)

Re:You get what you pay for (0, Offtopic)

donvall (676413) | more than 6 years ago | (#20576899)

My cell phone bill looks like NASA's budget.

No more phone-homes! (1)

Jaqenn (996058) | more than 6 years ago | (#20575815)

It radioed home information via a relay by NASA's Mars Odyssey orbiter, reporting its activities for the day.
Seriously guys, selling the Martians a package that phones home without their consent is not the route to good interstellar relations. Haven't we had enough media spectacles here at home to let us know not to do it on Mars?

Anyone else read? (1)

ale_ryu (1102077) | more than 6 years ago | (#20577593)

Opportunist takes a dip into Victoria's crater?

Re:Anyone else read? (1)

OrangeTide (124937) | more than 6 years ago | (#20577843)

I read "Opportunity to take a dip in Victoria Crater" .. and was thinking it was some sort of hot springs advertisement.

It can't rise out of the crater. (0, Offtopic)

master_p (608214) | more than 6 years ago | (#20578475)

Its the mud that causes the problem...

Would you dip your wick in it too? (-1, Offtopic)

Anonymous Coward | more than 6 years ago | (#20580277)

Who is Opportunity and who is Victoria Crater?

Opportunity Takes a Dip Into Uranus (-1, Offtopic)

Anonymous Coward | more than 6 years ago | (#20580603)

klingons blamed
Check for New Comments
Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?
or Connect with...

Don't worry, we never post anything without your permission.

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>