Beta
×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Ken Levine Defends Lair's Control Scheme

Zonk posted more than 7 years ago | from the it-needs-defending dept.

Games 72

A recent Gamers with Jobs podcast (well worth listening to) features co-hosting duties performed by Ken Levine of Irrational/2K Boston, makers of the title BioShock. During the podcast, Levine comes to the defense of Factor 5's Lair , saying that the folks over there may not have had much choice in how to proceed with their game. "Let me speak in these guys' defense for a minute as a game developer. I'm sure somebody came to them at some point and said, 'We have this motion control controller, and we have to make a go of it. And we really think you should try to make your game exclusively on that.' I think you're seeing a lot of this lately. Aren't there a lot of games where you're just like, 'Dude, can I just use the d-pad or the analog stick?' Ever since the DS came out I feel that there have been a lot of games like that. They've been so impressed by their control mechanic that they just really, really want you to play with that." It's still really, really bad.

Sorry! There are no comments related to the filter you selected.

He's probably right (1)

Tebriel (192168) | more than 7 years ago | (#20685201)

They probably were told "do it this way" by those on high.

Gotta love being forced to an agenda rather than making a fun game...

Re:He's probably right (1)

xenocide2 (231786) | more than 7 years ago | (#20686359)

I like how since Sony or whoever told them to do it, it's now not Factor 5's fault. Instead they got an order on high to "make this game suck" and they followed through.

Re:He's probably right (1)

XenoRyet (824514) | more than 7 years ago | (#20687617)

It's a dodge. The problem with Lair isn't that they used the motion controls, it's that they used them badly. If they had managed to develop a good motion based control scheme, or even an adequate one, it wouldn't be an issue.

Re:He's probably right (2, Insightful)

Mongoose Disciple (722373) | more than 7 years ago | (#20686523)

When you come right down to it, a video game is still a software project, and it's subject to all of the potential for weird politics, unrealistic deadlines, and irrational demands from on high that any other software project is. I'd be totally unsurprised if one or more of the above did indeed drive the crappy control scheme. The developers probably aren't idiots and knew it wasn't good but for whatever reason couldn't do much about it.

Developer sympathy/solidarity isn't enough to make me actually play the game, but I feel for the team.

Re:He's probably right (-1, Flamebait)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#20687141)

As someone who has actually played Lair, rather than some internet hate bandwagoner, I can tell you that Lair is actually pretty good.

It's not the best game ever, but it is fun, and the controls are actually well made. Why all the hate? Simple, it's not exactly the same as controls for 50 games you've already played. You weren't good with a D-pad when Nintendo came out, you weren't good with an Analog Stick when Dual Shock came out, and you weren't good with Sixaxis when Sixaxis came out.

People whine and bitch and moan when every game comes out that it is unoriginal garbage that plays exactly the same as every other game in the genre. When a developer takes a chance and makes a game that plays different, everybody bitches that it sucks because they won't take an hour or two to get used to the differences. You hypocrites should either admit that you want every game to be the same, or shut up and let intelligent gamers enjoy something new.

Re:He's probably right (2, Insightful)

Mongoose Disciple (722373) | more than 7 years ago | (#20687865)

Or: it could be that the controls are genuinely bad or inaccessible.

Different can be good. Different is not automatically good. I can take a crap on your desk and tell you you're stupid or hate originality if you don't love it, but that doesn't make it true.

I would say that this:

You weren't good with a D-pad when Nintendo came out, you weren't good with an Analog Stick when Dual Shock came out, and you weren't good with Sixaxis when Sixaxis came out.

is probably true, but with respect to game developers, not players. It takes people time to get good at making good controls for a new interface. Lair's team probably didn't have the time and resources to do it right, and if they made the same game again now I'd be willing to bet they'd do better... but, again, it doesn't make what's there now good. Equally, condemning the controls of one game doesn't mean there's something wrong with its developers, purchasers, or aficionados.
 

Re:He's probably right (2, Insightful)

Pluvius (734915) | more than 7 years ago | (#20688741)

Factor 5 itself basically admits this in their "Mastering the Beast" video. To quote one of the developers:

"We got the controller, it's great, new hardware! Everyone huddles around the desk and looks at it... So the first thing we did is just take the controller and use the tilt as a replacement for the joystick--we tilt left, we tilt right--and everyone tried it and it's like, 'This is crap. I don't want to play this.'"

But instead of just doing the logical thing of scrapping the idea of making Lair controllable only by motion sensors, they "try a little bit" and convince themselves that it doesn't really suck that bad. Watch it yourself [gametrailers.com] if you don't believe me.

Rob

Re:He's probably right (1)

cyborch (524661) | more than 7 years ago | (#20693201)

Is there a way to watch this without a Windows box? Did soneone put it on youtube or something similar?

I tried reading the source (usually there's a .wmv or .avi url somewhere in all the javascript mess), but I couldn't find an url for a stream or media file to fetch.

Re:He's probably right (1)

cyborch (524661) | more than 7 years ago | (#20693237)

Nevermind, I found it myself...

For those besides me who would like to get hold of the raw movie file, without all the javascript and ad mess, here's the plain .wmv [gametrailers.com] .

"Is there a game..." (4, Insightful)

nweaver (113078) | more than 7 years ago | (#20685221)

Is there a game, with the exception of Wii Sports, that you've been thrilled that there's no option to go back to a regular d-pad?

Yes. Metroid Prime III

Re:"Is there a game..." (1)

moderatorrater (1095745) | more than 7 years ago | (#20685345)

WarioWare

Raving Rabbids (1)

Chuck Chunder (21021) | more than 7 years ago | (#20689097)

Plus of course games where you get the best of both worlds, like The Godfather: Blackhand edition.

Re:"Is there a game..." (1)

Piata (927858) | more than 7 years ago | (#20685437)

I second Metroid Prime III. The game controls absolutely perfect.

Re:"Is there a game..." (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#20685627)

Correct, metroid prime is awesome and they really did a great job with the controls, but interestingly it uses the optical/ir tracking system for pointing & rotation and the analog stick on the nunchuk for fwd, back & sidle. The inertial sensor is relegated to stuff like grapple and that's almost binary, you can even grapple with opposite motion and it still works. So I don't think that really informs the debate on systems like Sony's 6DoF , or if it does it's a negative.

Re:"Is there a game..." (4, Interesting)

Tadrith (557354) | more than 7 years ago | (#20685629)

Seconded.

Retro did an absolutely amazing job using the Wiimote in Metroid Prime 3. The smoothness, the reaction time, it was absolutely perfect. I was dreading it for a while after seeing what it was like playing Red Steel, but it was nothing like that. Some of the most fun gaming I've had in a long time.

Re:"Is there a game..." (2, Informative)

Itchyeyes (908311) | more than 7 years ago | (#20685879)

They mention that in the podcast. Levine admits that he has not played it yet.

Re:"Is there a game..." (1)

DDLKermit007 (911046) | more than 7 years ago | (#20687373)

Ooops, moderated wrong! Ignore this post!

Re:"Is there a game..." (1)

Bardez (915334) | more than 7 years ago | (#20688499)

Except how shitty the game responded to the Wii-mote. Turning? Nope, you're pointing off the screen, so you must not be trying to turn at all. I'll just leave you there halfway through your turn, to get hit by that boss, and then let you wait a second or two once you are pointing at that screen again.

I tried all sensitivities and it was still a pain on all of them.

Prime III's control scheme wasn't all that great.

Re:"Is there a game..." (1, Informative)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#20689919)

Have you tried not waving your hands around like a hyperactive monkey? If you're having trouble with pointing that far off the screen, you're doing something really, really wrong.

Re:"Is there a game..." (1)

adisakp (705706) | more than 7 years ago | (#20689323)

Is there a game, with the exception of Wii Sports, that you've been thrilled that there's no option to go back to a regular d-pad?

Mortal Kombat Armageddon for the Wii is actually easier to control with the WiiMote than the d-pad. You do the special moves with simple gestures rather than memorizing long button combinations. For example, to throw Scorpion's spear, you just press the trigger on the WiiMote and make a small throwing motion towards and away from your opponent.

Re:"Is there a game..." (2, Insightful)

MemoryDragon (544441) | more than 7 years ago | (#20693491)

Super Paper Mario... they added a lot of useful functionality to the D-Pad, Zelda also works exceptionally well. Rayman Raving Rabbits basically lives from the Wiis Control scheme, just check out how poorly the game works on other platforms than the Wii. Resident Evil 4 also works better on the Wii than on any other system. Also on the DS it finally is possible to play strategy and point and click games decently, many games which use the pad as mouse replacement work exceptionally well, those which dont work are those which try weird control schemes.

Re:"Is there a game..." (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#20695673)

When playing Zelda and using the bow to aim in boss fights. Dodging then shooting has never been easier!

For a second, I thought this guy was Hitler (2, Funny)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#20685239)

Then I realized he wasn't defending Dragon's Lair

Hell, anyone who could defend the control scheme of Dragon's Lair, probably eats puppies for breakfast.

Re:For a second, I thought this guy was Hitler (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#20686417)

Weird; I wrote this [slashdot.org] before I'd even seen your comment. Great minds think alike... as do those who've ever played Dragon's Lair and got unbelievably annoyed at it, I guess.

Re:For a second, I thought this guy was Hitler (1)

SleptThroughClass (1127287) | more than 7 years ago | (#20686737)

Hell, anyone who could defend the control scheme of Dragon's Lair, probably eats puppies for breakfast.

ON switch for stove under puppies' cage flashes white.

Re:For a second, I thought this guy was Hitler (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#20686883)

Goodwin's law.

Dragon's Lair (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#20685263)

For a second there I thought that was something about the "Dragon's Lair" control scheme.

Which is an interesting idea actually; the control scheme (or lack of it) in Dragon's Lair is so bad that it makes any other game look brilliant in comparison. Whenever you unveil your new game, simply have a couple of ancient Dragon's Lair arcade games in the foyer and let the journalists play around with them. They'll get nostalgic, then they'll realise that it's actually a really horrible game with frustrating controls.

Then they get to play your game and it's bloody brilliant in comparison :-)

Wrong, wrong, wrong (2, Insightful)

PlatyPaul (690601) | more than 7 years ago | (#20685429)

From TFA:

Is there a game, with the exception of Wii Sports, that you've been thrilled that there's no option to go back to a regular d-pad?
Yes [wikipedia.org] , there [wikipedia.org] definitely [wikipedia.org] is [wikipedia.org] .

Why does he think the d-pad can necessarily provide better control? The issue isn't that motion controls are by-nature loose; it's that developers are new to doing it right. Lair sucked because they did it wrong, pure and simple, and it might (or might not) have been OK if they'd worked harder at really nailing it.

Re:Wrong, wrong, wrong (1)

Sciros (986030) | more than 7 years ago | (#20685675)

It depends entirely on the game, of course, but it IS true that a lot of developers have been utilizing the DS touch screen and Wiimote seemingly just for the sake of utilizing them, and to no good effect.

Think Castlevania for the DS with the "trace this BS shape to finish off the boss" mechanic that we all fell in love with (just kidding WTF was with that) or the "press the screen to change map types" functionality in Mario Kart DS or the horriblicious controls for games like Mario Hoops 3v3. There are many games that would have been better off being released on a "standard controls" console because then the devs would not have been tempted/coerced/whatever into making some half-ass use of the new interface the DS and Wii provide.

The only point on which you and I *may* disagree is that developers are "new to doing it right." I submit that most are just too lazy/stupid to do it right and should attempt it in the first place.

Re:Wrong, wrong, wrong (2, Insightful)

geeknado (1117395) | more than 7 years ago | (#20685821)

You're probably correct-- the developers are new to doing it "right". Given that that's the case, is it really good business to force them to adopt new control strategies, good or bad, before they're really ready for them? By doing so, it seems to me that a) many potentially good games will suffer for these directives and b) the merits of these control schemes in general may be unfairly called into question due to bad experiences with these games.

IMO, motion sensitive controls work best when we're capturing a motion that is at least an analog of some real activity. That's the "fun". Things tend to miss the mark the more abstract the symbols become, partly because the motions themselves may "blur" into others, causing a lack of precision(Lair, I'm looking directly at you).

What's really needed is a better balance between the motion controlled elements and the 'traditionally' controlled elements. I haven't played all of the games you've referenced in their Wii incarnations, but from what I've read, I'd suggest that these games strike such a balance and thus are relatively successful.

Re:Wrong, wrong, wrong (1)

p0tat03 (985078) | more than 7 years ago | (#20685945)

I haven't played some of the games on the list, but I can tell you that RE4's motion controls, while well done, was not superior to the traditional gamepad, IMHO at least. At no moment did I ever go "thank God they invented motion controls, or otherwise this game would be significantly inferior!", and in fact in a few moments i truly wished I had a control pad.

Re:Wrong, wrong, wrong (1)

Piata (927858) | more than 7 years ago | (#20686039)

I kept wondering how you could possibly play that game [i]with[/i] a dpad. Using the knife was so damn easy! But MP3 really shows what good motion controls can do for a game. It pretty much sealed the deal for me on motion controls. Any remaining doubts I had washed away.

Re:Wrong, wrong, wrong (2, Interesting)

iainl (136759) | more than 7 years ago | (#20693963)

Really? Everyone I know who bought the Wii release of RE4 did so specifically for the new controls, because they had already played the Gamecube or PS2 versions.

Re:Wrong, wrong, wrong (1)

provigilman (1044114) | more than 7 years ago | (#20686987)

He's not saying that the D-Pad or analog sticks are just purely better, he's asking "were you ever thrilled to not have a choice."

The problem though wasn't so much that the controls sucked per se, after all there might be some extremely masochistic people out there that actually like Lair's controls, it's that if you didn't like them you couldn't switch to something that you were more comfortable with. There's simply no excuse for that.

How many fighting games give you the option of D-Pad or analog sticks? How many games give you option of standard or inverted controls? How many games give you multiple controller configurations to choose from or allow button mapping? Choice is what allows a player to pick the option that's best for them...and isn't that what games are supposed to be about? Choice?

Re:Wrong, wrong, wrong (1)

iainl (136759) | more than 7 years ago | (#20693999)

If Lair's could have been implemented on an analogue stick (I wouldn't know really; I only played it for about 2 minutes on a demopod, as it's not my sort of thing), then it's perfectly reasonable to offer it.

But at the same time, to pick another example have you ever played DDR or Guitar Hero on a regular pad? It's absolutely hideous, and breaks the point of it all. Wii games that work well implement the motion sensing to do things that are either plain impossible on a pad, or would feel unnatural and stupid. To draw another analogy, try playing a serious driving game on an arcade stick; it just doesn't work because you don't have the degree of control you need.

Re:Wrong, wrong, wrong (1)

provigilman (1044114) | more than 7 years ago | (#20695775)

As I said though, I'm not arguing that it would be better with a D-Pad or analog sticks...just that the option should have been there.

Your DDR and Guitar Hero examples just prove the point. What if you don't have a DDR pad, or it broke? What if you did a Hendrix number on your Guitar Hero controller, or just couldn't afford one? You have the option to use the game pad on those games...it may suck, but at least you were given the option.

Re:Wrong, wrong, wrong (1)

iainl (136759) | more than 7 years ago | (#20696163)

I suppose that's the problem with analogies, though. Unlike those games, every PS3 owner can be assumed to posess a SIXAXIS, because it came with the machine. You're not really expected to try Guitar Hero on a pad either, it's just possible (barely) due to the way the guitar's buttons are rewired to a standard pad.

Hell, I remember having a great laugh trying to play Crazy Taxi on the Dreamcast's fishing rod controller, and I'm fairly sure the designers didn't expect it to be used that way.

I suppose though, that this is probably because I'm left-handed, and I've faced enough console FPS games that won't remap the controls to suit me that I don't care as much now it's someone else having to put up with the mappings being somewhere they don't want them. I got used to it, so I'm sure everyone else can.

Re:Wrong, wrong, wrong (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#20687751)

How about Dragonball Z for the Wii? That actually gives you the choice to use gamecube/classic controller, but I almost wish it didn't. First, if there's a gamecube controller plugged in, it assumes you want to use it and ignores the Wii Remote (So I have to get my ass up and unplug the controllers when I start the game). Second, they give no instructions on how to do anything with the gamecube controller so its sort of a taunting, "You could try this with a different controller... But we'll never tell you how!"

Re:Wrong, wrong, wrong (1)

darkmayo (251580) | more than 7 years ago | (#20701455)

yea I plugged in my Gamecube controller to see how the control style was with it and couldnt figure it out. Big oversight not having the controls listed for a controller.. that said I whoop ass with the Wii-mote on Tenkaichi 2.

Re:Wrong, wrong, wrong (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#20689551)

Zelda? Ugh, god, I despise the Wii controls for that game

Re:Wrong, wrong, wrong (1)

happyemoticon (543015) | more than 7 years ago | (#20689907)

Well, there's a question of appropriateness. For flight sims, it's all about the analog stick. For fighting games, you usually want to use the D-Pad because of the precise input sequences. In the case of this game, the use of motion control was not appropriate and was evidently tacked on because of politics. The end result was something that was both incomplete in execution and an inappropriate design choice. Even if you had all the engineers in the world working on it, you couldn't have made it anything but a square peg in a round hole. At least that's what I gather; I haven't actually played it.

By the way, I totally dug his comments about the obtuse plots, long cutscenes and general un-gaminess of practically every Japanese RPG. I was just ranting about that the other day.

Re:Wrong, wrong, wrong (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#20698533)

Monkeyball Wii was far worse than using a GC analog stick. Even most of the minigames had broken controls.

Rayman Rabbits, and Wario had nice controls.

No option to go back (-1, Flamebait)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#20685445)

Is there a game, with the exception of Wii Sports, that you've been thrilled that there's no option to go back to a regular d-pad?"

All of them, and Nintendo should be refusing to license games with CC/GC support. Kinesophobes should take the plunge or not play. Traditional controls served their purpose, but their time is up and it's time for them to die.

Re:No option to go back (1)

Quiet_Desperation (858215) | more than 7 years ago | (#20685953)

Kinesophobes should take the plunge or not play.

Oh, God, another false dichotomy! Can we divide and conquer ourselves in any more ways?

Re:No option to go back (1)

CdrGlork (1096607) | more than 7 years ago | (#20686349)

Oh, God, another false dichotomy! Can we divide and conquer ourselves in any more ways?

You antidichotomites are all the same, trying to tell me how to live my life!

Re:No option to go back (1)

Quiet_Desperation (858215) | more than 7 years ago | (#20690387)

antidichotomites

Wait. Isn't that what give Jedis their powers?

See? Another dichotomy! :)

Re:No option to go back (1)

fractoid (1076465) | more than 7 years ago | (#20691729)

You antidichotomites are all the same, trying to tell me how to live my life!
You're either with us Antidichotomites, or you're against us!

Re:No option to go back (1)

mink (266117) | about 7 years ago | (#20758737)

Only slashdoters deal in absolutes.

Re:No option to go back (1)

swordgeek (112599) | more than 7 years ago | (#20688521)

*I* can. Apparently *YOU* can't though, which is what separates us.

d-pad (2, Insightful)

HeronBlademaster (1079477) | more than 7 years ago | (#20685813)

I played some Mario game or other on my little brother's DS a few months ago, and I was absolutely confused by its insistence that you actually use the touch screen to work the menu. Intuitively, if a menu item is highlighted by default (and it was), using the d-pad should change which menu item is selected... but it didn't.

I absolutely hate the whole "use the [touch screen/motion sensor/whatever] just because it's there" fad. It drives me insane.

I haven't tried Metroid Prime III yet, so I can't say whether I like its control scheme or not, but the upcoming light saber duel thing has me... hesitant. I fail to see how the Wiimote could provide a good duel experience with light sabers. You'd have no feedback when you hit your opponent's light saber. Your arm would continue to swing while your on-screen avatar's saber is blocked by your opponent's, and more than likely, if you move your hands back to match what shows on-screen, it'll move your saber while you do that in a direction you don't intend.

Re:d-pad (1)

Cecil (37810) | more than 7 years ago | (#20686479)

I fail to see how the Wiimote could provide a good duel experience with light sabers. You'd have no feedback when you hit your opponent's light saber. Your arm would continue to swing while your on-screen avatar's saber is blocked by your opponent's, and more than likely, if you move your hands back to match what shows on-screen, it'll move your saber while you do that in a direction you don't intend.

First of all, "no feedback" is not entirely true. The Wiimote has a pretty intense rumble ability. And what's the alternative, to try and do swordplay with a D-pad? Yikes.

Besides, up until very recently racing games had no feedback either, and they suffered almost all of the same problems, and yet somehow, they were still a lot of fun. It's about making the best with what you've got. If you find a better swordplay controller than the Wiimote, and manage to get market acceptance for it, I'd be more than happy to play a sword game on it. Until then, the Wiimote will do just fine.

Re:d-pad (1)

Altus (1034) | more than 7 years ago | (#20686635)


I will agree with you, but it would be even more annoying if the opposite was true. If you couldn't use the touch screen.

most of the games on the wii allow for both pointer and d-pad driven navigation. Its good to have choices.

I hate the menu navigation in Tiger Woods 08 (for the Wii). So far the rest of the game has been ok (Ive only just started playing it) but the menus are a pain in the ass.

Re:d-pad (1)

HeronBlademaster (1079477) | more than 7 years ago | (#20686823)

I certainly don't think they should have dropped the whole touchscreen thing, I just think they should allow both the new way and the "old" way so everyone is happy. I don't believe it's a whole lot of extra effort to add in d-pad support on a menu.

Re:d-pad (2, Insightful)

rjung2k (576317) | more than 7 years ago | (#20687019)

"Intuitively, if a menu item is highlighted by default (and it was), using the d-pad should change which menu item is selected..."

This is only "intuitive" after you've spent years being accustomed to using D-pad-based control schemes. For ordinary non-geek mortals, the "intuitive" response when seeing a control is to *cough* touch it.

Re:d-pad (1, Flamebait)

provigilman (1044114) | more than 7 years ago | (#20687219)

Wow...that must suck at work. Always touching your monitor, never getting the cursor to move. Oh, and ATMs...how do you get money out?

I'm sorry, but everyone who has spend more than 5 minutes with an electronic device in their lives tends to look for a button to control a device. I don't know though, maybe you're the exception...maybe you're the guy pawing at his car window because he's trying to drag it down rather than hitting the "button".

Re:d-pad (1)

MemoryDragon (544441) | more than 7 years ago | (#20693633)

Wow...that must suck at work. Always touching your monitor, never getting the cursor to move. Oh, and ATMs...how do you get money out? Ahem, have you ever heard of a mouse, that is basically the equivalent to touching something directly. When whas the last time you used the keyboard for your graphical user interface without any mouse interaction.

Re:d-pad (1)

provigilman (1044114) | more than 7 years ago | (#20695751)

Wow...that must suck at work. Always touching your monitor, never getting the cursor to move. Oh, and ATMs...how do you get money out? Ahem, have you ever heard of a mouse, that is basically the equivalent to touching something directly. When whas the last time you used the keyboard for your graphical user interface without any mouse interaction.

ATM's have a mouse now?

But seriously, a mouse is another device with buttons that you press, instead of pressing the screen directly. It's no different than using the analog sticks to move a cursor. Even still though, the point is that there is a keyboard and you will be using it. You don't have to be "geek" in order to know that.

Re:d-pad (1)

HeronBlademaster (1079477) | more than 7 years ago | (#20687267)

"ordinary non-geek mortals"?

You mean everyone over the age of 8 who plays (or played) console or handheld games? You don't have to be a non-ordinary geek to know how to use a dpad-menu. D-pad menus are, in fact, intuitive - I have a four-directional button on the left of my controller (gee, what does that do?) so I would expect that pressing the 'down' button would move the current selection down, 'up' should move it up, and so forth.

My 10-year-old little brother whose DS I used had a Game Boy, Game Boy Color, and Game Boy Advance (as well as a Gamecube) before he ever got his DS. I'm quite sure he is used to d-pad-driven menus, though I doubt he cares how the menus work.

Don't act like only geeks know how to use d-pad-based menus, that's entirely untrue.

Re:d-pad (1)

MemoryDragon (544441) | more than 7 years ago | (#20693543)

Exactly, I never felt the touch screen to be annoying, especially since I played a lot of games on the PC and I know the merits of a good mouse controle for everything point and click related. The touch screen finally gives me that. The only thing annoying on the ds are those games which try to mimic an analog stick via the touch screen, which is exactly two games, Metroid Prime Hunters and Super Mario 64, both simply fail because the form factor of the ds simply gives you cramps on this control scheme.

Re:d-pad (1)

Loosifur (954968) | more than 7 years ago | (#20695317)

Well, I'm guessing that when the two lightsabers are in contact both wiimotes will rumble and make noise, which they do pretty well. But I'm also guessing that it's either going to come with or soon be followed by plastic lightsabers to pop the wiimote in to. Sort of like the steering wheel they've got: just a plastic shell for the 'mote.

Re:d-pad (1)

HeronBlademaster (1079477) | more than 7 years ago | (#20695889)

That's a good idea, it hadn't occurred to me to do something like that.

Re:d-pad (1)

Floritard (1058660) | more than 7 years ago | (#20696239)

Yea. I mean they should just use the d-pad for that game too. Feedback issues solved, slam dunk!

Proper feedback's pretty rare in all games man (if you can even called rumbling feedback), and until they come out with a fullscale Darth Vader robot with which to duel and play father-son catch, I'll certainly settle for the wiimote game thank you.

From someone who actually listened to the podcast (4, Informative)

Itchyeyes (908311) | more than 7 years ago | (#20685851)

As someone who actually listened to the podcast, I can say that I distinctly did not get the impression that Levine was defending Lair's control scheme as a good control scheme. He was just making the point that Factor 5 might have been pressured into using the tilt controls. He, in no way, defended how poorly of a job they did implementing the tilt controls. The headline and the quote in the summary are completely out of context.

Re:From someone who actually listened to the podca (4, Funny)

1019 (262204) | more than 7 years ago | (#20688279)

The headline and the quote in the summary are completely out of context.
On Slashdot? IMPOSSIBLE!

Re:From someone who actually listened to the podca (2, Insightful)

Tol Dantom (1114605) | more than 7 years ago | (#20691563)

I'm glad you call attention to this because I think it highlights the real problem with Lair which isn't that the technology sucks and they were pigeon holed, but that after the situation came down they didn't adapt and made a universally shitty user experience. From what I hear, cruising around controlling the dragon is just find if all you're doing is traveling. The real problem is their retarded play mechanics, which punish you for not juking the controller exactly the right way when a turn around button would have been stupid easy and punish you again with the terrible targeting system that goes terribly with the slow tilting controls and lack of camera control. I think a Panzer Dragoon style with this mode of moving the dragon around would have been amazing, if they gave you a stick for the camera and didn't require you to 180 by waving a dead chicken over the controller (or I guess the controller over the dead chicken in this case).

Keep your opinions to yourself (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#20687187)

It's still really, really bad.


Is this the new Slashdot? I think Zonked has read too many Microsoft-biased news articles from Kotaku and it's manifested itself in his writing.

Keep the opinions to yourself, unless you're doing a review.

Re:Keep your opinions to yourself (1)

R00BYtheN00BY (1118945) | more than 7 years ago | (#20687305)

shut up faggot

Lair's problems (2, Interesting)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#20688337)

Honestly, the control scheme isn't Lair's problem. I've got the game, and have played through most of it. The control scheme does have a high learning curve, but once I got used to it, it seemed realistic, like steering a dragon.

Lair's real problems are elsewhere. The biggest annoyance is the way the damn thing inserts ten second cut scenes in haphazardly during combat. You'll be in intense combat, trying to get a bead on something and suddenly you're looking at some stupid scene about something blowing up elsewhere. You're then return to combat in an entirely different location, utterly disconcerted.

The other annoyance is the way you are constantly ping-ponged between objectives by spoken words. "Go save the army!" "Get the bridge!" "Save the army!" For some of the boss battles, you seem to be sort of pulled out of the action nearly at random to go after the boss.

I personally don't think the game deserved the rock bottom ratings it got. It's a pretty solidly mediocre game. I wouldn't part with $59 for it if I had it to do over, but now that I've got it, it's entertaining enough to play through. (Though if I had something better, that might not be the case.)

It seems like the Lair meme is "shitty control scheme". In truth, I think the real problem is the more basic game play.

Give the novel controllers a rest already (3, Insightful)

RogueyWon (735973) | more than 7 years ago | (#20688523)

I know this is going to be an unpopular opinion around these parts, but I feel that the emphasis on so-called "innovative" controllers in the gaming market over the last 12 months or so has been a terrible thing for games in general. Lair is a particularly bad example - what could have been a servicable, perhaps even decent game crippled by a control system that is agonising at best. I had a horrible feeling that Heavenly Sword was going to be ruined by the same crap, until I found the option to turn the motion-sensing stuff off. Now, part of this is down to just how sheer bloody awful the motion sensing functions of the Sixaxis are, but Wii games are, in many ways, just as bad. Certainly, after the first two hours of Zelda, the novelty had worn off, my elbow was getting tired and I was desperate for a sensible controller. With the exception of Resident Evil 4, I've yet to play a *proper* Wii game (as opposed to one of those all-pervading tech-demo-cum-party-game atrocities) where the controller actually added to the experience, rather than being a distraction.

Fancy controllers might be ok for games which get dragged out once every couple of months when you have friends over and nothing better to do, but for those who, like myself, like to put in a substantial amount of time every week gaming, you just can't beat either a traditional two-analogue-sticks console controller or a keyboard and mouse combo. Far more precision, far less hassle and far more engagement. Right now, the best console controller on the market is the 360 controller, hands down.

Re:Give the novel controllers a rest already (1)

PaganRitual (551879) | more than 7 years ago | (#20690137)

I agree totally. Every game that comes out on the PS3 and Wii needs to have the option to control it with a normal controller.

Not everyone wants to play games with a remote control or swing their controller around for specific events, but we still want to actually play those games. I was thinking specifically of those two next gen consoles, but the DS is another great example.

You either end up with games that are simply less fun to play because of the fact that there is forced motion sensing (Lair, Excite Truck), or you get good games where the motion sensing crap feels like the obvious gimmick that it is (Folksoul, Ninja Gaiden Z).

"It's controlled purely with the normal controller, but when you want to suck the souls out of stuff, you yank the controller upwards". Awesome. Why not just let us pull the right analogue stick back as an alternative?

Sure, there are once in a blue moon games where the game needs the 'special' control system to work (Lost Magic, RE4Wii), but they really need to be the exception, and not the lazy rule.

Tennis (1)

argent (18001) | more than 7 years ago | (#20690153)

With the exception of Resident Evil 4, I've yet to play a *proper* Wii game (as opposed to one of those all-pervading tech-demo-cum-party-game atrocities) where the controller actually added to the experience, rather than being a distraction.

Wii Tennis rocks.

Re:Give the novel controllers a rest already (1)

MemoryDragon (544441) | more than 7 years ago | (#20693619)

Bad Example, the control scheme in Zelda works really well, the Bow definitely does work well and I love it. If you want to pinpoint bad control schemes, then better use another game, Zelda definitely has a good one.
Check for New Comments
Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?