Beta
×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Lost Odyssey To Span Four DVDs

Zonk posted more than 6 years ago | from the that's-a-big-game dept.

XBox (Games) 69

Perhaps proving that Sony has something to their 'bigger disc as standard' argument, IGN is reporting that Lost Odyssey will span multiple DVDs when it is released for the Xbox 360 next year. "Hot on the heels of the three DVD long Blue Dragon, Sakaguchi informed the crowd that Lost Odyssey will span a massive four DVDs. The game, which uses a mixture of CG and real-time cutscenes, will last roughly 40 to 50 hours. Lost Odyssey will follow in Blue Dragon's footsteps in another way as well. The team plans to ship the game with multiple language options, including English and Japanese. However, the voice animations will be synched to English on all versions, including the Japanese release."

cancel ×

69 comments

Sorry! There are no comments related to the filter you selected.

Fallacious argument (1)

cpct0 (558171) | more than 6 years ago | (#20704071)

HD-DVD also has more room. The DVD versus Blu-ray argument simply is not standing ground.

Besides, you can make something fit in most format, granted you take the time to do so.

Re:Fallacious argument (3, Interesting)

Tinyn (1100891) | more than 6 years ago | (#20704149)

Ya, but PS3 shipped with a Bluray drive for games. Xbox360 has that HD-DVD video addon, but it can't do games. The point of 'Hrm, maybe the game drive use one of the new, bigger formats' is still true.

Re:Fallacious argument (1)

cpct0 (558171) | more than 6 years ago | (#20704217)

If it became such a problem, I am sure a Xbox 360 patch would be along the way to play this game over the HD DVD. Granted, it would not be for ALL 360s, but it would still work. Also, they could make it a DVD-game with a HD-DVD "movie" extra, optional, for 720p and up native movie contents. That would allow all people to get it, while making sure the freaks with giant HD sets and Elite 360s would get their eye candy.

Finally, they could simply make a better use of the compression, and extend it to make sure everything works perfectly well. I still stand on my ground.

Re:Fallacious argument (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 6 years ago | (#20704885)

If it became such a problem, I am sure a Xbox 360 patch would be along the way to play this game over the HD DVD.
Does anyone actually doubt that it will become a problem? I mean unless you're assuming that this generation of consoles will only last a couple of years at most...

Finally, they could simply make a better use of the compression, and extend it to make sure everything works perfectly well.
Agreed, we just need some sort technological solution to our problems and all our problems will go away. As easy as that. Reverse the polarity on existing encryption perhaps, and focus it through a modified deflector dish. I mean, obviously you can fit an infinite amount on there if you just keep making better use of compression. You're a genius.

Re:Fallacious argument (1)

aichpvee (631243) | more than 6 years ago | (#20705785)

Well isn't that exactly what xbox fanboys not only expect but want? They seem to have loved their 4 year cycle last time.

Does anyone else think it's kind of funny that microsoft can churn out a new console faster than a new version of windows?

Re:Fallacious argument (1)

aliquis (678370) | more than 6 years ago | (#20705721)

But forcing people to buy the addon HD-DVD is rather lame, looks like shit and as expensive as a PS3.
And people who has the DVD-version would feel it sucked.

Also I doubt it will happen since not that many have the HD-DVD one currently, so the first few games which started to use it would have crappy sales, and noone wants that, and without games being released for it noone will care to get the drive.

Of course games could be released on both DVD and HD-DVD, but that kindof stuck aswell.

Anyway of those two PS3 are the only console I would consider buying, thought that's not that likely to happen at all, and even less likely in close time to now ;D

Not that intrested in Wii either since I have a cube which I haven't played much on at all and a DS.

Re:Fallacious argument (0, Flamebait)

cpct0 (558171) | about 7 years ago | (#20709741)

I have a Wii, I played it some, there are _SOME_ good games, but the production has only started ramping up on the Wii, as most major studios got caught red-handed with a 10-million-console market and no products to offer. So I think it will become more and more interesting, as the months will go back. DS, well, it's there to stay. PSP, we'll see.

Correcting you, a full-featured 360 costs MORE than the PS3 (Like $200 more), for all the same features.

As far as the way I see it, both consoles have to better themselves.
- 360 is more expensive than PS3 with HD and Wireless. When there will be a all-in-one, I will consider
- 360 is very fragile. At least half the 360 I know got sent to repairs, which is a total shame.
- 360 had a headstart, but it doesn't mean it will stay that way. HD-DVD might get to the dump bin too.
- PS3 doesn't have games for it. Actually, there are 2 games I find interesting, when it will become 3-4, I will consider
- PS3 uses Blu-Ray and no one is certain about that format either.

Finally, I don't have a HD screen (well, my laptop has), so buying these consoles is a total exercise in futility for me.

Re:Fallacious argument (1)

aliquis (678370) | about 7 years ago | (#20709843)

Well, that 360 with hd-dvd and live gold where as expensive (a little less, a little more, I don't know, I don't care.) where my point.

Re:Fallacious argument (1)

LKM (227954) | about 7 years ago | (#20726089)

Not that intrested in Wii either since I have a cube which I haven't played much on at all and a DS.

If you think the Gamecube and the DS offer what the Wii does, you're missing what the Wii is offering :-)

Oh, totally off-topic, but I just bought Tingle's for the DS, and man, that is one awesome game!

Re:Fallacious argument (1)

aliquis (678370) | about 7 years ago | (#20727401)

Still I have like 180 .. err.. games for my cube, which I sort of haven't played, and uhm.. gigs of.. uhm.. information for my DS, so I have enough games to play already if I wanted to.

Sure I would prefer a chiped Wii and sell the cube, but it's still expensive and I doubt the few existing games are worth it in experience compared to all the games I already have.

I can get a wii 3 years from now instead ;D

Re:Fallacious argument (1)

Seumas (6865) | about 7 years ago | (#20709857)

Developers are already reporting issues with the limited space provided by DVD on the XBOX 360 platform.

Yes, perhaps they can somehow patch the system so that their HD-DVD drives could play games. Now you'll be looking at a $400 system plus another $200 for the HD-DVD drive, while the PS3 comes with blu-ray and is a hundred bucks less already.

You must be imagining some super magic compression to crap a blu-ray disc worth of content on a DVD. Not to mention, the same super-magic compression could also be on the blu-ray disc, again blowing away the DVD.

All in all, the decision to go with DVD is a seriously limiting factor and seems weird that they chose it for a "next gen" system. How are they going to last the ten year product cycle that Sony has planned for the PS3, while using last-gen drives? Or are they going to start releasing systems with HD-DVD built-in and just expect every 360 owner to pony up another $400 or $500?

Re:Fallacious argument (1)

LKM (227954) | about 7 years ago | (#20726071)

If it became such a problem, I am sure a Xbox 360 patch would be along the way to play this game over the HD DVD.

How do you propose that would work? Games would come in two versions, which means shops will have two SKUs? Or games will include both four DVDs as well as one HD-DVD?

I actually am in a bet right now with a Sony fanboy who claims that Microsoft will be forced to release games on HD-DVD before the end of '08 in order to keep up with Sony. I'm betting against it. Such console add-ons have never worked, and Microsoft isn't stupid.

Re:Fallacious argument (1)

MBraynard (653724) | more than 6 years ago | (#20704151)

It does stand ground, in a way, because ms doesn't support HD-DVD games (though it may be technically possible.)

However, I think the argument is fallacious because if you are complaining about the need to change the CD every 10 hours, you probably need to be changing the CD every 10 hours just to give your body flaps [bobbyworks.com] a chance to air out.

Re:Fallacious argument (1)

moderatorrater (1095745) | more than 6 years ago | (#20704201)

It would be a pointless article if we were talking about movies, where HD-DVD is competing with Blu-Ray, but we're talking about consoles, where Microsoft pitted the DVD against the Blu-Ray. Apparently MS forgot that each succeeding generation will use 5-10x what the previous one did.

Re:Fallacious argument (1)

aliquis (678370) | more than 6 years ago | (#20705871)

They didn't forgot, the 360 where supposed to have HD-DVD from the begining, I would more belive that they noticed that it would cost more and therefor raise the cost of the console and also because there where no clear winner the "oh and it can play HD-DVD-movies aswell!"-argument wasn't that strong.

So they opted for a lower price than the PS3 which so far seems to have worked well for them, don't you think?

Re:Fallacious argument (1)

donaldm (919619) | about 7 years ago | (#20709447)

Look at the following chart http://vgchartz.com/hwcomps.php?cons1=X360&reg1=All&cons2=PS3&reg2=All&cons3=Wii&reg3=All&align=1 [vgchartz.com] and you can see that if you align the launches the PS3 and the Xbox360 are tracking each other, how long this will go on remains to be seen. What is significant is the massive take-up of the Wii which is not really that surprising considering the Wii is less than half the price of a PS3, whether this translates into good game sales remains to be seen. What Microsoft and Sony are trying to do is to position their consoles as a home entertainment hub with an empathise on gaming, Nintendo on the other hand have positioned the Wii as a fun game machine so it really is not in the same category as the PS3 and the Xbox360.

One of reasons why Microsoft brought out the Xbox360 early was Nvidia stopped producing graphics cards for the Xbox since Microsoft wanted them at a much cheaper price rather than bleed money (approx US5 billion) on the original Xbox, so basically they did not have to much choice but to bring out the Xbox360 early although they did not do a very good job on reliability testing and this is costing them still.

Re:Fallacious argument (1)

LKM (227954) | about 7 years ago | (#20726109)

What is significant is the massive take-up of the Wii which is not really that surprising considering the Wii is less than half the price of a PS3, whether this translates into good game sales remains to be seen.

I agree. However, it should be pointed out that as of now, attach rate on the Wii is higher than on the PS3 and on par with the 360 at the same time in its life. As more good games keep coming out, attach rate will only go up.

Re:Fallacious argument (1)

KDR_11k (778916) | about 7 years ago | (#20708973)

They probably knew but they realized that this generation started too early to make HDDVD and BluRay as a stock feature a good idea. Sony didn't and ended up going from first to last place. If these formats had come out a few years earlier the 360 would have used HDDVD but they were already hitting the limits for an acceptable price by trying to cram more advanced hardware in than it was time for. Sony crammed even more things in and ended up with a 600€ console, losing a huge portion of their marketshare to better planned consoles. If MS had done the same mistake they could have dissolved the XBox division two years later.

Re:Fallacious argument (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 6 years ago | (#20704397)

You're missing the point. The Blu-ray drive is standard on the PS3. The HD-DVD drive is a $180 add-on for the X-box 360, and very few game publishers will count on it being part of the console. Sony has received a lot of criticism for including the Blu-ray drive and jacking up the price.

The point is that there may have been some wisdom in making the Blu-ray drive standard on all PS3 models.

Re:Fallacious argument (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 6 years ago | (#20704661)

Not quite a fallacious argument. The PS3 is the only current gaming platform allows a game to put more than 9.4 GB on a disc. The XBox 360 can have a HD-DVD add-on, but because it's not standard, the add-on only allows you to play HD-DVD movies; it's still not an option to put a game on. Unless a game console comes out that lets you use a HD-DVD for game data, the issue isn't HD-DVD versus Blu-ray, but PS3 versus XBox 360 (which is Blu-ray versus DVD).

Also, yes, taking time to be fiendishly clever can allow amazing amounts of data to be stored on a disc. For games, however, you also need this data to be in something close to an immediately readable format, so heavy-duty compression schemes and such are usually not an option.

Re: Multiple discs didn't hurt FF VII... (4, Insightful)

trdrstv (986999) | more than 6 years ago | (#20704865)

Moving on to "the next disc" after 10-15 hours of play doesn't bother me. It worked for all the Final Fantasies of the PS1 era, so meh... whatever. What DOES bother me, is why are they STILL doing CG cutscenes? With the in game quality of Lost Odyssey, or any other "Current Gen game" why not use the in game engine to run them? It not only saves space, but makes the experience less jarring/ more immersive.

Re: Multiple discs didn't hurt FF VII... (1)

OK PC (857190) | more than 6 years ago | (#20705059)

In game engines can't do everything unfortunately.
Take for example, an epic scene with thousands of troops, an in game engine would struggle to produce high detail with a decent framerate.
In game engines are also unsuitable for quick cuts to different environments (textures etc would need to be loaded).

Re: Multiple discs didn't hurt FF VII... (2, Informative)

ADRA (37398) | more than 6 years ago | (#20705737)

FFVII was mostly linear in what it presented. The cut scenes included in each disc were arranged by timing of the event with some data spread over all the discs as needed. This is why (annoyingly) some event could only be triggered on a specific disc even through the area was open to you. If you ever wanted to develop a large sandbox type game with the same richness of content, there'd be no reasonable way of making the content fit.

The sad thing is developers know this and are most likely shearing the design of the game based on content size limitations.

Now before I get modded fan-boy, I don't have any Sony gaming products and I don't own any of their consoles.

Re: Multiple discs didn't hurt FF VII... (1)

trdrstv (986999) | about 7 years ago | (#20706795)

If you ever wanted to develop a large sandbox type game with the same richness of content, there'd be no reasonable way of making the content fit.

I think the developers at Bethesta would disagree. They fit Oblivion on a DVD9.

The sad thing is developers know this and are most likely shearing the design of the game based on content size limitations.

You say that as if it's a new thing. Every developer works around a systems' strengths and limitations.

Re: Multiple discs didn't hurt FF VII... (1)

aliquis (678370) | more than 6 years ago | (#20705941)

Warcraft III does this, and it's cool :D

Re: Multiple discs didn't hurt FF VII... (1)

RogueyWon (735973) | about 7 years ago | (#20708853)

Actually, I'd much rather have some CG or a nice FMV than an in-engine cutscene. When I'm watching rather than playing a game, I want it to look as nice as possible. Even on Gears of War and Bioshock, which are, in my opinion, the best-looking games currently available, the quality of the visuals isn't as good as what can be achieved with a proper, traditional cut-scene. As for immersion, I don't think I find anything more jarring than having supposedly emotional game-events rendered comic by close-up views of game-engine faces, with textures stretched to breaking point and two-frame lip animations.

I remember how, back more than a decade ago, when CD drives started to become more common in PCs and Sega launched the Mega CD addon for the Megadrive/Genesis, suddenly every game on the market had low-budget, badly acted FMV cutscenes. We got barely-interactive horrors such as Rebel Assault, Night Trap, Sewer Shark and Mad Dog McRee (as well as a few better offerings, such as Wing Commanders 3 and 4). Inevitably, there was a huge backlash against the use of FMV cutscenes, due to the expense of making them and the usually amateurish quality of the results. However, I personally feel that the backlash went too far; I've been glad to see FMV cutscenes starting to make a return over the last 12 months, in games such as Command & Conquer 3 (admittedly, the C&C series held onto them for longer than most, but I thought they were gone for good when Generals dropped them).

Re:Fallacious argument (0, Troll)

aliquis (678370) | more than 6 years ago | (#20705661)

Yeah but the Xbox360 HD-DVD speced where scraped and replaced with a DVD.

And I guess this is sort of why Microsoft started to support HD-DVD so much at all because having Bluray not seem like a definite winner which it more or less was and eventually fail would make the point that the PS3 came with a Bluray player which could also do HD-video less major. (Weird english :D)

Which is one of the reaons why I hope bluray wins:
1) More space.
2) HD-DVD are only considered because Microsoft wanted to hurt PS3 sales.

DVDs are fine, for Wii ;D

Re:Fallacious argument (1)

scolen2 (956819) | about 7 years ago | (#20711681)

First: You can't read Second: There is apparetnly a update to the HD DVD drive for the 360 sometime next year. Being in teh HD DVD industry i know this is a good thing for compatablity, cuase the 360 is a horrible HD DVD player, but perhaps they might be using this to create support for HD DVD game titles too! What is the limitation of why they can't play titles right now off that drive? Is it only software or is it hardware issues?

Re:Fallacious argument (1)

dank zappingly (975064) | about 7 years ago | (#20723661)

One of the issues is that it costs an extra 200 dollars. Another is that not too many people have it. Assuming it was possible to play games through the external HD-DVD drive, it would still be a pretty bad idea.

alt + f4 dickbutts (-1, Troll)

Anonymous Coward | more than 6 years ago | (#20704099)

press alt + f4 to recieve ur free dickbutts!!!

Sure, but (1)

heinousjay (683506) | more than 6 years ago | (#20704103)

On the other hand, Microsoft really seemed to have something with getting the console out first for a lower price.

On the gripping hand, I'd say Nintendo really had something with dropping out of the technological race to armageddon. They seem to have found the sweet spot this generation.

Re:Sure, but (1)

aliquis (678370) | more than 6 years ago | (#20705895)

I wonder what history says about this, I don't know which consoles does compare and have been in on similair pricepoints as Wii and 360, but PS3 and NeoGeo might be similair, thought the NeoGeo where even more expensive I think, the games much more so.

But we all know how well sales for NeoGeo went ...

I guess Nintendo where old enough to know their game, and wanted a console with high profits so they didn't lose their money on it, and also smaller development costs. And all three points worked.

Final Fantasy VIII all over again (1)

enderjsv (1128541) | more than 6 years ago | (#20704127)

Actually, having multiple disks didn't really bother me so much in Final Fantasy VIII. But in VIII, the discs were used pretty much sequentially. When you were finished with one, you wouldn't need it a second time around. But if a game required constant switching back and forth between disks, that could get real annoying real fast.

Re:Final Fantasy VIII all over again (2, Interesting)

Stormwatch (703920) | more than 6 years ago | (#20705671)

But if a game required constant switching back and forth between disks, that could get real annoying real fast.
One word for you: RIVEN.

Swapping disks? One word: Moonstone (1)

aliquis (678370) | about 7 years ago | (#20706109)

Subject says it all. Game for amiga on three discs, where you most often had to change disc 2 times for each fight or similair... A very good reason to get a second, or maybe even third external drive ;D

Monkey Island II where on 11 discs but required less swapping.

Cutscenes are large and long (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 6 years ago | (#20704227)

It makes me wonder how much of it is really necessary given how powerful game engines are now, that and the break from the action being seemlessly integrated into the story points. Something I thought gears took to a new level. Something Too Human promises to greatly expand, or so I've heard.

What will SDF have to say about this? (1)

Paladine97 (467512) | more than 6 years ago | (#20704311)

I hope SonyDefenseForce [sonydefenseforce.com] doesn't find out about this.

Re:What will SDF have to say about this? (1)

KDR_11k (778916) | about 7 years ago | (#20709135)

That's a joke site anyway, run by the same guy who runs some wii60 site.

Doing the math.. (1)

ironwill96 (736883) | more than 6 years ago | (#20704329)

Just using a nice round number for DVDs of 5 GB (I know 360 may be less than this), so Lost Odyssey might take up 20 GB of space. If we're using that much space in art assets of large RPGs this year, what about 2 years from now? Seems like the massive 50 GB of Blu-Ray will not even be enough and by the end of the PS3 life cycle we will for sure be seeing multi-disc releases. I'm a 360 owner but i'm not overly worried about multi-disc releases. What I am overly worried about is those developers that feel that their gameplay should have more cinematics than actual game, that seems to be a growing trend with JRPG's. Don't get me wrong, I love cinematics and story, but when you take out the interactivity it is more like you are paying for a movie than a game. I also hate inflated play-times through use of crappy random encounters, but I guess that is a staple of many RPGs and not just something that Japanese developed RPGs do. I definitely see the Xbox 720 or whatever using some sort of higher storage format for the next-generation since by the end of this life cycle we could be getting into floppy disk ridiculousness with 10 and 12 disc releases!

Re:Doing the math.. (1)

JanusFury (452699) | more than 6 years ago | (#20704511)

The majority of the space usage is almost certainly FMV and weakly-compressed audio. This has been the case in most major titles released in the past few years - FMV and audio eat up 40% or more of the total size of the game, and are typically not compressed nearly as effectively as they could be.

If previous Final Fantasy titles are any indicator, this is definitely going to be the case with Mistwalker games. Most of the information I've seen on space used by PS3 games also indicates more or less the same - audio and FMV consuming most of the space.

Not to say that audio and FMV are worthless, of course... just that they're what eats up space. A game developer can still deliver an extremely solid, cutting-edge experience in the amount of space offered by a DVD if they're willing to ante up and do the work necessary.

Re:Doing the math.. (1)

Swordopolis (1159065) | more than 6 years ago | (#20704565)

XBOX 360's games are on dual-layer DVD's, which puts 4 discs worth of data at around 35 GB.

Re:Doing the math.. (1)

aichpvee (631243) | more than 6 years ago | (#20705867)

But how much of that content is common to two or more of the discs? Strip out the redundant information and the data footprint would probably be MUCH smaller than 35GB.

Re:Doing the math.. (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 7 years ago | (#20706671)

Actually, 360 discs have a space limit of 7GB, the rest is reserved for security sectors.

4 DVDs translate to 28GB, discounting redundant data, I'd guess the actual size of the game is 15GB+, which is pretty big.

Re:Doing the math.. (1)

Osty (16825) | more than 6 years ago | (#20704571)

Just using a nice round number for DVDs of 5 GB (I know 360 may be less than this), so Lost Odyssey might take up 20 GB of space.

The Xbox 360 uses a dual-layer DVD9 format, or 9GB. Assuming each Lost Odyssey disk fully fills that space (unlikely), that's 45GB of space, which is also pushing the Blu-Ray format limit. Obviously some of that is duplicated data across each disk that wouldn't contribute to the full amount on a Blu-Ray release.

If we're using that much space in art assets of large RPGs this year, what about 2 years from now?

This seems like an issue unique to JRPGs. Oblivion was able to fit within the bounds of DVD9 by using procedural techniques to cut down on the number of art assets (SpeedTree, for example). Two Worlds fit onto a single DVD9 as well. At the same time, JRPG players are used to swapping disks, since they've been doing it since Final Fantasy VII. It's just part of playing a JRPG. If you want to avoid multi-disk madness, avoid JRPGs. No other games have had problems with the DVD9 size limit so far.

Re:Doing the math.. (1)

Osty (16825) | more than 6 years ago | (#20704919)

BTW, my math was wrong. I assumed 5 disks rather than 4, where 4 DVD9 disks would be 36GB, not 45GB.

Xbox 360 Game Discs have 7GB of usuable space. (1)

goodenoughnickname (874664) | more than 6 years ago | (#20704767)

From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xbox_360_hardware#Storage [wikipedia.org]

"Games are stored on standard dual-layer DVD-ROMs with 7 GB of usable space available for game content."

Re:Xbox 360 Game Discs have 7GB of usuable space. (1)

Swordopolis (1159065) | more than 6 years ago | (#20704845)

Odd....the reference link for that says that they're DVD-9's, but only 7 GB per disk. They should be getting at least 8 GB from each disk.

Re:Xbox 360 Game Discs have 7GB of usuable space. (1)

goodenoughnickname (874664) | more than 6 years ago | (#20705919)

I've read about this 7GB limit many times, yet no one has said WHY there's 1GB missing. Does anyone here have an answer?

Re:Xbox 360 Game Discs have 7GB of usuable space. (1)

Tauvix (97917) | more than 6 years ago | (#20706059)

I would not be surprised if it was for XBox overhead and copy protection...

Re:Doing the math.. (1)

OK PC (857190) | more than 6 years ago | (#20704881)

It's worth noting that the game isn't actually the size of four disks.
There will be a lot of data duplication between the disks, as you can visit the same areas on different disks.
Remove the movies and it may even fit on one disk.
I can't see a game needing any more than 4 disks, I think games have hit a few limits that prevent them getting much bigger.
One, the cost to make a game vs. a saturated market (for RPGs).
Two, content takes time to produce and test and games have to come out at some point.
Three, games aren't getting longer, if anything they are getting shorter.
Four, system limits such as RAM prevent textures from getting much bigger. In fact, the size should shrink if they can effectively use more compression.

Re:Doing the math.. (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 7 years ago | (#20708487)

So what you're saying is... 4 DVDs is enough for anyone!

Growing trend with JRPGs? (1)

2nd Post! (213333) | more than 6 years ago | (#20705957)

Excuse me? Final Fantasy 7 was released in 1997, ten years ago now.

Heck, don't you remember multiple CD games like "Under a Killing Moon" in 1994?

It's not restricted to JRPGs, and it's not even remotely new. This is something Microsoft should have anticipated, even if it meant going the HD-DVD route.

Re:Growing trend with JRPGs? (1)

EggyToast (858951) | about 7 years ago | (#20707571)

I'm pretty certain they anticipated it, and figured "people are OK with changing disks in the middle of a huge, multi-day game." Jade Empire, one of the RPGs for the original Xbox that actually sold pretty well, was on 2 discs -- and the content on disc 2 was about 10% of the game, so it was truly just "overflow" that didn't fit.

And no one complained. They were happy that Microsoft didn't force the developer to cut that 10% out of the rest of the game. It's not like these games require disc changing every 60 minutes -- it's more like every 15 hours. That's an entire waking day of playing a game.

Re:Growing trend with JRPGs? (1)

SuiteSisterMary (123932) | about 7 years ago | (#20713137)

Jade Empire, one of the RPGs for the original Xbox that actually sold pretty well, was on 2 discs -- and the content on disc 2 was about 10% of the game, so it was truly just "overflow" that didn't fit.

Incorrect. Jade Empire, and KotOR 1 and 2, were all single-disc releases.

Jade Empire was available with a 'special edition' bonus disc, which added a character and some new weapons.

why does it matter? (1)

Gogo0 (877020) | more than 6 years ago | (#20704957)

Why does it matter if a game takes more than one disc?

Having to get up every 15hrs of game time to swap discs is not a problem.
How much does it cost the manufacturer for three extra discs and larger packaging? Its likely to be pennies extra, though its better than spending extra dollars on a new disc format that causes everyone to hemorrhage money when they sell their hardware.

Indeed, need to look at the bigger picture. (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 6 years ago | (#20705397)

For every 360 game that requires you to swap discs every 20hrs (blue Dragon so far) there's a whole plethora of games for all consoles where you'll have finished with the disc, that is, the entire game in half that time.

I'd much rather swap the disc on Blue Dragon every 20hrs than have completed a game like Heavenly Sword in it's entirety in 6hrs.

Re:Indeed, need to look at the bigger picture. (1)

aichpvee (631243) | more than 6 years ago | (#20705887)

The way console RPGs have been going lately you'll probably get bored with it before finishing the first disc anyway so no swap will even be required.

Swapping discs is a nightmare! PS3 rules! (1)

jamie(really) (678877) | more than 6 years ago | (#20705113)

I request that all PS3 fanbois post their "360 is shit!" posts under this one. Please make sure that you also list other platforms that were totally shit for requiring games that span multiple discs, and also how those games placed an awful strain on you and you just couldn't play them. Here, I'll start you out:

  1. PS1: Resident Evil 2 - 2 discs. Fuck me that was awful. I watched one of the Capcom USA testers finish Leon's disc in under an hour, and then he had to lean over and swap the disc to Clair's. God forbid he had been sitting on a couch with the PS1 under the TV, instead of at a testing station.

Re:Swapping discs is a nightmare! PS3 rules! (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 7 years ago | (#20707135)

Baldur's Gate.

End of discussion.

Re:Swapping discs is a nightmare! PS3 rules! (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 7 years ago | (#20710341)

Yeah, having to stand up every hour is awful. If I have to move my butt at all during my 20 hour gaming day I get pissed off.

Re:Swapping discs is a nightmare! PS3 rules! (1)

dank zappingly (975064) | about 7 years ago | (#20723765)

These consoles are still relatively young. If this sort of problem starts to affect non-linear games it could become very annoying. Most people might not remember this, but the Gamecube Tiger Woods had half the courses on one disc, and half on another or something like that. There are certain types of games that don't lend themselves to multiple discs. It might not be an issue if the 360 has as short of a lifespan as the previous Xbox, but if I'm dropping a small fortune on a console, I'd like it to be future-proof.

Re:Swapping discs is a nightmare! PS3 rules! (1)

jamie(really) (678877) | about 7 years ago | (#20761211)

I live in fear of Tiger Woods on the XBox 360 not being able to fit all their courses on a 8Gb disc. I will run out and spend a small fortune, as you put it, on a PS3. Those trifling games like Bioshock and Halo 3 have been completely throttled to fit their games onto such a small medium, and I should make sure that my console can handle enormous epics the size of Heavenly Sword which will no doubt take me many months to finish given its enormous size on disc.

Holy crap! (1)

MMaestro (585010) | more than 6 years ago | (#20705437)

The game, which uses a mixture of CG and real-time cutscenes, will last roughly 40 to 50 hours.

The game will last roughly 40 to 50 hours and required FOUD DVDs?! Wtf do they need all that space for? Blue Dragon was 3 DVDs long and reviewers were complaining about the game's storyline being slow to unfold.

Re:Holy crap! (2, Insightful)

CastrTroy (595695) | more than 6 years ago | (#20706009)

Is there 40 to 50 hours of gameplay? Or 40 to 50 hours of full motion video. I'm currently playing the GC version of Twilight Princess, and have played a total of 40 hours. And from what I can tell, I'm probably under 5 hours from beating the game. That's not counting doing all the side quests. I've completed a couple, but I haven't really focused on it. All that fits on a single GameCube Mini DVD. There's quite a few cutscenes, but I think they are all rendered with the game engine. If you have 40 to 50 hours of HD video, even compressed with h.264, I could see this filling up 4 DVDs. However, I could(n't) care less about how much full motion video there is in a game, I want lots of play time. I seem to remember FF VII taking 4 CDs and taking quite a while to beat, but that was more due to long cutscenes, and those 8 minute long attack sequences every time you attacked your enemy.

Re:Holy crap! (1)

Dunbal (464142) | about 7 years ago | (#20707029)

The game will last roughly 40 to 50 hours and required FOUD DVDs?!

      That's ok, Oblivion only needed ONE DVD and I STILL play it. 40 to 50 hours, heheheh I think I know that type of game. Do not use brain and follow the exact path we have set for you.

Meh... Japanese RPG's (1)

popo (107611) | about 7 years ago | (#20720211)

Is it just me or do Japanese RPG's always seem to fall into one of two deeply uninteresting categories:

1) "Cute RPG's" starring groups of orphaned, round-eyed children weilding cute, oversized weapons, or
2) RPG's starring androgynous (or downright female-looking) men with overtly gay salon-styled haircuts, adolescent voices and hilariously useless-looking, oversized weapons.

Hey Japan, can we get an RPG which actually features adult men who aren't pretty?

Re:Meh... Japanese RPG's (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 7 years ago | (#20724493)

No. Deal with it.
Check for New Comments
Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?