Predator-Style Helmets Allow Pilots to See Through Planes 232
nitroy2k writes "It is only the neck and shoulders that prove there is a human being in there somewhere. And this isn't any Star Trek or Final Fantasy kind of trick, but the next generation of RAF fighter pilots' look, which kinda makes you wish you were in the army." And you thought Air Wolf had badass headgear.
Air Wolf (Score:5, Funny)
You'll have all the kids thinking "Is Air Wolf a new game for the wii???".
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Instead, you can look "cool" while committing war crimes - you know, like Guernica. [wikipedia.org]
Let's bomb Mommies and their babies into hamburger. Their standing over our oil.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2, Offtopic)
From what I've seen in the news, these have generally been the fault of the guys picking out targets, not of the technology. Precision is very good now - the bomb hits exactly what it was supposed to hit. Unfortunately, that isn't always something it was a good idea to be shooting at.
Historically: 'OK, British troops there, enemy troops there... FIRE!... oh, shit, we missed, and those Brits
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
IF "the right of the people" in the 2nd Amendment doesn't mean you and I then it doesn't mean you and I in the first and freedom of speech is a myth ready to be repealed by some facists or Marxist judge.
Some Federaljudges disagree with your. (http://www.mcsm.org/indivright.html)
The part about "well regulated" is being upheld also in the fact that assult weapons, grenade launchers, and other military
This Isn't New (Score:2, Informative)
This is really just new packaging of an old idea.
army? (Score:5, Informative)
So you could admire the cool helmets the Air Force, Navy, and Marine pilots have?
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
W's trying to lour us geeks into Iraq with cool gadgets. What's next, a Beowulf cluster of Linux tanks and a night with Natalie P.?
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
but leave looking like goatse
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
No, so you could become a warrant officer with MOS 153A, rotary-wing aviator.
but the British Army doesn't fly Harriers... (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
I thought the general idea was that Typhoons would replace Tornadoes, while JSFs would replace Harriers? They were looking into a navalised Typhoon for use on the new carriers, but I'm not sure what became of that.
Re:army? (Score:5, Informative)
Apparently the UK has plans to develop a navalised Typhoon, but plans are very different from an actual plane. So, in otherwords.. if the UK doesn't get the flight software for the F35 then the UK pulls out of the JSF program, doesn't buy any F35's and instead develops a navalised Typhoon.
Of course, there are good points and bad points to that:
Good:
* The Typhoon is faster, has a longer range and in every regard except for stealth/low radar visibility outperforms the F35
* We won't be dependant on the USA in the slightest
Bad:
* It will take time and lots of money to develop a navalised Typhoon
* The Typhoon isn't capable of VTOL (useful for the current Invincible class carriers, not so much for the new QE class carriers)
* A navalised Typhoon will cost more maintenance wise than an F35 for carrier usage. (think wear and tear, landing vertically with a nice lift fan doesn't damage an aircraft airframe or under carriage anyway near as bad as an arrestor hook landing)
The scenic view (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re:The scenic view (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Personally, I am terrified when at the edge of a bridge or the roof of a building, but love flying and I have no problem looking straight down when in plane or helicopter. I guess for me it's more of a fear of falling.
Re: (Score:2)
Personally, I am terrified when at the edge of a bridge or the roof of a building, but love flying and I have no problem looking straight down when in plane or helicopter. I guess for me it's more of a fear of falling.
Not really. I am extremely afraid of heights but have flown supersonic jets and jumped out of a/c; it's all a matter of surroundings.
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Besides at those altitudes the whole concept of ground and heights becomes more of a theoretical concept rather than a butt puckering reality. You know you are heigh up, but most of your references you're used to associating with hieghts are gone. Same goes for speed. 150mph seems like impending doom behind the wheel of a car. 600mph at 10,000ft seems like a leisurely pace.
Organic Fluids (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I just did a jump from a blackhawk a few weeks ago. You sit with your legs dangling out and the ground beneath you. The vertigo's not that bad at all... the wind and the helicopter turning, that's another matter, but I think that's mostly a problem for passengers because they're not controlling it.
Army? (Score:4, Informative)
The Army flies helicopters, not fixed-wing aircraft.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The memories! (Score:3, Funny)
Thank you for that bit of nostalgia! Now I'm browsing YouTube for cool startup sequences and intro's of AirWolf again! :)
What can I say more? Dom, give me the turbo's! :D
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
] ] And you thought Air Wolf had badass headgear.
] Thank you for that bit of nostalgia! Now I'm browsing YouTube for cool startup sequences and intro's of AirWolf again! :)
If you watch the episode Moffett's Ghost, you'll learn Airwolf was programmed in AppleSoft BASIC.
+2 to fear bonus (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
good point (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The story seems to have originated at the Daily Mail [dailymail.co.uk], a far-right UK tabloid (that's probably, oh... slightly left-of-centre by US standards) which has a tendency towards the jingoistic. 'British Pilots Get Awesome Scary Technology' is the kind of thing they're keen on, although they'd usually prefer 'British Pilots Don't Get Awesome Scary
Cool designs... (Score:2)
Earlier ... (Score:5, Informative)
engadget, CA - 23 hours ago
No, the headgear in the photo above wasn't some unused prototype created for The Terminator; rather, it's a snazzy new helmet designed to give fighter
CC.
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
A picture of the device can be found here: http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/10/new-helmet-allows-fighter-pilots-to-peer-through-the-jet/ [engadget.com]
The link given in the summary is slashdotted, which means that there are too many hits for the server to cope with. A server, in this context
CC.
Re:Earlier ... (Score:4, Informative)
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/technology/technology.html?in_article_id=492631&in_page_id=1965&ito=1490 [dailymail.co.uk]
Why not just link to that in the first place?
Reading 18 blog summaries to just get back to the original story is ridiculous. If you want to credit the guy who happened to tip you off, by all means, but stop wasting our time, link to the original article.
And then of course there's the old saw about how blogs will replace newspapers - interesting that their original material often seems to come from them.
I'm sure I'll get flamed with comments like, "but what about the blog writers ad revenue stream - how dare you cheat him out of his living!" - bullshit. What exactly is the blog writer adding to the equation here that entitles him to anything? The Daily mail reporter found & wrote the story, got quotes, graphics & photos and did the layout. The blog writer said, "Hey, this is cool, check it out". Or more likely said, "hey, check out what my blog buddy said about what his blog buddy said about what his blog buddy said about what his blog buddy said about this cool article in the newspaper"
hilarious.
Re: (Score:2)
It might even useful for a few years (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
We need small unmanned robotic subs also.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
slashdotted already? (Score:4, Informative)
cosmetic appeal (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
I think you didn't get the idea in the assertion "it kinda makes you wish you were in the army"
That was meant for actual Air Force pilots who know that, if they were in the Army, they wouldn't have to wear those helmets...
Re: (Score:2)
Re:cosmetic appeal (Score:4, Insightful)
No, but it is one of them nonetheless. Militaries have always recruited in part on having a really smart uniform in which you'd look really, really good - that one goes back millennia. And I reckon the opportunity to wear a badass TIE-fighter style helmet with awesome cyber-vision kit will indeed be a bonus for RAF recruitment. That thing is really cool.
Not just the UK (Score:2, Troll)
pfft (Score:5, Funny)
Yes but... (Score:2)
The tech is cool though.
The Pressing Question (Score:3, Insightful)
With the cold war over, and the major super powers having no one to have air battles with, is it really necessary to spend huge amounts of money to fight an enemy that doesn't exist? I mean, back in the Cold War, it made sense-ish, but since the current battle is against "terror", and "terror" doesn't have an air force
Granted - the technology is cool, and it's good to have somewhere to spend money to research tools like this, which I'm sure have other, less militaristic uses, but why should military spending dictate research?
Or is the world planning to gang up on China, and just not telling us?
Re:The Pressing Question (Score:5, Funny)
Re:The Pressing Question (Score:4, Insightful)
It's not so much about getting ready for war, as it is deterrence. Making sure the potential aggressor is aware of the risk so that he refrains from aggression. (See Iran). You don't need another cold war for a reason to have bigger guns than the next guy...
Re: (Score:2)
A loud loony as a figurehead Presiden
Re:The Pressing Question (Score:5, Insightful)
Right... whenever you have more than one country who thinks they are a superpower, you have a good chance that there will be a war.
A good country that want's to remain around needs to have a strong defense. Just because the current battlefield isn't so obvious doesn't mean the next one won't be.
Bill
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
The whole point of having such badass weapons is so the US can strike when and where it chooses. It is part of the military's doctrine to take action rather than react.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:The Pressing Question (Score:5, Interesting)
The Russians are probing European air defences again; I think it was just last month one of their bombers was intercepted over the North Sea by the new RAF Typhoons. Used to happen all the time in the Cold War - just testing how watchful the West really is, how quick to respond to an intruder. Nothing outright hostile, just a... friendly... reminder that they're there. North Korea is opening up to outside business investment and to tourism from the South to Mt Paektu, but on the other hand they've been playing with nukes lately, so that one could go either way. Not so long ago there was the war in Yugoslavia, right on our doorstep, yet little got done about it till the Yanks got involved - that was embarrassing. Belarus is run by a weirdo who keeps trying to re-establish the Soviet Union despite the fact that the Russians want as little to do with him as possible. The president of Turkmenistan is an egomaniac who makes Kim Jong Il look positively humble, though he seems content to keep to his own frontiers. Any day now our esteemed allies could drag us into a war with Iran. And it's probably only a matter of time before we have to do something about Zimbabwe.
Sure, today we're mostly fighting Iraqi rebels, against whom the air force can do relatively little - but that won't be the case forever. Britain gets into an awful lot of fights.
Re: (Score:2)
China, Russia, North Korea, Iran....who knows where the next conflict will arise? And who cares. If the crime rate in my city goes down, we don't respond to it by firing half the police force, or by turning them into meter-maids. If you want peace, prepare for war.
Re: (Score:2)
Link to original article (Score:5, Informative)
Note to submitters and Slashdot editors: Don't link to blogs. They get Slashdotted.
It's especially shiatty when a blogger doesn't even provide a link to the article he's pulling his text and images from.
Interesting how the blogger switched the referenced Schwarzenegger character of choice from The Terminator to the Predator in his 'article' to make it appear as original content.
This is just silly (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
I wonder why this makes me think of
- Do you want to play Chess?
- No, I want to play global thermonuclear war.
another photo (Score:3, Informative)
Clicky for bigness.
Re: (Score:2)
Comment removed (Score:5, Insightful)
What is the point? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
This plane will be the "high-tech stealth plane" taking radars out. And if it is
Re: (Score:2)
Already got you covered. [wikipedia.org]
Actually... (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Old Tech (Score:4, Informative)
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/aircraft/systems/jhmcs.htm [globalsecurity.org]
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Nothing to do with "Predator" (Score:5, Insightful)
It's really closest to a VR helmet, hooked up to cameras on the F-35 JSF to give pilots a 360 view.
Interesting story, but... (Score:2, Funny)
Why is the pilot still in the plane? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
We're jammin'. Hope you like jammin' too...
A half-measure at best (Score:5, Interesting)
Fighter planes design is very compromised by the requirement that the pilot be able to see out the canopy. Typically, you find the cockpit cantaleivered way out in front of the center of gravity. In more recent planes, the requirements of stealth require dramatic measures to enable vision from the cockpit while still maintaining a low radar profile. I feel, too, that in any serious war you're going to find that the easiest way to bring down an airplane is to blind the pilot with lasers.
So, put the pilot right in the middle of the airplane in an opaque cockpit. Put a large number of wide-bandwidth sensors on the plane that would enable the pilot to see better than he could with his own eyes, certainly over a wider frequency and contrast range. You could armor this cockpit much more easily, it could be far more stealthy, and it could be far more structurally sound. You could have redundant sensors that could be deployed if the primary sensors are blinded.
Now, some might say that we should go all the way and put the pilots on the ground -- and they have a point. But, I think that the amount of bandwidth available inside the plane would be far greater than you could ever hope to transmit securely over the air.
Thad Beier
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Slashdotted? (Score:5, Informative)
Link to the actual article (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Slashdotted? (Score:4, Insightful)
Obviously, when a site releases an news story, their the ones who should be credited with it. So I guess they shouldn't be attributing this story to some under-bandwidth blogging content thief in the first place. let alone doing so in a way that no one can read the damn article because of some seriously lacking forethought of the submitter or the site in question.
Re: (Score:2)
It might be odd that a server is overrun quickly, but if it's going to get slashdotted, it's going to happen when it's a newer story.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Maybe you should steam over here in one of your carriers... oh... you mean your last carrier design is from the 1940s? And even then we still had to save your ass? And then you sold the design to the french?
I'm not one for pointing fingers, but maybe you should not be so hasty to point yours. It is not us that needs you... get that right.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Armistice
Remembrance
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The britts design used complexed compressors and pumps and resemble more of a modern liquid rocket then a modern jet engine. The less complexed german design used a series of fans to compress the air and only injects fuel.
As for this, the US has had it for at least 15 years that I know of. Maybe more. I don't know how that can be stolen from
Re: (Score:2)
This gloriously evil-looking helmet goes along with the F-35 Lightning II fighter. Have you seen what those things are capable of? It's a supersonic fighter jet which can stop dead at will and hover in mid-air, and which has a radar signature about the size of a small duck.
And there are plans to fit them with fricking lasers [wikipedia.org]. LASERS.
I mean, seriously. What more do you want? This is a