Vote:Most Deserving Open Source Charity 9
Open Source can be a charity just as much as it can be a business
model. And several charities have sprung up to help fund the effort.
The nominees you selected for this category are
the Free Software Foundation, Software in the Public Interest, The
Apache Software Foundation and the XFree86 Project.
Vote for the one that you think deserves it most.
Where's Gutenberg? (Score:2)
XFree86 (Score:1)
--
Re:Where's Gutenberg? (Score:1)
Re:XFree86 (Score:2)
Re:FSF (Score:1)
Re: Slash 0.4 (Score:1)
Let me make a confession here. The reason that I contribute small, rounded off patches to Open Source projects (either a bug fix or one (1) feature), is that I know how much work goes into packaging something big, or just into merging patches like the ones I write (irrespective of how well these patches are done). There are too many projects I care about and work on, and too little time, and this must certainly be even more true for the slashdot crew.
I think Sun could put more effort into merging work on the JDK done by the community, but I wouldn't like to be in the shoes of the Sun manager who has got to get funding to hire folks to actually do it. And I have great respect for the folks at Netscape/Mozilla, who go through the daunting task of integrating patches in the face of criticism for not putting everything they get in on the same day.
So, to counter Eric Raymonds assertion that releasing early & often is the ticket to success, I'd like to quote Wietze Venema (I hope; apologies if I goof up the quote): "It is ready when it's ready".
On a few occasions, I've been referred to slashdot by people I was surprised to find had Linux on their radar. That in itself is a major achievement, and if the only price I pay for that service is to put some brainpower in myself when I need to build a user community site in Internet time (which could also be phrased as "ripping off slashdot in a hurry"), so be it.
It's ready when it's ready. That's my motto.