Beta

Slashdot: News for Nerds

×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Games That Could Have Been

Zonk posted more than 6 years ago | from the sparks-in-their-creators-eyes dept.

Games 99

Gamespot, to accompany a piece on the art of pitching a game has up a companion article on a few good pitches from talented developers that never quite made it into games. My favorite of the three, from Will Wright: "I've always been fascinated with airships, and I wanted to do a game about the Hindenburg. And it was originally conceived as a cross between Myst and a flight simulator, if you can imagine that. You basically wake up on the Hindenburg. You're all alone. It's flying toward Lakehurst, New Jersey. You can walk anywhere on the ship. You can turn lights on and off. You can steer. You can adjust the engines. But every time you come into Lakehurst, it blows up. And you have to figure out why, and it becomes like this weird mystery flight simulator thing. I'd still love to do that."

cancel ×

99 comments

Titanic (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 6 years ago | (#21778792)

Isn't that just like the Titanic game? http://www.gamespot.com/pc/action/titanicadventureoutoftime/review.html?tag=tabs;reviews [gamespot.com]

I'm sure Wil Wright would've made it more fun though.

Re:Titanic (1)

MetaPhyzx (212830) | more than 6 years ago | (#21780904)

That game was actually a ton of fun. I got it and enjoyed it on my Mac 7100/80 several times.

Interesting (1)

Hench3 (946011) | more than 6 years ago | (#21778822)

That's actually a good read. Wish it was longer, though. Good insight into some very interesting ideas for games! Wright's idea sounds awesome...wish that could actually be made.

Re:Interesting (1)

Pope (17780) | more than 6 years ago | (#21779950)

It sounds a lot like the beginning of the old Infocom game "Trinity," where you start off in Kensington Gardens in London, and if you don't figure out a way out of the park, you get vaporized by an atomic blast. I never got very far, but it's a hell of a way to start a game: http://www.csd.uwo.ca/Infocom/trinity.html [csd.uwo.ca]

Because... (5, Funny)

Anonymous Coward | more than 6 years ago | (#21778842)

And you have to figure out why
'Cause you're on the Hindenburg and it's filled with frickin' hydrogen?

Re:Because... (1)

GuyverDH (232921) | more than 6 years ago | (#21779272)

Actually, that wasn't necessarily the problem.

One theory is that the paint used on the outside of the airship was made up of chemicals commonly used in rockey fuel today.

Re:Because... (3, Informative)

blueg3 (192743) | more than 6 years ago | (#21779356)

That theory has been fairly soundly debunked.

Re:Because... (2, Informative)

omeomi (675045) | more than 6 years ago | (#21779660)

That theory has been fairly soundly debunked.

Not true. The Mythbusters episode clearly showed that the paint, which was essentially thermite, had quite a lot to do with the speed of the burn:

http://mythbusters-wiki.discovery.com/page/Hindenburg+Mystery?t=anon [discovery.com]

Not that the giant balloon filled with hydrogen helped matters.

Re:Because... (4, Insightful)

Cyclon (900781) | more than 6 years ago | (#21779996)

We're quoting Mythbusters as an authoritative source now?

Re:Because... (2, Informative)

omeomi (675045) | more than 6 years ago | (#21780362)

We're quoting Mythbusters as an authoritative source now?

I wouldn't say they're authoritative, but they did pretty clearly show that a hydrogen blimp burns faster with thermite paint than it does without.

Re:Because... (1, Insightful)

Anonymous Coward | more than 6 years ago | (#21782560)

they did pretty clearly show that a hydrogen blimp burns faster with thermite paint than it does without.
They even more clearly showed that thermite paint alone did Fuck all.
That by far the most important ingredient is hydrogen.

Re:Because... (1)

NoobixCube (1133473) | more than 6 years ago | (#21785776)

Hydrogen filled anything will vanish in a brilliant flash and a loud noise in the blink of an eye anyway. No matter how the fire started, the thermite paint would barely have even contributed to the smell, let alone significantly affected the speed of the burn.

Re:Because... (1)

The Archon V2.0 (782634) | more than 6 years ago | (#21786308)

I wouldn't say they're authoritative, but they did pretty clearly show that a hydrogen blimp burns faster with thermite paint than it does without.

So does a five-year-old, but that's hardly conclusive!

Uhhh... don't ask how I know that.

Re:Because... (2, Interesting)

snowraver1 (1052510) | more than 6 years ago | (#21780406)

Mythbusters screwed that one up...

They did not use the exact mixture. As I recall, they actually used thermite. Also, they (obvously) used a scale model of the hindenburg. This scale model would have a *MUCH* higher surface to colume ratio, thus anything changed about the skin would have a *MUCH* higher affect.

I'm sure everyone on /. has either used a match to ignite a baloon filled with H2 or at least seen it done. As you know, the baloon ignites very easily, and very fast... no thermite required.

Re:Because... (4, Insightful)

Gulthek (12570) | more than 6 years ago | (#21780410)

O. M. G.

Mythbusters is *entertainment*, not science! While their antics are somewhat entertaining, they are just that: antics. There is no rigor, no carefully thoughtout experiments, no theory, and no reasoning. While they may prove something empirically (and some of their questions lend themselves well to this) their methods make it impossible to generalize to answer the question with authority.

Re:Because... (1, Interesting)

omeomi (675045) | more than 6 years ago | (#21780578)

While they may prove something empirically (and some of their questions lend themselves well to this) their methods make it impossible to generalize to answer the question with authority.

Regardless, they demonstrated that the thermite paint on the skin had a clear effect on burn time, and thus, the OP comment that this has been "soundly debunked" is false.

Re:Because... (1)

omeomi (675045) | more than 6 years ago | (#21780706)

Might I also add that, while Myth Busters is far from science, so far I'm the only one to have provided a source of any sort. If somebody has a published empirical study that debunks the thermite paint theory, I'd love to see it.

Re:Because... (1)

mattack2 (1165421) | more than 6 years ago | (#21787626)

I can't link to the specific page, because it's a dumb Flash (redundant?) thing where you click through the pages.

But there was an episode of "Secrets of the Dead" with a theory about static electricity causing the doping compound to ignite.

You can find it at: http://www.pbs.org/wnet/secrets [pbs.org]
Pick "What happened to the Hindenburg?" from the popup.

Re:Because... (4, Insightful)

blueg3 (192743) | more than 6 years ago | (#21781016)

That summary of their analysis isn't that good -- it skips the important admissions of where what they tested differs from actual Hindenburg design. It does include that they used hydrogen-air mixtures instead of hydrogen. It also includes that the doped cloth (doped in an intentionally more-reactive mixture than was actually used on the Hindenburg) burned faster than undoped cloth, but this doesn't really address the question of why it was on fire in the first place, which was the real problem.

If the skin of the Hindenburg was really painted with thermite, then it would be fairly safe -- thermite is tough to ignite (though, once burning, is very hot and difficult to extinguish).

Mythbusters:Science::Reality-TV:Reality (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 6 years ago | (#21783850)

Forget the rest of the scientific method, they barely use controls most of the time.

They also seem to enjoy coming to conclusions based on single premises.

Re:Because... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 6 years ago | (#21779728)

According to a documentary I saw, the actual series of events was something like this:
  1. On approach to Lakehurst, an unexpected wind begins to blow the Hindenburg off course.
  2. Rather than go around and restart the approach, the pilot executes a sharp turn to compensate.
  3. The strain of the turn causes a cable to snap, tearing open a gas bag near the Hindenburg's tail.
  4. A spark ignites the leaking hydrogen, which in turn rapidly spreads the fire over the flammable skin of the craft.
  5. Your zeppelin a splode.

Re:Because... (1)

GuyverDH (232921) | more than 6 years ago | (#21780450)

I didn't get to watch the whole thing, but the Mythbusters did a round on that and it seems that the flames you see from the Hindenburg wouldn't have looked / burned as they did if not for the skin. Hydrogen burns with just a pale, barely visible orange flame and goes very quickly. Watching it burn, you can see those huge flames following the exoskeleton along the lines of the skin over it.

Re:Because... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 6 years ago | (#21781158)

That theory has been fairly soundly debunked.


Cite?

Re:Because... (1)

Bwana Geek (1033040) | more than 6 years ago | (#21780300)

Hey man! If you're going to post a walkthrough, at least put SPOILER in your subject line.

The nerver of some people...

ANother that could have..... (1)

Deadfyre_Deadsoul (1193759) | more than 6 years ago | (#21783304)

I remember some years back, a game called Dawn that was slated to me a mmorpg. The company had a good 200-300k people registered on the forums that were all expecting this great new 'EQ' like mmorpg to break the market, with pvp, destroyable terrain, towns. They kept this up for a year or so before announcing they were doing the game as a RTS. Dare we mention duke nukem never?

Re:ANother that could have..... (1)

nanowired (881497) | more than 6 years ago | (#21787668)

I believe this was the game where you could impregnate a female player or NPC, cut out the fetus, and then launch it from a catapult.

Open Source the last one... (3, Interesting)

Omicron32 (646469) | more than 6 years ago | (#21778846)

In the last idea they say they have the code there, they were demoing it to publishers and stuff... Why not just open source the code and let the community run with it?

If the idea was dropped, if there is no way you're gonna get that game published and make money from it, why waste all those man-hours than went into producing that prototype and instead open source it and let people have fun with it.

Re:Open Source the last one... (1)

192939495969798999 (58312) | more than 6 years ago | (#21778936)

I think software that can't be sold for whatever reason should default to being open sourced, so we don't lose it forever. There's a lot of good stuff out there, not just games.

Re:Open Source the last one... (2, Informative)

BytePusher (209961) | more than 6 years ago | (#21779116)

It would be nice, but unlikely. Sometimes companies don't know when old source is going to come in handy. Once it's "opened" they can't close it again. Where I work, sometimes, every now and then, when conditions are just right, when the planets align, we get to sell some software we haven't touched or sold or even thought about in 15 years for a pretty decent price. Admittedly though it may take us a while to find the code and some code is never found.

Re:Open Source the last one... (2, Funny)

BoomerSooner (308737) | more than 6 years ago | (#21779408)

Code from 15 years ago? Jesus you must have some kick ass programmers.

Re:Open Source the last one... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 6 years ago | (#21779954)

Or conversely, their programmers write such bloated crap that it takes computers 15 years of upgrades to be able to run it well.

Re:Open Source the last one... (1)

Jaqenn (996058) | more than 6 years ago | (#21786824)

I withheld a Duke Nukem comment.

Re:Open Source the last one... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 6 years ago | (#21782326)

--
echo jtdfhsaeiworuqpkysrlauty | tr qpwoeirutylaksjdhf k@drpeicoml.gajsuh

That's a damn fine signature you have there, son.

Re:Open Source the last one... (1)

ak_hepcat (468765) | more than 6 years ago | (#21784064)

I had to try it out myself, but I used some extra compression and a list of isograms to add humor:

--
echo shtpnyhrgstarhe | tr stenography lit@can.fed

That would break Berne (1)

tepples (727027) | more than 6 years ago | (#21784438)

I think software that can't be sold for whatever reason should default to being open sourced
Several have suggested that out of print should imply out of copyright. But this is not compatible with the Berne Convention, one of the World Trade Organization treaties. I can imagine that several unrelated industries would protest if the United States were to try to pull out of the WTO over copyright in orphan works.

Idealist, but unlikely. (2, Informative)

oneiros27 (46144) | more than 6 years ago | (#21780160)

I can see quite a few reasons why they might not want or be allowed to 'just open source [it]':
  • If the game is based on a franchise / IP they licensed, they might be unable to release those rights.
  • If based on a franchise / IP they own, they might be unwilling to release it due to concerns they might allow anyone to create and publish derivative works.
  • If they game uses an engine or other software they've licensed from other companies, they might be unable to release it.
  • If the game uses an engine or other software the company considers to be part of its competitive advantage, they might be unwilling to release it to the general public when it might be used in later games and/or licensed to other companies.
  • If the game hasn't been well screen, both in terms of content seen in the game as well as information in the source code, there could be negative PR if certain types of elements are found. (eg, the potentially offensive character that one of the artists put in as a joke, a frustrated programmer with a paragraph of derogatory comments about his manager, or something similar to 'hot coffee').
  • If the code is cleaned up and finished, it could potentially compete with the other games that the company might release in the future.
All you need is one unlicensed song left in there, and you can expect to be sued out of existence.

The process of vetting the software for release to make sure it's clean -- that you're allowed to release it, and that it won't adversely impact the company is something that takes time and resources, and although might earn them points with some members of the community would likely piss off their publishers and distributors. It's unrealistic to expect that it's 'free' for a company to make their their demo open source, and that it'd be in their best interest to do it.

Re:Idealist, but unlikely. (1)

bit01 (644603) | more than 6 years ago | (#21783800)

You're exaggerating hugely. There are reasons for not releasing open source but most of what you've listed are red herrings.

Vetting software before release to make sure it's clean has to be done for both open and closed source software. Companies do it every day. It's no big deal.

In any case whenever I hear of a company claiming that a piece of software can't be open sourced because it depends on some closed source component I call bullshit; there's nothing stopping them releasing what they have and allowing those with time on their hands to write a substitute for the closed component.

---

Open source software is everything that closed source software is. Plus the source is available.

Re:Idealist, but unlikely. (1)

grumbel (592662) | more than 6 years ago | (#21787466)

### Vetting software before release to make sure it's clean has to be done for both open and closed source software.

The difference is that they get paid for doing it for closed source software, they don't get paid for releasing old stuff as open source. Its really quite simple, if there is no benefit for them, why have the risk of a release?

Re:Idealist, but unlikely. (1)

Snowmit (704081) | more than 6 years ago | (#21787506)

Vetting software before release to make sure it's clean has to be done for both open and closed source software. Companies do it every day. It's no big deal.

Hi, I work in the industry. I happen to have been at work for 12 hours today because we had two deadlines on two projects at the same time and I needed to supervise both teams, and ensure that we got the drops off so that there'd be no question of publishers pressuring us to work over the holidays.

After careful consideration, I have decided not to spend another hour or two today vetting throw-away prototypes for ideas we might want to keep private, unlicensed code, place-holder assets and code from previous projects in order to give them away to people. Hope you understand.

Open Source the last one...Mantras. (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 6 years ago | (#21785706)

"In the last idea they say they have the code there, they were demoing it to publishers and stuff... Why not just open source the code and let the community run with it?"

And why should one presume that "the community" will do anything with this release? Let alone anything good. Me thinks you like buzzwords.

"If the idea was dropped, if there is no way you're gonna get that game published and make money from it, why waste all those man-hours than went into producing that prototype and instead open source it and let people have fun with it."

Never heard the saying "try, try, try again" have you?

A dimension of sound, a dimension of sight, a dime (1)

navygeek (1044768) | more than 6 years ago | (#21778862)

"There's a man of the wing of this airplane! " - John Valentine

My pick... (2, Insightful)

Xelios (822510) | more than 6 years ago | (#21778864)

... for a game that could have been, Freespace 3. Way to leave us all hanging Volition :(

At least the game was continued by a source code release and player designed campaigns, still it would have been nice to get an official conclusion to the story.

Re:My pick... (2, Informative)

Xelios (822510) | more than 6 years ago | (#21778898)

Eh... should have said "way to leave us hanging Interplay", it's not Volition's fault the publishers refuse to give up the liscense.

Re:My pick... (1)

MMaestro (585010) | more than 6 years ago | (#21781292)

Didn't Interplay, Volition's publisher, go bankrupt and sell off Volition?

Games that shouldn't have been... (1)

charlesbakerharris (623282) | more than 6 years ago | (#21778926)

Interesting article - I wish they'd swapped some of those for titles like... Master of Orion III Civilization III Which games do you think should never have been made?

Re:Games that shouldn't have been... (1)

TripMaster Monkey (862126) | more than 6 years ago | (#21779090)

Daikatana. [penny-arcade.com]

Re:Games that shouldn't have been... (1)

loimprevisto (910035) | more than 6 years ago | (#21779396)

Come on now, Civ 3 wasn't THAT bad... I actually liked the culture mechanic they added, other than that it just felt like Civ 2 with updated graphics and a little bit of new content. MoO 3 was inexcusable and irredeemable, no argument there.

As far as my nomination for a game that shouldn't have been made: Temple of Elemental Evil

Re:Games that shouldn't have been... (1)

charlesbakerharris (623282) | more than 6 years ago | (#21779762)

Civ 3, when it came out, was atrocious. Civ 4 was what Civ 3 should have been... Besides, the faux-Kenny G muzak in the modern age was nightmarish.

At the end of the day, it just wasn't very fun to play.

Re:Games that shouldn't have been... (1)

moderatorrater (1095745) | more than 6 years ago | (#21780416)

I just wish they'd go back to the Alpha Centauri mode, where you can customize units and you have a unit that will transfer resources from a square to it's home base. *sigh* Alpha Centauri was, in many ways, my favorite Civ game.

Re:Games that shouldn't have been... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 6 years ago | (#21780686)

The first Sid Meier game a played was Colonization. It has always been my favorite, probably due to that fact. I would love to see an updated version of it. Sure it was easy as hell, but damn some of those concepts were fantastic. And I'll be damned if the Civilopedia (the name was different in Colonization but I can't remember what it was) didn't teach me a lot about the time period for a 2nd grader.

Re:Games that shouldn't have been... (1)

smussman (1160103) | more than 6 years ago | (#21780912)

The first Sid Meier game a played was Colonization. It has always been my favorite, probably due to that fact. I would love to see an updated version of it. Sure it was easy as hell, but damn some of those concepts were fantastic. And I'll be damned if the Civilopedia (the name was different in Colonization but I can't remember what it was) didn't teach me a lot about the time period for a 2nd grader.
There is an open-source clone of Colonization (with updated graphics) at www.freecol.org [freecol.org] . It seems to be fairly actively developed.

Re:Games that shouldn't have been... (1)

erdraug (962369) | more than 6 years ago | (#21865838)

Colonization has been my favourite Sid Meier game too - thanks for the link i totally ignored the existence of an open source remake.

Re:Games that shouldn't have been... (1)

framauro13 (1148721) | more than 6 years ago | (#21779580)

Alone in the Dark: The New Nightmare. Completely ruined the trilogy, although, as a diehard fan, I'm looking forward to the new one coming out.

That, and any Sonic the Hedgehog game made in the last 5 years.

Re:Games that shouldn't have been... (1)

KDR_11k (778916) | more than 6 years ago | (#21780822)

You didn't like Sonic Rush?

Re:Games that shouldn't have been... (1)

Lord of Hyphens (975895) | more than 6 years ago | (#21782894)

While I liked Sonic Rush [wikipedia.org] myself (kicked the tar out of any of the fscking GBA games), I'm not as sure what I think about Sonic Rush Adventure [wikipedia.org] .

That being said, the "Extra" Stage in Sonic Rush was a great throwback to Sonic 3 & Knuckles.

Re:Games that shouldn't have been... (1)

Dralithi (983409) | more than 6 years ago | (#21781538)

Games that never should have been: Bethesda's horrible game "Pirates of the Caribbean" for Xbox would be a good start. Way to change the title screen and the box art from a different game that has ZERO to do with the franchise. Sorta like what Nintendo did to Stadium Events.

Fallout 3 (2, Interesting)

Huntr (951770) | more than 6 years ago | (#21778948)

And I don't mean [nma-fallout.com] the Bethesda one, either.

The Hindenburg... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 6 years ago | (#21779018)

... from latest research, was sabotaged by a crewmember recruited by anti-Nazi Germans associated with the German Communist Party. Goering and company felt that sabotage was politically unacceptable, so the conclusion was suppressed at the time, and some fanciful notion of hydrogen 'leakage' was substituted. The Americans went along with it.

Duke Nukem Forever... (3, Funny)

Notquitecajun (1073646) | more than 6 years ago | (#21779034)

HAH! Got it in first.

Sword of the Samurai redone with current tech (1)

getha (97821) | more than 6 years ago | (#21779310)

That's one game I still want to see.

Think Total War (which when I first heard about it, I thought already was what I wanted; big bummer that was), but with the 'mission' stuff (spying, asassination, etc) done as a FPS, like Deus Ex or Thief (although I never played that), instead of the lame 'watch the movie and wait till the computer has rolled the dice'.

That combination of battlefield simulation, resource management and small scale personal actions (stealing, killing, spying) would be totally awesome. And all the technology is there already. Just combing Total War with the Half-life (or Unreal, or Thief, or...) engine and voila! Instant hit! Well, I'd shelf over 50 euros for that (which I think is too much money for most games out there).

Anyone who has played Sword of the Samurai (old EGA (or VGA?) game on the PC) should know what I'm talking about.

Re:Sword of the Samurai redone with current tech (1)

The Iso (1088207) | more than 6 years ago | (#21782026)

I love Sword of the Samurai. At the beginning of the game, you have the option of VGA, MCGA, EGA, Tandy 1000, or CGA.

Get it now before they must cease and desist at http://abandonia.com/en/games/264/Sword+of+the+Samurai.html [abandonia.com] !

Re:Sword of the Samurai redone with current tech (1)

SQLGuru (980662) | more than 6 years ago | (#21786414)

No need for me.....I loved it so much that I *STILL* have the disk and original material. Same for Pirates! (the one you had to boot from floppy to play) and a few others.

Layne

Nnamtsreg (5, Informative)

mqduck (232646) | more than 6 years ago | (#21779336)

One would be excused for thinking this post is a trolling (which, if you will remember, is tactically trying to stir up trouble for the troll's own amusement). Though I wouldn't mind if I DO stir up emotions, my goal isn't entertainment for myself or anyone.

Okay, the substance of the post:
Let us not forget that Gamespot should still be shunned continually until it at least somehow repents for firing Jeff Gerstmann. Gamepost denied the rumors, Jeff hasn't, and frankly the facts of the matter speak for themselves.

It may well be a fine article (I wouldn't be a Slashdotter if I actually READ it), but we shouldn't forget the apartment policy (of at least willingness) of censorship - especially not just because it's been a little while, and "who cares anymore?".

Sure, I'm blowing it out of proportion, but you should be righteously angry to a relative degree.

Re:Nnamtsreg (3, Informative)

seebs (15766) | more than 6 years ago | (#21779374)

No idea what parent is talking about?

http://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2007/11/29 [penny-arcade.com]

That's what parent is talking about.

And I agree. Mod parent up!

Offtopic, but very true. (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 6 years ago | (#21779502)

"Let us not forget that Gamespot should still be shunned continually until it at least somehow repents for firing Jeff Gerstmann."

I whole heartly agree. This may be offtopic, Slashdot mods, but it is important. As a news site, Slashdot should stand against Gamespot's tactics as they are entirely unacceptable.

Re:Nnamtsreg (1)

grzzld (1206404) | more than 6 years ago | (#21780242)

I had sent an email to gamespot saying that they lost a reader. Was my favorite gaming news site for years. Until i read a story about the editor got fired for stealing pens or j walking and not because he wrote an opinion, I will not read their articles. I believe this post is very on topic. --grz

Re:Nnamtsreg (1)

MrNiceguy_KS (800771) | more than 6 years ago | (#21780282)

Also agreed. Somebody tag article "boycotgamespot"

Re:Nnamtsreg (0, Troll)

Chibi Merrow (226057) | more than 6 years ago | (#21782822)

but we shouldn't forget the apartment policy (of at least willingness) of censorship


Words have meaning. This was definitely a case of complete asshattery by a business, but it was not censorship.

Re:Nnamtsreg (1)

mqduck (232646) | more than 6 years ago | (#21788676)

his was definitely a case of complete asshattery by a business, but it was not censorship.
I suppose it might have been more correct technically (the best kind of correct!) if I had said "preemptive censorship".

Re:Nnamtsreg (1)

Chibi Merrow (226057) | more than 6 years ago | (#21817014)

A corporation is incapable of censorship. Censorship is the realm of governments alone.

Re:Nnamtsreg (1)

mqduck (232646) | more than 6 years ago | (#21820380)

A corporation is incapable of censorship. Censorship is the realm of governments alone.
You're quite factually incorrect. I suggest you consult a dictionary some time.

A game I want to make. (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 6 years ago | (#21779380)

..Is to make a mix of Q3 arena and wipeout. The arena it self could be like a great big skateboard/BMX park with ramps and stuff, and you zoom about in a wipeout style hovercraft and try to shoot down your opponents. Stuntcar racer meets tanks, on speed.

Don't Read TFA (1, Offtopic)

Alexpkeaton1010 (1101915) | more than 6 years ago | (#21779432)

It is from Gamespot. i.e. the Gamespot that just fired the senior editor for a negative review tone. Don't give them any hits, they don't deserve it.

Re:Don't Read TFA (1)

darkhitman (939662) | more than 6 years ago | (#21785100)

You're worried about Slashdot readers actually reading the linked article? You must be new here.

Put it on the to-do list, Will. (1)

penguin_dance (536599) | more than 6 years ago | (#21779442)

You can walk anywhere on the ship. You can turn lights on and off. You can steer. You can adjust the engines. But every time you come into Lakehurst, it blows up. And you have to figure out why, and it becomes like this weird mystery flight simulator thing. I'd still love to do that.

Gosh, Will, I'd like to play that too!

Re:Put it on the to-do list, Will. (1)

tilandal (1004811) | more than 6 years ago | (#21780146)

Worlds worst engineering disasters meets groundhogs day. Could be fun :P

Re:Put it on the to-do list, Will. (1)

moderatorrater (1095745) | more than 6 years ago | (#21780492)

I like the thought of a game ending in disaster no matter what happens. I want to play a game where no matter what you do, you can't "win" it, like in groundhog day, only you never break out of it, but when you do something different you learn something else. In other words, you get to examine from every possible angle the inevitability of disaster, and in the end you walk away when you've accepted it or grown bored out of your mind.

Re:Put it on the to-do list, Will. (1)

Violet Null (452694) | more than 6 years ago | (#21780728)

Allegedly, Harlan Ellison wanted the computer game version of "I Have No Mouth and I Must Scream" to not have any way to win it -- only various variations of losing. He was overruled, but you have to wonder how it would've been received if he wasn't.

Re:Put it on the to-do list, Will. (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 6 years ago | (#21781706)

Kobiyashi Maru? ;-)

As I recall, one of the Starfleet Command games actually offered that as a scenario.

Re:Put it on the to-do list, Will. (1)

Daengbo (523424) | more than 6 years ago | (#21786820)

So the only way to win is to cheat?

Re:Put it on the to-do list, Will. (1)

penguin_dance (536599) | more than 6 years ago | (#21782666)

Thats sounds like the plot for Global Thermonuclear Warfare (the game from the movie War Games).

Personally if I found I'd been duped into playing a game for hours only to find there is no solution, it would piss me off.

Re:Put it on the to-do list, Will. (2, Insightful)

tepples (727027) | more than 6 years ago | (#21784472)

Personally if I found I'd been duped into playing a game for hours only to find there is no solution, it would piss me off.
Have you beaten Tetris yet?

Re:Put it on the to-do list, Will. (1)

penguin_dance (536599) | more than 6 years ago | (#21821916)

"Have you beaten Tetris yet?"

That's a good point (and I don't play Tetris either, because I find it monotonous and boring!) However, this type of game would necessitate a story-line and therefore a conclusion and (hopefully) a logical way to get there. Which is far different from a 'mindless' arcade puzzle. Any adventure-based game sales would tank when it leaked out that you couldn't win it. Gamers will put up with tricks and traps, but just like mystery readers, they do not like games that 'cheat' or dupe the player unfairly.

Re:Put it on the to-do list, Will. (1)

drsquare (530038) | more than 6 years ago | (#21780804)

Sounds like the world's most boring flight simulator. Let's face it, the only fun parts of a flight simulator are taking off and landing, and in this Hindenburg thing you can't do either. And you can't travel at any fun speed either.

Re:Put it on the to-do list, Will. (1)

xubu_caapn (1086401) | more than 6 years ago | (#21795372)

not much replay value.

here's my elevator pitch... (1)

vrmlguy (120854) | more than 6 years ago | (#21779556)

Remake Shiny's Sacrifice for the Nintendo DS.

Until then, I'd love to see Portal: the Flash Version ported to the DS.

Re:here's my elevator pitch... (1)

meringuoid (568297) | more than 6 years ago | (#21782104)

Until then, I'd love to see Portal: the Flash Version ported to the DS.

Hell, why not Portal proper? It's not as if that game relies on exceptional graphics. The only time you ever benefit from a high resolution is when you're trying to read the graffiti. The only problem I'd foresee with it is that the portals might be too small on screen to make out detail in the room on the other side - which is important in solving a lot of puzzles. Maybe you could have the top screen show the view through the nearer portal, or something...

A blimp joke (0, Troll)

Altus (1034) | more than 6 years ago | (#21779944)


Whats the difference between Rush Limbaugh and the Hindenburg?

Ones a flaming Nazi gasbag and the other is a dirigible.

Nazi were Socialist (-1, Troll)

Anonymous Coward | more than 6 years ago | (#21780708)

Never forget that the NAZIs (The National SOCIALIST Party) were socisalists, much like today's Democrats.
Also don't forget the the Democrats spend all their time playing race and gender politics. During every election they plaster my town with signs that read "When Women Vote Democrats Win" and "When Blacks vote Democrats Win". Just in case you missed their racial/gender politics.
And when you play racial/gender politcs you need someone in the role of Der Juden. For Dems that is the white heterosexual male.

Is your hate politically correct hate?

Do you believe that racism is wrong unless you hate white people?
Do you believe that sexism is wrong unless you hate men?
Do you believe that sexual discrimination is wrong unless you hate heterosexuals?
Do you believe that religious intolerance is wrong unless you hate Christians?
Do you believe that freedom of speech involves censoring offensive non-Politically Correct speech?
Do you believe that DoubleThink is hard and that DoubleThink is easy?
Do you keep such an open mind that your brain fell out?
Are you a hypocrite and a bigot? Do your friends praise you for it and call you morally superior? Do you think that your bigotry makes you a better person than others?
If your hate is politically correct hate then the Democrat party is the party for you.

Democrats are vile bigoted hypocritical individuals who feel morally superior because they have the right kind of racism.
They cause misery and suffering by their willful ignorance that feeds their narcissism and delusions. Organizations like NOW willfully ignore the rape and mutilization of women around the globe, because criticism of worldwide acts against women wouldn't allow them to attack the demographic they have judged to be Der Juden.
That is who Democrats are.

Re:Nazi were Socialist (2, Funny)

Altus (1034) | more than 6 years ago | (#21781614)


your right, that joke is funnier.

Re:Nazi were Socialist (1)

Boronx (228853) | more than 6 years ago | (#21826074)

I disagree, it was too long and for all that, didn't have any surprising twists. Maybe you can't read it, it's in the delivery: try imagining it in Richard Pryor's voice.

Some of them make it much further along... (1)

foxtrot (14140) | more than 6 years ago | (#21780698)

The mousepad next to me is a promo item from the Babylon 5 space combat simulator game-- neat faux-3d thing with Starfuries that move around EAS Agamemnon depending on what angle you look at it. I even played a development version of the game at E3 back in '98.

It still never made it to market...

My two games that could have been. (1)

SlipperHat (1185737) | more than 6 years ago | (#21781216)

Septerra Core
I think this game might have won an award, but I've always been under the impression that it was underrated. Apart from one random bug, my only complaint about this game is that it felt a little short (possibly heightened by the epic nature of the storyline). However, I think the game makes for a nice RPG. If you like good stories but don't like having to pick skill points, then this a game worth looking into.

Vampire The Masquerade - Bloodlines
This game was one of the best games I have ever played. The story was gripping (the end seemed abrupt, but I sort made sense out of it). The amount of choice that the game offers to player is staggering. The dialogue and voice-acting was convincing, and at times very funny (Jack). The in-game music and soundtrack was very well done. I still remember events from the game - the haunted hotel with the exploding vases and crashing elevators still creeps me out, as does being chased by a nigh-invincible werewolf. I think the game suffered since it was rushed to make it into stores for Christmas. Hell, there are times I wish that the game was an MMORPG just because it would be so different.

So correct on both accounts (1)

Sid Nitzerglobin (1206012) | more than 6 years ago | (#21784292)

Aside from a bit of bugginess, both of these games were excellent and under appreciated.

I thought I was the only one completely freaked out by the haunted hotel in VtM:BL.

Re:My two games that could have been. (1)

Harliquin_Fool (966363) | more than 6 years ago | (#21787940)

That would be such a Kick ass Game though, a VTM MMORPG. just think of it now...there can be a billion malkavians running around trying to light peoples pants on fire..... on the other hand, the real fun of something like V:TM was the pure flexibility of the character types and storyline. without that, it seems to fall short from the intended goal...

Basic skill required (1)

Avatar8 (748465) | more than 6 years ago | (#21781900)

Like any sales job, pitching is an art, one requiring a skill set that doesn't necessarily overlap with the one that produces good games.

Just as any developer builds their skills with coding, graphics engines, world builders, etc. they should work on their people/sales/pitch skills, too. This seems to be rampant through all industries, but sticks out like a sore thumb in IT. Part of the reason many people enter the IT field is because they don't want to deal with people. Putting a developer in front of a crowd and asking them to speak is like throwing the deer in front of the headlights.

It's been offered here before, but I'll offer it again for any of you would-be proposal spokespeople or anyone that simply wants to improve their confidence, communication and leadership skills: http://www.toastmasters.org/ [toastmasters.org] It's inexpensive, doesn't take much time and can make a world of difference in just a few months.

Please, before you throw yourself to the wolves, find a club and let them help you.

Sub Racing (1)

Skraut (545247) | more than 6 years ago | (#21782160)

I worked on the team that did Ecco the Dolphin: Defender of the Future for the Sega Dreamcast (later ported to the PS2) They were looking for a next title and I wrote up a game design to use the same underwater engine and create a submarine racing game. Something set in the future sort of along the lines of Wipeout only underwater with full 3 dimensions of freedom (pass above, below, or to the side of your opponent etc.)

Unfortunately they made a REALLY bad racing game for the PS1 instead.

Over-complicating the simple stuff (3, Insightful)

Bones3D_mac (324952) | more than 6 years ago | (#21784466)

This is sort of a weird issue that seems to come up whenever someone has a game concept, but suddenly become intimidated by the industry and the overwhelming quality of the content they generate. The fact is, you don't need a huge team of developers and technicians to produce a great game. You just need a good idea and a couple people with enough determination and skill to make it happen.

Heck, look at the first person shooter genre. It was initially brought to life by only two people who loved to play games. Now, it's a multi-billion dollar industry and the resulting engines produced each year often creates the standards for which all other games are judged.

Nowadays, you don't even need to be a programming genius capable of juggling dozens of complex equations to produce content. You can now get fairly simple to use game development tools, such as Unity [unity3d.com] to design prototypes and tweak things until it finally feels right. Even if it doesn't end up being the final product, having a working prototype can make a huge difference in even pitching your concepts to other, larger developers. (The ones in charge of such decisions often need visual aids beyond just a storyboard or sketch, since they likely aren't developers themselves.)

If not anything else, even Flash can work in a pinch for prototyping or development.
Check for New Comments
Slashdot Account

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?

Don't worry, we never post anything without your permission.

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>
Create a Slashdot Account

Loading...