Beta
×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Garage door openers now have a DMCA notice?

corrosive_nf (744601) writes | more than 4 years ago

3

corrosive_nf writes "Over at Ars an editor discovered this on his garage door opener: "If this Security+ garage door opener is operated with a non-rolling code transmitter, the technical measure in the receiver of the garage door opener, which provides security against code-theft devices, will be circumvented," said the manual. "The owner of the copyright in the garage door opener does not authorize the purchaser or supplier of the non-rolling code transmitter to circumvent that technical measure.""
Link to Original Source

cancel ×

3 comments

Sorry! There are no comments related to the filter you selected.

Chamberlain lost. (1)

tepples (727027) | more than 4 years ago | (#30479070)

Skylink, a maker of garage door openers, broke the exact DRM that the Ars article mentioned. Chamberlain sued. Chamberlain lost in the Federal Circuit [wikipedia.org] . Lexmark tried the same thing on its printer cartridges, but two months later, the Sixth Circuit ruled against Lexmark too [wikipedia.org] . So the DMCA is not a free pass to lock out competitors and especially not to do things that would otherwise violate antitrust law.

And in other words, it's a bad summary. (1)

tepples (727027) | more than 4 years ago | (#30479216)

I just read the article. It summarizes Chamberlain v. Skylink, including the fact that the court ruled against Chamberlain, makers of this "Security+" garage door opener. Then it goes on to explain how Chamberlain tried to work around it by writing Chamberlain's preferred interpretation of the DMCA (which failed in two different appeals circuits) into what amounts to a EULA and how that probably won't fly in court either. Perhaps the Slashdot article's summary could be clarified with this sort of info before it hits the front page.

sure, why not? (1)

nurb432 (527695) | more than 4 years ago | (#30479284)

Everything else has some sort of disclaimer that you cant use your own device as you see fit.

Check for New Comments
Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>