Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Patent-Pending IBM Traffic Lights Stop Car Engines

theodp (442580) writes | more than 4 years ago


theodp (442580) writes "I'm sorry Dave, I'm afraid I can't let your engine idle. The USPTO has just published IBM's patent application for a System and Method for Controlling Vehicle Engine Running State at Busy Intersections for Increased Fuel Consumption Efficiency. Here's how Big Blue explains the invention: 'The present disclosure is directed to a method for managing engines in response to a traffic signal. The method may comprise establishing communications with participating vehicles; responding to a stop status indicated by the traffic signal, further comprising: receiving a position data from each participating vehicles; determining a queue of participating vehicles stopped at the traffic signal; determining a remaining duration of the stop status; sending a stop-engine notification to the list of participating vehicles stopped at the traffic signal when the remaining duration is greater than a threshold of time; responding to a proceed status indicated by the traffic signal, further comprising: sending a start-engine notification to a first vehicle in the queue; calculating an optimal time for an engine of a second vehicle in the queue to start; and sending the start-engine notification to the second vehicle at the optimal time.' IBM notes that 'traffic signals may include, but not limited to, traffic lights at intersections, railway crossing signals, or other devices for indicating correct moments to stop and to proceed.'"

cancel ×


Sorry! There are no comments related to the filter you selected.

Freedom to choose (1)

cryfreedomlove (929828) | more than 4 years ago | (#32306218)

What if I decide I need to run the light because my kid needs to get to the ER right now to save his life?

More Big Brother (1)

Chelmet (1273754) | more than 4 years ago | (#32306384)

This idea, I think, is quite ridiculous. Its another example of the state not just mandating what you can do, but forcing you to do it.

Here in the UK, you're not allowed to idle at a red light, and the police have the power to give you an on-the-spot fine of about £40 ($60), which is usually doubled if you don't pay within 2 weeks. Fair enough, I have no problem with this, as in the grand scheme of things its a good thing.

But having what amounts to a kill switch for cars near intersections? That's a whole different kettle of fish. What if my ignition is dodgy, because I'm driving an old car or on my way to the garage to get it fixed? What if my wife's in the passenger seat in labour? There are plenty of situations in which this would be a terrible, even life threatening, idea. Allowing police to have the ultimate say is, IMO, the bast way. Pregnant wife? They'll clear a way to the hospital for you.

I don't have so much problem with the government making rules (read: laws), and its our own personal choice as to whether we obey them or not. Taking this a step further, what about a car that won't stop unless its in a designated parking bay? Sounds ridiculous, but it would prevent people parking illegally by the pavement. Or a car that won't let you drive to work alone, you have to lift-share to reduce emissions?

Its one thing to make rules, its another thing entirely to remove control from the populace.

Check for New Comments
Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?