Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Google & Verizon's Real Net Neutrality Proposa

langelgjm (860756) writes | more than 4 years ago

Google 3

langelgjm (860756) writes "Announced this afternoon in a joint conference call held by CEOs Eric Schmidt and Ivan Seidenberg, Google and Verizon have released a joint net neutrality proposal in the form of a "suggested legislative framework for consideration by lawmakers." This comes on the heels of last week's assertion (and subsequent denial) that Google and Verizon were close to concluding talks that would permit Verizon to prioritize certain content in exchange for pay. A look at the actual text of the framework shows some positive net neutrality principles, but there is also some more curious content: "Wireless broadband" is singled out for exclusion from most of the agreement, and providers would be permitted to prioritize "additional online services... distinguishable in scope and purpose." Public Knowledge, a watchdog group based in Washington, has criticized the agreement for these provisions."
Link to Original Source

Sorry! There are no comments related to the filter you selected.

additional online services (1)

Spazmania (174582) | more than 4 years ago | (#33192442)

"additional online services... distinguishable in scope and purpose."

Translation: cable TV is not an Internet service. Just because we provide 600 channels over the same wires that we use to offer Internet doesn't mean we have to let our competitors do the same.

The wiggle-room is a little broad but it's not an inherently unreasonable notion.

Re:additional online services (1)

langelgjm (860756) | more than 4 years ago | (#33193040)

So the full text of that portion is as follows:

A provider that offers a broadband Internet access service complying with the above principles could offer any other additional or differentiated services. Such other services would have to be distinguishable in scope and purpose from broadband Internet access service, but could make use of or access Internet content, applications or services and could include traffic prioritization.

I agree, it's not unreasonable to craft a clause permitting both cable TV or phone service on the same wires as Internet service. On the other hand, by the time that principle makes it into law, will it permit offering a "superior web experience" (different from broadband Internet access precisely because some content has been prioritized)?

"The public internet" (1)

richardbewley (1874572) | more than 4 years ago | (#33192808)

Verizon is calling the "public internet" open. Its CEO was dodgy when it came to explaining what the "other" Internet was, i.e. using its pipes to stream a "3D opera".
Check for New Comments
Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?