×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Can you use Wikipedia to decide who to vote for?

Decius6i5 (650884) writes | more than 3 years ago

Wikipedia 3

Decius6i5 (650884) writes "This summer the WikiTrust team made the English language Wikipedia accessible through their Firefox plugin, which uses a reputation system to highlight untrustworthy text. I thought, made using this plugin I could read Wikipedia articles about politicians without being misled by vandals, so I created Wiki Voter Guide which uses Project Vote Smart's API to look up Wikipedia articles about candidates by ZIP code. Turns out, most local races aren't covered in Wikipedia yet, but I'd like to know what Slashdot readers think about all of this. With the help of reputation systems can Wikipedia become a useful way to research political candidates or is politically motivated vandalism an insurmountable problem?"
Link to Original Source

3 comments

"In other news..." (1)

Haedrian (1676506) | more than 3 years ago | (#34075936)

Politician X has also claimed that he once kicked a puppy because it was cool, while singing "I can do whatever I want, those idiots will still vote for me"

I don't know how it decides whether a source is trustworthy or not. I would assume it uses something similar to Google's page rank (if reputable sites link to it, it is reputable) - however since even large news companies are politically biased, I'm pretty sure that nowhere is really safe or reputable anymore.

Re:"In other news..." (1)

Decius6i5 (650884) | more than 3 years ago | (#34078666)

An overview of the wikitrust algorithms is here. [wikitrust.net] In a nutshell, new text is less likely to be reliable than stuff that has been subjected to a lot of peer review and survived. Couple that with the matter of whether or not your edits tend to get reverted...
Check for New Comments
Slashdot Account

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?

Don't worry, we never post anything without your permission.

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>
Sign up for Slashdot Newsletters
Create a Slashdot Account

Loading...