Beta
×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Does the Moon Have Military Value?

MarkWhittington (1084047) writes | more than 3 years ago

Moon 3

MarkWhittington (1084047) writes "Despite the fact that under President Barack Obama's space policy, Americans will not be going back to the moon any time soon, discussions are occurring about what if any military value the Earth nearest neighbor has.

Opinions, as can be expected, vary on the subject"

Link to Original Source

Sorry! There are no comments related to the filter you selected.

Maybe Drones? (1)

LifesABeach (234436) | more than 3 years ago | (#35001366)

Why not use drones to start exploring the surface? And then a more detailed survey of surface bearing ores?

TANSTAAFL (1)

TreeInMyCube (1789238) | more than 3 years ago | (#35003288)

Heinlein wrote about this in "The Moon is a Harsh Mistress". One doesn't need nukes, when one has lots and LOTS of kinetic energy. Rocks will do a lot of damage, and once on their way, would be hard to intercept/neutralize. The original article mentions attacking military assets in low earth orbit, which Heinlein didn't discuss. That's not surprising, considering the newness of applications of space technology for communications and navigation when he wrote the book.

more guns guns guns ??? (1)

polar red (215081) | more than 3 years ago | (#35005546)

yeah, give the baby some guns, it will make it happy.

Check for New Comments
Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?