Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Hard Drive of the Future: Built With Frickin' Lasers

MikeatWired (2562219) writes | more than 2 years ago

Data Storage 1

MikeatWired writes "A team of researchers from across Europe and Asia has demonstrated a way of using laser heat to store data rather than magnetic fields, potentially increasing the speed of your hard drive by 100 times or more. Tom Ostler — a physicist at the University of York, which led the research project — tells Wired that this would allow your machine to save files much faster, but also reduce the machine’s power consumption by avoid traditional magnetic storage techniques. This month, Ostler and his colleagues — who span research institutions in Spain, Switzerland, Ukraine, Russia, Japan and, the Netherlands — published a paper describing their breakthrough in the pages of Nature Communications. Typically, data is written to hard drives using magnetic fields. By shifting fields, you can write 1s and 0s, changing the polarization of the material where the data is stored. One polarization represents a 1; another represents a 0. Heat has long been the enemy of this technique, because it distorts the fields. But with their paper, Ostler and crew have shown a way using heat that changes a material’s polarization without using magnetic fields, storing thousands of gigabytes of data in a single second"
Link to Original Source

Sorry! There are no comments related to the filter you selected.

Gigabytes? (1)

jargonburn (1950578) | more than 2 years ago | (#38976451)

Wouldn't "thousands of gigabytes of data in a single second" be 10000 times faster that what we have? I know I've not managed a sustained write on a non-SSD HDD in excess of 100MB/s. Ah, well....I'd claim math is hard, but since I didn't RTFA, english must be even harder.
Check for New Comments
Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?