Beta

Slashdot: News for Nerds

×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Sopa-II : H.R. 1981 "Protecting Children From Internet Pornographers Act"

TaoPhoenix (980487) writes | more than 2 years ago

7

TaoPhoenix writes "Here we go! As many of you predicted, SOPA would be rebuilt worse than ever by switching the Copyright flavor to a "Protect the Kiddies" flavor. You were right. H.R. 1981, entitled "Protecting Children From Internet Pornographers Act", has just been sponsored by Lamar Smith, the same lead proponent of SOPA. That was fast! Unfortunately it has a built in cheapo argument ready as a talking point. It also has some nasty and costly data retention clauses that weren't even in SOPA. Are we ready to do another Blackout Day? I don't think we have too many of those left before the fragile Internet coalition becomes exhausted. So, two questions: How do we stop this bill, and how do we win a victory permanent enough that we don't have to do this every single month?
Business Insider version: http://www.businessinsider.com/anonymous-and-internet-advocates-wheres-your-hr-1981-outrage-2012-2
David Seaman's Youtube videocast http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PBVqm2W56c8"

Link to Original Source

cancel ×

7 comments

Should't that read H.R. 1984? (1)

GLMDesigns (2044134) | more than 2 years ago | (#39099731)

We knew this was coming. This is the new flavor of the month. It needs to be combated in just the same way. Thankfully both the left and right (OWS and Tea Party) are dead-set against this. I don't see this passing either -- but, as Mad-Eye Moody said: "Constant Vigilance."

Re:Should't that read H.R. 1984? (1)

TaoPhoenix (980487) | more than 2 years ago | (#39101823)

However, that requires getting it out of the Firehose.

I DO see this risking passing because of their aggressive agenda, they're pissed about the SOPA fallout.

The change in naming is lethal too - because Middle America is muddled but against Big Copyright, but the way this one is framed people risk smear campaigns that will be indexed in search engines forever.

Where have I heard of this before? (1)

newbie_fantod (514871) | more than 2 years ago | (#39101711)

At Least they let the original legislation die before renaming it. Up here in Canada, The Harper Govt. renamed the Investigating and Preventing Criminal Electronic Communications Act to the Protecting Children From Internet Predators Act in mid debate.

Re:Where have I heard of this before? (1)

TaoPhoenix (980487) | more than 2 years ago | (#39101835)

Well, only because we took such a flyswatter to it the first time they didn't have the backup plan in place first.

Also, it's a Month Later now - that protest was SO "Last Month's News".

How Do We Fix This Permanently (1)

turkeyfish (950384) | more than 2 years ago | (#39103831)

Getting rid of republicans like Lamar Smith. Otherwise, its like crotch rot and toe fungus. It will just keep coming back again and again.

Re:How Do We Fix This Permanently (1)

GLMDesigns (2044134) | more than 2 years ago | (#39104691)

Politicians, as with other people, need to be educated on the problems at hand. Too many people find something wrong and go "there ought to be a law." Republicans scream law and order. And Democrats are just as bad. Mention that a regulation is harmful and they scream "deregulation! - deregulation! - you want corporations to rule the world! - aahhh!!!! run-from-the-psycho" Sometimes the regulation sucks. Example: SOPA, ACTA, PIPA and now HR 1981.

Re:SOPA, ACTA, PIPA and now HR 1981. (1)

TaoPhoenix (980487) | more than 2 years ago | (#39104965)

Yep, the fact that they have introduced this stuff four times means they're well "educated" by now, it's a pure power grab.

And this story is voted Red Hot in the firehose, but it's still here, and the front page slot went to that Idle parody thing. Yep.

Check for New Comments
Slashdot Account

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?

Don't worry, we never post anything without your permission.

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>
Create a Slashdot Account

Loading...