Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Copy protection advice for ~$10k software

Anonymous Coward writes | more than 2 years ago


An anonymous reader writes "Hi /., I'm a long time reader and would like some advice.

I'm part owner of a relatively small video editing software company. We're not yet profitable, and our stuff turned up on thePirateBay recently. Some of our potential paying customers are using it without paying, and some non-potential customers are using it without paying. Our copy protection isn't that tough to crack, and I'd rather see the developers working on the product than the DRM (I'm convinced any sufficiently desirable digital widget will get copied without authorization).

Would it be insane to release a 'not for commercial use' copy that does some spying and reporting on you, along with a spy-free version for ~$10,000? I feel like that would reduce the incentive to crack the paid version, and legit businesses (In the US anyway but we're trying to sell everywhere) would generally pay and maybe we could identify some of the people using it to make money without paying us (and then sue the one with the biggest pockets). What would you do? I respect the collective wisdom of ./; thanks for your time!"

Sorry! There are no comments related to the filter you selected.

"Spy ... then Sue" (1)

TaoPhoenix (980487) | more than 2 years ago | (#39108235)

I hope you're not serious.

While you bring up a case that 10K software isn't a copy of a Justin Bieber song, a young struggling company planning a 'Spy & Sue' model will get you pulverized when you kick the sleeping corporate legal rottweiler.

Re:"Spy ... then Sue" (1)

Jah-Wren Ryel (80510) | more than 2 years ago | (#39108309)

Indeed, spy & sue is basically a path to internet self-immolation.

Spy & market/promote on the other hand would probably get them accolades.

Pirate Hats (1)

TheInternetGuy (2006682) | more than 2 years ago | (#39108353)

There was a story a while back about an indi game that was released on purpose on pirate pay, the difference being that all the characters wore pirates hats. [] Maybe something along the same lines? Google+ hangouts can put a clown nose on your face. So maybe your editing software could put a hat and an eye patch on all faces until a correct serial is entered?

The cost of DRM (1)

moj0e (812361) | more than 2 years ago | (#39109257)

Why don't you release a 'not for commercial use' copy w/o the spying. That will prevent it from being distributed on P2P sites. The added benefit is that people would learn to use and love your software. Eventually, they can be your marketing arm and help convince management to purchase the software for business use.

Also, as you might be aware, developing DRM is very costly. The cost of DRM is expected to reach $9bln this year: []

You're doing it wrong (1)

mcgrew (92797) | more than 2 years ago | (#39109821)

$10K? Look, dude, you're not SAS. The best way to ensure than any DRM gets cracked and your stuff getting uploaded is to charge insane prices for it. And $10K is insane for anything not coming out of a huge software house and needing a mainframe to run on.

Nobody wants to give their money to greedy thieves, and that's exactly what you look like. Sorry, but I just don't see your business succeeding.

Check for New Comments
Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?