Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Can Microsoft Ban Class-Action Suits? Apparently so.

colinneagle (2544914) writes | more than 2 years ago

Microsoft 2

colinneagle (2544914) writes "In a 5-to-4 decision that split along the usual ideological lines, the Supreme Court ruled in April 2011 that businesses may use standard-form contracts to bar consumers claiming fraud from teaming up for a class-action suit.

The decision concerned arbitrations, not suits, but that's no problem. Companies now use their standard contract to use arbitration to settle disputes. This is bad because you can't appeal the findings of a private arbitration hearing, nor is there an independent or public means of reviewing an arbitrator's decisions. They are designed to be conducted in private, unlike court cases.

The decision "basically lets companies escape class actions, so long as they do so by means of arbitration agreements," said Brian T. Fitzpatrick, a law professor at Vanderbilt University, in the New York Times.

Armed with this case, Microsoft has changed the terms of its consumer EULA. You know, that contract no one reads. Last Friday, right before Memorial Day when no one noticed it, Tim Fielden, assistant general counsel for Microsoft, announced that Microsoft was changing its EULA."

Link to Original Source

cancel ×


Sorry! There are no comments related to the filter you selected.

SCOTUS ruled that federal law trumps state law (1)

schwit1 (797399) | more than 2 years ago | (#40155209)

Section 2 of the Federal Arbitration Act(FAA) declares that agreements to arbitrate will be subject to invalidation only for the same grounds applicable to contracts generally, mainly unconscionability and duress. Under the Act, state laws that disfavor the enforcement of arbitration agreements will be preempted by the FAA.

The laws are from the legislative branch. If you don't like the FAA then write your Congressman. If Congress changes the law that too will most likely be deemed Constitutional.

What if arbitration only contracts were prohibited (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 2 years ago | (#40155289)

Could a state require all contracts have an opt-out clause pertaining to mandatory arbitration?

Can I be bound by a contract I didn't agree to? If something is given to me that required the original owner to agree to a contract, am I bound by that same contract?

Check for New Comments
Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>