Beta
×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

What should we do about Wikipedia's porn problem?

Larry Sanger (936381) writes | more than 2 years ago

Wikipedia 3

Larry Sanger writes "In 2011, the Wikimedia Board committed to installing a "controversial content" filter even weaker than Google's SafeSearch, as proposed by the "2010 Wikimedia Study of Controversial Content." Since then, after growing opposition by some Wikipedians, some board members have made it clear that they do not expect this filter to be finished and installed. Nevertheless, as TFA makes clear, Wikipedia continues to host an enormous amount of extremely gross porn and other material most parents don't want their kids stumbling across. And this content is some of the website's most-accessed. Nevertheless, children remain some of Wikipedia's heaviest users. Jimmy Wales has recently reiterated his support for such a filter, but no work is being done on it, and the Foundation has not yet issued any statement about whether they intend to continue work on it."
Link to Original Source

Sorry! There are no comments related to the filter you selected.

Toothbrush (1)

Stanistani (808333) | more than 2 years ago | (#40176527)

Without the image filter (something all other major sites have) if you search on Wikipedia or Wikimedia Commons for normal, everyday items such as' necklace', 'toothbrush' or, in French, 'homework' (devoir) you get as your top or second hit, porn. Children are encouraged to use these resources. Teens are often admin on these sites, cataloging and categorizing the porn. Yech.

Dead in the water (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 2 years ago | (#40176725)

I'm afraid the adult filter is dead in the water. Implementation was scheduled to start in January, but nothing happened, and two other board members have since said that they changed their mind, and that the implementation plans have been abandoned. http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/engine?do=post_view_flat;post=273633;page=1;mh=-1;list=wiki;sb=post_latest_reply;so=ASC [gossamer-threads.com] Meanwhile, a dog-on-nun "educational video" and much else besides remains visible to all comers, unfiltered.

Re:Dead in the water (1)

lilburne (648606) | more than 2 years ago | (#40182043)

Most wikipedians are dead from the groin up.
Check for New Comments
Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?