Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Ask Slashdot: Will The Hobbit at 48 fps be better than 24fps?

kodiaktau (2351664) writes | more than 2 years ago

Movies 1

kodiaktau (2351664) writes "Film makers keep touting increased frame per second rate as improving viewing and cinema experience, however the number of theaters who actually support the equipment that can play the higher rate film. It makes me wonder if this is in the real interest of creating a better experience and art, or if it is a ploy by the media manufacturers to sell more expensive equipment and drive ticket prices up."
Link to Original Source

Sorry! There are no comments related to the filter you selected.

It is better (1)

Jane Q. Public (1010737) | more than 2 years ago | (#40361251)

Eliminating all motion blur and other such artifacts requires about 40fps in a dark room (theater) or up to 80fps in more brightly-lit surroundings.
Check for New Comments
Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?