Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

AMD's Next Gen Steamroller CPU Could Deliver Where Bulldozer Fell Short

MojoKid (1002251) writes | more than 2 years ago


MojoKid writes "Today at the Hot Chips Symposium, AMD's CTO Mark Papermaster is taking the wraps off the company's upcoming CPU core, codenamed Steamroller. Steamroller is the third iteration of AMD's Bulldozer architecture and an extremely important part for AMD. Bulldozer, which launched just over a year ago, was a disappointment. The company's second-generation Bulldozer implementation, codenamed Piledriver, offered a number of key changes and was incorporated into theTrinity APU family that debuted last spring. Steamroller is the first refresh of Bulldozer's underlying architecture and may finally deliver the sort of performance and efficiency AMD was aiming for when it built Bulldozer in the first place. Enhancements to Fetch and Decode architecture have been made, as well as increased scheduler efficiency and cache load latency, which combined could bring a claimed 15 percent performance-per-watt performance gain. AMD expects to ship Steamroller sometime in 2013 but wouldn't offer timing detail beyond that."
Link to Original Source

Sorry! There are no comments related to the filter you selected.

Cache performance (2)

Taco Cowboy (5327) | more than 2 years ago | (#41159451)

Without a drastic improvement on the in-chip cache performance I do not believe AMD chips have any chance of compete against the offerings from Intel

A recent Slashdot submit - [] - has shown us how bad AMD chips have become - AMD's recent FX processors have worse performance than an older AMD offering, the Phenom II X4 980 processor

Check for New Comments
Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?