Zanadou (1043400) writes "Matthew Toseland, a.k.a. 'Toad', a lead developer of the Freenet peer-to-peer distribution project, recently wrote a blog post detailing his response to a group of academics' published findings concerning "an effort to unmask Freenet users". Not surprisingly, Toad goes on to describe what the Freenet developers might be able to do to close any perceived security holes, and so on.
But what is of most interest is this little nugget that Toad wrote—perhaps added as a quick afterthought—right at the bottom of the post in bold: "PS if you can run the build verification scripts (in the github maintenance scripts repository), please do! Under UK law likely to be passed soon I could be forced to distribute corrupted builds, and on penalty of 2 years in prison not be allowed to tip anyone off about it."
A search of the net reveals little news about any applicable "UK Law", either current or under parliamentary debate. Is Toad trying to give us all a tip off about some incoming legislative storm? And what could this mean for the code integrity of Freenet and/or other (UK-based) open source projects in general?"