Beta
×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Yet another call for abolishing patents, this one from the Fed

WOOFYGOOFY (1334993) writes | about 2 years ago

1

WOOFYGOOFY (1334993) writes "The most recent call for curtailing patents comes not just from an unexpected source, the St. Louis Fed, but also in its most basic form- total abolition of ALL patents.

Via the Atlantic Monthly,

http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2012/09/the-case-for-abolishing-patents-yes-all-of-them/262913/

a new working paper from two members of the St. Louis Federal Reserve, Michele Boldrin and David Levine:

http://research.stlouisfed.org/wp/2012/2012-035.pdf

in which they argue that while a weak patent system may mildly increase innovation with limited side-effects, such a system can never be contained and will inevitably lead a stifling patent system such as that presently found in the U.S.

They argue: "...strong patent systems retard innovation with many negative side-effects. and ..political demand for stronger patent protection comes from old and stagnant industries and firms, not from new and innovative ones. Hence the best solution is to abolish patents entirely through strong constitutional measures and to find other legislative instruments, less open to lobbying and rent-seeking".

They acknowledge that some industries could suffer under a such a system, they single out pharma, and suggest that other legislative measures be found to foster innovation whenever there is clear evidence that laissez-faire under-supplies it."

Link to Original Source

Sorry! There are no comments related to the filter you selected.

At least reduce patent protection period to 10 yrs (1)

macpacheco (1764378) | about 2 years ago | (#41486305)

Today a patent protects the holder for 20 yrs. Reducing the period to 10 yrs would be a great start.
It should reduce the incentive to file stupid/obvious patents.
And it should also encourage those being granted a patent in licensing it, in order to get more financial return.
Most patents take a few years before the holder can make money out of it, so reducing from 20 yrs to 10 yrs is akin to reducing the time the holder can make money out of the patent by about 2/3s.
Getting completely rid of patents can have one big negative effect, by filing the patent, the owner of the patent is documenting his invention. So if the patent represents a important invention, getting rid of patents could delay society from benefiting from the invention (regardless of the royalties paid). Inventors might prefer to maximize secrecy instead.

Check for New Comments
Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?