Grumbleduke (789126) writes "While not new, the 'Freemen' movement has been gaining popularity recently across the US, Canada and the UK, with various 'gurus' giving information on how people can avoid fines and taxes by using certain legal strategies. Having encountered these sorts of arguments once too often, a Canadian judge has examined and demolished the main points used by these “Organized Pseudolegal Commercial Argument litigants.”
In an epic, 736-paragraph judgment (pdf) Associate Chief Justice J.D. Rooke (Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta) discusses the main arguments put forward by “Detaxers; Freemen or Freemen-on-the-Land; Sovereign Men or Sovereign Citizens” and similar groups, and carefully explains why they are all legally nonsense. He offers guidance for judges, lawyers and others who encounter the techniques, but also directly addresses those using (or planning to use) these methods (paragraphs 663-668). However, he saves his anger for the 'gurus' who “purposefully promote and teach proven ineffective techniques that purport to defeat valid state and court authority, and circumvent social obligations for profit at the expense of naive and vulnerable customers” (paragraphs 669-675).
While this may be of use to legal professionals it remains to be seen whether those spreading these theories will stop, or merely see this as a corrupt system protecting itself."
Link to Original Source