Beta
×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

US Air Force's 1950s supersonic flying saucer declassified

MrSeb (471333) writes | about 2 years ago

The Military 2

MrSeb writes "Tighten the strap on your tinfoil hat: Recently declassified documents show that the US Air Force was working on, and perhaps had already built, a supersonic flying saucer in 1956. The aircraft, which had the code name Project 1794, was developed by the USAF and Avro Canada in the 1950s. One declassified memo, which seems to be the conclusion of initial research and prototyping, says that Project 1794 is a flying saucer capable of “between Mach 3 and Mach 4,” (2,300-3,000 mph) a service ceiling of over 100,000 feet (30,500m), and a range of around 1,000 nautical miles (1,150mi, 1850km). According to declassified cutaway diagrams, the supersonic flying saucer would propel itself by rotating an outer disk at very high speed, taking advantage of the Coand effect. Maneuvering would be accomplished by using small shutters on the edge of the disc (similar to ailerons on a winged aircraft). Power would be provided by jet turbines. According to the cutaway diagrams, the entire thing would even be capable of vertical takeoff and landing (VTOL). The fact that there are no disc-shaped aircraft in the skies today, though, suggests that the USAF's flying saucer efforts probably never got past the prototype stage."
Link to Original Source

cancel ×

2 comments

Sorry! There are no comments related to the filter you selected.

Special character (1)

MrSeb (471333) | about 2 years ago | (#41586253)

Oops, we lost the special character -- 'Coand' should be 'Coanda' (with a breve over the A)

Re:Special character (1)

Megane (129182) | about 2 years ago | (#41587255)

It might be a good idea to link to it, too, for the most of us who have never heard of it before.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coand%C4%83_effect [wikipedia.org]

Check for New Comments
Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?