Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Beware the Rings of Pluto

Hugh Pickens writes (1984118) writes | about 2 years ago

Space 1

Hugh Pickens writes writes "The Christian Science Monitor reports that scientists are planning a new route for NASA's New Horizons space probe as it approaches a potentially perilous path toward Pluto through a potential set of rings that may create dangerous debris zones for the NASA spacecraft. New Horizons is currently about 1,000 days away and 730 million miles from closest approach to Pluto but given how New Horizons is currently zooming away from the sun at more than 33,500 mph, "a collision with a single pebble, or even a millimeter-sized grain, could cripple or destroy New Horizons," says project scientist Hal Weaver. "We need to steer clear of any debris zones around Pluto." That's why researchers are making plans to avoid these hazards if New Horizons needs to. "We are now exploring nine other options, 'bail-out trajectories,'" says principal investigator Alan Stern. New Horizon's current plan would take it about halfway between Pluto and the orbit of its largest moon, Charon. Four of the bail-out trajectories would still take the spacecraft between Pluto and Charon's orbit. The other alternatives would take New Horizons much further away from Pluto, past the orbits of its known moons. "If you fly twice as far away, your camera does half as well; if it's 10 times as far, it does one-tenth as well," says Stern. "Still, half a loaf is better than no loaf. Sending New Horizons on a suicide mission does no one any good. We're very much of the mind to accomplish as much as we can, and not losing it all recklessly. Better to turn an A+ to an A- than get an F by overreaching.""

Sorry! There are no comments related to the filter you selected.

Someone do the math please (1)

niftymitch (1625721) | about 2 years ago | (#41679183)

The bit... "if you fly twice as far away your camera does half as well".
In general light diminishes with the square of the distance so twice as far
would see 1/4th the light. Since the light out this far is already dim this
could reduce the image count as well as image quality. An exposure
would require 4x the time.....

Angular resolution perhaps comes to play but a 2D metric does not
seem to be the right thing to ponder in the real 3D rule.

Despite this I think it is grand that this probe is out there and
doing good science.

Check for New Comments
Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?