Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

All of Nate Silver's Presidential Predictions Proved True

kkleiner (1468647) writes | about 2 years ago

Politics 2

kkleiner writes "For the last few months, the political pundit class has been at war with NYT/FiveThirtyEight blogger Nate Silver. Joe Scarborough of MSNBC called him a “joke,” while an op-ed in the LA Times accused him of running a “numbers racket.” But last night, Silver triumphed: every one of his state-level presidential predictions proved true. Statistics FTW!"
Link to Original Source

Sorry! There are no comments related to the filter you selected.

totally bad premise (1)

poetmatt (793785) | about 2 years ago | (#41920491)

The point here is not that he was accurate or not, and it's not statistics FTW. He acknowledged his estimates could be wrong:

the point is that he used accurate statistics to provide reasonable estimates, which the news and the pundits simply disregarded entirely as they made up numbers and false controversies.

So it's more like pundits fail at statistics.

Ratings are built on exciting news (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 years ago | (#41920999)

It's similar to a weather reporter saying its 'possible' we could be in for a blizzard compared to the other guy saying there's a 5% chance of a major snowstorm.

Check for New Comments
Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?