Beta
×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Apple Pinch-to-Zoom Patent Invalidated in Preliminary Review

SternisheFan (2529412) writes | about a year and a half ago

Iphone 0

SternisheFan (2529412) writes "Mashable's Alex Fitzpatrick writes: An Apple patent that paved the way for pinch-to-zoom functionality on the iPhone or iPad should not have been awarded in the first place, said the United States Patent and Trademark Office in a preliminary ruling made public late Wednesday. The patent is among six that lie at the heart of Apple's most recent lawsuit against Samsung, one of its top competitors in the mobile phone and tablet marketplace. Samsung was recently ordered by a jury to pay Apple $1.05 billion in damages for copyright infringement as a result of that case, but that number may change as a result of the USPTO's decision this week. The patent, number 7,844,915, has widely been characterized in the media as "the Pinch-to-Zoom" patent, but that's a misleading generalization. As The Verge previously pointed out, the patent only covers software that detects whether only one finger is making a scrolling action or if two fingers are doing some other action.
    That leads to pinch-to-zoom and other functionalities, but it isn't pinch-to-zoom itself. And, importantly, it leaves wiggle room for Apple's competitors in mobile software (read: Google) to find other ways to program pinch-to-zoom style actions on their operating systems. Should Apple fans be freaking out about the decision? Not yet. The USPTO's ruling is only preliminary, meaning the patent stays a patent for now. Apple will likely appeal the decision, and even if they lose that appeal, most patents that face re-inspection by the USPTO remain generally intact."

Link to Original Source

cancel ×

0 comments

Sorry! There are no comments related to the filter you selected.

Check for New Comments
Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>