Beta
×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Ron Paul calls on U.N. for help

thoughtfulbloke (1091595) writes | about a year and a half ago

1

thoughtfulbloke (1091595) writes "Maker or Taker? Ron Paul has gone to the United Nations' World Intellectual Property Organization to seize control of the RonPaul.com domain from the fans that built it up, rather than purchase it."
Link to Original Source

cancel ×

1 comment

Sorry! There are no comments related to the filter you selected.

That's Part Of The Contract (1)

mr.dillinger (2542624) | about a year and a half ago | (#42853049)

WIPO handles .COM domain disputes. Who else would he go to? Just because you don't support something doesn't mean you don't use it if that's the correct channel.

Ron Paul owns the trademark on his name. So if your name is Ron Paul then you have a strong case for fare use of the domain (the original owner had this). If it was a grass roots organization that did not do for profit work then it too would have a fair use argument (it is a for profit business though).

The truth is lots of people thought the .COM was his official site because it had his name and HIS FACE plastered all over it (read the angry people on the Facebook page). Not only that it was selling merchandise with his name and face all over it and taking donations (from many thousands of people apparently). This is a for profit business that is making a profit a profit from his name, likeness, trademark, and supporters. They contacted the trademark holder to sell the domain to him for a substantial profit (over $800,000) which is very much against the rules for trademarked .COM domains. They signed a legally binding agreement NOT to do this when the registered (or transferred) the domain. I know as I have done it hundreds of times.

He has every right to protect his trademark and avoid confusion by removing an "impostor" site. The most important reason for a trademark is to prevent "Likelihood of confusion" which certainly applies here. A big indicator of fraudulent registration is "not opportunistically trying to get value by using a well-known mark" which any site selling merchandise, advertising, and trying to contact the trademark owner to sell is certainly violating.
Check for New Comments
Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>