Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Scientific American censors blog post for not being scientific enough

rogue-girl (2837165) writes | 1 year,17 days


rogue-girl (2837165) writes "The popular science magazine 'Scientific American' is getting hard time after it removed a blog post by contributor DNLee, blogging at Urban Scientist. DNLee's post discussed integrity in science and misconduct from science communicators. DNLee has been approached by BiologyOnline staff Ofek who invited her to contribute. When DNLee asked for compensation details and learned she'd be writing for free, she kindly turned down the offer. In response, Ofek called her a "whore". DNLee wrote a post on her Scientific American blog, but the post was removed. It also appears that Biology Online is SciAm's partner, but SciAm's editor in chief Mariette di Christina claimed the partnership has nothing to do with the removal, but pulling it down is due to insufficient scientific content. DNLee's original post has been reposted here, and a Storify with (outraged) reactions is also available."

Sorry! There are no comments related to the filter you selected.

Ofek Has It Backwards (1)

Jeremiah Cornelius (137) | 1 year,17 days | (#45109677)

DNLee is not a "whore". He is a "rapist".

Puzzling (2)

barista (587936) | 1 year,17 days | (#45109987)

There are other posts at Scientific American that aren't about discovering science [] yet are allowed to remain. DNLee's original post should have should have been allowed to remain, since discussion about scientific integrity [] and the integrity of scientific [] publications [] , is often as important as science itself.
Check for New Comments
Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?