Beta

Slashdot: News for Nerds

×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Major Wikipedia donors caught editing their own articles

Anonymous Coward writes | about 4 months ago

7

An anonymous reader writes "As reported before on Slashdot, one of the most terrible sins on Wikipedia is to edit articles for pay, or otherwise violate the "neutral point of view" policy, per their co-founder Jimmy Wales. And yet, the Wikipedia-criticism website Wikipediocracy has recently performed a study showing that a large percentage of the Wikimedia Foundation's largest cash donors have violated that policy. Repeatedly, and wantonly. In short, they wrote articles about themselves or their companies, then gave the WMF big donations — and were not confronted about violating the NPOV policy. It reeks of outright favoritism. The first installment of an upcoming multi-part series discusses the co-creator of Cards Against Humanity, and his blatant editing of the Wikipedia article about his card game, followed by a $70,000 donation to the WMF. An honest donation, or hush money?"

cancel ×

7 comments

I have talked to the authors of this study (1)

metasonix (650947) | about 4 months ago | (#46453153)

And they say there is a LOT of outrageous behaviour in this area of Wikipedia editing. The card game is only "the tip of a large iceberg", whatever that means.

Re:I have talked to the authors of this study (1)

Stanistani (808333) | about 4 months ago | (#46461171)

Apparently this is just one in a series of blog posts that will tear open the veil over this serious problem.

COI is inevitable (1)

Stanistani (808333) | about 4 months ago | (#46453193)

Most anyone interested enough to navigate the hostile waters of Wikipedia has an interest in a subject, either through employment, advocacy, or just plain liking or disliking the topic of an article. The ‘Bright Line’ rule is doomed, as paid editing and advocacy is already rampant in Wikipedia. It’s time to manage this, not demonize it. I’m looking forward to subsequent chapters in this COI saga.

Re:COI is inevitable (2)

Andreas Kolbe (2591067) | about 4 months ago | (#46453221)

It's worth noting that the Wikipedia article was created four days before the launch of the game's hardcopy version. Basically, it would have supported the launch. In the 2013 Christmas season, the article got over 120,000 views (around 4,000 views a day throughout December 2013). Smart marketing.

Re:COI is inevitable (1)

Stanistani (808333) | about 4 months ago | (#46461163)

Illicit, perhaps, but smart marketing indeed. Oh, the Humanity!

WMF should return the donation (2)

thekohser (981254) | about 4 months ago | (#46453423)

Full disclosure: I authored the article that this Slashdot points to.

Since the Wikimedia Foundation takes such a firm position against financial conflict of interest editing, it stands to reason that if the WMF stands by its principles, it would return the $70,000 donation back to Cards Against Humanity. Does anyone think that the charity set up by Jimmy Wales would ever do that?

Is it any surprise (1)

lilburne (648606) | about 4 months ago | (#46453843)

Self promotion, political manipulation, corporate puffery, and revenge. All masquerading as some objective truth. Wikipedia is to knowledge, what arsenic is to nutrition.
Check for New Comments
Slashdot Account

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?

Don't worry, we never post anything without your permission.

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>
Create a Slashdot Account

Loading...