Beta
×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

ACLU and EFF Endorse Weaker USA Freedom Act Passed by Committee

sumakor (3571543) writes | about 5 months ago

1

sumakor (3571543) writes "The House Judiciary Committee has advanced a weakened version of the USA Freedom Act (HR3361). The amended compromise version allows collection of phone call records up to two hops away from a target, potentially including millions of customer records, and allows for collection without a judge's order in emergency cases. The amended bill also drops the requirement for a privacy advocate who can appeal the rulings of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court and extends the controversial Section 215 of the Patriot Act from 2015 through 2017.

Despite these significant changes the amended bill has been endorsed by the ACLU and the EFF as a first step and the most promising path towards reigning in government surveillance. The two organizations called for further Congressional measures to tighten control of surveillance authorities including an explicit definition of the term "selector," a reduction in the number of hops from 2 to 1 under most circumstances and the closing the loophole that allows searches of Americans' data inadvertently collected thru Section 702.

The bill now proceeds to the House Intelligence Committee, who has advanced its competing bill, the FISA Transparency and Modernization Act (HR 4291). The committee will mark up both bills on the same day, begining at 10am Thursday, behind closed doors.

https://www.aclu.org/national-...

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/...

http://www.nationaljournal.com..."

Link to Original Source

cancel ×

1 comment

Sorry! There are no comments related to the filter you selected.

The Freedom "to wiretap" Act (1)

AHuxley (892839) | about 5 months ago | (#46946115)

A lot of fine print in this color of law update.
Telcos demand ever more retroactive immunity. The NSA gets its "reasonable articulable suspicion" to keep on not having to face a real court in any real way per interesting person at two hops.
A lifetime of tracked US metadata is color of law legal, now fair game with less Fourth Amendment issues.
The same brands can 'legally' help, telcos can split their national backhaul and feed now legal parallel construction.
A digital Berlin Wall is now legal with all Fourth Amendment protections now legally degraded.
Welcome to a secret court where it has been decided that you wont get a Fourth Amendment, have to pay for a security cleared lawyer and that lawyers conversation with you will be 'saved'.
Evidence is something your cleared lawyer can see but never mention in public, tell you about or contest in an open court.
Your Fourth Amendment still exists, just not in that court setting :)
Check for New Comments
Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?