Beta
×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Comments

top

Blueprints For Taming the Climate Crisis

Alaska Jack Re:I live in Montana. I'm looking forward to it. (389 comments)

"Scum"?

I have no dog in this fight -- I wouldn't know Watt from Adam. I'm only commenting because I'm curious -- you do realize, right, then when people talk about how the science gets drowned out by immature idiots spouting partisan garbage, that they're talking about people like you? Right?

lllll AJ

about 3 months ago
top

The Pentagon's $399 Billion Plane To Nowhere

Alaska Jack I don't believe a word of it. Here's why. (364 comments)

If there's one thing the big Obamacare debates on Slashdot taught me, it's that the government CAN be trusted to faithfully and competently handle giant, complex projects. The government exists outside your petty notions of supply and demand. I am sure -- SURE -- that these problems must be imaginary.

lllll AJ

about 3 months ago
top

Tech Workforce Diversity At Facebook Similar To Google And Yahoo

Alaska Jack I, simply, don't believe it. (265 comments)

My entire life, I've been told diversity is a critical component of success -- building a robust and varied environment out of people from a range of different experiences, etc.

Now you're telling me that two of the most successful companies on the entire planet are, in fact, super homogeneous?

Yeah, right. This flies in the face of everything I was indoctrinated to believe.

lllll AJ

about 4 months ago
top

Can the ObamaCare Enrollment Numbers Be Believed?

Alaska Jack Re:Not so fast, cowboy ... (723 comments)

Good point. It was also a little surreal to have the SC rule that the mandate was, in effect, a tax, when the official position of the administration -- i.e., the ones pushing the law in the first place -- was that it was NOT a tax.

See here, for just one of many examples:

"The White House argued on Friday that the individual mandate at the heart of Obamacare is a penalty, not a tax, contradicting the Supreme Court's 5-4 ruling a day earlier upholding the historic health care law. " -- http://abcnews.go.com/Politics...

lllll AJ

about 6 months ago
top

Microsoft: Start Menu Returns, Windows Free For Small Device OEMs, Cortana Beta

Alaska Jack Re:Cortana (387 comments)

SuricouRaven -- what do you recommend as far as the best place to find instructions for doing this?

lllll AJ

about 7 months ago
top

UN Report: Climate Changes Overwhelming

Alaska Jack MOD PARENT UP (987 comments)

Is he right? I don't know. But whoever modded him "Troll" should be really fucking ashamed of themselves.

lllll AJ

about 7 months ago
top

The Quiet Fury of Former Secretary of Defense Robert Gates

Alaska Jack Re:in other words... (341 comments)

I'm not sure what you are asserting. If the motion was "We should tax every American a dollar a year, and give that money to Alaska Jack," then would I support it? Of course. Does that mean it would be good for the country? No.

about 9 months ago
top

The Quiet Fury of Former Secretary of Defense Robert Gates

Alaska Jack Re:in other words... (341 comments)

You don't understand.

*I* was going to refer the the "fireman first" principle -- I just didn't think I needed to.

The fireman-first principle (Or Washington Monument syndrome) is a *conservative/libertarian* argument, not a progressive one. Notice how it is attributed to National Review? It basically states that when taxpayers express a wish to scale back the size or scope of government, politicians often fight to preserve it by threatening to cut, not areas that are wasteful or inessential, but essential or highly visible government services -- like firemen.

That this principle exists does not mean that National Review doesn't think the size or scope of government should be restrained. It doesn't mean "Oh well, politicians will threaten to cut the police force, so we should just keep feeding the beast." As even a moment's thought would make obvious, I would have thought.

lllll AJ

about 9 months ago
top

The Quiet Fury of Former Secretary of Defense Robert Gates

Alaska Jack Re:Cranky for a military takeover, are we? (341 comments)

1. As demonlapin points out, you don't understand how tax brackets work.

2. Tax experts have pointed out, literally hundreds of times, that the attacks against Romney's income tax rate were politically motivated sound-bites meant to outrage people like you, who don't understand how taxes work. Here are just a couple of links: http://www.realclearmarkets.com/articles/2012/01/19/media_promote_myths_about_romneys_15_99470.html
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/09/27/1137048/-The-myth-of-Romney-s-tax-rates

It took me ten seconds to google "Romney tax myths"

3. Your source includes no claim or evidence that Romney "cheats on [his] taxes." The ones who decide whether or not a person is "cheating on his taxes" is the IRS. To my knowledge, the IRS has never accused or indicted Romney of tax fraud. Please tell us all how you know otherwise.

lllll AJ

about 9 months ago
top

The Quiet Fury of Former Secretary of Defense Robert Gates

Alaska Jack Re:in other words... (341 comments)

"Blindly "tightening the purse strings" leads to those parts of government that are good and useful to be sacrificed first, while the partisan and corrupt parts better defend themselves and their budgets. So, instead of a progressive nation of healthy, happy, nutritionally fed, employed, well educated citizens in a nation focused on freedom, scientific and technological advancement, we have become the secretive spymasters and bullies of the world, looking for the next war to line the pockets of the oligarchs, while the bigoted, ignorant masses fight from paycheck to paycheck, if they can find a job, until they die from easily preventable disease, if they survive the worst infant mortality rate of any first world nation."

There's no evidence for this, and a moment's thought will reveal that it flies in the face of common sense and historical evidence. As the federal government has grown, it has steadily expanded its scope far beyond what the framers seem to have intended... and it's consumed more money to do so.

"The worst infant mortality" part just shows your bias. It's been shown time and time again that this claim is misleading. (In a nutshell, it's because the US counts nearly every pregnancy, even those where the fetus is for various reasons given very little chance of survival. Other countries "write off" these problematic pregnancies and births. This is how Cuba, for example, claims to have a lower IM rate that the US, which is preposterous given the level of care available there.)

"Instead of demanding that the money be taken away, we should be demanding that the places where the money is being mis-spent be stopped"

Huh?

lllll AJ

about 9 months ago
top

The Quiet Fury of Former Secretary of Defense Robert Gates

Alaska Jack Re:he's a Conservative Republican (341 comments)

Exactly right. There's nothing mysterious here; these are not mutually exclusive qualities. The fact that the OP thinks they are suggests some confirmation bias on his part -- i.e., he is looking too hard for something to disagree with.

lllll AJ

about 9 months ago
top

The Quiet Fury of Former Secretary of Defense Robert Gates

Alaska Jack Re:in other words... (341 comments)

Funny -- my immediate reaction to this quote was not that it reflected the modern age, but that it was *timeless.* I could easily see John Adams or James Madison expressing nearly identical sentiments.

lllll AJ

about 9 months ago
top

Justine Sacco, Internet Justice, and the Dangers of a Righteous Mob

Alaska Jack Re:Mob or no mob, this was DUMB (399 comments)

Erich -

These are good questions, but see my two other comments in this thread.

I could care less about defending this girl, and I can certainly agree it was stupid to send out any tweet about race or AIDS that could in any way be misconstrued.

But that doesn't change the fact (I believe) that people ARE misconstruing it.

As I've noted, the tweet makes far more sense if you read it as sarcasm, and imagine the girl giving an eye-roll as she says it.

Again, one can still say it was stupid, especially for a PR professional. But while that would suggest that she (at least occasionally) has bad professional judgement, having poor judgement is much less of a sexy crime than being a racist.

(And note that, if you read the tweet as sarcasm, it would in fact suggest she is anti-racism, since she was *parodying* what she sees as racist ideas).

lllll AJ

about 10 months ago
top

Justine Sacco, Internet Justice, and the Dangers of a Righteous Mob

Alaska Jack Re:What if she hates what is going on there? (399 comments)

SCHecklerX -

Actually, as I noted in my comment upthread, that's the only context in which the tweet itself makes any sense.

I have no interest in "spinning" it. I'm not a progressive, and I suspect this girl is. I think she expected that her "followers" all knew her to a certain degree, and would know she was being sarcastic.

People should try this: Read the tweet in question. Then, read it again, this time picturing the girl rolling her eyes as she says it. Takes on completely different meaning, doesn't it?

lllll AJ

about 10 months ago
top

Justine Sacco, Internet Justice, and the Dangers of a Righteous Mob

Alaska Jack Re:Another Case of Poe's Law? (399 comments)

Jah-Wren -

You are right, and 95 percent of the super-justified, self-righteous commenters on here are just making themselves sound foolish.

The tweet only makes sense as a work of sarcasm -- like walking outside during a rainstorm and saying "Wow -- great day!" In person, the way you convey sarcasm is with a turn of voice and an eyeroll. We all do things like this all the time. It's just that allowance for this type of expression don't exist on Twitter.

I am not a progressive and have little sympathy for that worldview. But it's relatively obvious to me that this girl is a progressive who was sarcastically *parodying* the white-privilege view put forth in her tweet. She obviously thought her "followers" would understand that.

This fact, which you've picked up on, has gone over the heads of nearly everyone else here. No one even wants to stop for a second and actually think about it.

lllll AJ

about 10 months ago
top

The College-Loan Scandal

Alaska Jack Re:Administrative Costs are the problem (827 comments)

"Adminstrative Costs are the problem."

Well, no, they're not. They're a SYMPTOM of the problem, that is causing many people to confuse cause and effect.

It's not "Rising administrative costs cause universities to charge more."

It's "Increased demand, propelled by government subsidization of costs (i.e., cheap loans), allows universities to raise prices to the point where they can afford to spend lavishly."

lllll AJ

about a year ago
top

The College-Loan Scandal

Alaska Jack Re:Good intentions pave the road to hell (827 comments)

Yeah, pretty much exactly what I was going to say. His comments are mostly spot on. But, the government is ALWAYS harmful? Even the most hard-core libertarians don't believe THAT.

lllll AJ

about a year ago
top

The College-Loan Scandal

Alaska Jack Newsflash: Gov't prints money, prices increase (827 comments)

Ah -- the Law of Unintended Consequences strikes again!

This is exactly what classical, supply-and-demand economics would predict.

Most of us understand why the government can't just print more money. The price of everything would just go up.

This is exactly the same scenario. The only difference is that in this case, the government is printing a special kind of money -- money that can only be used for one thing. It is no surprise when then price of that thing just goes up accordingly.

Subsidies (i.e., cheap loans) increase demand. Increased demand causes the price to rise.

Consider:

* The US massively subsidizes education. The price of education rises far beyond the rate of inflation.

* The US massively subsidizes housing. The price of housing rises far beyond the rate of education.

* The US massively subsidizes health care. The price of health care rises far beyond the rate of inflation. (Except, of course, the kinds of health care -- like cosmetic surgery -- that do not typically get subsidized. Costs in these areas have plummeted.)

I don't pretend to have an answer to this dilemma. The only really clear thing is that the laws of supply and demand aren't *statutory* laws, that can just be altered with a pen and a lot of hand-waving. They are fundamental natural laws, and well-intentioned attempts to manipulate markets (from student loans to price-control regimes) almost always trigger equal and opposite consequences.

The real shame is that important issues like these are so easily demagogued. Even though the system is clearly broken, no politician in his right mind would ever propose changing it. "Look!" people would scream. "He hates education! And poor people!"

about a year ago
top

Google Raises Campaign Funds For Climate Change Denier

Alaska Jack Re:Investment (365 comments)

Rates have never been lower, and congress has never bee more corruptible.

I'm not disagreeing with you -- mostly I agree with you -- but I think you skipped the most important thing. Government has never been more powerful, which means lobbying has never been so worthwhile -- indeed, necessary. Centralizing power and decision-making makes it obvious where wealthy parties should be making their investments: at the center. That's why of America's 10 wealthiest counties, six of them surround Washington DC.

Also -- I thought it odd that every single thing you presented in your second paragraph as a hypothetical is in fact already happening all around us (carbon sequestration and other Solyndra-type debacles, higher-priced fuel formulations, huge research grants, etc.).

lllll Alaska Jack

about a year ago

Submissions

top

EPA: Broken CFL Bulb? Better read this.

Alaska Jack Alaska Jack writes  |  more than 3 years ago

Alaska Jack (679307) writes "Break a CFL light bulb? Not to worry: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has released instructions for cleaning up the mess. Might want to grab a sandwich and settle in — the instructions are three pages long. 'This cleanup guidance,' the EPA helpfully notes, 'represents the minimum actions recommended.'"
Link to Original Source
top

New leads in 1982 Tylenol poisoning cases

Alaska Jack Alaska Jack writes  |  more than 5 years ago

Alaska Jack (679307) writes "Authorities today raided the home of a man previously considered a suspect in the 1982 deaths of seven people via cyanide-tainted Tylenol. He was convicted in 1983 for writing blackmail letters to Johnson & Johnson, the makers of Tylenol, and served more than 12 years for extortion; however, he has always denied doing the actual poisoning. The FBI isn't commenting on any specific new evidence, except to say the search was prompted by a review of existing evidence, and that they had received numerous new tips about the case on the occasion of its 25th anniversary. I had always wondered about this case. I didn't realize they ever had any suspects."

Journals

top

Weird SlashDot experience

Alaska Jack Alaska Jack writes  |  about 10 years ago

So I get one of those e-mail messages about "comment moderation." I open it up, and check this out:

5 moderations
1 for each of my most recent comments
Every single one "overrated."

Isn't that funny? Someone has so little of a life that they felt compelled to look at my history, open my most recent comments, and mod them all as "overrated."

It's not like I care. It's just hard to imagine taking all that trouble to go and do that. I mean, really -- go outside. get a life.

      - AJ

Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?