Beta
×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Comments

top

Apple Doesn't Design For Yesterday

Anonymous Brave Guy Re: I don't follow (364 comments)

It's general knowledge in typography that Helvetica is the most legible typeface.

That is very much convention wisdom, yes.

It really isn't. Helvetica is actually a relatively awkward typeface to work with, particularly for body text. Its default tracking/kerning are tight for extended reading, its glyphs have quite inconsistent width fittings, and it has various problems with similar-looking glyphs that are easily mistaken for one another, which also makes it a less than ideal choice for user interfaces. Don't mistake popularity or endurance for quality.

2 days ago
top

Cisco Exec: Turnover In Engineering No Problem

Anonymous Brave Guy Re:It's interesting what Cisco is becoming. (148 comments)

It's not as if Cisco's acquisitions have always been completely independent, though -- look at their connections to Insieme Networks for example -- so I'm not sure you're really comparing apples to apples with those figures.

3 days ago
top

Cisco Exec: Turnover In Engineering No Problem

Anonymous Brave Guy HR idealism vs. the real world (148 comments)

Lest somebody misunderstand, the very essence of an enterprise (any enterprise) is that it is a bundle of labour and capital whose essential structure and identity is independent of and more persistent than the labour it employs.

That's a horrible oversimplification, but let's take it as read for the purposes of this discussion.

It is for this reason that any contemporary HR policy is aimed at (and this is important) divorcing the work from specific individuals.
What this means is that all and any employees must (and this is essential) be plug-replaceable as a matter of policy.

Unfortunately, if you adopt that policy, you have immediately and severely restricted your ability both to hire and retain the most effective staff and to build the most productive teams.

It is obvious that HR would love for employees to be plug-replaceable in such a way, and it is obvious why. However, the reality is that in a creative industry, and particularly in one related to technology, no two employees offer exactly the same potential contributions. If as a matter of policy you won't hire or depend on anyone with unique contributions to offer, then almost by definition you're only going to have staff with typical combinations of widely available skills and no special experience or unique insights to draw upon.

However, given that the creative component of technology companies is often where much of their value comes from, a business that can't or won't hire the most creative people is always at risk of a competitor disrupting their business model with a new product, service, distribution model...

Moreover, technology can be a dramatic effectiveness multiplier. A single smart, creative person using the best technologies can sometimes outperform an entire team of mediocre people with average technologies. More importantly, in scalable fields like software and on-line services, a relatively small team of smart, creative people with complementary skill sets and the best technologies has the potential compete with a much larger organisation on raw effectiveness, before you even consider the overheads that the larger organisation must bear.

Finally, one of the major factors in maintaining productivity and developing existing technological assets and IP is keeping sufficient knowledge and expertise available within the development team. That can be done through good documentation, tools, processes and so on, but in reality this very rarely happens and word-of-mouth advice is a far more efficient and effective way to pass information around. Of course, if you treat everyone as replaceable you not only forego that most efficient mechanism but also incur the very substantial overheads of trying to use other documentation and tools to compensate. In short, high turnover is an efficiency killer in technical teams where shared knowledge is a vital asset.

If you think all of this is nonsense, you might consider that this is a discussion about Cisco, whose main business model is currently facing an existential threat from modern technologies like SDN. I'm guessing you're a business studies or MBA student, so you might like to consider the commercial relationships between Cisco and the likes of Amazon, Facebook and Google as a case study for what can happen. Cisco's recurring model of spinning out and later buying up side companies to do the R&D for innovative technologies would also make an interesting case study.

3 days ago
top

If Your Cloud Vendor Goes Out of Business, Are You Ready?

Anonymous Brave Guy Re:incremental backups (150 comments)

Gosh, I'm running out of "I told you so" moments lately. First it turns out that Open Source networking software can have spectacularly serious security vulnerabilities after all. Then it turns out that Linux is not immune to worms and other malware. Now you're telling me that outsourcing everything to a remote system and remote staff of unknown competence, unknown security, unknown reliability, unknown solvency and business planning, and assorted other uncontrolled risks might not always be the best solution to every problem in computing? Seriously? :-)

about a week ago
top

Windows Users, Get Ready For a Bigger-Than-Usual Patch Tuesday

Anonymous Brave Guy Any standard source for reliable info on updates? (63 comments)

Does anyone know of a site or mailing list specifically dedicated to checking out the new updates and rating how safe and reliable they are to install? I've had far too many stability and performance problems after installing recommend updates to trust Microsoft's "Install this update to make {some important but unspecified change} to Windows" messages any more. However, life's too short to keep running a search on every update ID every month to see which ones are getting red flagged.

about two weeks ago
top

Brits Must Trade Digital Freedoms For Safety, Says Crime Agency Boss

Anonymous Brave Guy Re:Leader quotation bingo (264 comments)

I decided four quotations was enough to make my point, but that observation by Mencken was nearly the fifth. It comes to mind every time some government minister talks about repealing the Human Rights Act and cites the difficulties they've had in deporting a tiny number of high profile people as their justification.

about two weeks ago
top

Brits Must Trade Digital Freedoms For Safety, Says Crime Agency Boss

Anonymous Brave Guy Re:Leader quotation bingo (264 comments)

To borrow a well-known retort, if you outlaw encryption then only outlaws will use encryption. How does opening everyone else up to fraud, identity theft, and all the other problems encryption helps to fight on-line do anything to prevent bad people from communicating securely when encryption tools are widely available?

about two weeks ago
top

Brits Must Trade Digital Freedoms For Safety, Says Crime Agency Boss

Anonymous Brave Guy Re:Leader quotation bingo (264 comments)

That is all true, but it's difficult to have that sensible debate when one side's argument is expressed with approximately the intellectual and ethical rigour of "there are scary people out there who you should be scared of, and if you don't let us do anything we want no matter the other consequences then those scary people will kill other people and it will be your fault".

about two weeks ago
top

Brits Must Trade Digital Freedoms For Safety, Says Crime Agency Boss

Anonymous Brave Guy Re:That's How Law Works (264 comments)

I honestly don't know what point you're trying to make here. Do you understand that the Human Rights Act is national law, and that the rights and freedoms within its scope can therefore be protected by our own courts without necessarily resorting to any action at European level?

about two weeks ago
top

Brits Must Trade Digital Freedoms For Safety, Says Crime Agency Boss

Anonymous Brave Guy Re:Leader quotation bingo (264 comments)

Are we talking at cross-purposes here? My point was that plenty of people who do presumably have access to the whole picture, including sensitive details about security procedures and threat assessments and whatever else goes on behind closed doors, still lean toward liberty over security on this issue.

For example, right now the Lib Dems are in government. Their leader is the Deputy PM. They have MPs on relevant select committees in Parliament. As such, it is reasonable to assume that at least some senior Lib Dems have access to sensitive information about any identified threats that are out there. And yet they still all seem to oppose the so-called snooper's charter, citing similar civil liberties concerns to the rest of us.

about two weeks ago
top

Brits Must Trade Digital Freedoms For Safety, Says Crime Agency Boss

Anonymous Brave Guy Re:Leader quotation bingo (264 comments)

Of course. But when people who have literally led governments or armed forces can still maintain that position, any appeal to blind trust by an authoritarian government must surely demand a healthy degree of scepticism.

about two weeks ago
top

Brits Must Trade Digital Freedoms For Safety, Says Crime Agency Boss

Anonymous Brave Guy Re:That's How Law Works (264 comments)

All laws involve giving up freedom to do a certain thing, usually in exchange for security or safety for the society.

That is a reasonable ethical argument in favour of having laws, but unfortunately it is sometimes quite far from how the world really works. Laws are made by a small group of people, subject to a wide range of influences, most of which are not promoting the best interests of the population. Ideally, the democratic machinery of a government ensures that the population's interests still outweigh the other factors, but I think we all know this doesn't always happen.

The primary benefit of a formal constitution is to establish that certain principles are so important that they must be beyond the reach of whatever small group of lawmakers happens to hold power at any given time. To some extent, our Human Rights Act here has served a similar purpose in recent years, but of course the Tories want to get rid of that as well. In the absence of effective safeguards like this, as we have seen all too often in recent years, the politics of fear can dominate the agenda.

about two weeks ago
top

Brits Must Trade Digital Freedoms For Safety, Says Crime Agency Boss

Anonymous Brave Guy Leader quotation bingo (264 comments)

It's almost like playing quotation bingo with these issues now.

"Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves." -- Pitt the Younger

"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- Benjamin Franklin

"The problem in defense is how far you can go without destroying from within what you are trying to defend from without." -- Dwight D. Eisenhower

"Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it." -- George Santayana

about two weeks ago
top

Object Oriented Linux Kernel With C++ Driver Support

Anonymous Brave Guy Re:Why do people still care about C++ for kernel d (365 comments)

C certainly can have some magic happening under the covers, but it's an order of magnitude less than what goes on in C++.

Well, that's exactly the assumption I'm questioning. Certainly it was true once, but I'm not sure the gap is anywhere near that wide any more. It's not just about the differences written into the language specs, like overloading and construction/destruction in C++. It's also about all the things that aren't specified at all but matter in practice.

Perhaps the balance will shift back a bit now that both C and C++ have incorporated more detailed semantics in some of the tricky areas into their recent specifications, particularly in terms of the memory access model and concurrency, but even that is just the headline example at the top of a long list.

about two weeks ago
top

Object Oriented Linux Kernel With C++ Driver Support

Anonymous Brave Guy Re:Why do people still care about C++ for kernel d (365 comments)

It seems you missed my point. Both C and C++ have huge amounts of non-obvious things going on under the surface with modern compilers and processors/hardware architecture. The parts of C++ that add further implicit behaviours really aren't that big a deal in comparison, and ruling out C++ for systems programming on the grounds of magic happening and expecting C to be much better in that respect is highly optimistic.

about two weeks ago
top

Object Oriented Linux Kernel With C++ Driver Support

Anonymous Brave Guy Re:Why do people still care about C++ for kernel d (365 comments)

One of the real powerful things about C, especially for writing an operating system, is that a good C programmer can look at a piece of C code and have a pretty good idea of the machine code being generated.

For better or worse, that hasn't really been true for a long time now. Modern processors and the related architecture have become so complicated that generating correct, efficient code is an extremely specialist skill. Once you move beyond toy examples with basic flow control and arithmetic, it's common today that what you get out of a C compiler won't seem to bear much resemblance to what you put in, unless you happen to be one of the handful of people in the world who really is an expert in compiler technology and code generation on your particular platform.

about two weeks ago
top

Object Oriented Linux Kernel With C++ Driver Support

Anonymous Brave Guy Re:Why do people still care about C++ for kernel d (365 comments)

With C you just need to follow the code without worrying about a constructor being called or an operator being overloaded.

Until your compiler starts optimizing things.

Or anyone mentions "#define".

Or you have to worry about concurrency.

Or interrupts.

Or memory-mapped I/O.

The claim that C++ does lots of magic but C does not is one of those mythical ideas that makes us feel better about deciding to use C for some systems programming job, but really there's plenty of magic that goes on in both. If you're working on things like operating systems or device drivers, you simply have to know how your code is going to compile in all kinds of situations. Next to that, the differences where C++ systematically provides for things like construction/destruction or overloading are relatively minor concerns.

about two weeks ago
top

UK Copyright Reforms Legalize Back-Ups, Protect Parody

Anonymous Brave Guy Re:EUCD is (approximately) DMCA for the UK (68 comments)

We are talking specifically about the UK in this discussion. It's right there in the title.

In the UK, circumvention of technical measures is illegal even if it is otherwise legal to make the copy itself. There is really no ambiguity about any of this. It is fully enshrined in the laws of each relevant jurisdiction within the UK, it has been for years, it has been tested in court and it stood up, and nothing in the reforms we're discussing changes the situation.

All the discussion about DMCA and EUCD and what happens in other European countries is just a distraction from these basic facts and does not change them.

about two weeks ago

Submissions

top

YouTube blocking premium music videos in UK

Anonymous Brave Guy Anonymous Brave Guy writes  |  more than 5 years ago

Anonymous Brave Guy (457657) writes "What happens when the might of Google clashes with the might of Big Media? We're about to find out: after failing to negotiate a licensing deal with the PRS (one of the UK's collective licensing bodies for music), YouTube has simply pulled the plug, and as of 6pm Monday, premium music videos will start disappearing for visitors from the UK. From the BBC article, it seems the PRS asked for an unspecified but large increase in the royalties, and when Google worked out that they would actually be losing money on the service at that price, they firmly declined. The PRS has asked YouTube to reconsider as a "matter of urgency"."
Link to Original Source
top

Virgin's demise: illustrating the problem with DRM

Anonymous Brave Guy Anonymous Brave Guy writes  |  about 7 years ago

Anonymous Brave Guy (457657) writes "The BBC have an interesting article up today about the demise of Virgin Digital, which has offered music on a monthly subscription system, and how this is leaving their customers in a jam because they signed up to a DRM-based subscription service. This is no doubt not a new concern to many here, but it's the second real-life example of such a service folding within a matter of weeks, and interesting that a well-regarded mainstream news source is now openly condemning DRM and vendor lock-in, and advising people to avoid such services."
Link to Original Source
top

Anonymous Brave Guy Anonymous Brave Guy writes  |  more than 7 years ago

Anonymous Brave Guy (457657) writes "The BBC reports that CD-Wow, the third largest on-line music retailer in the UK after Amazon and Play, has been found in contempt of court for selling illegally imported CDs into the UK. Describing the verdict as "CD woe", the company claimed that all they were doing was bringing CDs into the UK that had been legitimately purchased from the big media companies elsewhere, with any breach of copyright down to human error, and that "At a time when the record industry is losing vast revenue to piracy, it seems ludicrous that they can set out to destroy a section of the market that is actually making them money.""
top

Anonymous Brave Guy Anonymous Brave Guy writes  |  more than 7 years ago

Anonymous Brave Guy (457657) writes "The Gowers Review of Intellectual Property, a large-scale, government-commissioned review of the current IP framework in the UK, has today published its final report. The report itself doesn't seem to be available yet, but the government's response (which includes a summary of the Gowers recommendations) is contained in the pre-budget report, linked from the same site.

Highlights include: proposing much stronger enforcement/penalties for infringement of IP rights, possibly including a fast-track litigation process and up to 10 years in prison for on-line copyright infringement; introducing a "private copying" exception to legalise format-shifting; and a recommendation that the European Commission should not extend copyright protection in sound recordings and performers' rights any further than the existing 50 years.

The government seems to be endorsing the Gowers recommendations pretty much in their entirety, and in particular has acknowledged the recommendation on not extending copyright terms via the European back door."
top

Anonymous Brave Guy Anonymous Brave Guy writes  |  about 8 years ago

Anonymous Brave Guy (457657) writes "It looks like Tesco, the UK's biggest supermarket, is planning to take on software giants like Microsoft with a new range of cheap, own-brand software covering office apps, photo editing and more. Tesco's Daniel Cook said, "When it comes to software there is little choice and prices are high. Our new range of software changes this." There's no sign yet on Tesco's web site, but an October date is mentioned in the BBC article. Sounds like a good time to be buying sell options... But in which company?"

Journals

Anonymous Brave Guy has no journal entries.

Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?