Beta

×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Comments

top

Ebola Outbreak Continues To Expand

BergZ Re:Scale? (167 comments)

"A virus with high mortaility and rapid spread will rapidly kill all susceptible individuals within it's catchment area, so it's likely that such things have never really gotten off the evolutionary drawing board."

Generally speaking I agree, but only when the virus is lethal to all susceptible individuals.
If the virus is non-lethal to some susceptible individuals then those individuals could become carriers (a reservoir where the virus can continue reproduce but does not kill its host). Carriers are how a virus can have a high mortaility and rapid spread without becoming an evolutionary dead-end.

In the case of Ebola I have heard that it is suspected that fruit bats are carriers. If it is true that fruit bats are Ebola carriers then I think that means Ebola has some susceptible individuals (humans) where it is highly lethal and some susceptible individuals (fruit bats) where it is non-lethal.

about a week ago
top

NASA: Lunar Pits and Caves Could House Astronauts

BergZ Re:AGW Activists Took Notice (157 comments)

When you bring up climate science (and the people who advocate climate science) on an article about moon caves it makes you sound like a deranged cultist.
Just save your hateful sniping for the next climate change article. Slashdot has at least one every week.

about two weeks ago
top

Peer Review Ring Broken - 60 Articles Retracted

BergZ Re:climate science, conspiracy, scientists (178 comments)

I see you've decided to use an article that has nothing to do with climate change as an excuse to make snide comments about climate science and the people who advocate it.
I usually associate that kind of behavior with people who have a "____ derangement syndrome" (they make everything about the topic/person they hate most: Obama or Bush, Liberals or Conservatives, Communists or Capitalists, Secularism or Religion, etc).

about three weeks ago
top

Climate Change Skeptic Group Must Pay Damages To UVA, Michael Mann

BergZ Re:That is not how conspiracy theories work. (497 comments)

"If you think a whitewash of 5 reports makes all of this ok ... [logical fallacy (ad hominem) omitted]"

I have seen the "skeptics" of climate change state that the independent investigations were, as you have said, "a whitewash" yet they've never provided a shred of credible evidence to support that statement. Prove it (let's just get this out of the way: blogs & op-eds do not count as evidence).
It is time for you to put-up or shut-up.

All I've seen so far is you "skeptics" complaining about getting exactly what you asked for (you asked for "an audit of climate science") but it didn't arrive at the conclusion you wanted (the conclusion you wanted "climate science is a hoax/fraud/scam")!

about three weeks ago
top

Climate Change Skeptic Group Must Pay Damages To UVA, Michael Mann

BergZ Re:"Thus ends "Climategate." Hopefully." (497 comments)

You say:

"Science is not supposed to be driven by consensus."

It isn't and nobody ever said it was. You're arguing against position that nobody believes.
Scientific consensus is only important as a signal to the general public. When a scientific consensus forms around a new theory it signals that the evidence for a theory is so strong that it has convinced a large majority of scientists in a field of study that the theory is accurate. It tells us "you can take the theory seriously now".

You say:

"You are supposed to design a theory that makes worthwhile predictions about some aspect of the real world and then test it in the real world to ensure it actually predicts stuff."

I'm not a Climatologist but I'm pretty sure that is exactly what they've been doing: Making predictions and testing them.
I suspect that the recently launched Orbiting Carbon Observatory satellite is going to collect data that will be used to test some predictions climate science has made about the sources and sinks of carbon.

about three weeks ago
top

Climate Change Skeptic Group Must Pay Damages To UVA, Michael Mann

BergZ Re:"Thus ends "Climategate." Hopefully." (497 comments)

You know how Creationists like to repeat (over and over and over again) "it's just a theory!" about Evolution?
Personally I just roll my eyes at that argument because I can see that they're trying to conflate the scientific use of the word "theory" and the common use of the word "theory".
Your argument is no better.
You are trying to conflate the scientific use of the word "consensus" with the common use of the "consensus".
There is a difference.

about three weeks ago
top

Climate Change Skeptic Group Must Pay Damages To UVA, Michael Mann

BergZ Re:That is not how conspiracy theories work. (497 comments)

"If what occurred at CRU is within normal bounds of science then science is in a sad state of affairs."

I've heard reports that the number of scientific papers being retracted is rising in all fields of study, so I have to ask:
How do you know that what occurred at the CRU is not "within normal bounds of science"? You can't actually know that unless we can read the work related emails of all scientists in all fields of study to objectively compare them... and that's where a sincere argument for greater scientific transparency begins:
A sincere argument for greater scientific transparency starts with new rules that apply generally to all scientists in all fields of study regardless of who pays for their research (public or private funding). That's how you raise the bar for scrutiny when you genuinely care about the quality of science.

The American Traditions Institute is not genuinely interested in greater scientific transparency, they're just interested in casting doubt on a specific scientist (and his specific field of study) because they have deemed his research "heresy" to their politics.

about three weeks ago
top

Climate Change Skeptic Group Must Pay Damages To UVA, Michael Mann

BergZ Re:That is not how conspiracy theories work. (497 comments)

There were at least 5 independent investigations launched as a result of Climategate and none of them found any evidence of scientific malpractice. That is to say the emails didn't reveal anything about Climatology that isn't happening in every other branch of scientific research.

Say, but on the topic of scientific malpractice: Did you hear what happened to the climate change "skeptic" journal Pattern Recognition in Physics?
The nepotism and scientific malpractice became so rampant that the publisher actually had to shut the whole thing down (it was becoming an embarrassment)!

about three weeks ago
top

Climate Change Skeptic Group Must Pay Damages To UVA, Michael Mann

BergZ Re:Modern Day Anti-Evolutionists (497 comments)

Creationists blame Christopher Hitchens for "polarizing the Evolution debate"... and I do not accept their argument.
The Creationists are wrong about that because:
(1) Hitchens (like Gore) is not a scientist. You can not draw any conclusions about the validity of a scientific theory on the basis of the statements of non-scientists.
(2) It doesn't matter how Hitchens said what he said. We are all responsible for deciding what we believe. Responsible people ignore the polarization and examine the arguments logically. Idiots blame their dismissal of science on "the other guy" for not being nice.

If I wouldn't accept the "that guy polarized the debate" argument from Creationists; why would I accept it from you?

about three weeks ago
top

Climate Change Skeptic Group Must Pay Damages To UVA, Michael Mann

BergZ Re:That is not how conspiracy theories work. (497 comments)

Nope. Mann's work, just like every other scientist on the planet, should be judged on the basis of what he has published.
We all know why ATI wanted access to Mann's emails: So that they could cherry-pick some juicy out of context quote to smear Mann with.

about three weeks ago
top

Study: People Would Rather Be Shocked Than Be Alone With Their Thoughts

BergZ Re:Sad, sad times... (333 comments)

The AC reply to your comment points out this study was conducted with people ranging in age from 18 to 77 (same results) ... but isn't it interesting that you read the results of one study and you knee-jerk to complaining about "the kids these days"?
Since your core premise is wrong the rest of your comment reveals a lot about who you are:
It tells me (1) that you are very judgmental, and (2) that your misconceptions about the young are protected by a strong confirmation bias.
How else could you fail to notice that this wasn't just about young people?

about a month ago
top

NASA Launching Satellite To Track Carbon

BergZ Re:what a waste of money (190 comments)

geekoid's comments are usually quite good; insightful and frequently accompanied with evidence & sources.
It looks like geekoid just misread the comment that he/she is replying to. Happens to the best of us.

about 1 month ago
top

NASA Launching Satellite To Track Carbon

BergZ Re:You would think. But you would be wrong. (190 comments)

"... they are convinced that government funding of scientific research is one of the factors contributing to their tax liability."

The people who say that are just making up excuses to dismiss the conclusions of scientific research.
In that way they're no different than Creationists who claim that Evolution is "just some secular hoax to fool the faithful".

... And they don't even consistently apply their "government money" argument: You never hear them make those sorts of complaints about the results from the LHC (that costed about ~$9billion split across many nations).

about 1 month ago
top

Girls Take All In $50 Million Google Learn-to-Code Initiative

BergZ Re:Want to code? (548 comments)

What's wrong with funding for programs that teach girls how to code? Do you read what you write before you press submit?

about a month ago
top

Girls Take All In $50 Million Google Learn-to-Code Initiative

BergZ Re:Want to code? (548 comments)

I read the headline and knew right then that somebody would find a way to turn this good news into something to complain about.

about a month ago
top

Strange New World Discovered: The "Mega Earth"

BergZ Re:pffff.. (147 comments)

Replying to undo accidental mod.

about 2 months ago
top

Data Mining Shows How Down-Voting Leads To Vicious Circle of Negative Feedback

BergZ Re:Do not feed the trolls. (293 comments)

We are told "Do not feed the trolls." But some cannot resist. Why are some incapable of letting the troll starve and vanish?

... because we are also told "the cure for bad speech is more speech".
When a troll posts misinformation (especially those long debunked arguments) I think the people who reply are not attempting to convince the troll (trolls can't be convinced):
They're trying to persuade the reasonable readers with facts and better information.

about 2 months ago
top

'The Door Problem' of Game Design

BergZ Re:Easy answers (305 comments)

Agreed.
Here's what happens to me occasionally when doing a "fetch quest" in a video game: I can't find the last item needed to complete the quest. I got all the others, but the last one is hidden away somewhere and I can't move the game forward a single inch until I find that very last one.
So I ask myself "What rooms haven't I been in?", "What doors haven't I opened?", "What box/crate/container haven't I looked in?" etc.
... and off I go exhaustively searching for that very. last. one.

I would hate to have to go searching through hundreds of mundane "template rooms" & closets that contain nothing of interest.

about 3 months ago
top

Retired SCOTUS Justice Wants To 'Fix' the Second Amendment

BergZ Re:Militia, then vs now (1633 comments)

"I would love to round up all these people and force them into "first amendment zones" where we can control their speech, like the government tried to do in Nevada."

Your gleeful fantasy of oppressing the supporters of gun control is sickening to anyone with a functional moral compass.

about 3 months ago
top

Jenny McCarthy: "I Am Not Anti-Vaccine'"

BergZ Re:Typical denialist tactic (588 comments)

She should just call herself a vaccine "skeptic".
Suddenly her reputation will go from anti-science loon, to hero of "free-thinkers" (aka conspiracy nutjobs) for challenging the scientific consensus about vaccines!

about 4 months ago

Submissions

top

Greenhouse gas level nearing 'significant' level

BergZ BergZ writes  |  about 2 years ago

BergZ (1680594) writes "The world's air has reached what scientists call a troubling new milestone for carbon dioxide, the main global warming pollutant.
Monitoring stations across the Arctic this spring are measuring more than 400 parts per million of the heat-trapping gas in the atmosphere. The number isn't quite a surprise, because it's been rising at an accelerating pace. Years ago, it passed the 350 ppm mark that many scientists say is the highest safe level for carbon dioxide. It now stands globally at 395."

Link to Original Source
top

Global warming 'undeniable,' report says

BergZ BergZ writes  |  about 4 years ago

BergZ (1680594) writes "Scientists from around the world are providing even more evidence of global warming.
"A comprehensive review of key climate indicators confirms the world is warming and the past decade was the warmest on record," the annual State of the Climate report declares.
Compiled by more than 300 scientists from 48 countries, including Canada, the report from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration said its analysis of 10 indicators that are "clearly and directly related to surface temperatures, all tell the same story: Global warming is undeniable.""

Link to Original Source
top

High-carbon ice age mystery solved

BergZ BergZ writes  |  more than 4 years ago

BergZ (1680594) writes "The Ordovician ice age happened 444 million years ago, and records have suggested that CO2 levels were relatively high then. But when Seth Young of Indiana University in Bloomington did a detailed analysis of carbon-13 levels in rocks formed at the time, the picture that emerged was very different. Young found CO2 concentrations were in fact relatively low when the ice age began."
Link to Original Source

Journals

BergZ has no journal entries.

Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?
or Connect with...

Don't worry, we never post anything without your permission.

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>