Announcing: Slashdot Deals - Explore geek apps, games, gadgets and more. (what is this?)

Thank you!

We are sorry to see you leave - Beta is different and we value the time you took to try it out. Before you decide to go, please take a look at some value-adds for Beta and learn more about it. Thank you for reading Slashdot, and for making the site better!



Meet the DoJ's 'Anti-Piracy' Lawyers

BlckKnght The threat of Decentralization and Anonymity to IP (721 comments)

Some introductory material first:

Projects like Freenet, GNUnet and IIP are creating decentralized, anonymous Peer-to-Peer networks that can strongly resist censorship by any attacker. I believe that if (when?) these kinds of secure networks replace currently popular networks (FastTrack, IRC, etc) as IP infringement tools, your job of effectively finding, stoping and prosecuting IP infringers will become much, much harder, and will require many more computer resources (perhaps impossibly many resources, both in computing time and in network bandwith).

Now my questions:

For how long do you think mass IP infringement will continue to take place in plain view, rather than on decentralized, anonymous, P2P networks?

If mass IP infringment does move to those kinds of networks, what kind of resources will your office be able to expend to attack those networks?

Would you be allowed to attack those networks at all without violating their user's First Ammendment right to anonymous speech?

What changes to IP law do you think would be needed to address decentralized anonymous networks?

more than 11 years ago


BlckKnght hasn't submitted any stories.


BlckKnght has no journal entries.

Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?