Beta
×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Comments

top

The $1,200 DIY Gunsmithing Machine

CanHasDIY Re:Honestly, rifles are not the problem (540 comments)

But studies show that most people that commit suicide do not 'really want to commit suicide'.

Now, I've seen some bizarre, nonsensical anti-gun arguments in my day, but this one...

I think you just got yourself into the running for Worst Argument Ever - Of All Time.

Congrats?

yesterday
top

The $1,200 DIY Gunsmithing Machine

CanHasDIY Re:Honestly, rifles are not the problem (540 comments)

There really needs to be some sort of "drops mic, walks off stage" tag for posts like this one...

In addition to MLK, I would also like to point out that the people we refer to (with pride) as our nation's "founding fathers" were, to the last man, capital criminals. Traitors, thieves, murderers... hell, by today's standards they'd either be labelled "terrorists" or "the honorable Senator from ______."

yesterday
top

The $1,200 DIY Gunsmithing Machine

CanHasDIY Re:Honestly, rifles are not the problem (540 comments)

Pistols are also the best self-defence weapon

Dogs are the best self-defence weapon.

Fuck yea they are. But they shouldn't be your only self-defense weapon. What if someone with a gun breaks in and shoots your dog?

yesterday
top

The $1,200 DIY Gunsmithing Machine

CanHasDIY Re:Honestly, rifles are not the problem (540 comments)

Pistols, however, are used by criminals, by people committing suicide, and by kids playing around with them. As a direct result, over 30,000 people die every year after being shot with a pistol.

You left a group out: pistols are also used by law-abiding citizens to defend themselves from criminals.

How many of that 30,000 were violent felons who deserved to be shot? More than none, I promise you, and I'm glad for it - IMO, a woman's right to not be raped far exceeds a rapists right to life.

yesterday
top

The $1,200 DIY Gunsmithing Machine

CanHasDIY Re:ugh (540 comments)

Ban automatic transmissions. That'll keep a good share of the inept off the road.

Throw in lane-sensing bullshit, self-parking, and all that other nonsense that allows shitty drivers to think they aren't shitty, you'll have my vote.

yesterday
top

The $1,200 DIY Gunsmithing Machine

CanHasDIY Re:ugh (540 comments)

Good. As a libertarian, gun owner, voter, and not insane person, I understand that there needs to be SOME government regulation of guns. There is no reason not to try something to prevent insane people from getting firearms.

I agree.

They're going to murder anyway,

I disagree.

If you have a subset of the population presenting a threat to the rest, wouldn't it make more sense to separate them from everyone else, rather than try with futility (and inevitably fail) to essentially un-invent a tool?

If America treated mental illness like, you know, a fucking illness rather than a crime, we probably wouldn't even be having this discussion.

yesterday
top

The $1,200 DIY Gunsmithing Machine

CanHasDIY Re:Why? (540 comments)

besides, it's not like the tanks are firing rockets into neighborhoods with fighter jets.

"tanks" == "cops"

Funny typo, but far from my best (or would it be worst?) work.

yesterday
top

The $1,200 DIY Gunsmithing Machine

CanHasDIY Re:Why? (540 comments)

I've never met a true anti-gun person. Every person I meet who argues that the general public shouldn't have (or only have very restrictive) access to guns also argues that the police should be allowed to use guns to enforce this argument. This is not an anti-gun argument. This is a monopolization of force argument.

If you as the opposite of "monopolization of force" think that there should be a balance of force between citizens and government and a real option of fighting the government, then you should start arguing for private ownership of real military heavy weaponry -- rockets, bombs, machine canons, armed fighter jets, attack helicopters, etc. Having hand guns in the hands of citizens is a joke in this context.

Reductio ad absurdum; besides, it's not like the tanks are firing rockets into neighborhoods with fighter jets.

All we need is an equalization of force: cops get tanks, we can have tanks; cops get machine guns with grenade launchers, we get them.

Of course, you're probably assuming TPTB would turn our own (actual) soldiers against us.. trouble with that is, they're going to be hard-pressed to convince guys like my brothers to start killing their own families over an ideology. Ever wonder why our soldiers are spread across the globe, rather than defending their own home turf?

Because soldiers are trained to use tanks and bombs to secure freedom, not take it away.

yesterday
top

The $1,200 DIY Gunsmithing Machine

CanHasDIY Re:Why? (540 comments)

Why would you want an untraceable weapon? I cannot think of any ethical reason.

To quote the great Ace Ventura, "That's none of your damn business, Dan, and I'll thank you to stay out of my personal life."

yesterday
top

The $1,200 DIY Gunsmithing Machine

CanHasDIY Re:Anarchy is all fun and games... (540 comments)

> A democracy is all fun and games, until you get shot in the head,

+ ...by a cop.

+... who gets 2 weeks paid vacation as a "punishment."

yesterday
top

The $1,200 DIY Gunsmithing Machine

CanHasDIY Re:Anarchy is all fun and games... (540 comments)

"Wilson's goal is still to render government gun regulation useless"

That's more than just making a gun.

It's also nothing close to anarchy.

yesterday
top

The $1,200 DIY Gunsmithing Machine

CanHasDIY Re:Government gun regulation is useless (540 comments)

And the thread is Godwined. Awesome.

The fact that the only response you have is a childish raising of the internet meme banner, I'm confident that my points stand valid, and that you, in fact, do not have a reasonable nor rationale counterargument.

Thanks for conceding the point, although I do wish you kids would find more grown-up ways to do so.

yesterday
top

The $1,200 DIY Gunsmithing Machine

CanHasDIY Re:Government gun regulation is useless (540 comments)

Amount of guns doesn't mean unregulated.
In Sweden we have plenty of guns but even the complete gun-nuts wouldn't leave a gun unattended.

Because knowledge of firearms and their proper use and storage is part of your culture.

Here in the US, when intelligent, reasonable gun advocates push for bringing firearms education back into our schools (as was the case in many places 40 years ago), the anti-gun people scream and whine about how we're trying to "indoctrinate" their kids into liking guns.

Please do us all a favor and talk to these anti-gun weirdies (my word) - coming from one of the Scandinavian cultures they seem to consider so much more civilized than our own, they might actually listen to you.

yesterday
top

The $1,200 DIY Gunsmithing Machine

CanHasDIY Re:Anarchy is all fun and games... (540 comments)

Armed confrontation with the state will not work. Syria is most recent historical example,

Um... is that the same Syria where large portions of the country have been taken over by rebels engaged in an armed confrontation with the state?

Sure you want to use that one as your example?

yesterday
top

The $1,200 DIY Gunsmithing Machine

CanHasDIY Re:Government gun regulation is useless (540 comments)

Your entire argument is that if you take something away, it can't be used anymore by crazy, bad, or angry people. That is a logical argument. So, why don't we just round up everyone that we think is crazy, bad, or angry and put only them into jail. That should stop the violence also, shouldn't it??? How about a law that says if you threaten someone, you are put into jail for 20 years to make sure you can't. What if we pass a law that says that if someone is scary, they also get put into jail. How about we pass a law that says the nice, quiet guy that lives next door, never bothers anyone, always says hi, is also thrown into jail just in case he goes nuts.

Dude!

Don't give those nosy fuckers any more ideas!

yesterday
top

The $1,200 DIY Gunsmithing Machine

CanHasDIY Re:Government gun regulation is useless (540 comments)

ie, you're 40 times more likely to get killed by a gun in the US than in UK, but sure.. believe what you like.

Go look up the statistics for what social group would be most likely to be holding that gun that shoots you.

Hint: They wear badges and roam the countryside extorting the population at the behest of the feudal-minded lords and ladies of their domain.

But yea, let's keep arming them with tanks and machine guns, and keep disarming everyone else. That will surely work out for the best.

yesterday
top

The $1,200 DIY Gunsmithing Machine

CanHasDIY Re:Government gun regulation is useless (540 comments)

Not true. Gun regulation is a statistical win.

Yea, look at how well it worked out for Hitler an Mao.

The first guy killed what, 6-8 MILLION people shortly after disarming them?

"Statistical win," so fuck the losers, right? That's what they get for being on the wrong side of power, fucking plebes.

yesterday
top

The $1,200 DIY Gunsmithing Machine

CanHasDIY Re:Hope He Continues (540 comments)

But the availability of guns is far lower so the rates of homicide and other deaths due to guns is also far lower.

No shit, Sherlock; and you may also be shocked to discover that countries with lower availability of blenders have lower rates of blender-related injuries and deaths.

What irritates me about that particular talking point, besides how contrived and stupid it is, is that the people who espouse it are basically saying, "if you didn't get hurt or killed by a gun, fuck you because you don't matter."

Which I find to be pretty fucked up thinking, myself. FYI, a number of those nations with lower gun death rates have exponentially higher rape and violent mugging rates. So "less guns" doesn't equate to the chocolate-rainbows-and-sexy-unicorns utopia that busybodies seem to think it would.

yesterday
top

The $1,200 DIY Gunsmithing Machine

CanHasDIY Re:Hope He Continues (540 comments)

I'm not anti-gun by any means, but how do "We need more guns!" people respond to the fantastic Onion article headline? Yes there have been shootings in Germany and Norway and other places, but do you think it's merely a coincidence that the USA has so many more than other countries for any reason other than the fact that we're all packing?

Oh that's easy, they respond by saying hammers kill people and dodging the subject.

Hammers don't kill people any more than any other inanimate object... such as a gun.

If guns kill people, then cars cause drunk driving, spoons make people fat, and houses make people agoraphobic.

yesterday

Submissions

top

Man criticizes Southwest employee, booted from flight and threatened with arrest

CanHasDIY CanHasDIY writes  |  about 2 months ago

CanHasDIY (1672858) writes "The old saying goes, "if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all." A man from Minnesota learned the consequences Sunday, after Tweeting about his experience with a rude Southwest gate attendant:

A Minnesota man and his two sons were asked to leave a Southwest Airlines flight after the man sent a tweet complaining about being treated rudely by a gate agent... he agent told him that he would have to wait if he wanted to board with his children. Watson replied that he had boarded early with them before and then sent out a tweet that read "RUDEST AGENT IN DENVER. KIMBERLY S. GATE C39. NOT HAPPY @SWA."

After he boarded, an announcement came over the plane asking his family to exit the aircraft. Once at the gate, the agent said that unless the tweet was deleted, police would be called and the family would not be allowed back onboard."

He gave into the threat, deleted the Tweet, and was allowed to board a later flight (with his sons). Southwest, as one could have predicted, offered a boilerplate "apology" and vouchers for more terrible service.

As of this post, no word on the rude agent's current employment status.

"

Link to Original Source
top

Worst Idea Ever? Missouri DOT Considers Assaulting Speeders With 150dB Cannon

CanHasDIY CanHasDIY writes  |  about 6 months ago

CanHasDIY (1672858) writes "The Missouri DOT has come up with a... let's say 'novel' solution to the issue of drivers speeding through work zones: Fire a 153dB LRAD sound cannon at their windshield.

MoDOT employee Michele Compton claims the device will only be triggered by speeders (however they choose to define that term), and that "The sound easily penetrates the windshield and well-insulated cab of a car, even overriding the vehicle's engine sounds and a radio turned up loud enough to jam to tunes at highway speeds."

Several people have brought up valid questions about the system's use — will it be able to tell if it's pointed at a car or a motorcycle, and compensate appropriately, or just blast the poor biker off the road? Aside from the obvious physical danger such a weapon would cause if deployed on a busy highway, there's also a more Orwellian component to be concerned with: Tasers were originally issued to police officers as less-than-lethal "deterrent" devices, and the scope of their use has crept into "compliance" territory. How long before the government is using the military grade weaponry such as the LRAD not to punish lawbreakers, but to control the populace in general?

Oh, wait, that already happened."

Link to Original Source
top

Retired SCOTUS Justice Wants to "Fix" the Second Amendment

CanHasDIY CanHasDIY writes  |  about 6 months ago

CanHasDIY (1672858) writes "In his yet-to-be-released book, Six Amendments: How and Why We Should Change the Constitution, John Paul Stevens, who served as an associate justice of the Supreme Court for 35 years, believes he has the key to stopping the seeming recent spate of mass killings — amend the Constitution to exclude private citizens from armament ownership. Specifically, he recommends adding 5 words to the 2nd Amendment, so that it would read as follows:

“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms when serving in the Militia shall not be infringed.”

What I find interesting is how Stevens maintains that the Amendment only protects armament ownership for those actively serving in a state or federal military unit, in spite of the fact that the Amendment specifically names "the People" as a benefactor (just like the First, Fourth, Ninth, and Tenth) and of course, ignoring the traditional definition of the term militia. I'm personally curious as to what his other 5 suggested changes are, but I guess we'll have towait until the end of April to find out."

Link to Original Source
top

GunGeoMarker App Finally Shows its True Colors (And They're Hideous)

CanHasDIY CanHasDIY writes  |  about a year ago

CanHasDIY (1672858) writes "The GunGeoMarker app for Android, which is probably the worst non-malware app ever thought up, updated in a way that completely changes the functionality of the program: instead of a garbage program that brings up a static map of your current location and only allows users to enter a single, 30-character-or-less post, the app now (via a button labeled, "What the Project Really Is: HONEYPOT" ) opens your web browser and directs you to the author's latest masturbatory blog post, in which Brett Stalbaum showers himself with praise for the success of the 'project,' as well as removing what little functionality existed in the first place.

  Apparently the whole point of this exercise was to give an excuse for Stalbaum to demonize those with differing opinions, as well as justify some self-inflicted back patting. Kudos, I guess?"
top

MIT: One Step Closer to 3D Holography, Better Medical Imaging

CanHasDIY CanHasDIY writes  |  about a year and a half ago

CanHasDIY (1672858) writes "Remember that scene in Back To The Future: Part II, where Marty is 'attacked' by the holographic Jaws? Researchers at MIT's Research Laboratory of Electronics have gotten one step closer to such a technology: record-setting Optical Phase Arrays that can actively steer light, in the form of a 4,096-emitter array that fits on a single silicon chip. From TFA:

Chips that can steer beams of light could enable a wide range of applications, including cheaper, more efficient, and smaller laser rangefinders; medical-imaging devices that can be threaded through tiny blood vessels; and even holographic televisions that emit different information when seen from different viewing angles.

Neat."
Link to Original Source

top

Valve Pulls a Sony, Eliminates Right to Sue in Newest Steam Subscriber Update

CanHasDIY CanHasDIY writes  |  about 2 years ago

CanHasDIY (1672858) writes "Per an article on PCGamer:

Valve has made some major changes to the Steam Subscriber Agreement, changing the way it handles customer disputes and banning any class action lawsuits over the service. In both cases, it informs us, this is for everyone’s own good – ours as customers, and Valve’s as a company.

The specific paragraph from [Valve's] blog post goes like this:

“It’s clear to us that in some situations, class actions have real benefits to customers. In far too many cases however, class actions don’t provide any real benefit to users and instead impose unnecessary expense and delay, and are often designed to benefit the class action lawyers who craft and litigate these claims. Class actions like these do not benefit us or our communities. We think this new dispute resolution process is faster and better for you and Valve while avoiding unnecessary costs, and that it will therefore benefit the community as a whole.”

Considering the decidedly less-than-noble motivations of others whose practices Valve is emulating (I'm looking at you, Sony... you too, EA), this submitter finds that statement dubious at best, as well as wondering what recourse, if any, current Steam subscribers will have to avoid being forced to either agree to get screwed, or lose access to our games."
Link to Original Source

top

Verizon Wireless Goes Ahead With "Bucket" Data Plans

CanHasDIY CanHasDIY writes  |  more than 2 years ago

CanHasDIY (1672858) writes "Previously, it was reported that Verizon was considering eliminating their current data plan scheme, as well as the grandfathered unlimited plans, in favor of a new 'bucket' plan in which up to 10 devices would share a data allotment. Verizon officially acknowledged it today, called the "Share Everything" plan, which will go into effect as of June 28, 2012;
according to USA Today:

Under the new pricing plan, a smartphone customer opting for the cheapest data bucket, 1 gigabyte, will pay $90 before taxes and fees ($40 for phone access and $50 for 1 GB). Customers can add a basic phone, laptop and tablet to share data for $30, $20 and $10, respectively.

Those of us still grandfathered into the unlimted plan will be forced to either sign up for Share Everything, or one of the tiered pricing plans currently in effect."
Link to Original Source

top

New Samsung TV Watches You Watching It

CanHasDIY CanHasDIY writes  |  more than 2 years ago

CanHasDIY (1672858) writes "Straight out of 1984, Samsung has unveiled a new series of telescreens with integrated cameras and microphones, complete with facial and voice recognition software. Best of all, there appears to be no physical indication of the mic and camera's status, so consumers have no way of knowing when they're being monitored, or by whom... and if you don't find the idea of a TV that watches you creepy enough, apparently Samsung's Terms of Service include a clause allowing third-party apps to make use of the monitoring system, and use the data gathered for their own purposes.

Nothing Orwellian about that..."

Link to Original Source
top

Nokia Applies for Vibrating Tattoo Patent

CanHasDIY CanHasDIY writes  |  more than 2 years ago

CanHasDIY (1672858) writes "Tired of waiting for the Pip-Boy or Omni-Tool to be invented? Never fear! Nokia is developing the basic technology needed to make your dreams a reality: haptic-feedback tattoos. According to the patent application, Nokia is proposing “a material attachable to skin, the material capable of detecting a magnetic field and transferring a perceivable stimulus to the skin, wherein the perceivable stimulus relates to the magnetic field.”

Basically, the process is the same as for normal tattooing; the difference is in the ferromagnetic ink.

Kind of brings new meaning to the term "embedded device," doesn't it?"

Link to Original Source
top

U.S. Congress Quietly Criminalizes Protesting

CanHasDIY CanHasDIY writes  |  more than 2 years ago

CanHasDIY (1672858) writes "From Huffington Post:

H. R. 347, better known to those in the DC beltway as the 'Trespass Bill' — potentially makes peaceable protest anywhere in the U.S. a federal felony punishable by up to 10 years in prison. H. R. 347, and it's companion senate bill S. 1794, make protest of any type potentially a federal offense with anywhere from a year to 10 years in federal prison, providing it occurs in the presence of elites brandishing Secret Service protection, or during an officially defined 'National Special Security Event' (NSSE). NSSEs , ( an invention of Bill Clinton) are events which have been deemed worthy of Secret Service protection, which previously received no such treatment... Past NSSE events included the funerals of Gerald Ford and Ronald Reagan, and the national security concern that was Superbowl XXXVI. Other NSSE protected events include the Academy Awards and the 2008 Democratic and Republican National Conventions... HR 347 & S. 1794 insulates such events as the G-8, WTO and presidential conventions against tough questions and politically justified protests.

"

Link to Original Source
top

New Android App Combines Business, Pleasure

CanHasDIY CanHasDIY writes  |  more than 2 years ago

CanHasDIY (1672858) writes "According to PCWorld, German IT firm Fraunhofer have developed a system of dividing a single Android smartphone into two; one for personal use, and one for business. The technology, known as BizzTrust, will be displayed at the IT-SA trade show running at the Nuremberg Exhibition Centre until October 13; a generic explanation of the software is available in PDF format here."
Link to Original Source

Journals

top

Obama and Romney respond to ScienceDebate.org questions - paraphrased

CanHasDIY CanHasDIY writes  |  about 2 years ago

Converting candidate responses from legalese to English, please wait...*

Question 1: Innovation and the Economy:

BO: I plan on dumping at least twice as much money into corporate pocketbooks via the continued fucking-up of the US intellectual property process. Oh, yea, and I plan on hiring a shitload of STEM teachers to prep future patent lawyers, er, "engineers" for this task.

MR: Less taxes and regulation for businesses, more H1B Visas and foreign "trade agreements" that take jobs away from Americans.

Question 2, Climate Change:

BO: Sure, it's a problem, but I've already dumped a shit-ton of your money into the "clean energy" companies my buddies own, as well as attempting to set up a "carbon credit exchange" scam, er, system, that would have funneled even more taxpayer dollars into the hands of my campaign contributors - what the fuck else do you expect me to do about it?

MR: Probably bullshit, but I won't let my disbelief in the concept prevent me from using this as an opportunity to badmouth my opponent and recommend further redistribution of wealth to my also-rich homies!

Furthermore, since China doesn't give a fuck about the environment, I don't think we should either.

Question 3: Research and the Future:

BO: Uh, like I said before - more of the public's money given to corporations so they can privately profit; seriously, what don't you guys get about that?

MR: Agreed, with the caveat of, you guessed it, less regulation for the same corporations. After all, corporations are people, and if you can't trust people with your money...

Question 4: Pandemics and Biosecurity:

BO: ... Pass.

MR: Less taxes and regulation on business... Oh, and more public surveillance. How are we supposed to know who's sick if we're not watching you all 24/7?

Question 5: Education:

BO: Earlier in my administration, I proposed adding 100,000 STEM (science, tech, engineering, and math) teachers... just don't ask how that's going...

MR: Education is a serious issue these days... which is why I recommend busting teachers' unions, defunding public schools in favor of private "charter" schools, and of course, blaming the current abysmal state of education solely on my opponent.

Question 6: Energy:

BO: Hey, I mentioned giving fuck-tons of taxpayer money to my buddies who run "clean energy" companies, right?

MR: I disagree with my opponent; I think we should be giving fuck-tons of taxpayer money to the oil companies my buddies run instead.
Can I getta 'Keystone Pipeline,' anyone?

Question 7: Food:

BO: Food safety was pretty fucked up when I came to office, so I made new rules that changes what qualifies as 'fucked up.'

MR: More government regulation and taxes. Hey, if those agri-business chumps want the same deal I give the oil and pharmaceutical companies, they need to pony up some campaign bucks, ya dig?

Question 8: Water:

BO: My administration has invested millions in fresh water conservation and restoration efforts. Granted, these programs would have existed anyway regardless of who held this office at the time, but hey - I do, so I get to take the credit. Suck it, Bush.

MR: Disband the EPA, less regulation on businesses, privatize the 'fresh water industry'.
What could possibly go wrong?

Question 9: The Internet:

BO: I promise to ensure online freedoms, granted they don't run afoul of all the new intellectual property and civilian surveillance we have/are coming up with.

Ha ha, remember when I told you I was going to veto CISPA? Suckers...

MR: The internet is for businesses to make money off of. Period. End of discussion. If you're somehow, some way preventing businesses from making as much money as possible from the internet, my administration will come down on you like fucking Mjölnir, you filthy fucking anti-capitalist pirates.

Question 10: The Ocean

BO: Funneling money into the Gulf to try and fix the problems caused by the Deepwater Horizon disaster. Also, I'll again take credit for several state-level programs I had nothing to do with.

MR: Government should handle this, never you mind. Seriously, we got this one, and unless you work for the government or the industrial fishery complex, it's really none of your concern. Now fuck off, peasant.

Question 11: Science in Public Policy:

BO: Science is, like, important, so I try to have my decisions guided by science. The decisions I let the media get wind of, anyway. Probably not a whole lot of science to, say, monitoring the communications of every American, so we just do it.

MR: Stupid nigger doesn't even know what 'science' is... If he did, he'd know the Earth is only about 6,000 years old, man rode dinosaurs, and Darwin was a Marxist.

Question 12: Space:

BO: Dude - Under my leadership, NASA put a fucking SUV equipped with some serious instrumentation on MARS. More in the works, stay tuned!

MR: Hey, so long as the military industrial complex and my campaign-funding buddies can make shitloads of money off of it, why not?

Question 13: Critical Natural Resources:

BO: Rare earth minerals are expensive, and the Chinese don't seem to keen on cutting us any deals, so my administration is looking into alternative materials that can be gathered domestically. We're also working on some electronics recycling programs that show real promise - stay tuned, more to come.

MR: Government regulation is the problem, not material scarcity; deregulate the mining companies, and the rare earth minerals will flow from the ground like water from a busted hydrant. Oh, also - Drill, baby, Drill!

Question 14: Vaccination and public health:

BO: Look, a lot of people don't get the proper vaccinations because they're just too damn expensive. So, I (and by I, I mean Congress) passed the Affordable Care Act, which... uh, which... OK, so it doesn't really do anything to get prices down, and in fact will likely increase the price of healthcare due to the compulsory insurance purchasing requirement... can't win 'em all! :3

MR: Less regulation for the pharmaceutical industry, and forced inoculation for the entire populace. Small government, you know?

--- END TRANSCRIPT ---

top

Setting up a Gmail account -- funny things

CanHasDIY CanHasDIY writes  |  more than 2 years ago So, I'm making a Gmail account for my in-law's business, and I'm to the part where you have to create a password. Just for a giggle, I entered 'fuckgoogle' into the box - here's where it gets funny:

Password - as soon as I got to the 'l' in the password, the strength meter jumped all the way to the top, but when I entered the final letter, it jumped right back down to the weakest.

Date of Birth - will only let you create an account if the DoB is between 1 and 150 years ago.

OK, so not that funny.

Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?