Beta
×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Comments

top

Apple Edits iPhone 6's Protruding Camera Out of Official Photos

CanadianRealist Re:Where are the links? (425 comments)

frnic:

I went to Apples site and looked around - there were no side views to be seen - hmm.

AC points out that there is a side view and provides a link. frnic:

I followed it and found none of the "edited" photos you claim are there. I found ONE photo that showed the iPhone from an angle that showed the camera bulge and the bulge was there...

Your original claim was that there was no view from the side. There clearly is. So it sounds like you are accusing someone of having created fake photos, rather than showing photos from the Apple site.

The camera bulge is not visible in that photo. Maybe, as some suggest, the angle is such that the lens is not visible. Or maybe the photo was edited. But you were trying to deny that there were any photos from the side - the AC pointed out that there is, it's the fourth image on the page. That's true whether coming from an AC or a logged in user.

I don't see anywhere in the AC's post where he says the photos were edited. Nor did he claim that there were no photos in which the bulge is visible. So one can at least wonder if that photo was edited. You were trying to claim there was no photo to wonder about.

about a month ago
top

Canada Tops List of Most Science-Literate Countries

CanadianRealist Re:Biased (221 comments)

I guess it was for the 13% of people who got the wrong answer. I liked the following quote in the CBC article:

"While 87 per cent knowing that the earth goes around the sun is pretty good, that still leaves 13 per cent of Canadians that haven't absorbed the scientific knowledge of several centuries ago," Ingram said.

It was also a pretty tough question for the Catholic church for quite a long time. And their top guy is supposed to have a direct line to the guy who created the universe.

And then there are also plenty of people who still have problems with the second question, about humans evolving from earlier species.

about 2 months ago
top

Canada Tops List of Most Science-Literate Countries

CanadianRealist Re:The problem with beaurocrats. (221 comments)

I live near the border and I can see all the wealthy Canadians bypass the socialized system by coming down here with cash.

Now look across the border and see the non wealthy Canadians who still get treated* without going bankrupt just because they got sick. Who don't have to worry about what a trip to the doctor will cost when they need treatment. (*Get treated, including preventative care, without having to wait until problems become serious enough to justify a trip to the emergency room.)

The US health care system may be really good for the wealthy, but it really is not so good for the non wealthy people who can't afford it. We socialist Canadians think everyone should have health care.

about 2 months ago
top

Canada Tops List of Most Science-Literate Countries

CanadianRealist Re:Biased (221 comments)

The linked article is not very clear. There's much better coverage on the CBC site.

The study considered two different things, scientific literacy, and level of reservations towards science.

The "we depend too much on science..." was from the second part - about reservations towards science.

The science literacy part asked questions like:
Does the sun go around the earth or does the earth go around the sun?
Human beings as we know them today developed from earlier species of animals. True or false?
Electrons are smaller than atoms. True or false?

about 2 months ago
top

Snowden Granted 3 More Years of Russian Residency

CanadianRealist Re:Not about leverage or influence (266 comments)

Your reason for doing something and whether or not you are brave or a coward are two very different things.

Suppose someone was willing to jump into a cage with multiple wild animals likely to attack them, just for the fame. Would you call them a coward?

In the case of Snowden he might refuse a deal because he doesn't trust the government. And many would say he's smart to do so, there are plenty of examples of the government and the NSA lying already.

about 2 months ago
top

Verizon's Accidental Mea Culpa

CanadianRealist Re:Verizon's Response (390 comments)

Woosh? Continuing from the part I quoted:

Maybe they can't afford the small piece of cable between our two ports. If that's the case, we'll provide it.

Does that sound serious to you? I'm sure the part about them being willing to provide the cable is serious. The part about maybe Verizon not being able to afford the cable ... probably not. Verizon are trying to get other people to pay for the service their customers are already paying them to provide. They have to justify that somehow. L3 seems to be pointing out how ridiculous Verizon is being. I was just piling on.

Oh and:

Not very apparent - seems confusing

I'm pretty sure that subtracting "seems confusing" from "Not very apparent" yields 0. ;-)

about 3 months ago
top

Verizon's Accidental Mea Culpa

CanadianRealist Verizon's Response (390 comments)

Level3 also offered to pay for the necessary upgrades to Verizon hardware: "... these cards are very cheap, a few thousand dollars for each 10 Gbps card which could support 5,000 streams or more

Verizon's response was "Ok, but these cards tend to wear out pretty quickly so we'll need you to pay that amount each month. 5,000 streams may sound like a lot, but they don't last very long. A person watches a few movies a week, maybe a couple of youtube videos per day, that's like 20 streams in one week, and that's only one customer. Before you know it, you've used up all 5,000 of those streams and the card needs to be replaced."

"Oh yeah, and if it's coming from Netflix then we're using twice as many streams. We use one stream from Netflix to us, then another stream from us to our customers. Maybe you should really pay us that amount every week."

about 3 months ago
top

Study Finds Porn Exposure Associated With Smaller Brain Region

CanadianRealist Re:Striatum (211 comments)

This is interesting. I posted elsewhere the idea that something like a "striatum deficiency" (as you phrase it) may be the cause of my depression and frequent porn watching. I didn't think of ADHD, but a few years ago I was diagnosed as having ADHD.

about 5 months ago
top

Study Finds Porn Exposure Associated With Smaller Brain Region

CanadianRealist Re:everyone's a brain scientist now (211 comments)

As someone with a long history of depression and high intelligence I've spent quite a bit of time trying to understand my condition. One thing I've noted frequently is that I tend to derive less enjoyment than other people from most activities. (I think this is a cause of the depression rather than a result of it.) The most notable exception is sexual gratification, whether from sex with a partner or from masturbation. I don't find this surprising as I think that it is such a basic part of the way our brains are wired. Given that I am not in a relationship more often than I am, I frequently watch porn to masturbate.

So in my case, I'd say it seems likely that a deficiency in the part of the brain associated with reward processing causes a greater exposure to porn.

about 5 months ago
top

Studies: Wildfires Worse Due To Global Warming

CanadianRealist Re:No, no it's not. (379 comments)

Fourthly, there's good reason to believe that at least some of the ones this week were started by (d-bag) arsonists.

The claim is that climate change is making the fires worse. That's very different than the question of how any one fire started.

Your argument is like pointing to a smoker killed in a car crash and saying "see, cigarettes don't cause cancer."

Maybe someone did start some of the fires. That's happened in the past as well. The real question is, are the fires worse now? From the article: in the 80's an average of 2.9 million acres burned each year, from 2010 to 2013 it was 6.4 million acres per year. That sounds quite a bit worse. Maybe the last few years were just unlucky years, or maybe the fires really are getting worse.

Maybe it's statements like yours from "non-scientists" arguing issues other than the ones raised that are confusing things.

about 5 months ago
top

The Design Flaw That Almost Wiped Out an NYC Skyscraper

CanadianRealist Re:Missing the obvious? (183 comments)

But wind produces considerably less force at angles.

True, which is why that is not normally considered. But in this case the lack of support at the corners made the building particularly vulnerable to diagonal forces. That was the point I was trying to make with the Lego example. And if you're designing such an unusual building maybe you should consider more than just the first "first obvious choice" for what could go wrong.

about 6 months ago
top

The Design Flaw That Almost Wiped Out an NYC Skyscraper

CanadianRealist Re:Missing the obvious? (183 comments)

No, they didn't.

LeMessurier had accounted for the perpendicular winds, but not the quartering winds.

With only the forces of the perpendicular winds considered and reported, the contractor's decision was ok. While it is true that the bolts were weaker than the welds would have been, they were strong enough to handle the forces the design specified. There's a quote by LeMessurier in the podcast that says this.

about 6 months ago
top

The Design Flaw That Almost Wiped Out an NYC Skyscraper

CanadianRealist Missing the obvious? (183 comments)

I know hindsight is 20/20 but not considering the effect of wind hitting the corners of the building seems unbelievable. With no support at the corners it seems obvious* that the easiest way to cause a failure would be to apply force directed towards a corner. TFA does say that wind at the corners is not usually an issue, but when designing something so radically different you have to consider the effects of those differences.

*For anyone who has ever played with Lego: imagine building something that looks like that building and think of the easiest way to push it over. Consider how you control the direction when felling a tree.

about 6 months ago
top

Google: Our Robot Cars Are Better Drivers Than You

CanadianRealist Re:Yup, and it doesn't matter. (722 comments)

I also think that autonomous vehicles will be much safer than human-driven vehicles. We can keep making them better based on experience while on the other hand we would keep adding new inexperienced human drivers. I'm sure that we can correct any problems that we may find with early autonomous vehicles. I doubt that we'll ever be able to correct human distraction, emotional reactions, bad judgement and general stupidity.

Do you have any stats on the percentage of accidents caused by physical wear and tear on brakes rotors and axles? Or on the "other thousands of extraneous factors" that you've considered? How do those compare to the percentage caused by any sort of human error?

The following claims human error is the sole cause 57% of the time and a contributing factor 90% of the time, while mechanical fault is the sole cause only 2.4% of the time.

about a year ago
top

Snowden Says He Took No Secret Files To Russia

CanadianRealist Re:Not shared by him doesn't mean a thing (220 comments)

TheRaven64 says there are a million people with the same clearance level and asks what are the chances that none are Chinese agents. You counter by making them all sysadmins who are all* stealing other people's credentials. And you think he's using hyperbole?

The opposite of none is at least one, not all of them.

* I know you don't use the word "all" but it is clearly implied in what you wrote. Compare the following: "There are a million people who have cancer." and "There are a million people, some of whom have cancer."

1 year,2 days
top

Silk Road Shut Down, Founder Arrested, $3.6 Million Worth of Bitcoin Seized

CanadianRealist $3.6 Million Bitcoin Seized (620 comments)

Will the government try to redeem these bitcoins? Wouldn't that be like saying that they accept that bitcoin is valid? (Of course they could be hypocrites and say that bitcoin is completely invalid and redeem them anyways.)

It would be neat if all the seized bitcoins could be identified and recorded as being worthless now.

1 year,18 days
top

Snowden Strikes Again: NSA Mapping Social Connections of US Citizens

CanadianRealist Re:news media has lost interest? (513 comments)

If the CEOs were really interested in reporting on this they could make their own news with a sting operation. Plan to do a few "embarrassing" searches, document them ahead of time with a few high profile lawyers then do them. When the NSA acts, you reveal it all on your news programs.

1 year,21 days
top

New Ship Will Remain Stable By Creating Its Own Inner Waves

CanadianRealist SWATH doesn't require power (43 comments)

Small Waterplane Area Twin Hull (SWATH) is a design that minimizes the effect of the waves. Most of the volume that supports the ship is below the level of the waves, making it very stable. The stability comes from the hull design, so it doesn't require any power and the stabilization isn't prone to failure like an active system.

Here's a short video of a SWATH ship in rough seas, with a regular hull ship for comparison. I'm pretty sure this is the one that I saw in a documentary about the design. They showed a glass of water sitting on a table in the SWATH ship, not spilling. I'm pretty sure that the glass would go flying in the other ship.

about a year ago
top

Report: By 2035, Nearly 100 Million Self-Driving Cars Will Be Sold Per Year

CanadianRealist Re:For the love of Junior Johnson... (325 comments)

Airbags are passive: drivers don't have to do anything at all, they just work.

Automatically. Which is the point that was being made in the post that you originally replied to.

The question of active or passive is a separate issue and is complicated by the government's way of defining it. (Which seems backwards to me.) I would expect active/passive to refer to the device itself, rather than the user's interaction with it. The way the government defines it a self driving car is pretty much a passive device. A rock is an active device - it doesn't do anything unless you pick it up and throw it. Imagine a fully automatic predator drone that takes off, locates a target and attacks completely automatically. That would be labelled a passive device. I don't think those labellings match the usual interpretations of those words.

about a year ago
top

Report: By 2035, Nearly 100 Million Self-Driving Cars Will Be Sold Per Year

CanadianRealist Re:For the love of Junior Johnson... (325 comments)

Red herring. Airbags are passive safety devices, not a device to automatically do something the driver had to do previously.

Sounds more like red herring argument to me. Deploying automatically, at high speed, at the instant an accident occurs is not at all passive. A seat belt is passive, once the driver attaches it. (At least the older style fixed ones were. Modern ones which lock only in response to a sufficient pull are questionably passive.) And as for not being something a driver had to do previously, they could have been set up as such, but I'd bet they would almost never have been used at the instant when needed since human reaction time is pretty poor. It would probably have been better for the human to try to avoid the accident in the first place.

about a year ago

Submissions

top

New catalyst allows cheaper hydrogen production

CanadianRealist CanadianRealist writes  |  about a year and a half ago

CanadianRealist (1258974) writes "Electrolysis of water to produce hydrogen is very inefficient without the use of a catalyst. Unfortunately catalysts are currently made of crystals containing rare, expensive toxic metals such as ruthenium and iridium. Two chemists from the University of Calgary have invented a process to make a catalyst using relatively non-toxic metal compounds such as iron oxide, for 1/1000 the cost of currently used catalysts.

It is suggested this would make it more feasible to use electrolysis of water to create hydrogen as a method of storing energy from variable green power sources such as wind and solar."
top

Cow manure generates electricity and big savings

CanadianRealist CanadianRealist writes  |  more than 5 years ago

CanadianRealist (1258974) writes "Manure from 600 cows is digested in a 16 foot deep, 70 foot diameter tank to produce methane gas which is then burned to generate electricity. The system generates enough electricity to power the farm and a dozen neighboring homes and still some back to the grid. Generation also creates heat which is used to heat the digester, farm buildings and water. The $200 000 per year savings are expected to pay for the system in 5 years or less. As a side benefit, the digester also reduces 98% of the odor."
Link to Original Source

Journals

CanadianRealist has no journal entries.

Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?